The management of the advanced colorectal cancer: management of the pulmonary metastases

FDG-PET/CT in colorectal cancer: potential for vascular-metabolic imaging to provide markers of prognosis

PURPOSE

This study assesses the potential for vascular-metabolic imaging with FluoroDeoxyGlucose (FDG)-Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) perfusion to provide markers of prognosis specific to the site and stage of colorectal cancer.

METHODS

This prospective observational study comprised of participants with suspected colorectal cancer categorized as either (a) non-metastatic colon cancer (M0colon), (b) non-metastatic rectal cancer (M0rectum), or (c) metastatic colorectal cancer (M+). Combined FDG-PET/CT perfusion imaging was successfully performed in 286 participants (184 males, 102 females, age: 69.60 ± 10 years) deriving vascular and metabolic imaging parameters. Vascular and metabolic imaging parameters alone and in combination were investigated with respect to overall survival.

RESULTS

A vascular-metabolic signature that was significantly associated with poorer survival was identified for each patient group: M0colon - high Total Lesion Glycolysis (TLG) with increased Permeability Surface Area Product/Blood Flow (PS/BF), Hazard Ratio (HR) 3.472 (95% CI: 1.441-8.333), p = 0.006; M0rectum - high Metabolic Tumour Volume (MTV) with increased PS/BF, HR 4.567 (95% CI: 1.901-10.970), p = 0.001; M+ participants, high MTV with longer Time To Peak (TTP) enhancement, HR 2.421 (95% CI: 1.162-5.045), p = 0.018. In participants with stage 2 colon cancer as well as those with stage 3 rectal cancer, the vascular-metabolic signature could stratify the prognosis of these participants.

CONCLUSION

Vascular and metabolic imaging using FDG-PET/CT can be used to synergise prognostic markers. The hazard ratios suggest that the technique may have clinical utility.

Modification of Apremilast from Pills to Aerosol a Future Concept

BACKGROUND

Inhaled drugs have been available in the market for several years and for several diseases. Drugs for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cystic fibrosis, and diabetes have been used for several years. In the field of drug modification, these drugs range from tablets to aerosol.

METHODS

Milling as used to break down the tablets to powder and nebulisers are used to produce aerosol droplets. A mastersizer was used to measure the mass median aerodynamic diameter of the aerosol droplets.

RESULTS

Apremilast produced mmad diameters (2.43 μm) without any statistical difference between the different jet-nebulizers. The residual cup B contributed to greater mmad diameters as the 95% interval of mean values, based on those the ANOVA mean square clearly indicated, followed by cups C and F. The previous interval plot is much better clarified when the interaction means between drug and residual cap are plotted. The residual cups B, C and F produce mmad between (2.0-3.2).

CONCLUSION

In the current research study we demonstrated our methodology to create apremilast powder and produce apremilast aerosol droplets with different nebulisers and residual cups.

Lung metastasectomy after colorectal cancer: prognostic impact of resection margin on long term survival, a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary metastasectomy is considered a potentially curative treatment for selected patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Several prognostic factors have been analysed, but to date, it is still not well defined which is the optimal resection margin during lung metastasectomy (LM). This study analyses the long-term results and prognostic factors after LM in CRC patients with particular attention to the resection margins. Primary endpoint of this study is to assess the correlation between resection margins and long-term outcomes.

METHODS

Observational cohort study on all proven cases of CRC lung metastases (2000-2016) resected with curative intent in a single centre.

RESULTS

The series included 210 consecutive patients (M/F 133/77) with a mean age of 65.4 (± 9.96) years, 75% (159/210) of them with a solitary metastasis. Mean size of metastasis was 2.57 cm (± 1.45). One hundred sixty-eight patients underwent wedge resections (80%) and lymphadenectomy was carried out in 90 cases (42.9%). With a mean follow-up of 56 months (range 5-192), we observed a 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) of 95%, 74% and 54%, respectively. The patients were divided into three groups according to the resection margin distance from the tumour: (a) ≥ 2 cm (145 cases); (b) < 2, ≥ 1 cm (37 cases); and (c) < 1 cm (12 cases). The OS was significantly different between the three groups (p = 0,020); univariate and multivariate analyses showed that a narrow resection margin was an independent prognostic factor of worse survival (p = 0.006 and HR 3.4 p = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term survival of patients after LM is strongly associated with a greater distance between the lesion and the resection margin.

Primary tumor resection in stage IV unresectable colorectal cancer: what has changed?

Most current guidelines do not recommend primary tumor resection in stage IV unresectable colorectal cancer. Rapid chemotherapy development over the last decade has substantially changed the decision making. However, results of recently published trials and meta-analyses suggest that primary tumor resection may in fact be beneficial, principally in terms of prolonged survival. Additional factors, such as use of minimally invasive approach or protocols of enhanced recovery after surgery, affect clinical outcomes as well, but are often neglected when discussing the state of the art in this area. There are still no randomized studies determining the legitimacy of upfront surgery in asymptomatic patients. Also, quality of life also plays an important role in choosing appropriate treatment. Having said that, there is no data that would prove whether primary tumor resection has an advantage on that issue. With all the uncertainty, currently decision making in unresectable stage IV colorectal cancer is primarily up to clinicians' knowledge, common sense and patients' preferences.

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus open resection of lung metastases from colorectal cancer

This study aimed to compare the short and long-term survival outcomes between video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and open resection of lung metastases from colorectal cancer. Between January 2006 and January 2013, 57 patients underwent VATS of lung metastases from colorectal cancer. These patients were compared with a consecutive matched group of 57 patients who underwent open resection within the same period. The two groups were similar in terms of age, gender, tumor size, number of tumors, tumor laterality and type of pulmonary resections. The operative time was longer in the VATS group, but the estimated blood loss was less in the VATS group than in the open group. Postoperative 30-day mortality, 30-day complications were similar between the groups. More complications were classified as major in patients underwent open resection, though the difference was not significant (P = 0.297). The 5-year overall survival rate was 50% for VATS and 46% for open resection (P = 0.251). The 5-year overall disease-free survival time was similar in two groups (P = 0.457). The findings suggest that VATS is associated with less blood loss than open resection for lung metastases of colorectal cancer. According to our results, VATS for lung metastases from colorectal cancer is equivalent to open resection in terms of long-term survival outcomes.

Role of systemic inflammation scores in pulmonary metastasectomy for colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Patients with pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer can benefit from surgical removal. However, the biological determinants of postsurgical outcome are not completely elucidated. We evaluated the role of host systemic inflammation status in this setting.

METHODS

The modified Glasgow prognostic score (based on serum C-reactive protein and albumin levels) and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte (NTL) ratio were obtained from 44 patients who received curative-intent metastasectomy, and were used as indicators of systemic inflammation status. We tested the impact of both of these parameters on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), as well as their correlation with other well-known prognosticators.

RESULTS

Five-year PFS and OS rates were 18% and 49%, respectively. At univariate analysis, multiple metastases, disease-free interval <36 months, and a Glasgow score of 2 (P = 0.031) were significantly associated to a worse PFS rate. A NTL ratio >3 predicted disease progression in the short-term (P = 0.036), but the effect on late events was weaker (P = 0.079). Factors associated with worse OS were multiple metastasis (P = 0.002), elevated carcinoembryonic antigen (P = 0.009), a Glasgow score of 2 (P = 0.029), and a faster metastasis growth (P = 0.008). At Cox regression analysis, neither a Glasgow score of 2, nor elevated NTL ratio showed an independent effect on survival rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Systemic inflammation scores did not perform well as independent survival prognosticators in patients undergoing curative-intent pulmonary metastasectomy. Further investigation is warranted to evaluate whether these measurements could still be useful when restricting the analysis to specific patient subcategories or to diverse postoperative phases.