Impact of Baseline Ischemia on Outcome in Older Patients Undergoing Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke

National Trends in Utilization and Outcome of Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke in Elderly

OBJECTIVE

Octogenarians were excluded and/or underrepresented in the major endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) randomized controlled trials, but continue to make up a growing proportion of stroke patients. To evaluate real-world trends in utilization and outcome of EVT in patients ≥80 years in a large nationally representative database.

METHODS

Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2014-2016), we identified patients admitted to United States hospitals with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) who also underwent EVT. The primary endpoint was good outcome (discharge to home/acute rehabilitation center). Poor outcome (discharge to skilled nursing facility or hospice and in-hospital mortality), intracerebral hemorrhage and in-hospital mortality were secondary outcome measures.

RESULTS

In 376,956 patients with AIS, 6,230(1.54%) underwent EVT. 1,547(24.83%) were ≥80. The rate of EVT in AIS patients ≥80 more than doubled from 0.83%(n = 317) in 2014 to 1.83%(n = 695) in 2016. The rate of good outcome in patients ≥80 was 9%, significantly lower than younger patients (26%, p<0.001). In-hospital mortality was 19% in patients ≥80 compared to 13% in the younger cohort (p < 0.001). There was no difference in the rate of hemorrhagic transformation between octogenarians and younger patients (18.52% vs 17.01%, p=0.19). In patients ≥80 years of age, decreasing baseline comorbidity burden independently predicted good outcome (OR 0.258, 95% CI [0.674- 0.935]).

CONCLUSIONS

A two-fold increase in the utilization of EVT in patients ≥80 years of age was seen from 2014 to 2016. While the comparative rate of good outcome is significantly lower in this age group, elderly patients with fewer comorbidities demonstrated better outcomes after EVT.

Number of Stent Retriever Passes Associated With Futile Recanalization in Acute Stroke

Background and Purpose- Stent retriever (SR) thrombectomy has become the mainstay of treatment of acute intracranial large artery occlusion. However, it is still not much known about the optimal limit of SR attempts for favorable outcome. We evaluated whether a specific number of SR passes for futile recanalization can be determined. Methods- Patients who were treated with a SR as the first endovascular modality for their intracranial large artery occlusion in anterior circulation were retrospectively reviewed. The recanalization rate for each SR pass was calculated. The association between the number of SR passes and a patient's functional outcome was analyzed. Results- A total of 467 patients were included. Successful recanalization by SR alone was achieved in 82.2% of patients. Recanalization rates got sequentially lower as the number of passes increased, and the recanalization rate achievable by ≥5 passes of the SR was 5.5%. In a multivariable analysis, functional outcomes were more favorable in patients with 1 to 4 passes of the SR than in patients without recanalization (odds ratio [OR] was 8.06 for 1 pass; OR 7.78 for 2 passes; OR 6.10 for 3 passes; OR 6.57 for 4 passes; all P<0.001). However, the functional outcomes of patients with ≥5 passes were not significantly more favorable than found among patients without recanalization (OR 1.70 with 95% CI, 0.42-6.90 for 5 passes, P=0.455; OR 0.33 with 0.02-5.70, P=0.445 for ≥6 passes). Conclusions- The likelihood of successful recanalization got sequentially lower as the number of SR passes increased. Five or more passes of the SR became futile in terms of the recanalization rate and functional outcomes.

Endovascular Treatment of Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusion in the Elderly

Endovascular treatment of anterior circulation large vessel occlusion in the elderly population presents special challenges and opportunities. In this review, we discuss the published literature regarding thrombectomy in elderly patients and also discuss specific issues related to treatment in this patient population. In summary, while the overall outcomes following thrombectomy in elderly patients are worse than following thrombectomy in younger patients, there appears to be a similar benefit as in young patients. While there are challenges with successfully delivering thrombectomy in older patients, age alone should not be an independent exclusion from thrombectomy.