The history of arterial revascularization: from Kolesov to Tector and beyond

Pathophysiology and management of saphenous vein graft disease

INTRODUCTION

The saphenous vein graft (SVG) is the most used conduit in CABG. With standardization of its use as a conduit came an understanding of its accelerated atherosclerosis, known as saphenous vein graft disease (SVGD). Given its extensive use, a review of the pathophysiology and management of SVGD is important as we optimize its use.

AREAS COVERED

For this review, an extensive literature search was completed to identify and examine the evolution of SVG in CABG, mechanisms driving SVGD, and methods developed to prevent and manage it. This includes a review of relevant major papers and trials in this space.

EXPERT OPINION

Eras of evolution in SVG usage in CABG include an experimental era, era of SVG dominance in CABG, and the current era of mixed venous and arterial grafting. As SVGD was studied, the mechanisms behind it became more understood, and prevention and management methods were developed. As advances in surgical techniques and pharmacotherapy continue to reduce occurrence and severity of SVGD, long-term patency of SV grafts continues to improve and remain excellent in optimized settings. With continued innovation and improvement in operative techniques, the SVG conduit is and will remain an important player in the field of coronary bypass.

Coronary artery bypass surgery plus medical therapy versus medical therapy alone for ischaemic heart disease: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

BACKGROUND

Despite increasing survival, cardiovascular disease remains the primary cause of death worldwide with an estimated 7.4 million annual deaths. The main symptom of ischaemic heart disease is chest pain (angina pectoris) most often caused by blockage of a coronary artery. The aim of coronary artery bypass surgery is revascularisation achieved by surgically grafting harvested arteries or veins distal to the coronary lesion restoring blood flow to the heart muscle. Older evidence suggested a clear survival benefit of coronary artery bypass graft surgery, but more recent trials yield less clear evidence. We want to assess the benefits and harms of coronary artery bypass surgery combined with different medical therapies versus medical therapy alone in patients with ischaemic heart disease.

METHODS

This protocol for a systematic review follows the recommendations of Cochrane and the eight-step assessment procedure suggested by Jakobsen and colleagues. We plan to include all randomised clinical trials assessing coronary artery bypass surgery combined with different medical therapies versus medical therapy alone in patients with ischaemic heart disease. We plan to search the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, Science Citation Index Expanded on Web of Science, and BIOSIS to identify relevant trials. Any eligible trial will be assessed as high risk or low risk of bias, and our conclusions will primarily be based on trials at low risk of bias. The analyses of the extracted data will be performed using Review Manager 5, STATA 16 and trial sequential analysis. For both our primary and secondary outcomes, we will create a 'Summary of Findings' table and use GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence.

DISCUSSION

Coronary artery bypass surgery is invasive and can cause death, which is why its use must be thoroughly studied to determine if it yields a large enough long-term benefit for the thousands of patients receiving it every year.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO ID 131924.

Lessons learned from Radial Artery Database International ALliance (RADIAL)

Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery was first performed in the 1960s. As the surgery has evolved, there has been a growing interest in the use of multiple arterial grafts in CABG. Since the re-introduction of the radial artery (RA) to clinical use as a bypass conduit in the 1990s, there have been several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which have compared saphenous vein graft (SVG) conduits to RA use in CABG. While most trials have shown improved patency of the RA, none of them have been able to demonstrate a survival benefit using the arterial conduit. In this review, we examine the existing RCTs on the subject. We then look at our solution to the decades-old inquiry regarding the RA compared with the SVG. The Radial Artery Database International ALliance (RADIAL) project is an individual patient-level meta-analysis developed to adequately power a study to assess if the RA has superior clinical outcomes compared with the SVG. We describe the process by which this investigation was conducted and the collaboration necessary to achieve success.

Incidence of perioperative stroke in clampless aortic anastomosis during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting

This study aimed to assess if clampless off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) decreases the incidence of perioperative stroke (POS) rate and in-hospital mortality. The secondary aim was to evaluate 12-year rates of overall mortality. Between January 2003 to December 2015, data of 645 consecutive patients undergoing isolated CABG were retrospectively collected. 363 underwent aortic no-touch OPCAB (No-touch group) and 282 underwent OPCAB with the Heartstring device (HS group). In-hospital mortality and perioperative stroke rate as primary endpoint, as well as long-term follow-up outcome were analysed. In-hospital mortality was lower into No-touch group compared with HS group but without significant statistical difference (1.7 vs. 3.2%, p = 0.19, respectively); the rate of postoperative stroke was higher in No-touch group compared with HS group, although this difference did not reach statistically significance. Delirium was reported with higher presentation rate in HS group (3.9 vs. 0.8%, p = 0.01). Blood transfusions rate was higher in HS subjects (23.4 vs. 16.1%, p = 0.01). Intubation time, ICU, and hospital length of stay were increased in the HS group (p = 0.008, p = 0.001 and p = 0.003, respectively). Over a 12-year follow-up period, survival probabilities at 1, 5, and 10 years were 93.6 ± 1.3 vs. 93.2 ± 1.5, 80.4 ± 2.6 vs. 80.3 ± 2.2, and 57.9 ± 5 vs. 58.4 ± 3.8% in the No-touch and HS group, respectively (p = 0.97). In this retrospective study, clampless off-pump CABG lowers perioperative stroke rate whose incidence is, however, not inferior compared with No-touch technique, and no statistically significance was detected. Delirium has a higher presentation rate in clampless off-pump CABG.