Efficacy of a Second Brain Biopsy for Intracranial Lesions after Initial Negativity

Comparison meta-analysis of intraoperative MRI-guided needle biopsy versus conventional stereotactic needle biopsies

Background

MRI-guided needle biopsy (INB) is an emerging alternative to conventional frame-based or frameless stereotactic needle biopsy (SNB). Studies of INB have been limited to select case series, and comparative studies between INB and SNB remain a missing gap in the literature. We performed a meta-analysis to compare INB and SNB literature in terms of diagnostic yield, surgical morbidity and mortality, tumor size, and procedural time.

Methods

We identified 36 separate cohorts in 26 studies of SNB (including both frameless and frame-based biopsies, 3374 patients) and 27 studies of INB (977 patients). Meta-regression and meta-analysis by proportions were performed.

Results

Relative to publications that studied SNB, publications studying INB more likely involved brain tumors located in the eloquent cerebrum (79.4% versus 62.6%, P = 0.004) or are smaller in maximal diameter (2.7 cm in INB group versus 3.6 cm in the SNB group, P = .032). Despite these differences, the pooled estimate of diagnostic yield for INB was higher than SNB (95.4% versus 92.3%, P = .026). The pooled estimate of surgical morbidity was higher in the SNB group (12.0%) relative to the INB group (6.1%) (P = .004). Mortality after the procedure was comparable between INB and SNB (1.7% versus 2.3%, P = .288). Procedural time was statistically comparable at 90.3 min (INB) and 103.7 min (SNB), respectively (P = .526).

Conclusions

Our meta-analysis indicates that, relative to SNB, INB is more often performed for the challenging, smaller-sized brain tumors located in the eloquent cerebrum. INB is associated with lower surgical morbidity and improved diagnostic yield.

The ghost tumour revisited. Corticosteroids in primary central nervous system lymphoma: diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic implications

OBJECTIVE

The cytolytic effect of corticosteroids on primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) has established the clinical dogma of avoiding steroid therapy prior to surgery for diagnostic purposes. However, since steroids are very useful during the initial management of intracranial lesions with vasogenic oedema, it was our aim to determine whether they cause a drawback in the diagnosis and prognosis of PCNSL.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with PCNSL between 2000 and 2020 in our tertiary neurosurgical centre. Data on steroid administration, surgery type and complications, haematopathological findings and prognostic factors were compiled. A second cohort was used as a control group to compare the ratio of non-diagnostic biopsies; this series comprised patients who underwent stereotactic brain biopsy for any reason between 2019 and 2020.

RESULTS

Forty patients with PCNSL were included in the study, of which 28 (70%) had received steroids before surgery. The use of steroids was more prevalent in patients with poorer performance status at diagnosis. No relevant differences were found in the diagnostic accuracy regardless of steroid exposure (93% under steroids vs 100% without steroids) or type of surgery performed. Furthermore, steroid withdrawal did not seem to augment the diagnostic ratio. The notable diagnostic delay was not influenced by the use of steroids.

CONCLUSIONS

Novel imaging and surgical techniques might obviate the need to withhold corticosteroids from patients suffering from PCNSL prior to biopsy. Moreover, when steroids have been given, tapering them and delaying the surgery might not be justified. This could hold relevant therapeutic implications in the early clinical stages.

Advances, technological innovations, and future prospects in stereotactic brain biopsies

Stereotactic brain biopsy is one of the most frequently performed brain surgeries. This review aimed to expose the latest cutting-edge and updated technologies and innovations available to neurosurgeons to safely perform stereotactic brain biopsy by minimizing the risks of complications and ensuring that the procedure is successful, leading to a histological diagnosis. We also examined methods for improving preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative workflows. We performed a comprehensive state-of-the-art literature review. Intraoperative histology, fluorescence, and imaging techniques appear as smart tools to improve the diagnostic yield of biopsy. Constant innovations such as optical methods and augmented reality are also being made to increase patient safety. Robotics and integrated imaging techniques provide an enhanced intraoperative workflow. Patients' management algorithms based on early discharge after biopsy optimize the patient's personal experience and make the most efficient possible use of the available hospital resources. Many new trends are emerging, constantly improving patient care and safety, as well as surgical workflow. A parameter that must be considered is the cost-effectiveness of these devices and the possibility of using them on a daily basis. The decision to implement a new instrument in the surgical workflow should also be dependent on the number of procedures per year, the existing stereotactic equipment, and the experience of each center. Research on patients' postbiopsy management is another mandatory approach to enhance the safety profile of stereotactic brain biopsy and patient satisfaction, as well as to reduce healthcare costs.

Roles and outcomes of stereotactic biopsy for adult patients with brainstem lesion

PURPOSE

This study aimed to assess the benefit-risk ratio by determining diagnostic yield and safety of brainstem biopsies in adult patients. The secondary objectives were (i) to compare brainstem biopsy safety and postbiopsy patients' outcomes and survival with those of patients biopsied for a brain or cerebellar lesion, and (ii) to assess the impact of brainstem biopsy on final diagnosis and further therapeutic management.

METHODS

Among 1784 stereotactic biopsies performed in adult patients at a tertiary center between April 2009 and October 2020, we retrospectively examined 50 consecutive brainstem biopsies. We compared variables regarding diagnostic yield, safety and post-biopsy outcomes between brainstem biopsy patients and brain/cerebellum biopsy patients.

RESULTS

Brainstem biopsy led to a diagnosis in 86% of patients (94.6% in patients with suspected tumor). Lesion contrast enhancement on imaging was the sole predictor of obtaining a diagnosis. Rates of symptomatic complications and mortality were significantly higher in brainstem biopsy patients compared to brain/cerebellum biopsy patients (20% vs 0%; p < 0.001 and 6% vs 0%; p = 0.01, respectively). Transfrontal trajectory and prebiopsy swallowing disorders were predictors of brainstem biopsy-related symptomatic complications. Brainstem biopsy findings led to diagnostic change in 22% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Stereotactic biopsy in adult patients with brainstem lesion has a high diagnostic yield. Although stereotactic brainstem biopsy is associated with more functional and fatal complications than biopsies targeting the brain/cerebellum, its safety profile appears acceptable. Thus, the benefit-risk ratio of stereotactic biopsy in patients with brainstem lesion is favorable but should nevertheless be carefully weighted on a case-by-case basis.

Accuracy and safety of 101 consecutives neurosurgical procedures for newly diagnosed central nervous system lymphomas: a single-institution experience

INTRODUCTION

Brain surgery is required to ascertain the diagnosis of central nervous system lymphoma. We assessed the diagnostic yield and safety of the surgical procedures, the predictors of postoperative morbidity, and of overall survival.

METHODS

Observational single-institution retrospective cohort study (1992-2020) of 101 consecutive adult patients who underwent stereotactic biopsy, open biopsy, or resection for a newly diagnosed central nervous system lymphoma.

RESULTS

The diagnostic yield was 100% despite preoperative steroid administration in 48/101 cases (47.5%). A preoperative Karnofsky Performance Status score less than 70 (p = 0.006) was an independent predictor of a new postoperative focal neurological deficit (7/101 cases, 6.9%). A previous history of hematological malignancy (p = 0.049), age 65 years or more (p = 0.031), and new postoperative neurological deficit (p < 0.001) were independent predictors of a Karnofsky Performance Status score decrease 20 points or more postoperatively (13/101 cases, 12.9%). A previous history of hematological malignancy (p = 0.034), and preoperative Karnofsky Performance Status score less than 70 (p = 0.024) were independent predictors of postoperative hemorrhage (13/101 cases, 12.9%). A preoperative Karnofsky Performance Status score less than 70 (p = 0.019), and a previous history of hematological malignancy (p = 0.014) were independent predictors of death during hospital stay (8/101 cases, 7.9%). In the 82 immunocompetent patients harboring a primary central nervous system lymphoma, age 65 years or more (p = 0.044), and time to hematological treatment more than 21 days (p = 0.008), were independent predictors of a shorter overall survival. A dedicated hematological treatment (p < 0.001) was an independent predictor of a longer overall survival.

CONCLUSION

Brain biopsy is feasible with low morbidity for central nervous system lymphomas. Postoperatively, patients should be promptly referred for hematological treatment initiation.

Brain Biopsy for Neurological Diseases of Unknown Etiology in Critically Ill Patients: Feasibility, Safety, and Diagnostic Yield

OBJECTIVES

Brain biopsy is a useful surgical procedure in the management of patients with suspected neoplastic lesions. Its role in neurologic diseases of unknown etiology remains controversial, especially in ICU patients. This study was undertaken to determine the feasibility, safety, and the diagnostic yield of brain biopsy in critically ill patients with neurologic diseases of unknown etiology. We also aimed to compare these endpoints to those of non-ICU patients who underwent a brain biopsy in the same clinical context.

DESIGN

Monocenter, retrospective, observational cohort study.

SETTING

A French tertiary center.

PATIENTS

All adult patients with neurologic diseases of unknown etiology under mechanical ventilation undergoing in-ICU brain biopsy between January 2008 and October 2020 were compared with a cohort of non-ICU patients.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Among the 2,207 brain-biopsied patients during the study period, 234 biopsies were performed for neurologic diseases of unknown etiology, including 29 who were mechanically ventilated and 205 who were not ICU patients. Specific histological diagnosis and final diagnosis rates were 62.1% and 75.9%, respectively, leading to therapeutic management modification in 62.1% of cases. Meningitis on prebiopsy cerebrospinal fluid analysis was the sole predictor of obtaining a final diagnosis (2.3 [1.4-3.8]; p = 0.02). ICU patients who experienced therapeutic management modification after the biopsy had longer survival (p = 0.03). The grade 1 to 4 (mild to severe) complication rates were: 24.1%, 3.5%, 0%, and 6.9%, respectively. Biopsy-related mortality was significantly higher in ICU patients compared with non-ICU patients (6.9% vs 0%; p = 0.02). Hematological malignancy was associated with biopsy-related mortality (1.5 [1.01-2.6]; p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Brain biopsy in critically ill patients with neurologic disease of unknown etiology is associated with high diagnostic yield, therapeutic modifications and postbiopsy survival advantage. Safety profile seems acceptable in most patients. The benefit/risk ratio of brain biopsy in this population should be carefully weighted.

Autoimmune Meningitis and Encephalitis

Meningitis and encephalitis are inflammatory syndromes of the meninges and brain parenchyma, respectively, and may be identified either by finding definitive evidence of inflammation on tissue pathology or by cerebrocpinal fluid (CSF) analysis showing pleocytosis or intrathecal antibody synthesis. Clinicians evaluating undifferentiated meningitis or encephalitis should simultaneously consider autoimmune, infectious, and neoplastic causes, using patient risk factors, clinical syndrome, and diagnostic results including CSF and MRI findings to narrow the differential diagnosis. If an autoimmune cause is favored, an important early diagnostic question is whether a specific neural autoantibody is likely to be identified.

Severity, timeline, and management of complications after stereotactic brain biopsy

OBJECTIVE

The literature shows discrepancies in stereotactic brain biopsy complication rates, severities, and outcomes. Little is known about the timeline of postbiopsy complications. This study aimed to analyze 1) complications following brain biopsies, using a graded severity scale, and 2) a timeline of complication occurrence. The secondary objectives were to determine factors associated with an increased risk of complications and to assess complication-related management and extra costs.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively examined 1500 consecutive stereotactic brain biopsies performed in adult patients at their tertiary medical center between April 2009 and April 2019.

RESULTS

Three hundred eighty-one biopsies (25.4%) were followed by a complication, including 88.2% of asymptomatic hemorrhages. Symptomatic complications involved 3.0% of the biopsies, and 0.8% of the biopsies were fatal. The severity grading scale had a 97.6% interobserver reproducibility. Twenty-three (51.1%) of the 45 symptomatic complications occurred within the 1st hour following the biopsy, while 75.6% occurred within the first 6 hours. Age ≥ 65 years, second biopsy procedures, gadolinium-enhanced lesions, glioblastomas, and lymphomas were predictors of biopsy-related complications. Brainstem biopsy-targeted lesions and cerebral toxoplasmosis were predictive of mortality. Asymptomatic hemorrhage was associated with delayed (> 6 hours) symptomatic complications. Symptomatic complications led to extended hospitalization in 86.7% of patients. The average extra cost for management of a patient with postbiopsy symptomatic complication was $35,702.

CONCLUSIONS

Symptomatic complications from brain biopsies are infrequent but associated with substantial adverse effects and cost implications for the healthcare system. The use of a severity grading scale, as the authors propose in this article, helps to classify complications according to the therapeutic consequences and the patient's outcome. Because this study indicates that most complications occur within the first few hours following the biopsy, postbiopsy monitoring can be tailored accordingly. The authors therefore recommend systematic monitoring for 2 hours in the recovery unit and a CT scan 2 hours after the end of the biopsy procedure. In addition, they propose a modern algorithm for optimal postoperative management of patients undergoing stereotactic biopsy.