1
|
Kanamori Y, Takahashi R, Nikaido T, Nitta H, Shimada Y, Tagami J, Kunzelmann KH. Influence of resin-coating techniques on the marginal adaptation and the bond strengths of CAD/CAM-fabricated hybrid ceramic inlays. Dent Mater J 2024; 43:407-414. [PMID: 38644215 DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2023-182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/23/2024]
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the effects of different resin-coating technique strategies and dual-cure resin luting materials on proximal marginal adaptation and the microtensile bond strengths (μTBSs) of CAD/CAM hybrid ceramic inlays. Extracted human molars were classified into four groups, depending on the coating technique: No coating (None), single coating (1-coating), double coating (2-coating), and flowable resin-coating (Combination). The inlays were bonded with one of the three materials: Panavia V5 (V5), Rely X Ultimate (RXU), and Calibra Ceram (CC). The differences with regard to adaptation were not significant. In the case of μTBS data for V5, no significant differences were observed, whereas for RXU, μTBS values for Combination statistically exceeded those for None and 1-coating. For CC, μTBS values for Combination statistically exceeded those for None, 1-coating, and 2-coating. The coating techniques did not influence the adaptation but influenced the bond strength, and Combination performed the best.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuna Kanamori
- Institute of Global Affairs, Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU)
| | - Rena Takahashi
- Department of Cariology and Operative Dentistry, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, TMDU
| | - Toru Nikaido
- Department of Operative Dentistry, Division of Oral Functional Science and Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, Asahi University
| | - Hiroshi Nitta
- Department of General Dentistry, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, TMDU
| | - Yasushi Shimada
- Department of Cariology and Operative Dentistry, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, TMDU
| | - Junji Tagami
- Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University
| | - Karl-Heinz Kunzelmann
- Department of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ismail HS, Azees PAA, Wang H, Ali AI, Mehesen RE, Mahmoud SH, Chen XD, Yeh CK, Garcia-Godoy F. Periodontopathic bacterial adhesion to different restorative materials used to elevate proximal subgingival margins. Eur J Oral Sci 2023; 131:e12909. [PMID: 36526586 DOI: 10.1111/eos.12909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2022] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
This study compared the periodontopathic bacterial adhesion to four restorative materials used for deep margin elevation at 2, 24, and 48-h after incubation. Discs were produced from four restorative materials: resin modified glass ionomer, glass hybrid, flowable bulk fill resin composite, and bioactive ionic resin. Root dentin was used as control. Specimens were coated with saliva and used to culture a biofilm comprised of three strains of periodontopathic bacteria; Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia, and Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans. Bacterial adherence was assessed by colony count assay, crystal violet staining, and visualized using confocal laser scanning microscopy. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc tests. The adhesion values for the control specimens were significantly higher than for other materials, while those for the flowable bulk fill were significantly lower than for any other material within all evaluation assays. The 2-h incubation period showed the lowest adhesion values regardless of the group. The 48-h adhesion values were higher than the 24-h results in all groups except the flowable bulk fill. Microscopic imaging partially supported the findings of the measurements. In terms of periodontopathic bacterial adhesion, the tested flowable bulk fill may be preferable for subgingival use over other tested materials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hoda S Ismail
- Operative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.,Department of Bioscience Research, College of Dentistry, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Parveez Ahamed Abdul Azees
- Department of Comprehensive Dentistry, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Hanzhou Wang
- Department of Comprehensive Dentistry, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Ashraf I Ali
- Operative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Rabab El Mehesen
- Operative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Salah H Mahmoud
- Operative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.,Conservative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Horus University, New-Damietta, Damietta, Egypt
| | - Xiao-Dong Chen
- Department of Comprehensive Dentistry, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA.,Research Service, South Texas Veterans Health Care System, Audie Murphy VA Medical Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Chih-Ko Yeh
- Department of Comprehensive Dentistry, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA.,Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center Audie L. Murphy Division South Texas Veterans Health care system, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Franklin Garcia-Godoy
- Department of Bioscience Research, College of Dentistry, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.,The Forsyth Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|