Endoscopic intervention of lower airway foreign matter in adults-a different perspective

Foreign Body in the Airway Mimicking Tumour in an Adult: A Case Report

Foreign body (FB) aspiration is an infrequent cause of respiratory distress in adults. Advancing age, central nervous system disorders or trauma, drug or alcohol addiction, neuromuscular diseases, and mental health issues and illnesses are the main risk factors. The authors present an atypical clinical presentation of a 3-week-lasting foreign body aspiration mimicking a tumour that led to severe acute respiratory insufficiency and required aggressive artificial lung ventilation. Diagnosis of FB was based on the results of the chest computed tomography (CT) scans and flexible bronchoscopy, which, however, initially assumed a neoplastic disease in the right main bronchus. During FB extraction via flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy inserted through an 8.5 mm endotracheal tube high-frequency ventilation through a catheter placed between the vocal cords was used to ensure adequate alveolar ventilation and maintain sufficient oxygenation. After extraction of the FB, thoracosurgical intervention was performed to resolve empyema as a septic complication of the FB aspiration. After this therapy, a complete resolution of pleural empyema and lung atelectasis was observed.

Foreign body aspiration

The clinical manifestations of foreign body (FB) aspiration can range from an asymptomatic presentation to a life-threatening emergency. Patients may present with acute onset cough, chest pain, breathlessness or sub-acutely with unexplained hemoptysis, non-resolving pneumonia and at times, as an incidental finding on imaging. Patients with iatrogenic FB such as an aspirated broken tooth during difficult intubation or a broken instrument are more common scenarios in the intensive care unit (ICU). Patients with post-obstructive pneumonia with or without sepsis, or variable degree of hemoptysis often require ICU level of care and bronchoscopic interventions. Rigid bronchoscopy has traditionally been the modality of choice; however, with the innovation in instrumentation and wider availability of flexible bronchoscopes, most of the FB removal is now successfully performed using flexible bronchoscopy. Proceduralists choose instruments in accordance with their training and expertise. We describe the use of most common instruments including forceps, balloon catheters, and baskets. Role of cryoprobe and LASER in FB removal is reviewed as well. In general, larger working channel bronchoscopes are preferred; however, smaller working channel bronchoscopes may be used in situations when the patients are intubated with a smaller diameter endotracheal or tracheostomy tubes. Large size FB are removed en bloc with the grasping tool, bronchoscope, and endotracheal or tracheostomy tube, requiring preparation to safely re-establish the airway. After FB removal, bronchoscopy is re-performed to identify any residual FB, assess any injury to the airway, suction post-obstructive secretions or pus, control any active bleeding and remove granulation tissue that may be obstructing the airway. Additional interventions like balloon dilatation may be required to dislodge an impacted FB or to maintain patency of bronchial lumen. If bronchoscopic methods fail, surgery may be required for retrieval of FB in symptomatic patients or to resect suppurative or necrotizing lung process. Multidisciplinary approach involving intensivists, surgeons, and anesthesiologists is the key to optimal patient outcomes.

Unsuspected foreign-body aspiration in adult patient with status asthmaticus: Case report

Introduction

Accidental foreign body aspiration can cause severe damage to the airway and threaten the patient's life. This situation requires multidisciplinary and systematic approach from the medical and surgical team, in order to achieve complete resolution maintaining airway permeability.

Presentation of case

This is a 49 y/o man who presented with a severe asthma attack, in whom an unsuspected foreign body in the inferior airway was diagnosed, which was possibly the result of aspiration during the initial emergency care, causing worsening of the already critical condition.

Discussion

We described the clinical course, radiologic and endoscopic findings, and outcome of the patient, highlighting the importance of considering the possibility of a foreign body in the airway, when there is no improvement in refractory status asthmaticus. This is particularly important in a university hospital. Moreover, the implementation of checklists when invasive procedures are performed can avoid loss of material, preventing iatrogenic aspiration events.

Conclusion

Foreign body aspirations may remain undetected due to lack of suspicion, especially in adults, in whom they can cause chronic symptoms, or worsen chronic respiratory conditions turning them into more complex diseases. This cause must be considered in the differential diagnosis of refractory status asthmaticus.

•

Accidental foreign body aspiration can cause severe damage to the airway.

•

This situation can threaten the patient's life.

•

Requires multidisciplinary and systematic approach from the medical and surgery team.

•

The goal is to achieve complete resolution maintaining airway permeability.

Utility of Flexible Bronchoscopy for Airway Foreign Bodies Removal in Adults

Foreign body aspiration is relatively infrequent in adults. Airway foreign bodies (AFBs) can be removed by flexible bronchoscopy (FB) or rigid bronchoscopy (RB). We performed a retrospective analysis of FBs performed in our centre over a 25 year period, focusing on the procedures that revealed an AFB during the examination stage. We recorded demographic data, clinical characteristics and radiological and bronchoscopic findings. During the study period, 12,588 FBs were performed in adults. Airway foreign bodies were identified in 32 of these cases, giving a prevalence of 0.25%. The most frequent clinical presentation was cough, sputum and fever. The most frequent radiological findings were alveolar infiltrates and atelectasis. In 94% of cases, AFBs were removed successfully by FB; RB was necessary in only 6% of cases. There were no FB-related complications. The most common AFB location was the right bronchial tree (69%). We classified AFBs as organic (85%: animal 57%; vegetable 28%), inorganic (6%) and iatrogenic (9%). Bronchial infection occurred in 51% of cases, and Actinomyces spp. was the most common causal microorganism. In conclusion, AFBs are a rare entity with nonspecific clinical presentation, most AFBs were organic, and FB is a safe and effective method for AFB removal.

Clinical features and treatment outcomes of airway foreign body aspiration in adults

Background

There are few reports comparing flexible and rigid bronchoscopy in adult foreign body (FB) aspiration. The aim of this retrospective study was to review the clinical characteristics, outcomes and factors associated with success in adult patients who underwent flexible or rigid bronchoscopy for airway FB removal.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 103 patients who underwent bronchoscopy to remove airway FB at Samsung Medical Center, South Korea from January 1999 to March 2017.

Results

The median patient age was 64 years, and 70% were males. Among the 54 patients who underwent flexible bronchoscopy as first-line treatment, 43 (80%) patients had their FB successfully removed. Previous attempts at other hospitals was significantly associated with failed flexible bronchoscopy [9/11 (82%) vs. 3/43 (7%), P<0.001]. Delayed diagnosis (median 29 vs. 5 days, P=0.074) and peripherally located airway FB [9/12 (75%) vs. 23/48 (48%), P=0.115] were factors that trended towards flexible bronchoscopy failure. All of the 59 patients who underwent rigid bronchoscopy had their FB successfully removed. Rigid bronchoscopy was preferred to flexible bronchoscopy in patients with no comorbidities [38/59 (64%) vs. 18/44 (41%), P=0.018], previous attempts at other hospitals [34/59 (58%) vs. 4/44 (9%), P<0.001], delayed diagnosis (median 162 vs. 5 days, P<0.001), and hard FBs [48/62 (77%) vs. 21/49 (43%), P<0.001].

Conclusions

Our data suggest that previous failed attempts and delayed diagnosis are associated with flexible bronchoscopy failure. However, rigid bronchoscopy could be effective in removing an airway FB even in these cases. Further studies to identify factors to facilitate optimal patient selection will minimize failure rates and optimize resource utilization.

Foreign body aspiration in adult airways: therapeutic approach

Tracheobronchial foreign body (FB) aspiration is an uncommon but potentially life-threatening event in adults. Symptoms typically consist of a choking event followed by cough and dyspnea, however, these findings are inconsistent and symptoms may mimic more chronic lung diseases such as asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chest radiography and computed tomography can provide information regarding the location and characteristics of foreign bodies and aid in diagnosis. Bronchoscopy remains the gold standard for diagnosis and management of FB aspiration. The authors describe the typical clinical presentation, diagnostic evaluation, and bronchoscopic management of foreign bodies in adult airways with a focus on bronchoscopic techniques and potential complications of FB extraction.

The anaesthetic consideration of tracheobronchial foreign body aspiration in children

Cases of tracheobronchial foreign body aspiration are frequently encountered emergency cases of childhood; and, delays in its recognition and treatment do result in serious morbidity and mortality. Diagnosis mainly relies on taking history which should indicate what the foreign body is, when it has been aspirated and where it is located. Belated consultation can cause misdiagnosis with the mixing of the symptoms and data with those of other pathologies common to childhood and further delays in the correct diagnosis. Bronchoscopy is required for the differential diagnosis of suspected tracheobronchial foreign body aspiration in order to eliminate other common pediatric respiratory concerns. Given the shared use of the airways by the surgeon and the anaesthesiologist, bronchoscopy is a challenging procedure requiring experienced teams with an efficient method of intercommunication, and also well planning of the anaesthesia and bronchoscopy ahead of the procedures. Despite the recent popularisation of the fiberoptic brochoscopes, the rigid bronchoscopy remains to be used commonly and is regarded to provide the gold standard technique. There have been reports in the literature on the uses of inhalation and/or intravenous (IV) anaesthesia and spontaneous or controlled ventilation methods without any demonstration of the superiority of one technique over the other. The most suitable methods of anaesthesia and ventilation would be those that reduce the risks of complications, morbidity and mortality; and, preventive measures should be taken with priority against childhood cases of tracheobronchial foreign body aspiration.

Update in the extraction of airway foreign bodies in adults

Foreign body (FB) aspiration into the airway is lees common in adults than children. Nevertheless its incidence does not decrease through time. We present clinical relevant aspects of airway FBs on the basis of a selective review of pertinent literature retrieved by a search in the PubMed database. The most common aspirated FBs by adults are organics, especially fragments of bones and seeds. Symptoms usually are cough, chocking and dyspnea. Right localization, especially bronchus intermedius and right lower lobe, is more frequent. Chest radiography can be normal in up to 20% of the cases and FBs can be detected in 26% of the patients. FBs can safely remove in the majority of patients under flexible bronchoscopy. Surgical treatment must be reserved for cases in which bronchoscope fails or there are irreversible bronchial or lung complications.

Endoscopic intervention of lower airway foreign matter in adults-a different perspective

BACKGROUND

Lower airway foreign matter (FM) is uncommonly encountered in adults. This study reviews FM in the lower airway that required bronchoscopic intervention.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients with FM in the lower airway seen at a tertiary hospital between 1996 and 2014 was undertaken.

RESULTS

Lower airway FM was removed in 80 out of 18,650 bronchoscopies performed. Forty-seven were males, with mean age of 50.8 (range, 29-78) years and mean symptom duration of 10.3 months (range, 1 day -20 years). The most common symptoms were persistent cough, followed by dyspnea, hemoptysis, episodes of choking and fever. Three-quarters of the patients had risk factors of either aspiration or iatrogenic cause for FM in the airway. FM identified following bronchoscopy was classified as: organic (31.3%), inorganic (46.3%) and endogenous matter (22.4%). Iatrogenic etiology was evident in four-fifths of the patients with inorganic FM (stents being the most common). Forty-eight (60.0%) patients had FM removed via flexible bronchoscopy, and the remainder via rigid bronchoscopy. The majority (27 out of 32) of FM removed by rigid bronchoscopy could not be removed using the flexible scope. This was primarily due to retrieval of stents [24] could only be done with the rigid bronchoscope. There were four FM-related complications (three bronchostenosis, one actinomycosis).

CONCLUSIONS

There is an increasing indication for bronchoscopists to retrieve FM, particularly of iatrogenic and endogenous sources, lodging in the lower airway of adults. There may be a reversing trend in the utilization of rigid bronchoscopy, mainly due to the increasing need to remove airway stents as more are deployed.