Clinical Utility of Intravenous Nifekalant Injection during Radiofrequency catheter Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling of nifekalant injection with varies dosing plan in Chinese volunteers: a randomized, blind, placebo-controlled study

Nifekalant hydrochloride is a class III antiarrhythmic agent which could increase the duration of the action potential and the effective refractory period of ventricular and atrial myocytes by blocking the K+ current. Nifekalant is used to prevent ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation. QT interval prolongation is the main measurable drug effect. However, due to the complicated dosing plan in clinic, the relationship among dosage, time, drug concentration and efficacy is not fully understood. In this study, a single-center, randomized, blind, dose-ascending, placebo-controlled study was conducted to explore the intrinsic characteristics of nifekalant injection in healthy Chinese volunteers by a population pharmacokinetic (PK)-pharmacodynamic (PD) model approach. 42 subjects were enrolled in this study and received one of three dose plans (loading dose on Day 1 (0.15, 0.3 or 0.5 mg/kg), loading dose followed by maintenance dose (0.2, 0.4 or 0.8 mg/kg/h) on Day 4) or vehicle. Blood samples were drawn for PK evaluation, and ECGs were recorded for QTc calculation at the designed timepoints. No Torsades de Pointes occurred during the study. The popPK model of nifekalant injection could be described by a two-compartment model with first-order elimination. The population mean clearance (CL) was 53.8 L/h. The population mean distribution volume of the central (Vc) and peripheral (Vp) compartments was 8.27 L and 45.6 L, respectively. A nonlinear dose-response (Emax) model well described the pharmacodynamic effect (QTc interval prolongation) of nifekalant. The Emax and EC50 from current study were 101 ms and 342 ng/mL, respectively.

Failure of intravenous nifekalant cardioversion as an independent predictor for persistent atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation

AIMS

Nifekalant is a class III antiarrhythmic drug that exerts antiarrhythmic effects by inhibiting rapid rectifying potassium channels and extending the effective refractory period of cardiomyocytes. It has a high success rate in converting atrial fibrillation (AF) to sinus rhythm. Whether the failure of intravenous nifekalant cardioversion is an independent predictor for persistent AF recurrence after catheter ablation has not been reported.

METHODS

A total of 92 patients with drug-refractory persistent AF were retrospectively enrolled. After all ablations, intravenous nifekalant was administrated. Patients were assigned to the success group (group 1) and failure group (group 2) based on nifekalant cardioversion results and followed for 12 months to note any episode of atrial arrhythmia recurrence.

RESULTS

Each group included 46 patients. After 12 months of follow-up, nine (19.6%) patients from group 1 and 23 (50.0%) patients from group 2 had a recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia (P = 0.002). AF duration and type 2 diabetes were strongly associated with failure of intravenous nifekalant cardioversion. Univariable Cox proportional hazard regression showed that failure of intravenous nifekalant cardioversion, AF duration, and type 2 diabetes were potential risk factors. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression showed that failure of nifekalant cardioversion was statistically associated with AF recurrence (adjusted RR = 2.257, 95% CI: 1.006-5.066, P = 0.048). Failure of intravenous nifekalant cardioversion could bring a positive effect on the prognostic differentiation when added into the multivariable model (0.767 ± 0.042 vs. 0.774 ± 0.045, P = 0.025).

CONCLUSION

Failure of nifekalant cardioversion is an independent predictor for persistent AF recurrence after catheter ablation.

Development and Validation of a Novel Prognostic Model Predicting the Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence Risk for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Patients Treated with Nifekalant During the First Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to establish and assess a prediction model for patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) treated with nifekalant during the first radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA).

METHODS

In this study, 244 patients with persistent AF from January 17, 2017 to December 14, 2017, formed the derivation cohort, and 205 patients with persistent AF from December 15, 2017 to October 28, 2018, constituted the validation cohort. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression was used for variable screening and the multivariable Cox survival model for nomogram development. The accuracy and discriminative capability of this predictive model were assessed according to discrimination (area under the curve [AUC]) and calibration. Clinical practical value was evaluated using decision curve analysis.

RESULTS

Body mass index, AF duration, sex, left atrial diameter, and the different responses after nifekalant administration were identified as AF recurrence-associated factors, all of which were selected for the nomogram. In the development and validation cohorts, the AUC for predicting 1-year AF-free survival was 0.863 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.801-0.926) and 0.855 (95% CI 0.782-0.929), respectively. The calibration curves showed satisfactory agreement between the actual AF-free survival and the nomogram prediction in the derivation and validation cohorts. In both groups, the prognostic score enabled stratifying the patients into different AF recurrence risk groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This predictive nomogram can serve as a quantitative tool for estimating the 1-year AF recurrence risk for patients with persistent AF treated with nifekalant during the first RFCA.

Meta‑analysis of the efficacy and safety of nifekalant in the conversion of atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common type of supraventricular tachyarrhythmia. Nifekalant is a new class III antiarrhythmic drug approved for the treatment of ventricular tachyarrhythmias, but its effectiveness in converting AF to sinus rhythm remains unclear. The present analysis aimed to investigate the effect of nifekalant in the conversion of AF. PubMed, Cochrane Library and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases were systematically used to search relevant studies published between 1999 (data at which the drug was first approved for marketing in Japan) and 2022. Randomized clinical trials, prospective studies and retrospective studies on the use of nifekalant for AF were screened. The study metrics included the success rate of the conversion of AF, the mean time to conversion, the success rate of 12 months after a single AF catheter ablation procedure and the incidence of adverse events. The eligible studies screened included six randomized clinical trials, three prospective studies and three retrospective studies, totalling 12 studies with 1,162 patients. The risk ratio (RR) for successful conversion in the nifekalant and control groups was 1.95 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.23-3.08; P=0.005] and the mean difference for the mean time to conversion was -1.73 [95% CI, -2.69-(-0.77); P=0.0004]. Statistically significant differences were observed between nifekalant and control groups. Subgroup analysis revealed a statistically significant difference in the success rate of conversion following catheter ablation in the nifekalant group compared with the amiodarone group and the RR value was 1.95 (95% CI, 1.37-2.77; P=0.0002). Statistically significant difference was observed compared with the electrical cardioversion group and the RR value was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.84-0.98; P=0.01). However, the combined RR values for the two groups were 1.18 (95% CI, 0.85-1.65; P<0.0002). The RR value for adverse events was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.51-1.43; P=0.55), with no statistically significant differences between nifekalant and control groups. In conclusion, the results demonstrated that the success rate and time to conversion in the nifekalant group were improved compared with those in the control group, particularly after catheter ablation, and the conversion effect with nifekalant was significantly improved compared with that in the control group.

Reproducibility and stability of atrial fibrillation drivers identified by an automated algorithm: CARTOFINDER

BACKGROUND

The characteristics of atrial fibrillation (AF) drivers identified by CARTOFINDER have not been thoroughly evaluated. Therefore, the current study was sought to validate the reliability of AF drivers.

METHODS

The reliability of focal and rotational activation identified by CARTOFINDER during AF was assessed by the sequential recordings in each site before and after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in 27 persistent AF patients. The primary outcome measures were the reproducibility rate during the sequential recordings and the stability rate between pre- and post-PVI.

RESULTS

Among 32,135 points in 509 sites, focal activation was identified in 1775 points (5.5%) with a repetition of 11 (6-26) times during the recording. Rotational activation was identified in 132 points (0.4%) with a repetition number of 21 (14-21) times. AF drivers had significantly higher voltage and shorter AF cycle length than non-AF driver sites. The reproducibility rate of focal activation during the sequential recordings was 57.8% and increased with the repetition number. The reproducibility rate of rotational activation was 37.4%. The prevalence and the reproducibility rate of focal activation in post-PVI were significantly lower than pre-PVI (5.3% versus 6.0%, P = 0.02; 53.4% versus 63.6%, P < 0.001). The stability rate of focal activation between pre- and post-PVI was only 28.3% but increased with the repetition number. There was no stable rotational activation between pre- and post-PVI.

CONCLUSIONS

The reproducibility of AF drivers, especially focal activation, identified by CARTOFINDER is relatively favorable, but the stability between pre- and post-PVI was poor. These results depended on the repetition number during the recording.

Instability of rotational activation as atrial fibrillation drivers: assessment by ExTRa Mapping system

BACKGROUND

ExTRa Mapping™ has developed to visualize rotational activation as atrial fibrillation(AF) drivers. The current study was sought to evaluate the instability of AF drivers by ExTRa Mapping™.

METHODS

Variation of non-passively activated ratio(%NP) among 3-time repetitive recordings before and after pulmonary vein isolation(PVI) in left atrium was assessed in 26 persistent AF patients. The recoding time was set at 5 seconds or 8 seconds for the respective patients. The outcome measures included %NP at each recording, mean value of the 3-time recordings, and the instability index, which was defined as maximum difference per mean %NP×100 (%).

RESULTS

Total 683 sites 2049 recordings were assessed. Mean %NP was 33.3(23.3-42.7)%, and higher in sites with severe(≥50%) and patchy low voltage area than those without, but not in those with severe complex fractionated atrial electrogram area. There was significant correlation between actual and mean %NP (R = 0.86, P<0.001), but maximum difference among the repetitive recordings was 16(10-24) %. The instability index of %NP was 55.9(30.9-83.6)%, and significantly lower at the recordings of 8 seconds compared with 5 seconds (50.6[28.6-78.4]% versus 60.4[35.0-90.0]%, P = 0.004). Furthermore, it was higher at sites with lower reliability of the recordings. After PVI, mean %NP significantly decreased (28.7[18.3-36.7]% versus 37.7[28.7-45.7]%, P<0.001), but the instability index significantly increased compared with those before PVI (60.0[35.0-92.7]% versus 48.9[29.1-75.0]%, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Rotational activation as AF drivers assessed by ExTRa Mapping™ is unstable, and repetitive and longer recording is required for the reliable assessment even after PVI. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Intraprocedural Conversion Efficacy of Intravenous Nifekalant Administration for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation after Pulmonary Vein Isolation

The aim of this study was to prospectively assess the efficacy, safety, and predictive effect of intravenous nifekalant administration for persistent atrial fibrillation (PerAF) after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with second-generation cryoballoon ablation (CBA) on 1-year atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATa) -free survival by examining the pharmacological conversion rate.One hundred and two drug-refractory, consecutive PerAF patients undergoing PVI were enrolled in this prospective observational study. After PVI, nifekalant (50 mg) was given followed by 30 minutes of observation and no further intervention. PerAF was successfully converted to sinus rhythm (SR) in 60 patients (58.8%) after a median time of 7.75 (4.13-12) minutes (group N). In the remaining 42 patients (41.2%) (group C), PerAF was successfully converted to SR by external electrical cardioversion. Nonsustained ventricular tachycardia occurred in 1 patient in group N. The left atrial volume (LAV) in group C was larger than that in group N (128.2 ± 28.2 versus 111.8 ± 24.5 mL, P = 0.002). Phrenic nerve injury occurred in 4 of 102 patients (3.9%). No other complications occurred during the procedure or within the 1-year follow-up period. At the 1-year follow-up, after a 3-month blanking period (BP), ATa-free survival during 1-year follow-up in group C was significantly lower than that in group N (50.0% versus 71.7%, P = 0.026), and the overall ATa-free survival rate was 62.7%. Two patients in group C and 4 patients in group N underwent a second procedure with radiofrequency catheter ablation. Multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that unsuccessful conversion to SR (P = 0.025), ATa relapse during the BP (P = 0.000), and larger LAV (P = 0.016) were independent predictors of ATa recurrence at the 1-year follow-up.In conclusion, at the 1-year follow-up, the ATa-free survival rate after PVI with CBA for PerAF patients was 62.7%, and successful conversion to SR with nifekalant could serve as a clinical predictor of reduced ATa recurrence.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of different doses of nifekalant in the instant cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation during radiofrequency ablation

Nifekalant has been used in the treatment of atrial arrhythmia recently. However, there is no consensus on the preferable nifekalant dose to treat atrial fibrillation (AF). The purpose of this study was to explore efficacy and safety of different doses of nifekalant in the cardioversion of persistent AF. The study was a single-centre, randomized controlled trial. All subjects received nifekalant or placebo intravenously, and the nifekalant was given at the dosage of 0.3, 0.4 or 0.5 mg/kg. Primary efficacy end-point: compared with 0.3 mg group, the rate of cardioversion to sinus rhythm from AF in 0.4 and 0.5 mg group was higher. The 0.4 and 0.5 mg/kg doses were associated with a similar magnitude of efficacy (P > .05). Secondary efficacy end-point: termination rates of AF in the group of 0.4 mg and 0.5 mg were higher than 0.3 mg. Primary safety end-point: the rate of Torsades de Pointes or ventricular fibrillation was numerically lower in the 0.4 mg group than 0.5 mg group (P = .02). Secondary safety end-point: The rates of the majority of other common drug-related adverse events in the group of 0.5 and 0.4 mg were higher than the 0.3 mg group. A 0.4 mg/kg dose of intravenous nifekalant may be recommended during the radiofrequency ablation for persistent AF considering the benefit-risk profile.

The evolution of mapping and ablation techniques in the treatment of atrial tachycardias occurring after atrial fibrillation ablation

PURPOSE

A possible consequence of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is the occurrence of organized atrial tachycardias (ATs). ATs after AF ablation (ATAAF) may be more symptomatic than AF itself, thus necessitating catheter ablation. We evaluated the prognostic significance of clinical and invasive characteristics for long-term sinus rhythm (SR) maintenance following ATAAF ablation and assessed the effect of technological developments on these results.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Fifty-six consecutive patients with symptomatic ATAAF participated in the study and 114 ATAAF were revealed (2.04 ± 0.93 per patient). Sixty-eight ATAAF (60%) were macroreentrant and 33 (29%) were microreentrant circuits, while 13 (11%) were focal automatic tachycardias. The mean follow-up was 40 ± 18 months with 34 (61%) patients maintaining SR. Treatment with contact force (CF) catheters and EnSite AutoMap module (n = 11) showed significantly better AT/AF free rates at 1-year follow-up (10/11, 91%) compared with treatment using CF catheters but not AutoMap module (n = 13) (8/13, 62%) and treatment with use of neither of these modalities (n = 32) (16/32, 50%). Among patients with macroreentrant circuits around the mitral annulus or left atrial roof (n = 38), the group treated with complete linear lesions in anatomical isthmuses (n = 25) showed significantly better SR maintenance (19/25, 76%) compared with patients (n = 13) treated by empirical ablation in critical functional areas (6/13, 46%).

CONCLUSIONS

Technology advancement contributes substantially to long-term success in SR maintenance, by achieving detailed mapping and more effective ablation of ATAAF. The targeting of macroreentrant circuits by creating anatomical linear lesions appears to provide better results.