Clinical outcomes after intrastromal corneal ring segments reoperation in keratoconus patients

Evaluation of a Tangential Map-Based Nomogram for Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments' Implantation in Keratoconus: One Year Results

Purpose

To evaluate a new tangential map-based nomogram versus the axial map-based nomogram for ICRS in keratoconus.

Methods

A prospective case series study including 64 eyes of 64 patients who underwent ICRS implantation. Cone location was determined for each eye with two maps: the axial and the tangential. Appropriate ring selection was determined using two surgical nomograms: axial map-based and tangential map-based. Visual, refractive, and topographic outcomes were assessed before, as well as at 3, 6, and 12 months after ICRS implantation.

Results

The cone location, and consequently the ring selection, was significantly different in the two nomograms with a “centralization tendency” in the tangential map. In the axial group, UDVA and CDVA improved from 0.12 ± 0.04 and 0.24 ± 0.08 to 0.28 ± 0.08 and 0.4 ± 0.1, respectively. Similarly, MRSE substantially decreased from −6.7 ± 3.3 to −1.2 ± 1.1D at 12 months after the procedure. In the tangential group, UDVA and CDVA improved from 0.09 ± 0.06 and 0.2 ± 0.1 to 0.5 ± 0.2 and 0.7 ± 0.2, respectively. MRSE substantially decreased from −4.9 ± 1D at 12 months after the procedure. In the tangential group, UDVA and CDVA improved from 0.09 ± 0.06 and 0.2 ± 0.1 to 0.5 ± 0.2 and 0.7 ± 0.2, respectively. MRSE substantially decreased from −4.9 ± 1D at 12 months after the procedure. In the tangential group, UDVA and CDVA improved from 0.09 ± 0.06 and 0.2 ± 0.1 to 0.5 ± 0.2 and 0.7 ± 0.2, respectively. MRSE substantially decreased from −4.9 ± 1P=0.01^∗. Similarly, the gain in the CDVA was 0.4 and 0.15 in the tangential and axial groups, respectively, at 12 months, P=0.01^∗. Similarly, the gain in the CDVA was 0.4 and 0.15 in the tangential and axial groups, respectively, at 12 months,

Conclusion

The tangential map-based nomogram attained better visual and refractive outcomes at 1 year. In addition, the cone location was significantly different between both maps with a centralization tendency in the tangential one.

Modification of the Intrastromal Ring Position according to Postimplant Visual and Refractive Failure: Report of Two Cases

Objective

The following report presents the adaptation of an existing technique of intrastromal corneal ring (ICRS) implantation enabling repositioning of the ring position postoperatively to manage a refractive failure in two patients with keratoconus.

Methods

In two cases, KeraRing and Ferrara nomograms had suggested different ring positions. To manage with the differences between the two nomograms, a longer corneal tunnel was created followed by the classic intervention to move the ring through the initial intrastromal corneal tunnel according to the topographic values. Once the first ring position has failed, the ring segment was repositioned along the longer corneal tunnel according to the postoperative outcome.

Results

Significant improvement in both cases was observed in the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), and root mean square (RMS) measured with Scheimpflug imaging (Pentacam; Oculus GmBH, Wetzlar, Germany). The participants were followed for one year.

Conclusion

In patients with keratoconus which exhibit significant differences between KeraRing and Ferrara nomograms, a longer tunnel should be created to enable repositioning of the ring postoperatively if necessary, to avoid extracting the ring or changing it.

Template-based methodology for the simulation of intracorneal segment ring implantation in human corneas

Keratoconus is an idiopathic, non-inflammatory and degenerative corneal disease characterised by a loss of the organisation in the corneal collagen fibrils. As a result, keratoconic corneas present a localised thinning and conical protrusion with irregular astigmatism and high myopia that worsen visual acuity. Intracorneal ring segments (ICRSs) are used in clinic to regularise the corneal surface and to prevent the disease from progressing. Unfortunately, the post-surgical effect of the ICRS is not explicitly accounted beforehand. Traditional treatments rely on population-based nomograms and the experience of the surgeon. In this vein, in silico models could be a clinical aid tool for clinicians to plan the intervention, or to test the post-surgical impact of different clinical scenarios. A semi-automatic computational methodology is presented in order to simulate the ICRS surgical operation and to predict the post-surgical optical outcomes. For the sake of simplicity, circular cross section rings, average corneas and an isotropic hyperelastic material are used. To determine whether the model behaves physiologically and to carry out a sensitivity analysis, a [Formula: see text] full-factorial analysis is carried out. In particular, how the stromal depth insertion, horizontal distance of ring insertion (hDRI) and diameter of the ring's cross section ([Formula: see text]) are impacting in the spherical and cylindrical power of the cornea is analysed. Afterwards, the kinematics, mechanics and optics of keratoconic corneas after the ICRS insertion are analysed. Based on the parametric study, we can conclude that our model follows clinical trends previously reported. In particular and although there is an improvement in defocus, all corneas presented a change in their optical aberrations. The stromal depth insertion is the parameter that affects the corneal optics the most, whereas hDRI and [Formula: see text] are less important. Not only that, but it is almost impossible to achieve an optimal trade-off between spherical and cylindrical correction. Regarding the mechanical behaviour, inserting the rings at 65% depth or above will cause the cornea to slightly bend. This abnormal stress distribution greatly distorts the corneal optics and, more importantly, could be the cause of clinical problems such as corneal extrusion. Not only that, but our model also supports that rings are acting as restraint elements which relax the stresses of the corneal stroma in the cone of the disease. However, depending on the exact spatial location of the keratoconus, the insertion of rings could promote its evolution instead of preventing it. ICRS inserted deeper will prevent keratoconus in the posterior stroma from growing (relaxation of posterior surface), but will promote its growing if they are located in the anterior surface (increment of stress). In conclusion, the methodology proposed is suitable for simulating long-term mechanical and optical effects of ICRS insertion.

Evaluation of anterior and posterior surfaces of the cornea using a dual Scheimpflug analyzer in keratoconus patients implanted with intrastromal corneal ring segments

AIM

To evaluate corneal parameters measured with a dual Scheimpflug analyzer in keratoconus patients implanted with intrastromal corneal ring segments (ICRS).

METHODS

Fifty eyes of 40 keratoconus patients had Ferrara ICRS implantation from November 2010 to April 2014. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), refraction, keratometry, asphericity, elevation, pachymetry, root mean square (RMS), spherical aberration and coma were studied. All patients were evaluated using a dual Scheimpflug system.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up time after the procedure was 12.7mo. The mean UCVA improved from 0.82 to 0.31 (P<0.001); the mean BCVA improved from 0.42 to 0.05 (P<0.0001), the mean spherical refraction changed from -3.06±3.80 D to -0.80±2.5 D (P<0.0001) and the mean refraction astigmatism reduced from -4.51±2.08 D to -2.26±1.18 D (P<0.0001). The changes from preoperative to postoperative, in parameters of the anterior and posterior surface of the cornea, were statistically significant except the elevation posterior at the apex of the cornea and posterior asphericity.

CONCLUSION

The implantation of Ferrara ICRS induces changes in both anterior and posterior surfaces of the cornea.