Reproducibility of optical quality parameters measured at objective and subjective best focuses in a double-pass system

Intense pulsed-light treatment improves objective optical quality in patients with meibomian gland dysfunction

BACKGROUND

To evaluate changes in objective optical quality following intense pulsed light (IPL) treatment combined with meibomian gland (MG) expression (MGX) in patients with MG dysfunction (MGD).

METHODS

This retrospective cross-sectional study included MGD-related dry eye disease (DED) patients who received IPL treatment between March and December 2021 at Kim's Eye Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Each patient underwent four sessions of IPL treatment using Lumenis M22 (Lumenis Ltd., Yokneam, Israel) and MGX at three-week intervals.

RESULTS

This study included 90 eyes from 45 patients with MGD. The mean age was 52.3 ± 16.1 years (range, 20-75 years), and 53.3% (24/45) of patients were female. Compared with the baseline, all clinical symptoms and signs significantly improved after IPL treatment combined with MGX. All optical quality parameters obtained with an optical quality analysis system (OQAS: Visiometrics, Castelldefels, Spain) have improved significantly over the baseline (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with MGD, IPL treatment combined with MGX improved the objective optical quality and clinical signs and symptoms of DED.

Bias of near-infrared light in evaluation of patients implanted with multifocal intraocular lenses

PURPOSE

To compare visual quality between subjective tests and optical devices using near-infrared (NIR) light in patients implanted with monofocal, multifocal and enlarged depth-of-focus (EDoF) intraocular lenses (IOLs).

METHODS

Cross-sectional study enrolling patients aged between 55 and 75 (axial length between 22 and 25 mm) bilaterally implanted with Tecnis IOLs (Johnson & Johnson) four months previously: 40 patients (80 eyes) with monofocal ZCB00, 41 patients (82 eyes) with bifocal diffractive ZMB00 and 48 patients (96 eyes) with EDoF Symfony. They were examined using subjective and objective tests. The subjective tests comprised visual acuity (VA) with ETDRS charts, contrast sensitivity (CS) with Pelli-Robson and CSV-1000E tests, and clear vision range (CVR). The objective tests using NIR light were performed with the KR-1 W wavefront analyzer and the OQAS.

RESULTS

In the subjective tests, the monofocal group achieved the best outcomes in some of the VA and CS sections, while the bifocal group obtained the worst outcomes in some of the CS sections. In the objective tests, the bifocal group achieved the best results for VA and CS. Discrepancies between pseudoaccommodation range and CVR were found in the bifocal and EDoF groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Assessment of visual quality using NIR light implies greater bias for diffractive lenses than for EDoF lenses. This bias may be even greater with devices using longer light wavelengths or Hartmann-Shack technology. The difference in wavelength between NIR and visible light leads to dimming of near-vision focus and magnification of distance focus.

Utility of the optical quality analysis system for decision-making in Nd: YAG laser posterior capsulotomy in patients with light posterior capsule opacity

Background

A prospective cohort study was performed to evaluate whether the Optical Quality Analysis System (OQAS) can serve as a valuable additional indicator for appropriate posterior capsulotomy referral.

Methods

One hundred and five eyes from 96 patients undergoing capsulotomy were divided into precapsulotomy logMAR CDVA ≤0.1 group and logMAR CDVA > 0.1 group. CDVA, and the Visual Function 14 index (VF-14) score were estimated before and 1 month after capsulotomy. The objective scattering index (OSI) value was measured by using the OQAS. Posterior capsule opacification (PCO) severity was assessed with Evaluation of PCO 2000 (EPCO 2000) software.

Results

In logMAR CDVA > 0.1 group, the correlations of OSI, logMAR CDVA, EPCO score and VF-14 score were very strong preoperatively. In logMAR CDVA ≤0.1 group, preoperatively, OSI was correlated with logMAR CDVA (r = 0.451), EPCO score (r = 0.789), and VF-14 score (r = 0.852). LogMAR CDVA has weak correlation with VF-14 score (r = − 0.384) and EPCO score (r = 0.566). VF-14 score was correlated with EPCO score (r = − 0.669). In the logMAR CDVA ≤0.1 group, there was no significant difference in logMAR CDVA between precapsulotomy and postcapsulotomy (P > 0.05). In the two groups, all the other optical quality parameters were significantly improved after capsulotomy (P < 0.05). In logMAR CDVA > 0.1 group, the area under the curve of the ROC of the OSI was 0.996 (P = 0.000). In logMAR CDVA ≤0.1 group, the area under the curve of the ROC of the OSI was 0.943 (P = 0.000).

Conclusions

The OSI was useful for evaluating of PCO and prediction of beneficial capsulotomy. Especially for patients with slight PCO and better visual acuity, OSI is more valuable than CDVA and completely objective examination.

Trial registration

The study protocol was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry. Register: ChiCTR1800018842 (Registered Date: October 13th, 2018).

Study of tear film optics and its impact on quality of vision

Purpose:

To evaluate the relation of the tear film on the quality of vision comparing parameters in normal patients to those having dry eye disease.

Methods:

50 normal and 50 eyes with dry eye disease (DED) were included in the study. Patients were screened for dry eye with Schirmer's test, tear break up time, ocular surface staining, and assessment of meibomian gland disease. Their quality of vision was assessed using the Optical quality analysis system (OQAS). The results of dry eye evaluation were correlated with the parameters on the OQAS especially the mean objective scatter index (OSI).

Results:

Patients with dry eye and unstable tear film were found to have a significantly worse quality of vision and optical scatter (P < 0.05). They were also noted to have fluctuation of vision between blinks.

Conclusion:

Tear film optics can have an important bearing on the quality of vision and quality of life. A detailed assessment preoperatively will help improve surgical outcomes and patient satisfaction.

Using Optical Quality Analysis System for predicting surgical parameters in age-related cataract patients

The Optical Quality Analysis System (OQAS, Visiometrics) provides objective measurements of image formed onto retina, by combining quantification of ocular media transparency and of optical aberrations. In order to evaluate its contribution in the assessment of age-related cataract, we conducted a monocentric clinical study to determine the relationships between clinical grading of lens opacity, OQAS parameters, and parameters required for cataract surgery by phacoemulsification with ultrasound (called “phacodynamics”). Clinical parameters were: best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA, expressed as Log of minimal angle resolution (logMAR)) and the lens opacity classification system III (LOCS III) as a gold standard determined by two independent observers who graded total cataract and nuclear, cortical and posterior sub capsular components. The OQAS provided an objective scatter index (OSI), a modulation transfer function (MTF, expressed in cycle per degree (cpd)) and a Strehl ratio (SR) used as an aberration marker. Patients were operated on by the same surgeon using a phacoemulsification machine that provided the cumulative dissipated energy (CDE) and total ultrasound time (US time) necessary to extract the lens. Patients with poor compliance, corneal or retinal diseases impairing OSI, or who required surgical settings variation, were excluded. Twenty-one eyes of 21 patients aged 76±8 years were analyzed. They were 11 pure nuclear, 3 pure cortical, and 7 mixed cataracts. Mean LOCS III and OSI were respectively: 4.86 ±2.03 and 6.12 ±3.07 (mean±SD). Medians (10°-90° percentiles) were: for BCVA 0.30 (0.10–0.70) logMAR, for MTF cutoff 9.31 (1.54–30.57) cpd, for SR 0.071 (0.042–0.146), for CDE 8.04 (5.74–23.29) and for US time 58 (39–116) seconds. LOCS III was significantly correlated (spearman r, r_s) with BCVA (r_s = 0.561, p = 0.008), CDE (r_s = 0.457, p = 0.038) and US time (r_s = 0.647, p = 0.002). The three OQAS parameters significantly correlated (all r_s ≥ 0.526, p<0.05) with BCVA, and LOCS III grading, but the strongest correlations were found with OSI for cortical components and with MTF for nuclear components: only OSI may be used objectively to assess the effect of cortical components on optical quality, and MTF cutoff—integrating scattering and aberrations—seems the best objective parameter for clinical assessment of nuclear cataracts. The three OQAS parameters were also significantly correlated (r_s) with CDE, and with US time only for pure nuclear cataracts: OSI had the strongest correlations with phacodynamics (r_s = 0.693, p = 0.022 with CDE and r_s = 0.703, p = 0.019 US time). OSI increased with cortical components not requiring higher CDE. When measured in optimal conditions (good compliance, no retinal or ocular surface or tear film diseases), the three OQAS parameters are complementary for objective grading of cataract. In the future, they may help to optimize surgical parameters, especially energy distribution, in femtosecond laser assisted cataract surgery.

Tear Film Characteristics During Wear of Daily Disposable Contact Lenses

Purpose

To evaluate changes induced over time by three daily disposable (DD) contact lenses on tear meniscus height (TMH), pre-lens non-invasive break-up time (pre-lens NIBUT), tear film osmolarity (TO) and objective quality of vision (OQV).

Patients and Methods

Forty-six subjects enrolled in this prospective open-label unmasked non-randomized simultaneous comparative cross-over study. For the first week of the study, subjects wore a nesofilcon A lens in the right eye and a delefilcon A lens in the left eye. After 3 days of washout, for the second week, subjects wore a nesofilcon A lens in the left eye and a stenfilcon A lens in the right eye. TMH, pre-lens NIBUT, TO and OQV were measured before contact lens fitting and for each contact lens combination on day 1 at 20 minutes and on day 7 after ≥8 hours of wear. OQV measurement included the changes of objective scatter index (OSI), the stability index (SI) and the fluctuation index (FI) calculated in a range of time of 20 s from a blink.

Results

TMH was unchanged at 20 minutes wear of all lenses but was significantly reduced after 8 or more hours wear (on day 7) of delefilcon A and stenfilcon A, respectively. Pre-lens NIBUT was significantly reduced with all lenses, while no significant change in TO was observed with any lens. SI and FI increased significantly for all lenses at both wear times.

Conclusion

While the presence of any contact lens on the eye challenges the tear film, nesofilcon A contact lenses, despite their high water content, compared to delefilcon A and stenfilcon A contact lenses, showed a lower overall effect. We speculate that superior tear film behavior while wearing nesofilcon A lenses may translate to improved subjective comfort, but this remains to be evaluated.

Objective assessment of optical quality in dry eye disease using a double-pass imaging system

PURPOSE

To assess optical quality dynamics using a double-pass (DP) system in patients with dry eye disease (DED).

METHODS

Seventy-six eyes with DED and 44 control subjects were enrolled in this study. Each patient underwent ocular surface evaluation including fluorescein corneal staining and Schirmer's II test. Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire was used to assess subjective symptoms. Optical quality dynamics and tear film instability was analyzed using a DP system (HD AnalyzerTM, Visiometrics, Spain). Mean objective scatter index (OSI), maximum and minimum OSI, difference between maximum and minimum OSI (ΔOSI) were recorded with 40 consecutive scans over 20 s.

RESULTS

The DED group had pronounced impairment of optical quality compared to the control group. Mean OSI (4.29±4.07), minimum (3.22±3.51) and maximum (5.72±4.52) OSI, ΔOSI (2.50±1.96), OSDI score (36.94±16.55), and fluorescein corneal staining (0.79±0.96) were statistically significantly higher than controls (p<0.05). Schirmer's II test was statistically significantly lower in the DED group compared to controls (10.08±7.85, 26.41±6.75, respectively; p<0.001). Three patterns of dynamic changes of OSI were proposed: ladder (continuous increase of OSI), seesaw (instability of OSI without improvement after blinking), and plateau (steady-high OSI). The ladder group showed the highest value of maximum OSI (6.93±4.13; p=0.03) and ΔOSI (3.76±2.08; p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

DP imaging system provides an objective measurement of the visual quality in DED. Tear film instability may be assessed by dynamic changes of OSI over 20 s. In particular, the highest OSI values were observed in the ladder pattern group.

Comprehensive Evaluation of Retinal Image Quality in Comparing Different Aspheric to Spherical Intraocular Lens Implants

Purpose: To compare the visual and optical quality of eyes implanted with three aspheric versus two spherical intraocular lenses (IOL) after cataract surgery. Methods: This prospective comparative study included 349 eyes of 349 patients with age-related cataract and undergone uneventful phacoemulsification. Implanted posterior monofocal IOLs have an aspheric optic (Tecnis ZCB00 [Johnson & Johnson Vision], Acrysof IQ SN60WF [Alcon], Akreos AO [Bausch & Lomb]) or a spherical optic (Akreos [Bausch & Lomb], Sensar AR40e [Johnson & Johnson Vision]). Postoperatively, objective optical quality parameters were performed using an Optical Quality Analysis System II (Visiometrics), and wave-front aberrations were assessed using a KR-1W aberrometer (Topcon). Meanwhile, subjective visual acuity was performed using a logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution chart at 3 months after cataract surgery. Results: Statistical significant differences (P < .05) across all groups were found regarding intraocular and total ocular spherical aberration (SA) at 4.0 mm and 6.0 mm pupil diameter and total high-order aberration (tHOA) at 6.0 mm pupil diameter. Furthermore, differences among the evaluated groups were observed regarding several objective parameters such as objective scatter index (OSI), modulation transfer function cutoff (MTF cutoff), Strehl ratio (SR) at two dimensions and contrast visual acuity (OV) at three contrast levels. Conclusions: The present results reflect the optical characteristics of IOL in vivo. The scattering light and high-order aberration may be the main reasons for the degradation of retinal imaging quality in comparing different aspheric to spherical IOL implants.

Impact of Dry Eye Disease on Vision Quality: An Optical Quality Analysis System Study

Purpose

We evaluated the relationship between ocular surface clinical tests and quality of vision in patients with dry eye disease (DED).

Methods

In this study, 136 eyes of 72 dry eye patients were evaluated retrospectively using the ocular surface disease index (OSDI), measurement of tear film break-up time (TBUT), the Oxford score, Van Bijsterveld score, and Schirmer I test. Quality of vision was assessed with the optical quality analysis system (OQAS) using the objective scatter index (OSI) recorded over 20 seconds without blinking. Correlations between dry eye symptoms and signs, and OSI measurements were evaluated.

Results

The OSI and OSI standard deviation (OSI SD) were correlated with TBUT (r = -0.21, P = 0.013 and r = -0.18, P = 0.038, respectively), Oxford score (r = 0.31, P = 0.0002 and r = 0.18, P = 0.032, respectively), and the Van Bijsterveld score (r = 0.33, P = 0.0001 and r = 0.25, P = 0.003, respectively). The OSI also was correlated with the Schirmer test (r = -0.19, P = 0.025), OSDI (r = 0.17, P = 0.04), and the ocular symptoms subscale of the OSDI (r = 0.21, P = 0.01). OSI SD was correlated with the environmental triggers subscale of the OSDI (r = 0.21, P = 0.016).

Conclusions

Quality of vision measured with the OQAS was correlated with dry eye symptoms and signs. The OQAS could be a useful tool to better evaluate visual function in patients with DED.

Translational Relevance

The OQAS provides a better understanding of patient complaints about alteration of vision quality. It might be useful to integrate this objective system in severity assessments and follow-up of DED, especially for treatment evaluations.

Evaluation of visual quality of spherical and aspherical intraocular lenses by Optical Quality Analysis System

AIM

To evaluate the impact of spherical and aspherical intraocular lenses on the postoperative visual quality of age-related cataract patients using Optical Quality Analysis System (OQAS).

METHODS

Seventy-four eyes with age-related cataracts were randomly divided into spherical and aspherical lens implantation groups. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was measured preoperatively, one day, one week, two weeks, one month and two months after surgery. A biometric systems analysis using the OQAS objective scattering index (OSI) was performed.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in visual acuity (P>0.05) before and after spherical and aspheric lens implantation. There was a negative linear correction between the OSI value and BCVA (r=-0.634, P=0.000), and positive corrections between the OSI value and the lens LOCUS III value of nucleus color (NC), nucleus opacity (NO), cortex (C) and posterior lens capsular (P) (r=0.704, P=0.000; r=0.514, P=0.000; r=0.276, P=0.020; r=0.417, P=0.000, respectively). OSI values of spherical vs aspherical lenses were 11.5±3.6 vs 11.8±3.4, 4.1±0.9 vs 3.3±0.8, 3.5±0.9 vs 2.7±0.7, 3.3±0.8 vs 2.6±0.7, 3.2±0.7 vs 2.5±0.8, and 3.2±0.8 vs 2.5±0.8 before and 1d, 1, 2wk, 1 and 2mo after surgery, respectively. All time points varied significantly (P<0.01) between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Aspherical IOLs does not significantly affect visual acuity compared with spherical IOLs. The OSI value, was significantly lower in the aspherical lens group compared with the spherical lens. This study shows that objective visual quality of aspheric IOLs is better than that of the spherical lens by means of OQAS biological measurement method.