Evolution and update on current devices for prosthetic breast reconstruction

Complication Profiles of Smooth vs Textured Tissue Expanders in Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is a type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma first linked with breast implants in 2011. The correlation between BIA-ALCL and textured devices has led to increased use of smooth devices. However, much of the data surrounding smooth and textured devices investigates breast implants specifically and not tissue expanders.

OBJECTIVES

We performed a systematic review and a meta-analysis to compare surgical outcomes for smooth tissue expanders (STEs) and textured tissue expanders (TTEs).

METHODS

A search was performed on PubMed, including articles from 2016 to 2023 (n = 419). Studies comparing TTEs and STEs and reported complications were included. A random-effects model was utilized for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 5 articles met inclusion criteria, representing 1709 patients in the STE cohort and 1716 patients in the TTE cohort. The mean duration of tissue expansion with STEs was 221.25 days, while TTEs had a mean time of tissue expansion of 220.43 days.Our meta-analysis found no differences in all surgical outcomes except for explantation risk. STE use was associated with increased odds of explantation by over 50% compared to TTE use (odds ratio = 1.53; 95% CI = 1.15 to 2.02; P = .003).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, STEs and TTEs had similar complication profiles. However, STEs had 1.5 times higher odds of explantation. The incidence of BIA-ALCL is low, and only a single case of BIA-ALCL has been reported with TTEs. This indicates that TTEs are safe and may lower the risk of early complications requiring explantation. Further studies are warranted to further define the relationship between tissue expanders and BIA-ALCL.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

The current use of tissue expanders in breast reconstruction: device design, features, and technical considerations

INTRODUCTION

The use of tissue expanders (TE) in post-mastectomy breast reconstruction is a widely accepted practice, especially in patients desiring implant-based breast reconstruction. It has become the standard of care to perform a two-staged breast reconstruction using tissue expanders for the past 50 years due to its reliability, safety, cost-effectiveness, and versatility. Due to its popularity, there are numerous types and features of breast tissue expanders and various surgical approaches available for plastic surgeons.

AREAS COVERED

In this article, we will review the role of tissue expanders in breast reconstruction, the types and features of breast tissue expanders, and technical considerations.

EXPERT OPINION

The use of tissue expanders in breast reconstruction offers significant advantages of preserving the breast skin envelope and reestablishing the breast mound. With evolving approaches to breast reconstruction, tissue expander design, and application underwent several refinements and modifications. Due to these advances, studies on its long-term efficacy and safety profile typically fall behind and more studies with higher levels of evidence are needed to better evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of tissue expanders. With increased understanding, reconstructive surgeons can minimize complications and maximize reconstructive, aesthetic outcomes with high patient satisfaction.

Two Cases of Autoimmune Syndrome Induced by Adjuvants (ASIA): A Multifaceted Condition Calling for a Multidisciplinary Approach

Silicone implants have been used for cosmetic enhancement and reconstructive purposes for over 60 years. Despite assiduous efforts to ensure safety, there is continuous evidence that they are not as biologically inert as previously postulated. We present two cases of autoimmune syndrome induced by adjuvants (ASIA) in Hispanic women. The first patient developed biopsy-proven immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy that was successfully treated with the combination of silicone explantation along with immunosuppressive therapy. Findings after implant removal demonstrated rupture and leakage of silicone from gluteal implants. The second patient developed autoimmune hemolytic anemia in the setting of a ruptured silicone breast implant. Similarly, the patient was treated with corticosteroids followed by breast implant removal with complete resolution of symptoms. The successful treatment of these patients was achieved by collaboration between rheumatology and plastic surgery, which emphasizes the need for a multidisciplinary approach in the diagnosis and management of patients with ASIA.

The Value of Capsule Thickness on Breast Ultrasound as an Indicator of the Severity of Capsular Contracture and Its Correlation with the Baker Classification

BACKGROUND

We conducted this study to explore the value of the capsule thickness as an indicator of the severity of capsular contracture (CC) alternatively to the Baker classification system in patients who were treated with an implant-based augmentation mammaplasty.

METHODS

A total of 117 eligible patients (202 breasts) were included in the current study. We measured the capsule thickness using ultrasound and histologic examination in association with the Baker grades I, II, III and IV. Then, we analysed agreement of the capsule thickness between the two methods using an intra-correlation coefficient (ICC 2,1) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The CC of Baker grades II, III and IV (105 breasts), for which the capsule thickness could be measured using US, served as Model 1. Moreover, Model 1 including the CC of Baker grades I (97 breasts) served as Model 2.

RESULTS

The capsule thickness was measured as 0.58 ± 0.11 (0.4-0.8) mm, 1.07 ± 0.16 (0.8-1.31) mm and 1.89 ± 0.55 (1-4.1) mm on ultrasound in association with Baker grades II, III and IV, respectively. In addition, it was also measured as 0.28 ± 0.07 (0.09-0.41) mm, 0.58 ± 0.08 (0.42-0.75) mm, 1.06 ± 0.14 (0.79-1.34) mm and 2.13 ± 1.14 (1.38-6.98) mm on histologic examination in association with Baker grades I, II, III and IV, respectively. In Model 1 and 2, the ICC was calculated as 0.942 (95%CI 0.914-0.961) and 0.955 (95%CI 0.940-0.966), respectively. The cut-off values between the Baker grades I-II, II-III and III-IV were calculated as 0. mm, 0.8 mm and 1.2 mm, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, the capsule thickness might be used as an indicator of the severity of CC alternatively to the Baker classification system. But further studies are warranted to establish our results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Comparing the Antimicrobial Effect of Silver Ion-Coated Silicone and Gentamicin-Irrigated Silicone Sheets from Breast Implant Material

BACKGROUND

Post-operative infection is a significant complication of breast implant surgery that may require extensive use of antibiotics and surgical interventions. Here, we developed a biomaterial coating that is chemically bonded to silicone implants which delivers antimicrobial ions over time.

METHODS

After coating the silicone implants with a "mediator" polymer (γ-PGA), the implants were impregnated with silver (Ag) ions. Antimicrobial effects of these implants were assayed with modified Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method. The silicone disks were transferred to a plate with fresh bacteria. Control was intended to simulate an intra-operative wash.

RESULTS

The Ag-γ-PGA coated silicone demonstrated antimicrobial effects against the most common etiological agents of breast implant infections, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. There was no effect of inhibition of bacterial growth around the control silicone or the silicone coated only with γ-PGA. The zone of inhibition was generally larger around the Ag-γ-PGA coated silicone as compared to the silicone irrigated with gentamicin, and continued antibacterial effect was also observed at 48 hours in the Ag-γ-PGA coated silicone for all bacteria groups with the exception of P. aeruginosa. Gentamicin-irrigated silicone did not inhibit bacterial growth at 48 hours.

CONCLUSION

The observed antibacterial performance of the Ag-γ-PGA coating as compared to simulated intra-operative antibiotic wash is promising and should be further evaluated to develop the next generation of implants with diminished risk for post-operative implant infections.

Safety of CPX4 Breast Tissue Expanders in Primary Reconstruction Patients

Background:

In the United States, 2-stage expander-to-implant–based breast reconstruction accounts for more than half of all breast reconstruction procedures. Tissue expansion technology has undergone significant advancements in the past few decades. Previous reports suggest that the most common perioperative complications associated with breast tissue expanders are infection and skin flap necrosis. However, little clinical data are available for CPX4 Breast Tissue Expanders. The aim of the study was to measure real-world outcomes related to safety and effectiveness of the tissue expansion process, in patients who underwent primary breast reconstruction following the use of CPX4 Breast Tissue Expanders.

Methods:

This was a single-arm retrospective cohort design looking at patients who underwent 2-stage, expander-to-implant–based primary breast reconstruction at a single site between April 2013 and December 2016 and who had a minimum of 2 years follow-up. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize baseline characteristics and safety outcomes.

Results:

A total of 123 patients were followed for an average of 3.73 ± 0.94 years. At least 1 complication during the time of tissue expansion, before the permanent implant, was reported in 39/123 (31.7%) patients [51/220 implants (23.2%)]. The most frequently reported complications were delayed wound healing (13.8%) and cellulitis/infection (9.7%).

Conclusion:

Analyses of real-world data from a single site provide further support for the safety and effectiveness of the CPX4 Breast Tissue Expander for women undergoing 2-stage expander-to-implant primary breast reconstruction.

Safety and Efficacy of Smooth Surface Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Traditional 2-stage breast reconstruction involves placement of a textured-surface tissue expander (TTE). Recent studies have demonstrated textured surface devices have higher propensity for bacterial contamination and biofilm formation.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of smooth surface tissue expanders (STE) in immediate breast reconstruction.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively reviewed consecutive women who underwent STE breast reconstruction from 2016 to 2017 at 3 institutions. Indications and outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total 112 patients underwent STE reconstruction (75 subpectoral, 37 prepectoral placement), receiving 173 devices and monitored for a mean follow-up of 14.1 months. Demographics of patients included average age of 53 years and average BMI of 27.2 kg/m2, and 18.6% received postmastectomy radiation therapy. Overall complication rates were 15.6% and included mastectomy skin flap necrosis (10.4%), seroma (5.2%), expander malposition (2.9%), and infection requiring intravenous antibiotic therapy (3.5%). Six (3.5%) unplanned reoperations with explantation were reported for 3 infections and 3 patients requesting change of plan with no reconstruction.

CONCLUSIONS

STEs represent a safe and efficacious alternative to TTE breast reconstruction with at least equitable outcomes. Technique modification including tab fixation, strict pocket control, postoperative bra support, and suture choice may contribute to observed favorable outcomes and are reviewed. Early results for infection control and explantation rate are encouraging and warrant comparative evaluation for potential superiority over TTEs in a prospective randomized trial.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

The A, B and C's of Silicone Breast Implants: Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma, Biofilm and Capsular Contracture

Breast implantation either for cosmetic or reconstructive e purposes is one of the most common procedures performed in plastic surgery. Biofilm infection is hypothesised to be involved in the development of both capsular contracture and anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL). Capsular contracture is one of the principal reasons for breast revision surgery and is characterised by the tightening and hardening of the capsule surrounding the implant, and ALCL is an indolent lymphoma found only in women with textured implants. We describe the types of breast implants available with regard to their surface characteristics of surface area and roughness and how this might contribute to capsular contracture and/or biofilm formation. The pathogenesis of capsular contracture is thought to be due to biofilm formation on the implant, which results in on-going inflammation. We describe the current research into breast implant associated ALCL and how implant properties may affect its pathogenesis, with ALCL only occurring in women with textured implants.

Shaped versus Round Implants in Breast Reconstruction: A Multi-Institutional Comparison of Surgical and Patient-Reported Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Since the 2012 approval of shaped implants, their use in breast reconstruction has increased in the United States. However, large-scale comparisons of complications and patient-reported outcomes are lacking. The authors endeavored to compare surgical and patient-reported outcomes across implant types.

METHODS

The Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium database was queried for expander/implant reconstructions with at least 1-year postexchange follow-up (mean, 18.5 months). Outcomes of interest included postoperative complications, 1-year revisions, and patient-reported outcomes. Bivariate and mixed-effects regression analyses evaluated the effect of implant type on patient outcomes.

RESULTS

Overall, 822 patients (73.5 percent) received round and 297 patients (26.5 percent) received shaped implants. Patients undergoing unilateral reconstructions with round implants underwent more contralateral symmetry procedures, including augmentations (round, 18.7 percent; shaped, 6.8 percent; p = 0.003) and reductions (round, 32.2 percent; shaped, 20.5 percent; p = 0.019). Shaped implants were associated with higher rates of infection (shaped, 6.1 percent; round, 2.3 percent; p = 0.002), that remained significant after multivariable adjustment. Other complication rates did not differ significantly between cohorts. Round and shaped implants experienced similar 2-year patient-reported outcome scores.

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective, multicenter study is the largest evaluating outcomes of shaped versus round implants in breast reconstruction. Although recipients of round implants demonstrated lower infection rates compared with shaped implants, these patients were more likely to undergo contralateral symmetry procedures. Both implant types yielded comparable patient-reported outcome scores. With appropriate patient selection, both shaped and round implants can provide acceptable outcomes in breast reconstruction.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Relevant In Vitro Predictors of Human Acellular Dermal Matrix-Associated Inflammation and Capsule Formation in a Nonhuman Primate Subcutaneous Tissue Expander Model

Objective: Benchtop methods were evaluated for preclinical inflammation/capsule formation correlation following implantation of human acellular dermal matrices. Methods: Dermal matrices were compared with native dermis for structure (histology, scanning electron microscopy), collagen solubility (hydroxyproline), enzymatic susceptibility (collagenase), and thermal stability (differential scanning calorimetry). Results were compared with implantation outcomes in a primate tissue expander model. Results: Native dermis, electron beam-sterilized, and freeze-dried human acellular dermal matrices had equivalent morphology, acid-soluble collagen (60.5% ± 6.3%, 65.3% ± 3.2%, and 63.3% ± 2.4%, respectively), and collagenase resistance. Implant results showed minimal inflammation/matrix degradation, lack of capsule formation, insignificant elastic modulus change (57.65 ± 20.24 MPa out-of-package/44.84 ± 23.87 MPa in vivo), and low antibody induction (2- to 8-fold increase) for electron beam-sterilized matrix. Similar results for freeze-dried dermal matrix were previously observed. γ-Irradiated, γ-irradiated/freeze-dried, and ethanol-stored dermal matrices were statistically different from native dermis for acid-soluble collagen (82.4% ± 5.8%, 72.2% ± 6.2%, and 76.8% ± 5.0%, respectively) and collagenase digestion rate, indicating matrix damage. γ-Irradiated matrix-implanted animals demonstrated elevated inflammatory response, foreign body giant cells, capsule formation at the tissue expander junction, and robust matrix metalloproteinase-1 staining with significant elastic modulus decrease (37.43 ± 7.52 MPa out-of-package/19.58 ± 1.16 MPa in vivo). Antibody increase (32- to 128-fold) was observed 6 to 10 weeks following γ-irradiated matrix implantation. Ethanol-stored dermal matrix elicited an acute antibody response (4- to 128-fold increase, 2-4 weeks) and macrophage-concentrated synovial-like hyperplasia at the tissue expander junction, moderate matrix metalloproteinase-1 staining, and significant elastic modulus decrease (61.15 ± 9.12 MPa out-of-package/17.92 ± 4.02 MPa in vivo) by 10 weeks implantation. Conclusion: Demonstrated loss of collagen integrity in vitro may be predictive of inflammation/capsule formation in primate tissue expander models. These results may be further predictive of clinical observations.