1
|
Samantaray T, Gupta U, Saini J, Gupta CN. Unique Brain Network Identification Number for Parkinson's and Healthy Individuals Using Structural MRI. Brain Sci 2023; 13:1297. [PMID: 37759898 PMCID: PMC10526827 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13091297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Revised: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
We propose a novel algorithm called Unique Brain Network Identification Number (UBNIN) for encoding the brain networks of individual subjects. To realize this objective, we employed structural MRI on 180 Parkinson's disease (PD) patients and 70 healthy controls (HC) from the National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, India. We parcellated each subject's brain volume and constructed an individual adjacency matrix using the correlation between the gray matter volumes of every pair of regions. The unique code is derived from values representing connections for every node (i), weighted by a factor of 2-(i-1). The numerical representation (UBNIN) was observed to be distinct for each individual brain network, which may also be applied to other neuroimaging modalities. UBNIN ranges observed for PD were 15,360 to 17,768,936,615,460,608, and HC ranges were 12,288 to 17,733,751,438,064,640. This model may be implemented as a neural signature of a person's unique brain connectivity, thereby making it useful for brainprinting applications. Additionally, we segregated the above datasets into five age cohorts: A: ≤32 years (n1 = 4, n2 = 5), B: 33-42 years (n1 = 18, n2 = 14), C: 43-52 years (n1 = 42, n2 = 23), D: 53-62 years (n1 = 69, n2 = 22), and E: ≥63 years (n1 = 46, n2 = 6), where n1 and n2 are the number of individuals in PD and HC, respectively, to study the variation in network topology over age. Sparsity was adopted as the threshold estimate to binarize each age-based correlation matrix. Connectivity metrics were obtained using Brain Connectivity toolbox (Version 2019-03-03)-based MATLAB (R2020a) functions. For each age cohort, a decreasing trend was observed in the mean clustering coefficient with increasing sparsity. Significantly different clustering coefficients were noted in PD between age-cohort B and C (sparsity: 0.63, 0.66), C and E (sparsity: 0.66, 0.69), and in HC between E and B (sparsity: 0.75 and above 0.81), E and C (sparsity above 0.78), E and D (sparsity above 0.84), and C and D (sparsity: 0.9). Our findings suggest network connectivity patterns change with age, indicating network disruption may be due to the underlying neuropathology. Varying clustering coefficients for different cohorts indicate that information transfer between neighboring nodes changes with age. This provides evidence of age-related brain shrinkage and network degeneration. We also discuss limitations and provide an open-access link to software codes and a help file for the entire study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanmayee Samantaray
- Neural Engineering Lab, Department of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati 781039, India; (T.S.)
| | - Utsav Gupta
- Neural Engineering Lab, Department of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati 781039, India; (T.S.)
| | - Jitender Saini
- Department of Neuroimaging and Interventional Radiology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru 560029, India;
| | - Cota Navin Gupta
- Neural Engineering Lab, Department of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati 781039, India; (T.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dong K, Zhu X, Xiao W, Gan C, Luo Y, Jiang M, Liu H, Chen X. Comparative efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation on different targets in Parkinson's disease: A Bayesian network meta-analysis. Front Aging Neurosci 2023; 14:1073310. [PMID: 36688161 PMCID: PMC9845788 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.1073310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2022] [Accepted: 12/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background/Objective The efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) on Parkinson's disease (PD) varies across the stimulation targets. This study aims to estimate the effect of different TMS targets on motor symptoms in PD. Methods A Bayesian hierarchical model was built to assess the effects across different TMS targets, and the rank probabilities and the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values were calculated to determine the ranks of each target. The primary outcome was the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part-III. Inconsistency between direct and indirect comparisons was assessed using the node-splitting method. Results Thirty-six trials with 1,122 subjects were included for analysis. The pair-wise meta-analysis results showed that TMS could significantly improve motor symptoms in PD patients. Network meta-analysis results showed that the high-frequency stimulation over bilateral M1, bilateral DLPFC, and M1+DLPFC could significantly reduce the UPDRS-III scores compared with sham conditions. The high-frequency stimulation over both M1 and DLPFC had a more significant effect when compared with other parameters, and ranked first with the highest SCURA value. There was no significant inconsistency between direct and indirect comparisons. Conclusion Considering all settings reported in our research, high-frequency stimulation over bilateral M1 or bilateral DLPFC has a moderate beneficial effect on the improvement of motor symptoms in PD (high confidence rating). High-frequency stimulation over M1+DLPFC has a prominent beneficial effect and appears to be the most effective TMS parameter setting for ameliorating motor symptoms of PD patients (high confidence rating).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ke Dong
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiaoxia Zhu
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wenwu Xiao
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Chu Gan
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yulu Luo
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Manying Jiang
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hanjun Liu
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Disease, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Guangzhou, China,Hanjun Liu,
| | - Xi Chen
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China,*Correspondence: Xi Chen,
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lees A, Ferreira JJ, Rocha JF, Rascol O, Poewe W, Gama H, Soares-da-Silva P. Safety Profile of Opicapone in the Management of Parkinson's Disease. JOURNAL OF PARKINSONS DISEASE 2020; 9:733-740. [PMID: 31498127 DOI: 10.3233/jpd-191593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Opicapone is a catechol O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitor indicated for use as adjunct to levodopa therapy in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and motor fluctuations. OBJECTIVE To characterize the safety and tolerability of adjunct opicapone (25 and 50 mg) in a pooled population of levodopa-treated PD patients who participated in the opicapone Phase-3 clinical program. METHODS Patient-level data (placebo, opicapone 25 mg and 50 mg) from the BIPARK-1 and BIPARK-2 double-blind and open-label studies were combined. RESULTS Pooled analyses included 766 patients from the double-blind studies and 848 patients from the open-label studies. In the double-blind studies, 63.3% of opicapone-treated patients reported treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) versus 57.2% in the placebo group. The most common TEAEs reported in the opicapone group compared to placebo were dyskinesia, constipation and insomnia. The incidence of serious TEAEs was similar across opicapone and placebo groups (3.5% versus 4.3%, respectively). Overall, 71.3% patients treated with open-label opicapone reported at least one TEAE; most occurred within the first 2 months of the open-label studies, and then decreased thereafter. Throughout the Phase-3 clinical program, there were no serious AEs suggestive of hepatic toxicity, and the incidence of gastrointestinal disorders such as nausea and diarrhea remained low (<2%). There were no relevant changes in laboratory parameters including liver enzymes, vital signs, physical or neurological examinations, or ECG readings. CONCLUSIONS Long-term use of opicapone once-daily over 1-year at doses of 25 mg or 50 mg was generally safe and well tolerated, supporting its clinical usefulness in the management of PD motor fluctuations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Lees
- University College London, Reta Lila Weston Institute, London, UK
| | - Joaquim J Ferreira
- Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculty of Medicine, University of Lisbon, Portugal.,CNS - Campus Neurológico Sénior, Torres Vedras, Portugal
| | - José-Francisco Rocha
- Department of Research and Development, BIAL - Portela & Ca SA, S. Mamede do Coronado, Portugal
| | - Olivier Rascol
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Neurosciences, INSERM and University Hospital of Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Werner Poewe
- Department of Neurology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Helena Gama
- Department of Research and Development, BIAL - Portela & Ca SA, S. Mamede do Coronado, Portugal
| | - Patrício Soares-da-Silva
- Department of Research and Development, BIAL - Portela & Ca SA, S. Mamede do Coronado, Portugal.,Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, University Porto, Porto, Portugal.,MedInUP, Center for Drug Discovery and Innovative Medicines, University Porto, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Orayj K, Lane E. Patterns and Determinants of Prescribing for Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Literature Review. PARKINSON'S DISEASE 2019; 2019:9237181. [PMID: 31781365 PMCID: PMC6875178 DOI: 10.1155/2019/9237181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2019] [Revised: 10/02/2019] [Accepted: 10/10/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Since the discovery of levodopa (L-dopa) in 1967, the range of medications available to treat Parkinson's disease has increased significantly and guidance on the use, efficacy, and safety of these medications has evolved. To assess levels of adherence to national prescribing guidelines and awareness of changes in the efficacy and safety data published in the profiles of medications for the treatment of PD, we have reviewed studies on patterns and determinants of prescribing PD medications conducted in the last 50 years (since the discovery of L-dopa). A systematic literature review was conducted using EMBASE (1967 to March, 2018), Ovid MEDLINE(R) ALL (1967 to March 16, 2018), PsycINFO (1967 to the 2nd week of March, 2018), and PubMed to identify all studies measuring prescribing patterns of PD medication between 1967 and 2017. Study design, source of data, country, year of study, number of patients and/or prescriptions, unit of analysis, prescribing determinants, and percentage utilisation of PD medications were extracted where possible. 44 studies examining prescribing patterns and/or prescribing determinants across 17 countries were identified. Unsurprisingly, L-dopa was the most commonly prescribed medication in all studies, accounting for 46.50% to 100% of all prescriptions for PD. In several studies, the prescribing rate of ergot-derived dopamine agonists (DAs) decreased over time in concordance with guidance. In contrast, the prescribing rates of non-ergot DAs increased over the last ten years in most of the included studies. In examining prescribing factors, two major categories were exemplified, patients' factors and prescribers' factors, with patients' age being the most common factor that affected the prescription in most studies. In conclusion, L-dopa is now the most commonly prescribed medication for cases of PD but there is large variation in the prescribing rates of catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitors, monoamine oxidase B (MAO-B) inhibitors, amantadine, and anticholinergics between countries. New studies examining the effects of recent clinical trials and measuring the prescribing rates of newly approved medications are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khalid Orayj
- School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cardiff University, Redwood Building, King Edward VII Ave, Cardiff CF10 3NB, UK
- College of Pharmacy, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia
| | - Emma Lane
- School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cardiff University, Redwood Building, King Edward VII Ave, Cardiff CF10 3NB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Latt MD, Lewis S, Zekry O, Fung VSC. Factors to Consider in the Selection of Dopamine Agonists for Older Persons with Parkinson's Disease. Drugs Aging 2019; 36:189-202. [PMID: 30623310 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-018-0629-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Dopamine agonists (DAs) are frequently used in the management of Parkinson's disease (PD), a complex multisystem disorder influenced substantially by age-related factors. Over 80% of PD patients present after age 60 years and may have clinical features exacerbated by age-related comorbidities or decline in physiological compensatory mechanisms. Pharmacotherapy for motor symptoms in older persons is more likely to involve exclusive use of levodopa combined with a peripheral decarboxylase inhibitor throughout the course of the illness. Non-ergot DAs, such as pramipexole, rotigotine and ropinirole, may be used as de novo monotherapy for the control of motor symptoms in older persons, although they are less efficacious than levodopa therapy. DAs may also be considered as adjunct therapy in older persons when motor symptoms are no longer adequately controlled by levodopa or when motor fluctuations and dyskinesia appear. DAs may be used cautiously in older persons with cognitive impairment and orthostatic hypotension but should be avoided when there is a history or risk of psychosis or impulse control disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Dominic Latt
- Geriatric Medicine Department, University of Sydney, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, KGV Level 7, Missenden Road, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia.
| | - Simon Lewis
- Parkinson's Disease Research Clinic, Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Olfat Zekry
- Department of Pharmacy, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Victor S C Fung
- Department of Neurology, Westmead Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|