Thoracoscopic thymectomy: technical pearls to a 21st century approach

Intercostal approach VATS is feasible for large-sized anterior mediastinal tumors

There is no consensus about whether relatively large mediastinal tumors (≥ 5.0 cm) are suitable for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Therefore, this study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of intercostal approach VATS for large-sized anterior mediastinal tumors (5.0-10.0 cm) with no invasion to the surrounding tissues and organs. A total of 129 patients with anterior mediastinal tumors who received surgery in our hospital between January 2018 and July 2022 were consecutively enrolled. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on mediastinal tumor diameter: Group A (tumor size between 1.0 and 4.9 cm) and Group B (tumor size between 5.0 and 10.0 cm). The primary endpoints were operation time, blood loss, and postoperative pain, and the secondary endpoints were the volume of drainage, drainage duration, postoperative hospital stay, and postoperative complications. Significant differences were found in the volume of drainage between the two groups (Group A: 218.4 ± 140.6, Group B: 398.9 ± 369.3, P < 0.001). However, no differences were found in operation time, blood loss, drainage duration, postoperative hospital stay and duration of postoperative oral analgesics (P > 0.05). In addition, there existed no significant differences in the postoperative complications. Intercostal approach VATS is regarded as a feasible and safe surgical method for large-sized anterior mediastinal tumors (5.0-10.0 cm) with no invasion to the surrounding tissues and organs.

Mixed squamous cell and glandular papilloma of the lung increased in twelve years -A case report

We report the case of a 55-year-old man presented with a nodule in the right middle lung on computed tomography. The size of the nodule had increased at 12 years after the first visit. Consequently, the patient was diagnosed with a Mixed squamous cell and glandular papilloma (MSGP) by surgical resection. To our knowledge, there are no previous studies that MSGP in the lung which had been observed for 12 years before surgery. This study reports the case of a patient who underwent surgical resection of a MSGP.

The resident's point of view in the learning curve of thymic MIS: why should I learn it?

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in thoracic surgery became quite popular during the last years. The aim of introducing and performing more MIS is to reduce surgical trauma, pain and complications in patients. Training in MIS increases operative time and thus cost in theatre but thus improves with experience. For a resident, the cases should be well selected with experienced supervision in a suitable setting with supporting staff and optimal instruments. Understanding the anatomy of the lung, using simulators, and attending workshops makes the learning curve shorter.

Left video-assisted thoracic surgery thymectomy

Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) for the management of non-thymomatous myasthenia gravis (MG) as well as the management of small thymomas and other benign thymic pathology has been gaining in acceptance and popularity as an alternative to the traditional median sternotomy approach. Although VATS thymectomy has been described in several variations, our current preference is a left sided VATS approach due to the exposure it provides in critical areas of dissection. Here we describe our technique for the left sided VATS thymectomy including patient selection, preoperative preparation, operative steps, and postoperative care. We also share pitfalls and tips to prevent them at each step of the procedure learned from our experience with this approach.

Minimally Invasive versus Open Thymectomy for Thymic Malignancies: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Complete resection is the standard of care for treatment of thymic malignancies. The use of minimally invasive surgery remains controversial. We searched online databases and identified studies from 1995 to 2014 that compared minimally invasive to open thymectomy for thymic malignancies. Study end points included operative blood loss, operative time, respiratory complications, cardiac complications, length of hospital stay, R0 resection, and recurrence. We summarized outcomes across studies using random-effects meta-analysis to account for study heterogeneity. We calculated ORs for binary outcomes and standardized mean differences for continuous outcomes. We calculated incidence rate ratios for the number of recurrences, accounting for total person-time observed in each study. Of 516 potential reference studies, 30 with a total of 2038 patients met the inclusion criteria. Patients with Masaoka stage I or II thymic malignancy constituted 94.89% of those in the minimally invasive surgery (MIS) group and 78.62% of those in open thymectomy (open) group. Mean tumor size was 4.09 cm (MIS) versus 4.80 (open). Of the 1355 MIS cases, 32 were converted to open cases. Patients in the MIS group had significantly less blood loss; however, no significant differences in operating time, respiratory complications, cardiac complications, or overall complications were identified. Length of stay was shorter for patients in the MIS group. When patients with Masaoka stage I and II thymic malignancy only were analyzed, there was no difference in rate of R0 resection or overall recurrence rate. One postoperative death occurred in the open group. The results of this unadjusted meta-analysis of published reports comparing minimally invasive with open thymectomy suggest that in selected patients with thymic malignancy, minimally invasive thymectomy is safe and can achieve oncologic outcomes similar to those of open thymectomy.

Determinants of Complete Resection of Thymoma by Minimally Invasive and Open Thymectomy: Analysis of an International Registry

INTRODUCTION

Minimally invasive thymectomy (MIT) is a surgical approach to thymectomy that has more favorable short-term outcomes for myasthenia gravis than open thymectomy (OT). The oncologic outcomes of MIT performed for thymoma have not been rigorously evaluated. We analyzed determinants of complete (R0) resection among patients undergoing MIT and OT in a large international database.

METHODS

The retrospective database of the International Thymic Malignancy Interest Group was queried. Chi-square and Wilcoxon rank sum tests, multivariate logistic regression models, and propensity matching were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 2514 patients underwent thymectomy for thymoma between 1997 and 2012; 2053 of them (82%) underwent OT and 461 (18%) underwent MIT, with the use of MIT increasing significantly in recent years. The rate of R0 resection among patients undergoing OT was 86%, and among those undergoing MIT it was 94% (p < 0.0001). In propensity-matched MIT and OT groups (n = 266 in each group); however, the rate of R0 resection did not differ significantly (96% in both the MIT and OT groups, p = 0.7). Multivariate analyses were performed to identify determinants of R0 resection. Factors independently associated with R0 resection were geographical region, later time period, less advanced Masaoka stage, total thymectomy, and the absence of radiotherapy. Surgical approach, whether minimally invasive or open, was not associated with completeness of resection.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of MIT for resection of thymoma has been increasing substantially over time, and MIT can achieve rates of R0 resection for thymoma similar to those achieved with OT.

[Perioperative Outcomes and Long-term Survival in Clinically Early-stage Thymic Malignancies: Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Thymectomy versus Open Approaches]

背景与目的

胸腔镜胸腺切除术相比开放手术治疗早期（Masaoka-Koga Ⅰ期或Ⅱ期）胸腺恶性肿瘤在理论上具有优势，然而尚未有研究报道其在长期生存率方面的差异。本研究基于中国胸腺肿瘤研究协作组（Chinese Alliance for Research in Thymomas, ChART）的数据库对此进行了研究。

方法

以数据库中1994年到2012年间的1, 117例早期（Masaoka-Koga Ⅰ期或Ⅱ期）胸腺恶性肿瘤患者为研究对象。其中241例行胸腔镜胸腺切除术，876例行开放手术。采用单因素分析比较两组的临床资料与围手术期结果方面的差异。采用多因素分析明确影响长期预后的相关因素。

结果

与开放手术组相比，胸腔镜组的全胸腺切除比例更高（80.5% vs 73.9%, P=0.028），根治性切除率更高（98.8% vs 88.7%, P < 0.000），而复发率更低（2.9% vs 16.0%, P < 0.001），5年无瘤生存率更高（92% vs 83%, P=0.011），而两组的5年生存率接近（92% vs 92%, P=0.15）。Cox比例风险模型分析显示WHO分型、Masaoka-Koga分期和术后辅助治疗是影响胸腺恶性肿瘤长期生存的独立因素。

结论

胸腔镜胸腺切除术是治疗早期胸腺恶性肿瘤安全有效的方法，与开放手术相比其围手术期效果更好，肿瘤学疗效一致。

Perioperative outcomes and long-term survival in clinically early-stage thymic malignancies: video-assisted thoracoscopic thymectomy versus open approaches

BACKGROUND

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) theoretically offers advantages over open thymectomy for clinically early-stage (Masaoka-Koga stage I and II) thymic malignancies. However, long-term outcomes have not been well studied. We compared the postoperative outcomes and survival from a cohort study based on the database of the Chinese Alliance for Research in Thymomas (ChART).

METHODS

Between 1994 and 2012, data of 1,117 patients having surgery for clinically early-stage (Masaoka-Koga stage I and II) tumors were enrolled for the study. Among them, 241 cases underwent VATS thymectomy (VATS group), while 876 cases underwent open thymectomy (Open group). Univariate analyses were used to compare the clinical character and perioperative outcomes between the two groups. And multivariate analysis was performed to determine the independent predictive factors for long-term survival.

RESULTS

Compared with the Open group, the VATS group had higher percentage of total thymectomy (80.5% vs. 73.9%, P=0.028), resection rate (98.8% vs. 88.7%, P=0.000) and less recurrence (2.9% vs. 16.0%, P=0.000). Five-year overall survival was 92% after VATS and 92% after open thymectomy, with no significant difference between the two groups (P=0.15). However, 5-year disease free survival were 92% in VATS group and 83% in Open group (P=0.011). Cox proportional hazards model revealed that WHO classification, Masaoka-Koga stage and adjuvant therapy were independent predictive factors for overall survival, while surgical approach had no significant impact on long-term outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that VATS thymectomy is an effective approach for clinically early-stage thymic malignancies. And it may offer better perioperative outcomes, as well as equal oncological survival.