A Prospective Study of Chronic Oxaliplatin-Induced Neuropathy in Patients with Colon Cancer: Long-Term Outcomes and Predictors of Severe Oxaliplatin-Induced Neuropathy

The association between sociodemographic, clinical, and potentially preventive therapies with oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy in colorectal cancer patients

PURPOSE

The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to evaluate whether several potentially preventive therapies reduced the rate of oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy (OIPN) in colorectal cancer patients and to assess the relationship of sociodemographic/clinical factors with OIPN diagnosis.

METHODS

Data were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database combined with Medicare claims. Eligible patients were diagnosed with colorectal cancer between 2007 and 2015, ≥ 66 years of age, and treated with oxaliplatin. Two definitions were used to denote diagnosis of OIPN based on diagnosis codes: OIPN 1 (specific definition, drug-induced polyneuropathy) and OIPN 2 (broader definition, additional codes for peripheral neuropathy). Cox regression was used to obtain hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the relative rate of OIPN within 2 years of oxaliplatin initiation.

RESULTS

There were 4792 subjects available for analysis. At 2 years, the unadjusted cumulative incidence of OIPN 1 was 13.1% and 27.1% for OIPN 2. For both outcomes, no therapies reduced the rate of OIPN diagnosis. The anticonvulsants gabapentin and oxcarbazepine/carbamazepine were associated with an increased rate of OIPN (both definitions) as were increasing cycles of oxaliplatin. Compared to younger patients, those 75-84 years of age experienced a 15% decreased rate of OIPN. For OIPN 2, prior peripheral neuropathy and moderate/severe liver disease were also associated with an increased hazard rate. For OIPN 1, state buy-in health insurance coverage was associated with a decreased hazard rate.

CONCLUSION

Additional studies are needed to identify preventive therapeutics for OIPN in cancer patients treated with oxaliplatin.

Self-Reported Assessment of the Socio-Economic Impact of Anticancer Chemotherapy-Related Neurotoxicity

Chemotherapy-induced neurotoxicity is a well-known complication of several very effective systemic anticancer treatments, mainly presenting as cognitive impairment ("chemo-brain") and peripheral neuropathy. The social and economic effects of long-lasting chemotherapy-induced neurotoxicity on patients' lifestyles and their relationships are under-investigated, and their impact is, therefore, largely unknown. In this study, we used a web-based questionnaire to record the self-reported perception of chemotherapy-induced neurotoxicity on cancer patients' health status, but also on several different aspects of their daily life. From the study results, it emerged that the impact of chemotherapy-induced neurotoxicity on personal, social, and working activities is very high. A similar effect was also observed when the psychological impact is assessed. Moreover, there is evidence suggesting that the management of CIPN is suboptimal; this is partially due to a lack of effective drugs, but also of appropriate advice from healthcare providers. In conclusion, this study provides evidence for the relevance of the impact on the explored aspects of the daily life of cancer patients and spotlights the need for a larger and more structured investigation on these long-term side effects of anticancer chemotherapy.

Blood neurofilament light chain as a biomarker for monitoring and predicting paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy in patients with gynecological cancers

Objective

We aimed to evaluate the potential of serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) and serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor (sBDNF) as reliable biomarkers for paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy (PIPN).

Methods

Forty-eight patients with gynecologic cancer scheduled to undergo six cycles of paclitaxel-based chemotherapy at the National Cancer Center of Korea between September 2020 and January 2022 were prospectively assessed during and after chemotherapy.

Results

At the end of the chemotherapy, 12 (25%) patients were classified as having grade 3 PIPN according to the National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria. The sNfL levels increased during paclitaxel treatment in all patients. After two, four, and six cycles, patients with grade 3 PIPN exhibited higher mean sNfL levels than those in the 0-2 grade range (p = 0.004, p = 001, and p < 0.001, respectively). For sNfL levels ≥ 124 pg/mL, after two cycles of chemotherapy, the sensitivity and specificity for predicting grade 3 PIPN at the end of treatment were 80% and 79%, respectively. Over the course of paclitaxel-based treatment, sBDNF levels continued to decrease regardless of the severity of PIPN. At the end of treatment and six months after chemotherapy, patients with grade 3 PIPN had lower sBDNF levels than those within the 0-2 grade range (p =0.037 and 0.02, respectively), and the patients in the latter group had better clinical symptoms six months after the end of treatment.

Conclusions

The sNfL levels during paclitaxel-based chemotherapy reflect ongoing neuroaxonal injury and serve as reliable biomarkers of PIPN severity. The sNfL levels during early treatment with paclitaxel might be prognostic indicators for PIPN progression. Low sBDNF levels 6 months after chemotherapy might adversely affect PIPN recovery.

Systematic review of long-term chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) following adjuvant oxaliplatin for colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is the most common dose-limiting side effect of oxaliplatin. It often persists and can adversely affect quality of life of colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors. This systematic review explored the proportions of patients with persistent CIPN and the reporting methods used.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and CINAHL were searched up to March 2021 for publications reporting CIPN outcomes following adjuvant oxaliplatin-containing chemotherapy at prespecified timepoints in participants with CRC. Secondary outcomes assessed the tools used to measure CIPN. Two authors reviewed full text publications for eligibility, data extraction and appraisal. Meta-analysis was performed where Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (any grade) was reported at the most frequent timepoints.

RESULTS

From 7895 citations identified, 27 studies met the eligibility criteria: six were randomised control trials, and 21 were non-randomised studies. Pooled prevalence of CIPN at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months after chemotherapy were 58%, 45%, 32% and 24% respectively. The average prevalence of CIPN decreased by 26% per year after chemotherapy (pooled RR = 0.74; 95% CI 0.72-0.75). Across all studies, ten separate tools were used as the primary measure of CIPN. Quality appraisal identified open-label design and inadequate reporting of participants lost to follow-up as the main methodological limitations.

CONCLUSION

Our summary of reported rates of persistent CIPN indicates substantial long-term toxicity affecting CRC survivors, and will help clinicians estimate CIPN risk and its change over time. The heterogeneity of CIPN measures identified in the review highlights the need for a standardised CIPN assessment.

Predictive Biomarkers of Oxaliplatin-Induced Peripheral Neurotoxicity

Oxaliplatin (OXA) is a platinum compound primarily used in the treatment of gastrointestinal cancer. OXA-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (OXAIPN) is the major non-hematological dose-limiting toxicity of OXA-based chemotherapy and includes acute transient neurotoxic effects that appear soon after OXA infusion, and chronic non-length dependent sensory neuronopathy symmetrically affecting both upper and lower limbs in a stocking-and-glove distribution. No effective strategy has been established to reverse or treat OXAIPN. Thus, it is necessary to early predict the occurrence of OXAIPN during treatment and possibly modify the OXA-based regimen in patients at high risk as an early diagnosis and intervention may slow down neuropathy progression. However, identifying which patients are more likely to develop OXAIPN is clinically challenging. Several objective and measurable early biomarkers for OXAIPN prediction have been described in recent years, becoming useful for informing clinical decisions about treatment. The purpose of this review is to critically review data on currently available or promising predictors of OXAIPN. Neurological monitoring, according to predictive factors for increased risk of OXAIPN, would allow clinicians to personalize treatment, by monitoring at-risk patients more closely and guide clinicians towards better counseling of patients about neurotoxicity effects of OXA.

Patient-centric decision framework for treatment alterations in patients with Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN)

Recently updated American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) guidelines for Prevention and Management of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN) in Survivors of Adult Cancers make a single recommendation to alter treatment by delaying, decreasing, or discontinuing dosing in patients who develop CIPN during neurotoxic chemotherapy treatment. Dosing guidelines have inconsistent recommendations for when (i.e., what CIPN severity) and how (i.e., delay, decrease, or discontinue) to alter neurotoxic chemotherapy treatment in patients with CIPN. Clinical decision making requires an understanding the benefits and risks of treatment alteration, in addition to consideration of other disease and patient factors. This review summarizes four areas of literature and culminates in a patient-centric decision framework to guide clinicians in helping patients to make treatment alteration decisions. First, we describe the current practice of altering treatment due to CIPN, including treatment alteration recommendations and published rates. Second, we summarize the potential benefits of treatment alteration including the reduction in CIPN severity and persistence. Third, we evaluate the potential risk of treatment alteration in compromising treatment efficacy by reviewing prospective trials comparing dosing regimens and retrospective analyses of the effect of relative dose intensity on efficacy. Fourth, we summarize disease and patient factors that should be considered when making a treatment alteration decision for a patient. We then propose a patient-centric decision framework that clinicians can use to assess an individual patient's current and anticipated future CIPN severity and compare that to their maximum tolerable severity to determine whether they should continue, delay, decrease, or discontinue neurotoxic chemotherapy.

Adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with stage II high-risk and III colon cancer: Hindering factors to adherence and impact on long-term survival

Purpose

Adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended after curative surgery in patients with colon cancer of high-risk stage II and stage III. However, a considerable number of patients cannot complete the scheduled adjuvant treatment for various reasons. This study investigates the hindering factors to the adherence to adjuvant chemotherapy and their impact on long-term survival.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted for patients with colon cancer and had curative resection from 2009 to 2014. Among patients with pathologic stage II and III, stage II with low-risk features, double primary cancers, R2 resection cases were excluded. Patients were grouped into three groups: no-adjuvant therapy, adjuvant therapy for less than 3 months, and more than 3 months. Factors for withdrawal and the oncologic outcome were analyzed.

Results

Of 571 patients, adjuvant chemotherapy was recommended in 403. One hundred and sixteen patients (28.8%) did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy, 78 (19.4%) withdrew within 3 months, and 209 (51.9%) maintained for more than 3 months. Factors for not receiving adjuvant chemotherapy or withdrawing within 3 months were older than 70 and American Society of Anesthesiologists class 3 or higher. Main reasons for discontinuation before 3 months were chemotoxicity and patient's refusal. The long-term oncologic outcome of the patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy for more than 3 months was significantly better than others.

Conclusion

No-adjuvant therapy or receiving them for lesser than 3 months is significantly affected by the patient's performance status and social support, which coincides with a poor oncologic outcome. Social support and rehabilitation system may help to improve the survival outcome.

TRPA1 involved in miR-141-5p-alleviated neuropathic pain induced by oxaliplatin

Oxaliplatin (OXA) is widely used to treat advanced colorectal cancer, but it can induce severe peripheral neuropathy. Accumulating evidence has shown that microRNAs (miRNAs) are closely linked to neuropathic pain induced by sciatic nerve lesion and spinal cord injury. However, the study on the role of miRNAs in OXA-induced neuropathic pain is rare and needs to be further investigated. The study is aiming to investigate the effects of miR-141-5p on OXA-induced neuropathic pain and its underlying mechanisms. The neuropathic pain rat model was built through intraperitoneal injection of OXA. Mechanical withdrawal threshold and tail withdrawal latency were measured. The expressions of miR-141-5p and TRPA1 in dorsal root ganglion were detected by qRT-PCR, western blot, and immunohistochemistry. The results indicated that OXA down-regulated the expression of miR-141-5p. By contrast, OXA significantly up-regulated the expression of TRPA1 mRNA and protein. Besides, intrathecal injection of miR-141-5p mimic attenuated OXA-induced neuropathic pain and reduced the expression of TRPA1, a predicted target of miR-141-5p. Collectively, the results suggest that TRPA1 may mediate miR-141-5p-alleviated neuropathic pain induced by OXA. Our findings provide a potential therapeutic target for OXA-induced neuropathic pain.

Serum neurofilament light chain levels as a biomarker of neuroaxonal injury and severity of oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy

We set out to determine the usability of serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL), serum glial fibrillary acidic protein (sGFAP), and retinal parameters by using optical coherence tomography (OCT) as reliable biomarkers of the progression of oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy (OIPN). Forty-three patients scheduled to undergo oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy at the National Cancer Center of Korea between June 2018 and October 2019 were prospectively assessed at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months of chemotherapy. Patients were assessed on clinical scales and underwent OCT, sNfL, and sGFAP level measurement at each follow-up visit. By applying the National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC), OIPN was classified as grade 1 in 12 (28%) patients, grade 2 in 25 (58%), and grade 3 in 5 (12%) at 6 months of chemotherapy. sNfL levels increased during oxaliplatin administration, while serial sGFAP levels or retinal parameters did not change. Patients with grade-3 OIPN showed significantly higher mean sNfL levels than patients with grade 0-2 OIPN at 6 months of treatment. At 4-6 months after completion of chemotherapy, sNfL levels were significantly reduced compared to the levels at 6 months of chemotherapy. Monitoring of sNfL during chemotherapy can indicate ongoing neuroaxonal injury and the severity of OIPN.

Is TRPA1 Burning Down TRPV1 as Druggable Target for the Treatment of Chronic Pain?

Over the last decades, a great array of molecular mediators have been identified as potential targets for the treatment of chronic pain. Among these mediators, transient receptor potential (TRP) channel superfamily members have been thoroughly studied. Namely, the nonselective cationic channel, transient receptor potential ankyrin subtype 1 (TRPA1), has been described as a chemical nocisensor involved in noxious cold and mechanical sensation and as rivalling TRPV1, which traditionally has been considered as the most important TRP channel involved in nociceptive transduction. However, few TRPA1-related drugs have succeeded in clinical trials. In the present review, we attempt to discuss the latest data on the topic and future directions for pharmacological intervention.