Quality analysis of a breast thermal images database

The study and early detection of breast cancer are key for its treatment. We carry out an exhaustive analysis of the most used database for mastology research with infrared images, analyzing the anomalies according to five quality dimensions: completeness, correctness, concordance, plausibility, and currency. We established control queries that looked for these anomalies and that can be used to ensure the quality of the database. Finally, we briefly review the more than 40 papers that use this database and that do not mention any of these anomalies. When analyzing the database, we found 365 anomalies related to personal and clinical data, and thermal images. The errors found in our research may lead to a modification of the results and conclusions made in the articles found in the literature, serve as a basis for improvements in the quality of the database, and help future researchers to work with it.

BREAST CANCER DETECTION USING RSFS-BASED FEATURE SELECTION ALGORITHMS IN THERMAL IMAGES

Breast cancer is a common cancer in female. Accurate and early detection of breast cancer can play a vital role in treatment. This paper presents and evaluates a thermogram based Computer-Aided Detection (CAD) system for the detection of breast cancer. In this CAD system, the Random Subset Feature Selection (RSFS) algorithm and hybrid of minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance (mRMR) algorithm and Genetic Algorithm (GA) with RSFS algorithm are utilized for feature selection. In addition, the Support Vector Machine (SVM) and k-Nearest Neighbors (kNN) algorithms are utilized as classifier algorithm. The proposed CAD system is verified using MATLAB 2017 and a dataset that is composed of breast images from 78 patients. The implementation results demonstrate that using RSFS algorithm for feature selection and kNN and SVM algorithms as classifier have accuracy of 85.36% and 75%, and sensitivity of 94.11% and 79.31%, respectively. In addition, using hybrid GA and RSFS algorithm for feature selection and kNN and SVM algorithms as classifier have accuracy of 83.87% and 69.56%, and sensitivity of 96% and 81.81%, respectively, and using hybrid mRMR and RSFS algorithms for feature selection and kNN and SVM algorithms as classifier have accuracy of 77.41% and 73.07%, and sensitivity of 98% and 72.72%, respectively.