1
|
Mogl MT, Öllinger R, Jann H, Gebauer B, Fehrenbach U, Amthauer H, Wetz C, Schmelzle M, Raschzok N, Krenzien F, Goretzki PE, Pratschke J, Schoening W. Differenzierte Therapiestrategie bei Lebermetastasen gastro-entero-pankreatischer Neuroendokriner Neoplasien. Zentralbl Chir 2022; 147:270-280. [DOI: 10.1055/a-1830-8442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
ZusammenfassungNeuroendokrine Neoplasien (NEN) bilden eine heterogene Gruppe maligner Tumoren, die überwiegend dem gastro-entero-pankreatischen System (GEP) zuzuordnen sind. Hierbei sind Dünndarm und
Pankreas die häufigsten Organe für Primärtumoren, die Leber stellt den dominanten Metastasierungsort dar. Da viele Patient*innen lange asymptomatisch bleiben, führen oftmals zufällig
diagnostizierte Lebermetastasen oder ein Ileus zur Diagnose. Die einzige kurative Therapieoption stellt die komplette Entfernung von Primarius und Metastasen dar. Besonders im Falle der
metastasierten Erkrankung sollten die vorhandenen Therapieoptionen immer im interdisziplinären Tumorboard mit Spezialisten*innen aus Gastroenterologie, (Leber-)Chirurgie, Radiologie,
Nuklearmedizin, Radiotherapie, Pathologie und Endokrinologie evaluiert werden. Durch die Kombination der verschiedenen Therapieverfahren kann auch für Patient*innen mit fortgeschrittener
Erkrankung eine jahrelange Prognose bei guter Lebensqualität erreicht werden. Wichtig für die Therapieentscheidung sind neben patientenindividuellen Faktoren der Differenzierungsgrad des
Tumors, dessen hormonelle Sekretion, das Metastasierungsmuster und der Erkrankungsverlauf. Die Behandlung von Lebermetastasen umfasst neben den unterschiedlichen chirurgischen Strategien die
lokal-ablativen radiologischen und nuklearmedizinischen Verfahren, die als Ergänzung zu den systemischen Therapien zur Verfügung stehen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martina T. Mogl
- Chirurgische Klinik Campus Charité Mitte
- Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Robert Öllinger
- Europäisches Metastasenzentrum Charité, Charité Universitätsmedizin-Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
- Chirurgische Klinik Campus Charité Mitte
- Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Henning Jann
- Medizinische Klinik für Hepatologie und Gastroenterologie, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Bernhard Gebauer
- Klinik für Radiologie, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Uli Fehrenbach
- Klinik für Radiologie, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Klinik für Nuklearmedizin, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Christoph Wetz
- Klinik für Nuklearmedizin, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Moritz Schmelzle
- Chirurgische Klinik Campus Charité Mitte
- Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Nathanael Raschzok
- Chirurgische Klinik Campus Charité Mitte
- Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Felix Krenzien
- Chirurgische Klinik Campus Charité Mitte
- Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Peter E. Goretzki
- Chirurgische Klinik Campus Charité Mitte
- Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Chirurgische Klinik Campus Charité Mitte
- Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Wenzel Schoening
- Chirurgische Klinik Campus Charité Mitte
- Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hormone Replacement Therapy in Endometrial Cancer Survivors: A Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10143165. [PMID: 34300331 PMCID: PMC8303659 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10143165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2021] [Revised: 07/11/2021] [Accepted: 07/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of hormone therapy (HT) on the oncological outcomes of endometrial cancer (EC) survivors. A systematic literature review was conducted in July 2021 to identify studies detailing the effect size for the relationship between HT use in EC and oncological outcomes (survival and disease recurrence). This included studies that evaluated the different recurrence rates among women treated for EC who subsequently underwent HT and those who did not. The collected studies were evaluated for quality, heterogeneity, and publication bias, and a pooled odds ratio (OR) or hazard ratio (HR) was calculated with a confidence interval of 95% (95% CI). In total, 5291 studies were collated, and after the review process, one randomized trial and seven observational studies were included, comprising 1801 EC survivors treated with HT and 6015 controls. The time-dependent analysis could be conducted for four studies, and considering the disease-free survival, the pooled HR of 0.90 (95% CI 0.28 to 2.87) showed no significant differences. However, among Black American women treated with continuous estrogen HT, the HR was 7.58 (95% CI 1.96 to 29.31), showing a significantly increased risk of recurrence for women in this ethnic group. Considering the pooled OR of all included studies 0.63 (95% CI 0.48 to 0.83), a significantly reduced risk of recurrence was found among EC survivors treated with HT. Considering the type of HT, the most risk-reducing was combined estrogen and progestin therapy and the cyclic regimen. Although supporting evidence is based mainly upon observational studies, evidence of no increased risk or even decreased risk was generally found, apart from in Black American women where a significantly increased recurrence risk was evident. The data are rather reassuring for the short-term administration of HT to symptomatic EC survivors. Future studies with a longer follow-up are necessary to better clarify the long-term effects of HT.
Collapse
|
3
|
Cavalcoli F, Rausa E, Conte D, Nicolini AF, Massironi S. Is there still a role for the hepatic locoregional treatment of metastatic neuroendocrine tumors in the era of systemic targeted therapies? World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23:2640-2650. [PMID: 28487601 PMCID: PMC5403743 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i15.2640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2017] [Revised: 03/11/2017] [Accepted: 03/20/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) frequently present with distant metastases at the time of diagnosis and the liver is the most frequent site of spreading. The early identification of metastatic disease represents a major prognostic factor for GEP-NENs patients. Radical surgical resection, which is feasible for a minority of patients, is considered the only curative option, while the best management for patients with unresectable liver metastases is still being debated. In the last few years, a number of locoregional and systemic treatments has become available for GEP-NEN patients metastatic to the liver. However, to date only a few prospective studies have compared those therapies and the optimal management option is based on clinical judgement. Additionally, locoregional treatments appear feasible and safe for disease control for patients with limited liver involvement and effective in symptoms control for patients with diffuse liver metastases. Considering the lack of randomized controlled trials comparing the locoregional treatments of liver metastatic NEN patients, clinical judgment remains key to set the most appropriate therapeutic pathway. Prospective data may ultimately lead to more personalized and optimized treatments. The present review analyzes all the locoregional therapy modalities (i.e., surgery, ablative treatments and transarterial approach) and aims to provide clinicians with a useful algorithm to best treat GEP-NEN patients metastatic to the liver.
Collapse
|
4
|
Surgery for Liver Metastases From Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015. [PMID: 26252272 DOI: 10.1097/md0000000000001113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The role of surgical therapy in patients with liver metastases from gastric cancer is still controversial. In this study, we investigated the results obtained with local treatment of hepatic metastases in patients with gastric cancer, by performing a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies published between 1990 and 2014. These works included multiple studies that evaluated the different survival rate among patients who underwent local treatment, such as hepatectomy or radiofrequency ablation, for hepatic metastases derived from primary gastric cancer. The collected studies were evaluated for heterogeneity, publication bias, and quality, and a pooled hazard ratio (HR) was calculated with a confidence interval estimated at 95% (95% CI).After conducting a thorough research among all published works, 2337 studies were found and after the review process 11 observational studies were included in the analysis. The total amount of patients considered in the survival analysis was 1010. An accurate analysis of all included studies reported a significantly higher survival rate in the group of patients who underwent the most aggressive local treatment for hepatic metastases (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.46-0.95) as opposed to patients who underwent only palliation or systemic treatment. Furthermore, palliative local treatment of hepatic metastases had a higher survival rate if compared to surgical (without liver surgery) and systemic palliation (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.26-0.96). Considering the only 3 studies where data from multivariate analyses was available, we found a higher survival rate in the local treatment groups, but the difference was not significant (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.22-1.15).Curative and also palliative surgery of liver metastases from gastric cancer may improve patients' survival. However, further trials are needed in order to better understand the role of surgery in this group of patients.
Collapse
|
5
|
Martella L, Bertozzi S, Londero AP, Steffan A, De Paoli P, Bertola G. Surgery for Liver Metastases From Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015; 94:e1113. [PMID: 26252272 PMCID: PMC4616574 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000001113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The role of surgical therapy in patients with liver metastases from gastric cancer is still controversial. In this study, we investigated the results obtained with local treatment of hepatic metastases in patients with gastric cancer, by performing a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies published between 1990 and 2014. These works included multiple studies that evaluated the different survival rate among patients who underwent local treatment, such as hepatectomy or radiofrequency ablation, for hepatic metastases derived from primary gastric cancer. The collected studies were evaluated for heterogeneity, publication bias, and quality, and a pooled hazard ratio (HR) was calculated with a confidence interval estimated at 95% (95% CI).After conducting a thorough research among all published works, 2337 studies were found and after the review process 11 observational studies were included in the analysis. The total amount of patients considered in the survival analysis was 1010. An accurate analysis of all included studies reported a significantly higher survival rate in the group of patients who underwent the most aggressive local treatment for hepatic metastases (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.46-0.95) as opposed to patients who underwent only palliation or systemic treatment. Furthermore, palliative local treatment of hepatic metastases had a higher survival rate if compared to surgical (without liver surgery) and systemic palliation (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.26-0.96). Considering the only 3 studies where data from multivariate analyses was available, we found a higher survival rate in the local treatment groups, but the difference was not significant (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.22-1.15).Curative and also palliative surgery of liver metastases from gastric cancer may improve patients' survival. However, further trials are needed in order to better understand the role of surgery in this group of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Martella
- From the Surgical Oncology Department, IRCSS CRO, Aviano, Italy (LM, SB, PDP, GB); SOC of Obstetrics and Gynecology, S. Polo Hospital, Monfalcone, Italy (APL); and Oncological Pathology Unit, IRCSS CRO, Aviano, Italy (AS)
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|