TISSUE CLASSIFICATION FOR COLORECTAL CANCER UTILIZING TECHNIQUES OF DEEP LEARNING AND MACHINE LEARNING

Since the introduction of image pattern recognition and computer vision processing, the classification of cancer tissues has been a challenge at pixel-level, slide-level, and patient-level. Conventional machine learning techniques have given way to Deep Learning (DL), a contemporary, state-of-the-art approach to texture classification and localization of cancer tissues. Colorectal Cancer (CRC) is the third ranked cause of death from cancer worldwide. This paper proposes image-level texture classification of a CRC dataset by deep convolutional neural networks (CNN). Simple DL techniques consisting of transfer learning and fine-tuning were exploited. VGG-16, a Keras pre-trained model with initial weights by ImageNet, was applied. The transfer learning architecture and methods responding to VGG-16 are proposed. The training, validation, and testing sets included 5000 images of 150 × 150 pixels. The application set for detection and localization contained 10 large original images of 5000 × 5000 pixels. The model achieved F1-score and accuracy of 0.96 and 0.99, respectively, and produced a false positive rate of 0.01. AUC-based evaluation was also measured. The model classified ten large previously unseen images from the application set represented in false color maps. The reported results show the satisfactory performance of the model. The simplicity of the architecture, configuration, and implementation also contributes to the outcome this work.

Cancer Classification with a Cost-Sensitive Naive Bayes Stacking Ensemble

Ensemble learning combines multiple learners to perform combinatorial learning, which has advantages of good flexibility and higher generalization performance. To achieve higher quality cancer classification, in this study, the fast correlation-based feature selection (FCBF) method was used to preprocess the data to eliminate irrelevant and redundant features. Then, the classification was carried out in the stacking ensemble learner. A library for support vector machine (LIBSVM), K-nearest neighbor (KNN), decision tree C4.5 (C4.5), and random forest (RF) were used as the primary learners of the stacking ensemble. Given the imbalanced characteristics of cancer gene expression data, the embedding cost-sensitive naive Bayes was used as the metalearner of the stacking ensemble, which was represented as CSNB stacking. The proposed CSNB stacking method was applied to nine cancer datasets to further verify the classification performance of the model. Compared with other classification methods, such as single classifier algorithms and ensemble algorithms, the experimental results showed the effectiveness and robustness of the proposed method in processing different types of cancer data. This method may therefore help guide cancer diagnosis and research.

BREAST CANCER DETECTION USING RSFS-BASED FEATURE SELECTION ALGORITHMS IN THERMAL IMAGES

Breast cancer is a common cancer in female. Accurate and early detection of breast cancer can play a vital role in treatment. This paper presents and evaluates a thermogram based Computer-Aided Detection (CAD) system for the detection of breast cancer. In this CAD system, the Random Subset Feature Selection (RSFS) algorithm and hybrid of minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance (mRMR) algorithm and Genetic Algorithm (GA) with RSFS algorithm are utilized for feature selection. In addition, the Support Vector Machine (SVM) and k-Nearest Neighbors (kNN) algorithms are utilized as classifier algorithm. The proposed CAD system is verified using MATLAB 2017 and a dataset that is composed of breast images from 78 patients. The implementation results demonstrate that using RSFS algorithm for feature selection and kNN and SVM algorithms as classifier have accuracy of 85.36% and 75%, and sensitivity of 94.11% and 79.31%, respectively. In addition, using hybrid GA and RSFS algorithm for feature selection and kNN and SVM algorithms as classifier have accuracy of 83.87% and 69.56%, and sensitivity of 96% and 81.81%, respectively, and using hybrid mRMR and RSFS algorithms for feature selection and kNN and SVM algorithms as classifier have accuracy of 77.41% and 73.07%, and sensitivity of 98% and 72.72%, respectively.