Pregabalin and Radicular Pain Study (PARPS) for Cervical Spondylosis in a Multiracial Asian Population

Degenerative cervical myelopathy: Recent updates and future directions

Advances in patient selection, surgical techniques, and postoperative care have facilitated spine surgeons to manage complex spine cases with shorter operative times, reduced hospital stay and improved outcomes. We focus this article on a few areas which have shown maximum developments in management of degenerative cervical myelopathy and also throw a glimpse into the future ahead. Imaging modalities, surgical decision making, robotics and neuro-navigation, minimally invasive spinal surgery, motion preservation, use of biologics are few of them. Through this review article, we hope to provide the readers with an insight into the present state of art in cervical myelopathy and what the future has in store for us.

MicroRNA-204 silencing relieves pain of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy by targeting GDNF

Cervical spondylosis may cause chronic neck pain, radiculopathy and/or myelopathy, and consequently results in severe brain damage. Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) is a potent neurotrophic factor for motoneurons. Accumulating microRNAs (miRNAs) have highlighted as critical regulators of GDNF signaling in the mediation of neuroinflammation and neuropathic pain. Hence, we performed this study to investigate the potential role of miR-204 in the neuropathic pain of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR) by targeting GDNF. A rat model of spinal cord compression (SCC) was established to stimulate a pathologic lesion. RT-qPCR and western blot assays characterized the downregulation of GDNF and the upregulation of miR-204 in spinal cord tissues of rats under the conditions of SCC. Moreover, miR-204 could directly target GDNF, as evidenced by dual-luciferase reporter gene assay. In order to elucidate the roles of miR-204 and GDNF in SCC-induced neuropathic pain, miR-204 sponge, GDNF, or shRNA against GDNF was introduced to the rats, followed by measurements for SCC-induced neuroinflammation and neuropathic pain. GDNF upregulation or miR-204 silencing was identified to reduce the spontaneous pain score, gait scores and cell apoptosis. Furthermore, GDNF upregulation or miR-204 silencing resulted in elevated amplitude of sensory-evoked potentials (SEPs), number of motoneurons, release of pro-inflammatory factors, TNF-α, and IL-1β in addition to an increase in the anti-inflammatory factor BDNF. Taken together, upregulation of GDNF induced by miR-204 silencing confers protection against SCC-induced pain in rat models, suggesting a potential therapeutic target for CSR treatment.

Clinical efficacy and tolerability of Gabapentinoids with current prescription patterns in patients with Neuropathic pain

Objective:

To investigate the current dosing regimens of gabapentinoids in Pakistani patients with neuropathic pain and to compare their clinical efficacy and tolerability in terms of pain relief and adverse effects using difference in pain score as a treatment outcome.

Methods:

This observational, prospective study was conducted in 320 patients with neuropathic pain from August 2016 to March 2018 at Basic Medical Sciences Institute (BMSI), Karachi in collaboration with Shifa International Hospital and Benazir Bhutto Hospital, Islamabad. Demographic data, treatment-related adverse effects and pain intensity was documented at recruitment and follow up visits at two, four and eight weeks. Discontinuation due to adverse effects and lack of efficacy were also recorded. Data was entered and analyzed using SPSS version 22.

Results:

Mean age of patients was 52.57±12.47 and the most common ethnicity were Punjabi speaking population (66%). Diabetic neuropathy (51%) was the most common etiology followed by radicular pain (25%). Mean dosages of pregabalin and gabapentin were 114mg and 470mg respectively. Mean pain score was significantly reduced by gabapentinoids (<0.001). Dizziness, drowsiness and somnolence were frequent adverse effects. Common dosages for pregabalin and gabapentin were 75 mg/day and 300 mg/day respectively.

Conclusion:

Current dosing regimens of gabapentinoids in Pakistani patients with neuropathic pain were found to be efficacious at low dosages in comparison to international recommended dosages. Gabapentin and pregabalin were both similar in terms of reducing pain score but onset of pain relief was relatively faster with pregabalin. Dizziness, drowsiness and somnolence were frequently reported with both gabapentinoids; however, visual blurring, ataxia and weight gain were observed only with the use of pregabalin. Adverse effects are frequently observed with gabapentinoids which necessitates reverting back to low dosages or switching to other drugs for pain relief.

Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy; A Review of the Latest Advances and Future Directions in Management

The assessment, diagnosis, operative and nonoperative management of degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) have evolved rapidly over the last 20 years. A clearer understanding of the pathobiology of DCM has led to attempts to develop objective measurements of the severity of myelopathy, including technology such as multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, biomarkers, and ancillary clinical testing. New pharmacological treatments have the potential to alter the course of surgical outcomes, and greater innovation in surgical techniques have made surgery safer, more effective and less invasive. Future developments for the treatment of DCM will seek to improve the diagnostic accuracy of imaging, improve the objectivity of clinical assessment, and increase the use of surgical technology to ensure the best outcome is achieved for each individual patient.

Effectiveness of pregabalin for treatment of chronic cervical radiculopathy with upper limb radiating pain: an 8-week, multicenter prospective observational study in Japanese primary care settings

Background: Despite high prevalence of chronic neck pain in Japan and the negative impact pain has on patient’s quality of life (QoL), the therapeutic value of pregabalin for chronic neck pain with a neuropathic pain (NeP) component has not been assessed in a typical Japanese health care setting.

Methods: An 8-week, non-interventional, multicenter, observational study of Japanese adults (≥20 years) with chronic refractory cervical pain including a NeP element (for ≥12 weeks) and sleep disturbance on the Pain-Related Sleep-Interference Scale (PRSIS) ≥1 (from 0 “does not interfere with sleep” to 10 “completely interferes”). Patients received either usual care with conventional analgesics or pregabalin (150–600 mg/day) for 8 weeks. “Usual care” with analgesics or other treatment(s) was determined based on physician’s best clinical judgment. Primary endpoint was change from baseline to week 8 in PRSIS. Secondary endpoints included: change from baseline to week 4 in PRSIS, and to week 4 and 8 in pain Numerical Rating Scale (NRS; from 0 “no pain” to 10 “worst possible pain”), and on the Neck Disability Index (NDI). Other assessments of QoL were undertaken. Safety was monitored.

Results: Overall, 369 patients received pregabalin (n=145) or usual care (n=224). The median (range) dose of pregabalin was 49.6 (25.0–251.5) mg/day. Least-squares mean change in PRSIS from baseline to week 8 favored pregabalin (–1.167 vs –0.269; treatment difference –0.898 [95% CI –1.262, –0.535], P<0.001). Similar observations were seen at week 4 in favor of pregabalin versus usual care (P<0.001). Pregabalin significantly improved pain NRS and NDI scores at weeks 4 and 8 (all P<0.001). Improvements in QoL versus usual care were also observed. Pregabalin was generally well tolerated.

Conclusion: In this open-label study, pregabalin improved PRSIS and resulted in clinically meaningful reductions in pain in Japanese patients with NeP associated with chronic cervical pain.

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02868359.

Comparisons between the efficacy of limaprost alfadex and pregabalin in cervical spondylotic radiculopathy : design of a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR) is a relatively common neurological disease caused by the mechanical compression of nerve roots. Limaprost, a prostaglandin E₁ derivative, functions as a vasodilator and has been used in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis in Japan. However, the effects of limaprost in cervical radiculopathy remain unclear. Our aim was to compare the efficacy of limaprost with that of pregabalin, which is widely used for the treatment of neuropathic pain.

METHODS

In this randomized trial, patients with CSR received either limaprost or pregabalin orally for 8 weeks, along with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. The primary outcomes were assessed using a numerical rating scale of pain and numbness, both at rest and during movement. Secondary outcomes were assessed using Short Form-36, provocation tests, painDETECT questionnaire, and subjective global assessment. The obtained data were evaluated according to the per-protocol analysis principle.

RESULTS

A total of 46 patients were enrolled in this study, and 35 were available for analysis. A greater reduction in pain score was observed in neck pain during movement, and scapular and arm pain both at rest and during movement in the pregabalin-treated group up to 4 weeks. In the limaprost-treated group, numbness of the arm during movement showed a marked alleviation compared to the pregabalin-treated group at 8 weeks. There were no apparent differences between the two groups in terms of the secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Although pregabalin provided an earlier pain relief than limaprost, limaprost was superior to pregabalin in treating arm numbness. Limaprost might be one of the effective therapeutic options for CSR in primary care settings.

Nelson A, J. Avram M, Lee Robak S, T. Benzon H. Efficacy of Pregabalin in the Treatment of Radicular Pain: Results of a Controlled Trial

Background:

Pregabalin is commonly used to treat patients with various neuropathic pain syndromes.

Objectives:

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of pregabalin in patients with lumbar or cervical radicular pain.

Patients and Methods:

A prospective, randomized, double-blind trial was conducted in 39 patients with lumbar and cervical radicular pain, who received 3 weeks of either pregabalin (n = 10) or placebo (n = 9) treatment. Baseline pain and disability were evaluated before the treatment and were re-evaluated, along with overall patient satisfaction, after the 3 weeks of treatment.

Results:

Data on 19 of the 39 patients recruited were available for analysis. No statistically significant differences in the pain, disability, and patient satisfaction scores were found between the groups. When the individual patient scores were assessed, the placebo treatment was found to be efficacious in 4 of the 9 patients and pregabalin was effective in 2 of the 10 patients, but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.350).

Conclusions:

The present data do not suggest that pregabalin is more efficacious than placebo in the treatment of lumbar and cervical radicular pain. However, the small sample size of this study may have affected the ability to detect such a difference.