Multiple sclerosis and peripheral multifocal demyelinating neuropathies occurring in a same patient

Clinical and radiological findings of facial paralysis in multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Diagnosis of central or peripheral facial palsy (FP) is traditionally based on clinical evaluation. This study aims at investigating the relationship between clinical evaluation of FP and lesion location as visible on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in patients with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) for the purpose of adding supporting evidence to the diagnosis of central or peripheral FP in these patients.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on data from patients who underwent MS treatment between January 2016 and January 2019 at the MS Center of Wayne State University, MI, USA, and presented with at least one episode of FP during the observational period. The following data was collected from each patient: demographics, time from MS onset, side of FP, FP type (central or peripheral, as clinically evaluated), FP onset, FP treatment, amount of recovery of normal facial movements, time elapsed from beginning of FP treatment, number of FP recurrences, lesions presence/absence and location as visible on MRI. Correlation analysis was performed to assess to which extent clinical evaluation of FP correlated with presence of MRI lesions in different locations.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients were included in this study. In thirteen patients (72.2%) FP was classified as peripheral. Among them only five (38.4%) displayed one or more lesions in the pons. Correlation between presence of lesions in the pons and presence of peripheral FP was statistically significant (p = 0.02). Correlation between presence of lesions in the cortex (observed in 61.5% of patients with FP clinically evaluated as peripheral) and presence of FP clinically evaluated as peripheral was also statistically significant (p = 0.01). Finally, presence of lesions in the cortex was significantly correlated with presence of FP clinically evaluated as central (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

FP clinically classified as peripheral may be caused by central lesions in the cortex or pons and not only by peripheral facial nerve damage. In MS patients, FP may appear at the onset of the disease and be misdiagnosed as Bell 's palsy. Clinicians should carefully approach FP diagnosis and perform a brain as well as temporal bone MRI before pursuing pharmacological treatment.

Peripheral (Seventh) Nerve Palsy and Multiple Sclerosis: A Diagnostic Dilemma - A Case Report

During the last decades, only a few cases on the association between peripheral demyelinating diseases and multiple sclerosis (MS) have been reported. We describe the case of a young man who was initially diagnosed with Bell's palsy, and only after performing a brain MRI was the diagnosis of MS made. We review the literature and discuss some pitfalls which may lead to missing the diagnosis of MS.

[A case of combined central and peripheral demyelination]

A 22-year-old man had had difficulty running fast since about he was 10 years old. In June 2011, he was referred to us because of worsened unsteady gait. A neurological examination revealed mild ataxic speech, weakness of the four limbs, with spasticity, and pes cavus. Magnetic resonance T2-weighted images showed multiple high-intensity lesions in the bilateral periventricular white matter, brainstem, and thoracic spinal cord. Peripheral nerve conduction studies revealed marked motor conduction velocities were markedly reduced and sensory nerve velocities were not evoked in the upper and lower limbs. A sural nerve biopsy showed highly active demyelinating lesions. The patient was treated with high-dose steroid therapy (intravenous methylprednisolone, 1,000 mg/day × 3 days) followed by self-injection of interferon β. With these treatments, his symptoms gradually improved. In this case, we could not detect the causative factors, and all autoantibodies tested, except for the anti-neurofascin antibody, were negative. The anti-neurofascin antibody might induce demyelination in the central and peripheral nervous systems. However, in the literature, the evidence of an association between this antibody and these clinical characteristics is not conclusive. We need more studies on the pathogenesis of combined central and peripheral demyelination to establish more effective therapies.

Concurrence of Multifocal Motor Neuropathy and Hashimoto's Thyroiditis

Background

Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) is an immune-mediated disorder that is characterized by slowly progressive and asymmetrical weakness, but its pathophysiological mechanism is uncertain. The hypothesis that MMN is an immunological disease has been supported by the proven therapeutic effects of intravenous immunoglobulin and the detection of antiganglioside antibodies in MMN patients. The coexistence of MMN with other immune diseases has been rarely reported.

Case Report

A 37-year-old woman visited our hospital complaining of weakness in both hands. The clinical manifestations coincided well with MMN: predominantly distal upper-limb weakness, asymmetric involvement, a progressive course, absence of sensory symptoms, absence of pyramidal signs, and sparing of the cranial muscles. The electrophysiological findings also supported a diagnosis of MMN, with motor nerve conduction block in the median, ulnar, and radial nerves, without sensory nerve involvement. The patient was simultaneously diagnosed as having Hashimoto's thyroiditis, which is a well-known immune-mediated disease.

Conclusions

The concurrence of MMN and Hashimoto's thyroiditis in our patient is significant for understanding the immunological characteristics of the two diseases.

The sad plight of multiple sclerosis research (low on fact, high on fiction): critical data to support it being a neurocristopathy

The literature for evidence of autoimmunity in multiple sclerosis (MS) is analysed critically. In contrast to the accepted theory, the human counterpart of the animal model experimental autoimmune demyelinating disease, experimental allergic encephalomyelitis (EAE), is not MS but a different demyelinating disorder, i.e. acute disseminated encephalomyelitis and acute haemorrhagic leucoencephalitis. Extrapolation of EAE research to MS has been guided largely by faith and a blind acceptance rather than sound, scientific rationale. No specific or sensitive immunological test exists that is diagnostic of MS despite the extensive application of modern technology. Immunosuppression has failed to have any consistent effect on prognosis or disease progression. The available data on MS immunotherapy are conflicting, at times contradictory and are based on findings in animals with EAE. They show predominantly a 30% effect in relapsing/remitting MS which suggests powerful placebo effect. Critical analysis of the epidemiological data shows no association with any specific autoimmune diseases, but does suggest that geographic factors and age at development posit an early onset possibly dependent on environmental influences. Certain neurological diseases are, however, found in association with MS, namely hypertrophic peripheral neuropathy, neurofibromatosis-1, cerebral glioma, glioblastoma multiforme and certain familial forms of narcolepsy. These share a common genetic influence possibly from genes on chromosome 17 affecting cell proliferation. A significant number of these disorders are of neural crest origin, the classical example being abnormalities of the Schwann cell. These and other data allow us to propose that MS is a developmental neural crest disorder, i.e. a cristopathy, implicating glial cell dysfunction with diffuse blood-brain barrier breakdown. The data on transcription factor SOX10 mutations in animals may explain these bizarre clinical associations with MS and the phenotypic variability of such alterations (Cossais et al. 2010). Research directed to the area of neural crest associations is likely to be rewarding.