Visual outcome of manual small-incision cataract surgery: comparison of modified Blumenthal and Ruit techniques

Complications of manual small-incision cataract surgery

The manual small-incision cataract surgery (MSICS) is instrumental in tackling cataract-induced blindness in developing countries, especially with a sizeable proportion being hard brunescent cataracts. MSICS has a unique set of complications related to wound construction, the creation of the capsular opening, and the technique of nuclear delivery. A poorly constructed sclero-corneal tunnel or a small capsulorhexis hampers the nuclear extraction, and the extensive intracameral maneuvers increase the chances of postoperative corneal edema and iritis. Though MSICS has been shown to have universal applicability, producing replicable visual outcomes requires a significant learning curve. This article reviews the relevant published literature on complications of MSICS utilizing the databases of PubMed, Medline, Cochrane, and Google Scholar.

Evolution of manual small-incision cataract surgery from 8 mm to 2 mm - A comprehensive review

Cataract is the most common cause of reversible blindness worldwide, accounting for approximately 50% of blindness worldwide. Cataract surgery is the most common surgical procedure performed in routine ophthalmic practice. It has undergone tremendous evolution, and the incision size has progressively reduced from 10-12 mm in extracapsular cataract surgery (ECCE) to 6-8 mm for manual small-incision cataract surgery (MSICS) and 2.2-2.8 mm in phacoemulsification. In a developing country like India, with a massive backlog of cataract, everyone cannot afford private surgery like phacoemulsification. Moreover, annual maintenance of the machine, cost of foldable IOLs, need for greater skill, learning curve, and difficulty in performing the surgery in mature and brown cataracts are other barriers. Due to these factors, MSICS is the surgery of choice in the developing world, with profound societal and economic benefits and similar visual recovery compared to phacoemulsification. During the last two decades, MSICS gained popularity in developing countries and has undergone tremendous advances. This article aims to review the various techniques of MSICS and how the surgery has evolved over the years, particularly focusing on the current technique of 2-mm MSICS.

The visual outcomes and complications of manual small incision cataract surgery and phacoemulsification: long term results

Objective: To compare visual outcomes and complications between manual small incision cataract surgery (MSICS) and phacoemulsification.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in the tertiary care center. A total of 1281 cases underwent manual small incision cataract surgery and phacoemulsification from January 2014 to December 2016. The postoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) along with the rates of complications were compared between both groups.

Results: Five hundred and twenty-one patients (40.67%) and 760 patients (59.33%) were subjected by staff members and residents, respectively. Altogether, 689 cases (53.79%) were subjected to MSICS technique and 592 cases (46.21%) to phacoemulsification. The MSICS group had significantly harder cataract (cataract grading ≥ 4+ :31.64% vs. 7.77%; p<0.001). One month postoperatively, good visual outcome (BCVA ≥ 6 /18) in the phacoemulsification group was higher than that in the MSICS group (86.33% vs. 72.12%, p<0.001). The risk factor for poor outcome (post-operative BCVA < 6 /60 in both groups) was the presence of associated ocular pathologies. The intraoperative and perioperative complications rates were higher in the MSICS group (16.55% vs. 6.6%, p<0.001). The most common complications were hyphema (4.35%), posterior capsule ruptures (4.21%), and prolapsed iris (3.05%). Long-term postoperative complication rates were higher in the phacoemulsification group (9.29% vs. 21.28%, p<0.001). The most common complication was posterior capsule opacity (8.71% vs. 20.44%, p<0.001). Pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (PBK) was similar in both groups (0.29% vs. 0.17%, p=1.00).

Conclusion: The number of patients who had experienced good visual outcomes was higher in the phacoemulsification group. However, for both groups, no significant differences were found on the long-term complication rate.

Outbreak of Multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Endophthalmitis Due to Contaminated Trypan Blue Solution

Purpose

To report the investigation of an outbreak of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa endophthalmitis in 13 patients after cataract surgery and to emphasize on the importance of clinical profile, risk factors, and treatment outcomes

Methods

This was a hospital-based, retrospective case study with 13 consecutive patients who had man- ual small-incision cataract surgery with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation and developed acute postoperative Pseudomonas aeruginosa endophthalmitis. The anterior chamber taps, vitreous aspirates, and environ- mental surveillance specimens were inoculated for culturing. Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed using the agar diffusion method. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) was used to determine the relation- ship between bacterial isolates recovered from study patients and contaminated surveillance samples.

Results

Pseudomonas aeruginosa was isolated from all 13 eyes with acute postoperative endophthalmitis and the trypan blue solutions used during surgery. Sensitivity tests revealed that all isolates had an identical resistance to multiple drugs and were only susceptible to imipenem. Genomic DNA typing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates recovered from patients and trypan blue solutions showed an identical banding pattern on the PFGE. Despite the prompt use of intravitreal antibiotics and early vitrectomy with IOL explantation in some patients, the outcome was poor in about 50% of patients.

Conclusion

Positive microbiology and genomic DNA typing results proved that the contaminated trypan blue solutions were the source of infection in this outbreak. Postoperative endophthalmitis caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa is often associated with a poor visual prognosis despite prompt treatment with intravitreal antibiotics.

Ciliary sulcus implantation of intraocular lens in manual small incision cataract surgery complicated by large posterior capsule rupture

The present study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficiency of ciliary sulcus implantation of intraocular lens (IOL) in patients that had undergone manual small incision cataract surgery (MSICS) complicated by large posterior capsule rupture (LPCR). A total of 11 eyes taken from 11 patients in Brazzaville, Republic of the Congo, that had experienced LPCR following MSICS were included in the current study. A rigid single-piece IOL (5.5 mm optic, 12.50 mm overall length) was implanted into the ciliary sulcus. Postoperative follow-up assessments evaluated visual acuity, anterior segment biomicroscopy, IOL centration and position, and fundus biomicroscopy. The median follow-up time was 3.7 months (range, 2-6 months). All patients experienced vision improvement: Uncorrected visual acuity 2 months following surgery was 0.3-0.5 in 9 patients and >0.5 in 2 patients. Postoperative complications included pronounced anterior segment inflammation (1 patient), mild corneal endothelium edema (3 patients), residual cortex (1 patient) and intraocular pressure elevation (1 patient). Significant IOL decentration and tilt were not observed in any patients. The results of the present study indicate that ciliary sulcus implantation of a rigid single-piece IOL may be a feasible and effective method of treating patients that have experienced LPCR complications following cataract surgery, as it provides satisfactory visual acuity outcomes. Appropriate intraoperative management may reduce the incidence of postoperative complications.

Minimal duration cataract surgery with oblique limbal stab incision technique

PURPOSE:

Small incision cataract surgery (SICS) and phacoemulsification with oblique limbal stab incision technique were studied and compared.

SETTING:

The study was conducted in the Department of Ophthalmology, Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla, for 1 year.

DESIGN:

This was a prospective randomized study.

METHODS:

One hundred patients undergoing SICS (6–7 mm) were compared with another age- and sex-matched 100 patients undergoing phaco (2.8 mm) surgery with oblique limbal stab incision technique. These two groups were further subdivided into two groups of 50 each. Patients with traumatic cataract, corneal diseases, and preoperative astigmatism >1.5 D were excluded from the study. The patients were subjected to standard preoperative evaluation. Follow-up was done at 1, 2, 4, 6, and 12 weeks.

RESULTS:

Mean surgically induced astigmatism at 12 weeks was <1 D in both groups (+0.62 D ± 0.34 in Group A and +0.46 D ± 0.39 in Group B) (statistically significant P < 0.0010). Mean surgical duration was 690.09 s in SICS and 792.29 s in phacoemulsification (statistically significant, P < 0.0010). Visual outcome was between 6/6 and 6/9 in 86% of the patients in Group A and 97% of patients in Group B at 12 weeks.

CONCLUSION:

SICS and phacoemulsification with this technique yield lesser astigmatism than clear corneal and scleral incisions, with the advantage of extension without suturing in complicated cases of phaco and in patients with rigid intraocular lens phacoemulsification gives better BCVA in a larger proportion of patients at 12 weeks.

Superior subconjunctival anesthesia versus retrobulbar anesthesia for manual small-incision cataract surgery in a residency training program: a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness of subconjunctival anesthesia as compared to retrobulbar anesthesia for pain control during manual small-incision cataract surgery (MSICS) performed by third-year residents.

DESIGN

A randomized, controlled trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 150 patients undergoing routine cataract surgery were randomly assigned to receive either subconjunctival anesthesia (group 1, n = 75) or retrobulbar anesthesia (group 2, n = 75). Third-year residents performed MSICS using the modified Blumenthal technique. Subconjunctival anesthesia was administered by injecting 2% xylocaine with adrenalin into the superior conjunctiva, and retrobulbar anesthesia by injecting 2 mL of 2% xylocaine with adrenalin into the retrobulbar space. We studied the following variables: intraoperative pain score rated on a 100-point visual analog scale (VAS), operative time, and injection and operative complications.

RESULTS

A mean age of 69 vs 70 years, an operative time of 47.1 (SD, 9.9) min vs 47.7 (10.9) min, and a median (interquartile range) pain score of 40 (range, 20-70) vs 40 (range, 20-50) were observed in the subconjunctival and the retrobulbar groups, respectively. The injection complication of subconjunctival hemorrhage was significantly higher in the subconjunctival group (25.3%) compared to the retrobulbar group (1.3%). The operative complication rate between groups was not different (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Both, superior subconjunctival anesthesia and retrobulbar anesthesia were effective during MSICS when used in a residency training program.