GuttaCore Pink, Thermafil and Warm Vertically compacted gutta-percha retreatment: Time required and quantitative evaluation by using ProTaper files

Removal of Thermafil obturators using two different techniques: A comparative Ex Vivo study

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this ex vivo study was to compare two techniques for removal of Thermafil obturators from curved root canals in mandibular molars.

METHODS

Sixty mesial root canals in extracted mandibular molars were distributed into matched pairs according to degree and radius of curvature and were prepared to size 35/.04 and obturated with Thermafil obturators size 35. Each tooth was embedded in resin, mounted in a mannequin head and isolated with rubber dam to simulate clinical conditions. Removal of obturators was undertaken under a dental operating microscope by an experienced endodontist using either the FragRemover loop device, or reciprocating NiTi instruments. Pre- and postoperative micro-CT scans were taken to compare the amount of remaining filling material and of removed dentin. Eventual problems during removal attempts were recorded.

RESULTS

Using Reciproc 24 carriers (80%) were removed, 16 in one piece, 8 in small pieces, in 6 cases removal failed. The FragRemover removed 12 carriers (40%), all of these completely, but in 18 cases removal failed (P < 0.05). Reciproc left less remaining filling material than the FragRemover (P < 0.05) but removed significantly more dentin in the apical part of the root canal (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference concerning the total amount of removed dentin (P > 0.05) between both groups. Seven complications occurred in the Reciproc group. In five teeth working length could not be reached, in two teeth a Reciproc file R25 fractured. With the FragRemover 64 complications occurred, in 36 cases, including second removal attempts, the loop slipped over the carrier, in 24 cases the top of the carrier was sheared off. In nine cases separation of the core occurred too far apically, not allowing further use of the FragRemover. In four cases the wire loop tore.

CONCLUSIONS

Reciproc was more effective in removal of Thermafil carriers, whereas using the FragRemover less dentin was removed in the apical part of the root canal and more obturation material was left.

Critical analysis of research methods and experimental models to study removal of root filling materials

Despite enjoying high favourable outcome rates, root canal treatment is not always successful. Root canal retreatment is a widely practised option for managing a non-healing root treated tooth. A basic distinction between retreatment and initial treatment is the requirement to remove the existing root filling material occupying the root canal space. Only then, can the technical deficiencies and possible causes of failure be addressed. Hence, the successful removal of the root filling material is critical to achieving the objectives of retreatment. Many different materials and techniques have been used for root canal filling, which have been documented in a plethora of studies; these are mainly laboratory studies investigating the removal of root filling materials. To help guide future research, which may then better inform clinical practice in relation to retreatment procedures, the focus of this narrative review is on the research methods and experimental models employed to study the removal of root filling materials. The current available literature demonstrates great variation in the research methodologies used to study the removal of root filling material, including direct visualization by splitting tooth samples or clearing, three-dimensional radiographic imaging including using microcomputed tomography or cone-beam computed tomography, and a combination of these techniques. Depending on the research method employed, variation also exists in quantification of root filling material removal; these include measurements of surface area, volume or weight, and criteria-based (semi-quantitative) assessment. Experimental models, using human teeth or resin models, differ with respect to standardization techniques and replication of the clinical scenario including initial sample preparation, canal filling, allocation and technical aspects of retreatment procedures. Future models should replicate, as closely as possible, the clinical scenario. Currently, microcomputed tomography provides a highly detailed, non-invasive and non-destructive method of objectively assessing and quantifying root filling removal.

Dentinal tubule penetration of gutta-percha with syringe-mix resin sealer using different obturation techniques: A confocal laser scanning microscopy study

This study aimed to evaluate dentinal tubule penetration of the root canal filling material using various techniques such as cold lateral compaction, new generation thermoplastic core carrier and continuous-wave obturation. The root canals of premolar teeth were instrumented, and the teeth were allocated randomly to three groups (n = 15/group). After the obturation with three different techniques, three sections of 2-mm thickness at 2, 5 and 8-mm from the apex were examined under a confocal laser scanning microscope. The data were analysed of variance with a significance level of P < 0.05. There was no significant difference between techniques when parameters were evaluated in total (penetration depth P = 0.418, penetration area P = 0.701). The mean value of the cold lateral compaction group for maximum penetration depth was obtained higher than continuous wave (P = 0.004), whilst there was no significant difference between the thermoplastic core carrier and the other groups.

Retreatment in endodontics with plastic core obturators. A new technique

The aim of this study was to present a new technique for plastic carrier removal in retreatment situations. The gutta-percha technique that uses plastic carrier obturators is one of the most commonly used; however, removing this core is tedious and time-consuming. Two clinical cases were performed by an expert in the field of endodontics, to expose this technique, in which a conical ultrasonic tip with an active point and a Hëdstrom hand file allowed the removal of the plastic carrier quickly and effectively. The use of magnification is indispensable for a predictable success with this method.

Efficacy of Removing Thermafil and GuttaCore from Straight Root Canal Systems Using a Novel Non-Surgical Root Canal Re-Treatment System: A Micro-Computed Tomography Analysis

The present study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of an XP-endo non-surgical root canal re-treatment system in removing both GuttaCore and Thermafil gutta-percha carrier-based root canal filling materials from straight root canal systems using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) analysis. The study was performed on 20 single-rooted upper teeth, which were randomly allocated into the following study groups: Group A, Thermafil and AH Plus sealer (n = 10); Group B, GuttaCore and AH Plus sealer (n = 10). Before and after the non-surgical root canal re-treatment procedure, the samples were submitted for a micro-CT analysis. The volume of the root canal filling material (mm³), the volume of the remaining root canal filling material (mm³) and the time (minutes) needed to remove the root canal filling material were also recorded. Student's t-test was used to analyze the results. No statistically significant differences were found between the volume of the remaining root canal filling material in the GuttaCore and Thermafil root canal filling systems at the coronal third (p = 0.782), middle third (p = 0.838) or apical third (p = 0.882) of the straight root canal systems; however, the GuttaCore required a statistically significant (p = 0.037) shorter amount of time (4.72 ± 0.76 min) to be removed than the Thermafil carrier-based root canal filling material (5.92 ± 1.42 min). The XP-endo Finisher non-surgical endodontic re-treatment system removes both GuttaCore and Thermafil gutta-percha carrier-based root canal filling materials from straight root canal systems, although removal of the GuttaCore gutta-percha carrier-based root canal filling material required less time.