Bayesian Interpretation of Essential Tremor Plus

The Spectrum of Non-Parkinsonian Tremor: A Registry at a Tertiary Care Teaching Institute

Background

Tremors other than those associated with Parkinson's disease (non-parkinsonian tremor) are commonly observed in clinical settings. However, their frequency and clinical characteristics have rarely been reported.

Objectives

To classify non-parkinsonian tremors based on the consensus statement on the classification of tremors, from the task force of the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society published in 2018.

Methods

A prospective registry at a tertiary care teaching institute.

Results

A total of 475 patients with non-parkinsonian tremors were recruited for the study. 67.57% (n = 321) of our patients were male and a family history of tremor was present in 20.84% (n = 99) of patients. Dystonic tremor (DT) was the most common non-parkinsonian tremor (33.26%). 27.78% of patients fulfilled the new classification criteria for essential tremor, with 13.47% classified as pure ET (ET) and 14.31% exhibiting neurological soft signs, leading to the classification of ET plus (ETP). Patients with ETP had more family history (57.35%) [vs DT (26.48%, p = 0.00004) and ET (10.93%, p = 0.00003], longer duration of disease [mean ± standard deviation (SD) = 9.53 ± 8.64 years] [vs DT (5.60 ± 5.93, p = 0.0003) and ET (6.38 ± 5.97, p = 0.01) years], and more severe tremor as measured by the essential tremor rating assessment scale total score [mean ± SD = 27.42 ± 11.70] [vs DT (23.50 ± 8.62, p = 0.007) and ET (22.12 ± 8.19, p = 0.007)] compared with patients with DT and ET.

Conclusions

DT was the most common cause of non-parkinsonian tremor in our registry followed by essential tremor syndrome. ETP was more common than ET.

Deep brain stimulation for essential tremor versus essential tremor plus: should we target the same spot in the thalamus?

Background

Although ET is a phenomenologically heterogeneous condition, thalamic DBS appears to be equally effective across subtypes. We hypothesized stimulation sites optimized for individuals with essential tremor (ET) would differ from individuals with essential tremor plus syndrome (ET-plus). We examined group differences in optimal stimulation sites within the ventral thalamus and their overlap of with relevant white matter tracts. By capturing these differences, we sought to determine whether ET subtypes are associated with anatomically distinct neural pathways.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was conducted on ET patients undergoing VIM DBS at MUSC between 01/2012 and 02/2022. Clinical, demographic, neuroimaging, and DBS stimulation parameter data were collected. Clinical characteristics and pre-DBS videos were reviewed to classify ET and ET-plus cohorts. Patients in ET-plus cohorts were further divided into ET with dystonia, ET with ataxia, and ET with others. DBS leads were reconstructed using Lead-DBS and the volume of tissue activated (VTA) overlap was performed using normative connectomes. Tremor improvement was measured by reduction in a subscore of tremor rating scale (TRS) post-DBS lateralized to the more affected limb.

Results

Sixty-eight ET patients were enrolled after initial screening, of these 10 ET and 24 ET-plus patients were included in the final analyses. ET group had an earlier age at onset (p = 0.185) and underwent surgery at a younger age (p = 0.096). Both groups achieved effective tremor control. No significant differences were found in lead placement or VTA overlap within ventral thalamus. The VTA center of gravity (COG) in the ET-plus cohort was located dorsal to that of the ET cohort. No significant differences were found in VTA overlap with the dentato-rubral-thalamic (DRTT) tracts or the ansa lenticularis. Dystonia was more prevalent than ataxia in the ET-plus subgroups (n = 18 and n = 5, respectively). ET-plus with dystonia subgroup had a more medial COG compared to ET-plus with ataxia.

Conclusion

VIM DBS therapy is efficacious in patients with ET and ET-plus. There were no significant differences in optimal stimulation site or VTA overlap with white-matter tracts between ET, ET-plus and ET-plus subgroups.

Essential and dystonic head tremor: More similarities than differences

INTRODUCTION

Head tremor is a common symptom of essential tremor (ET) and cervical dystonia (CD). In clinical practice, it is often difficult to distinguish between these two conditions, especially in cases where head tremor predominates.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate which clinical and instrumental methods best differentiate ET and CD in patients with head tremor.

METHODS

65 patients were included, of which 23 were diagnosed with ET and head tremor (HT+), 21 with ET without head tremor (HT-) and 21 with CD and dystonic head tremor. 22 healthy volunteers served as controls. All patients were examined using the rating scales for ET (TETRAS), cervical dystonia (TWSTRS), and ataxia (SARA). The Somatosensory Temporal Discrimination Threshold (STDT) was defined as the shortest interval in which an individual recognizes two tactile stimuli as temporally separated.

RESULTS

TETRAS and SARA scores were higher in the HT+ group compared with HT- and CD, with no significant difference between mild head tremor subscores in HT+ and CD. In most HT+ and CD patients, head tremor disappeared supine. The STDT values were significantly higher in the HT+ group compared with controls.

CONCLUSION

While TWSTRS contributed to assess dystonia severity, the scales of tremor and ataxia were not helpful in differentiating head tremor syndromes. The cessation of head tremor in the supine position could be related to the overall mild head tremor scores in both groups. Increased SARA scores and STDT values in HT+ patients suggest a possible role of cerebellar involvement and altered somatosensory timing that merit further verification.

Age and Sex Affect Essential Tremor (ET) Plus: Clinical Heterogeneity in ET Based on the National Survey in China

The new term essential tremor (ET) plus was proposed in the 2018 tremor consensus criteria. The National Survey of Essential Tremor Plus in China, a large multicenter registry study, aimed to evaluate the clinical features of pure ET and ET plus and explore possible factors related to ET plus. All patients with ET underwent neurological examination and neuropsychological assessment at 17 clinical sites. The diagnosis was made according to the 2018 consensus criteria. Clinicodemographic characteristics were analyzed. A total of 1160 patients were included, including 546 patients with pure ET and 614 patients with ET plus. The proportion of females was significantly higher in the ET plus than that in the pure ET (P = 0.001). The age at onset (AAO) of pure ET showed a bimodal distribution, with peaks in the 2nd and 5th decades. However, the AAO of the ET plus group demonstrated a skewed distribution, with a single peak in the 6th decade. Female sex (OR=1.645, P<0.001), older age (OR=1.023, P<0.001), lower educational level (OR=0.934, P<0.001), head tremor (OR=1.457, P<0.001), and higher the Tremor Research Group Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale (TETRAS)-II scores (OR=1.134, P<0.001) were significantly associated with ET plus. Old age and female sex may contribute to ET plus development. Pure ET showed a bimodal distribution for AAO, whereas ET plus showed a unimodal distribution. It remains unclear whether pure ET and ET plus are merely different stages of a single disease or represent distinct disease entities.

New horizons in late-onset essential tremor: a pre-cognitive biomarker of dementia?

Essential tremor (ET) is the most common cause of tremor in older adults. However, it is increasingly recognised that 30–50% of ET cases are misdiagnosed. Late-onset ET, when tremor begins after the age of 60, is particularly likely to be misdiagnosed and there is mounting evidence that it may be a distinct clinical entity, perhaps better termed ‘ageing-related tremor’. Compared with older adults with early-onset ET, late-onset ET is associated with weak grip strength, cognitive decline, dementia and mortality. This raises questions around whether late-onset ET is a pre-cognitive biomarker of dementia and whether modification of dementia risk factors may be particularly important in this group. On the other hand, it is possible that the clinical manifestations of late-onset ET simply reflect markers of healthy ageing, or frailty, superimposed on typical ET. These issues are important to clarify, especially in the era of specialist neurosurgical treatments for ET being increasingly offered to older adults, and these may not be suitable in people at high risk of cognitive decline. There is a pressing need for clinicians to understand late-onset ET, but this is challenging when there are so few publications specifically focussed on this subject and no specific features to guide prognosis. More rigorous clinical follow-up and precise phenotyping of the clinical manifestations of late-onset ET using accessible computer technologies may help us delineate whether late-onset ET is a separate clinical entity and aid prognostication.