Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration for staging of lung cancer: a concise review

Assessing ROSE for adequacy of EBUS-TBNA compared with a direct-to-cell block approach as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic

Introduction:

Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) has been used during the endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) procedure as standard practice. Because of the COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic, our institute had had to discontinue ROSE and adopt a direct-to-cell block approach. In the present study, we aimed to determine whether this change has had significant effects on the cytopathology quality.

Materials and methods:

A total of 1903 EBUS-TBNA cases from 734 patients were collected (1097 cases with ROSE for 452 patients; 806 cases without ROSE but with direct-to-cell block for 282 patients). The clinical and cytology data were analyzed using SAS, version 9.4, software to render calculated standardized residuals and a fitted multivariate generalized linear model.

Results:

On average, a biopsy from a patient with ROSE was 0.936 (=exp −0.066) times less likely to be reported as satisfactory compared with a biopsy from a patient without ROSE, although the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.785). The inadequacy rate of EBUS-TBNA was 6.4% higher on average for cases with ROSE compared with a direct-to-cell block approach. However, this difference was also not statistically significant. The proportions of biopsies reported as diagnostic for malignancy and other were significantly different between the ROSE and no-ROSE groups with a standardized residual of 1.80 (P = 0.036) and −2.27 (P = 0.012), respectively.

Conclusions

Discontinuing ROSE and using a direct-to-cell block approach had no negative effects on cytopathology quality. This practice can be considered acceptable during the COVID-19 pandemic when social distancing and the shortage of staff and supplies have resulted in challenges to delivering quality care to cancer patients whose treatment cannot be postponed.

Endobronchial Ultrasound Combined with Clinical Data for Predicting Malignant Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions

Introduction

This study was to develop a simple model for predicting malignancy of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) based on endobronchial ultrasonography (EBUS) and clinical findings.

Methods

Patients who had EBUS for PPLs were analyzed and compared on the EBUS imaging characteristics and clinical data. The malignancy prediction model was established by the logistic equation of probability of malignant PPL based on the data of 135 patients. The model was tested on an additional 50 patients for efficiency.

Results

Among 135 prospectively enrolled patients, 77 (57%) patients had malignant and 58 (43%) had benign lesions with the size of 36.5±19.9 mm. Univariate analysis demonstrated a significant (P<0.05) difference in the serum CEA (borderline 15 µg/mL) and smoking history between malignant and benign lesions but a non-significant (P>0.05) difference in age (50 years as the cutoff value) and history of extra-thoracic malignancies. Logistic analysis of multiple factors showed that smoking history, serum CEA, borderline, air bronchogram, heterogeneous echo, and anechoic areas were significant (P<0.02) risk factors for malignant lesions. The malignancy prediction model was established by the logistic equation of probability of malignant PPL (P) = l/[l+e^–Z], where Z=−2.986+1.993X₁+2.293X₂+l.552X₃+1.616X₄–2.011X₅+1.718X₆, e is the base of the natural logarithm, X₁ is the smoking history, X₂ is the serum CEA, X₃ is the borderline, X₄ is the heterogenicity, X₅ is the air bronchogram, and X₆ is the anechoic area. The receiver operating characteristic curve had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.926 (95% confidence interval: 0.883–0.969). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 88.2% (30/34), 75.0% (12/16), and 92.0% (46/50), respectively, for the logistic equation to predict the malignancy.

Conclusion

Endobronchial ultrasonography is a safe and practical method, and the model combining EBUS and clinical data can accurately predict the malignancy of peripheral pulmonary lesions.

A narrative review of lung cancer cytology in the times of coronavirus: what physicians should know

In the modern era of personalized and precision medicine, lung cancer management needs to be carried out in a multidisciplinary manner. Among other disciplines, also cytopathology is key in diagnosis and treatment management of these patients. Indeed, cytopathology specimens are often the only source of available tissue material for morphological diagnosis and molecular purposes in order to guarantee an adequate treatment decision making, since surgical resection specimens are not available when lung cancer is diagnosed at advanced disease stages. Today, as an effect of the current severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic, cytopathology is reorganizing and reshaping many of its procedures and workflows, in order to ensure the safety of cytopathologists and laboratory personnel. In particular, careful attention should be paid on biosafety procedures when pulmonary cytological specimens are handled. In addition, also molecular cytopathology, that provides relevant information on the molecular status and on the potential sensitivity to target treatments, is undergoing major changes. In this setting, fully automated technologies, requiring minimal hands-on work, may be a valid option. The aim of this narrative review is to keep updated all the different professional figures involved in lung cancer management and treatment on how SARS-CoV-2 is modifying lung cancer cytopathology.

Is bronchodilator the correct treatment for COPD subjects before EBUS?

Endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is a reliable and commonly established technique, enabling real-time guidance of transbronchial needle aspiration of mediastinal and hilar structures and parabronchial lung masses. As EBUS-TBNA became more available and adopted by clinicians, questions emerged about the optimal performance of the procedure. Although EBUS is considered safe, there are few complications that could occur during the test, correlated with both the procedure itself and the patient's characteristics. Moreover, this technique is often addressed to patients with overlapping airways diseases, which might have higher risk of complications during the procedure. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients could experience EBUS-TBNA with a relative high frequency due to their risk of developing lung cancer. The irreversible bronchial constriction characteristic of the disease raises some questions on premedication before bronchoscopic procedures. It is mandatory to optimize every aspect of the procedure in order to minimize the risk of complications, especially for fragile patients. Whether the use of inhaled bronchodilators before the procedure could improve the outcome of the procedure in COPD patients is reviewed in this article. No clear indication emerged from the literature suggesting the need of more studies in order to clarify this point.