Atrioesophageal Fistula After Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: A single center series

2023 Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand Expert Position Statement on Catheter and Surgical Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation

Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) has increased exponentially in many developed countries, including Australia and New Zealand. This Expert Position Statement on Catheter and Surgical Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation from the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSANZ) recognises healthcare factors, expertise and expenditure relevant to the Australian and New Zealand healthcare environments including considerations of potential implications for First Nations Peoples. The statement is cognisant of international advice but tailored to local conditions and populations, and is intended to be used by electrophysiologists, cardiologists and general physicians across all disciplines caring for patients with AF. They are also intended to provide guidance to healthcare facilities seeking to establish or maintain catheter ablation for AF.

Impact of Active Esophageal Cooling on Fluoroscopy Usage During Left Atrial Ablation

Risks to collateral structures exist with radiofrequency (RF) ablation of the left atrium to obtain pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. Passive luminal esophageal temperature (LET) monitoring is commonly utilized, but increasing data suggest limited benefits with LET monitoring. In contrast, active cooling of the esophagus has been shown to significantly reduce esophageal injury. Active cooling of the esophagus also avoids the need for stopping and repositioning an LET probe during use, which may reduce the need for fluoroscopy use. This study aimed to measure the impact on fluoroscopy use during RF ablation with esophageal cooling using a dedicated cooling device in a low-fluoroscopy practice. All patients who underwent PVI over a one-year timeframe by a single provider were analyzed. Patients undergoing PVI prior to the incorporation of an esophageal cooling protocol into standard ablation practice were treated with traditional LET monitoring. Patients treated after this point received active esophageal cooling, in which no LET monitoring is utilized. A total of 280 patients were treated; 91 patients were treated using LET monitoring, and 189 patients were treated with esophageal cooling. The mean total fluoroscopy time before the implementation of the esophageal cooling protocol in 91 patients was 194 seconds [standard deviation (SD): 182 seconds] per case, with a median of 144 seconds. The mean total fluoroscopy time after implementation in 189 patients was 126 seconds (SD: 120 seconds) per case with a median of 96 seconds, representing a reduction of 35% per case (p < 0.0001, Mann-Whitney U test). In this largest study to date of active esophageal cooling during PVI, a 35% reduction in fluoroscopy time compared with patients who received LET monitoring was found. This reduction was seen despite an already low fluoroscopy usage rate in place.

Esophageal Findings in the Setting of a Novel Preventive Strategy to Avoid Thermal Lesions during Hybrid Thoracoscopic Radiofrequency Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation

Purpose The development of an atrio-esophageal fistula, a rare yet potentially lethal complication of ablation for atrial fibrillation, could be related to direct tissue heat transfer during and immediately after the ablation. We therefore studied the postoperative esophageal findings by esophagogastroduodenoscopy in patients that underwent a hybrid ablation procedure using a novel preventive strategy to avoid thermal lesions. Methods Thirty-four patients (28 males; 65 years ± 9 years) were retrospectively included. All underwent a hybrid ablation in our center between April 2015 and November 2019 and agreed to an esophagogastroduodenoscopy within 0–14 days (mean: 5 days) following the ablation. To reduce the incidence of thermal lesions three procedural preventive strategies were introduced: (i) videoscopic intrathoracic transesophageal echocardiographic probe visualization to understand the relationship between posterior left atrial wall and esophagus, with probe retraction before ablation; (ii) lifting the cardiac tissue away from the esophagus during energy application; and (iii) a 30-s cool-off period after energy delivery with irrigation of the device, the ablated tissue, and the surrounding tissues. Results No esophageal thermal lesions were observed. One third of patients were diagnosed with incidental esophageal findings unrelated to the ablation procedure (11; 32.4%). Conclusion Novel preventive strategies by visualization and by avoiding contact between the ablation catheter or ablated tissue and the pericardium, seems to eliminate the potential risk of esophageal thermal lesions in the setting of hybrid ablation. Since one third of patients had preexisting esophageal disease, a more comprehensive pre-operative screening could be important to reduce the risk.

Clinical Manifestations, Outcomes, and Mortality Risk Factors of Atrial-Esophageal Fistula: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

Atrial-esophageal fistula (AEF) is a rare but life-threatening complication of catheter ablation. The clinical presentation and mortality risk factors of AEF have not been fully elucidated. The aim of this study was to systematically review the clinical characteristics and prognosis of AEF.

METHODS

PubMed was searched from inception to October 2020 following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement protocol.

RESULTS

A total of 190 AEF patients were included. The mean age was 59.29 ± 11.67 years, 74.21% occurred in males, and 81.58% underwent radiofrequency ablation. AEF occurred within 30 days after ablation in 80.82% of patients and occurred later in patients presenting with neurological symptoms compared with other symptoms (median of onset time: 27.5 days vs. 16 days, p < 0.001). Clinical presentation included fever (81.58%) and neurological symptoms (80.53%). Chest computed tomography (abnormal rate of 91.24%) was the preferred diagnostic test, followed by magnetic resonance imaging of the brain (abnormal rate of 90.91%). Repeated testing improved diagnostic evaluation sensitivity. Distinctive imaging results included free air in the mediastinum (incidence rate of 81.73%) and air embolism of the brain (incidence rate of 57.53%). The overall mortality was 63.16%, with worse nonsurgical treatment outcomes compared with outcomes of surgical treatment (94.19% vs. 33.71%, p < 0.001). Conservative or stent intervention was an independent risk factor for mortality. Age (adjusted odds ratio, 1.063, p = 0.004), presentation with neurological symptoms (adjusted odds ratio, 5.706, p = 0.017), and presentation with gastrointestinal bleeds (adjusted odds ratio, 3.009, p = 0.045) were also predictors of mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

AEF is a fatal ablation complication. AEF can be diagnosed using a combination of a clinical history of ablation, infection, or neurological symptoms and an abnormal chest CT. Our analysis supports that surgical treatment reduces the mortality rate.

Atrioesophageal fistula after atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: A case report

RATIONALE

Atrioesophageal fistula (AEF) is a rare but serious complication of atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation with associated high mortality rates.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 42-year-old male patient who underwent catheter ablation in local hospital 20 days ago because of persistent AF was admitted to our Emergency Room with unconsciousness and high axillary temperature and white blood cell count. Craniocerebral CT scan found multiple infarct lesions in both frontal and occipital lobes. Pneumatosis between the left atrium and the esophagus was observed in the chest CT.

DIAGNOSES

AEF.

INTERVENTIONS

We performed a salvage operation of the left atrium debridement, and left atrium patch repairing under extracorporeal circulation. We opened the mediastinum, and dissected the esophageal perforation. A special irrigating catheter with multiple side ports on the tip was placed from the esophagus to the posterior mediastinum through the esophageal orificium fistulae. We also inserted a gastrointestinal tube to the jejunum under gastroscopy. Three additional drainage tubes were inserted into the esophageal bed and the right thoracic cavity.

OUTCOMES

The procedure was successful. But 7 days later, the patient's family chose to forgo treatment due to multiple cerebral infarcts, respiratory and blood system infection, liver failure, and other complications.

LESSONS

AEF is a rare but fatal complication after catheter ablation. Heightened vigilance is required for early recognition of the AEF. Surgical treatment should be performed as early as possible, especially before the neurological complications occur.

Atrioesophageal fistula with meningitis: A rare complication of atrial fibrillation ablation, case report and literature review

Atrioesophageal fistula is a rare, devastating complication of atrial fibrillation ablation, reportedly occurring in 0.015–0.04% of catheter ablations. A 66-year-old African American male with a past medical history of chronic atrial fibrillation status post recent radiofrequency ablation and on chronic anticoagulation with rivaroxaban presented with left upper extremity numbness, tingling, and transient weakness. He was admitted for a cerebrovascular accident workup; a 12-lead electrocardiogram revealed atrial fibrillation and magnetic resonance imaging of the brain was consistent with multifocal embolic infarcts. Hospital course was further complicated by persistent high-grade fevers, gram-positive bacteremia, and worsening mental status requiring mechanical ventilation. Lumbar puncture was consistent with bacterial meningitis. Transthoracic echocardiogram was negative for vegetations. Computed tomography angiography of the chest with intravenous contrast revealed an outpouching off the posterior wall of the left atrium at the level of the inferior pulmonary vein, consistent with an atrioesophageal fistula. We present this case to highlight the clinical features of a rare but potentially fatal complication from a commonly performed procedure requiring prompt recognition and life-saving intervention.

•

Atrioesophageal fistula (AEF) is a rare, devastating complication of atrial fibrillation ablation.

•

AEF-related complications vary in presentation and should be suspected within three-months of radiofrequency ablation.

•

Repeat imaging is reasonable in patients with high clinical suspicion.

•

Treatment options include surgical repair and conservative management with esophageal stenting.

Treatment Complications of Atrial Fibrillation and Their Management

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a rhythm disturbance defined by irregular, rapid electrical, and mechanical activation of the atria, which causes unsynchronized atrial contraction and promotes thromboembolism. AF is the most common sustained arrhythmia. Its prevalence and incidence are increasing due to aging and improved survival from acute heart diseases. This article is a review on AF management from both a surgical and catheter-based perspective. While both treatment approaches to AF have been shown to be successful in the management of AF, they are not without their own inherent complications. This article seeks to review some of these complications and help to guide treatment.

Esophageal cooling for protection during left atrial ablation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose

Thermal damage to the esophagus is a risk from radiofrequency (RF) ablation of the left atrium for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). The most extreme type of thermal injury results in atrio-esophageal fistula (AEF) and a correspondingly high mortality rate. Various strategies for reducing esophageal injury have been developed, including power reduction, esophageal deviation, and esophageal cooling. One method of esophageal cooling involves the direct instillation of cold water or saline into the esophagus during RF ablation. Although this method provides limited heat-extraction capacity, studies of it have suggested potential benefit. We sought to perform a meta-analysis of published studies evaluating the use of esophageal cooling via direct liquid instillation for the reduction of thermal injury during RF ablation.

Methods

We searched PubMed for studies that used esophageal cooling to protect the esophagus from thermal injury during RF ablation. We then performed a meta-analysis using a random effects model to calculate estimated effect size with 95% confidence intervals, with an outcome of esophageal lesions stratified by severity, as determined by post-procedure endoscopy.

Results

A total of 9 studies were identified and reviewed. After excluding preclinical and mathematical model studies, 3 were included in the meta-analysis, totaling 494 patients. Esophageal cooling showed a tendency to shift lesion severity downward, such that total lesions did not show a statistically significant change (OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.15 to 2.38). For high-grade lesions, a significant OR of 0.39 (95% CI 0.17 to 0.89) in favor of esophageal cooling was found, suggesting that esophageal cooling, even with a low-capacity thermal extraction technique, reduces the severity of lesions resulting from RF ablation.

Conclusions

Esophageal cooling reduces the severity of the lesions that may result from RF ablation, even when relatively low heat extraction methods are used, such as the direct instillation of small volumes of cold liquid. Further investigation of this approach is warranted, particularly with higher heat extraction capacity techniques.

Atrial-Esophageal Fistula After Catheter Ablation: Diagnosing and Managing a Rare Complication of a Common Procedure

Patient: Male, 67

Final Diagnosis: Atrial-esophageal fistula

Symptoms: Chills • fever

Medication: —

Clinical Procedure: —

Specialty: Cardiology