Predictors of Short and Long Term Recurrences of Paroxysmal AF after Radiofrequency Ablation. Is Blanking Period Really Benign?

Prevalence, timing, and impact of early recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias after pulsed field ablation: A secondary analysis of the PULSED AF trial

BACKGROUND

Early recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias (ERAT) within 3 months of thermal ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) is common and often considered transient. Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a nonthermal energy source in which ERAT is not well described.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to analyze ERAT in patients with AF undergoing PFA in the Pulsed Field Ablation to Irreversibly Electroporate Tissue and Treat AF (PULSED AF) trial.

METHODS

This analysis included 294 patients (154 paroxysmal AF and 140 persistent AF) who had ≥10 rhythm assessments during the 90-day blanking period. ERAT was defined as any instance of ≥30 seconds of AF, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia on transtelephonic monitoring (weekly and symptomatic) or ≥10 seconds on electrocardiography (at 3 months), both within 90 days. Late recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias (LRAT) was defined as observed atrial tachyarrhythmias between 90 days and 12 months.

RESULTS

The overall prevalence of ERAT was 27.1% in patients with paroxysmal AF and 31.6% in patients with persistent AF. In patients with ERAT, 73% had ERAT onset within the first month of the procedure. The presence of ERAT was associated with LRAT in patients with paroxysmal AF (hazard ratio 6.4; 95% confidence interval 3.6-11.3) and patients with persistent AF (hazard ratio 3.8; 95% confidence interval 2.2-6.6). Yet, in 29.4% of patients with paroxysmal AF and 34.3% of patients with persistent AF with ERAT, LRAT was not observed. LRAT was positively correlated with the number of ERAT observations.

CONCLUSION

ERAT after PFA predicted LRAT in patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF. However, the concept of a blanking period after PFA is still valid, as approximately one-third of patients with ERAT did not continue to have LRAT during follow-up and may not need reablation.

Predictors of Atrial Fibrillation Recurrences after a First Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation Intervention for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation—Experience of a Low Volume Ablation Centre

Background and Objectives: Atrial fibrillation recurrences (AFR) after radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) are not uncommon, up to 65% of patients having relapses in the first year. However, current data are based mainly on studies from centres with a large volume of ablations, as they include technically inhomogeneous interventions, and populations with different types of AF. The aim of our study was to assess and stratify the risk at 6 and 12 months for AFR after a single RFCA, in patients with paroxysmal AF, in a centre with low volume activity. Materials and Methods: We enrolled 40 patients who underwent an initial RFCA, followed by continuous 48 h ECG monitoring at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Patients self-monitored their cardiac activity by random daily radial pulse palpation or in the presence of palpitations. Results: Ten independent predictors for late AFR were identified, and a 6-month risk score was computed using three of them: AFR duration in the first month, number of AFR between 1 and 3 months, and supraventricular ectopics per 24 h at 6 months. The score can explain 59% of the AFR (p = 0.001). A further 12-month assessment identified three independent predictors. The presence of AFR between 6–12 months is the most important of them (OR = 23.11, 95% CI = 3.87–137.83, p = 0.001), explaining 45% of AFR over 1 year. The risk scores at 6 and 12 months were internally validated. Conclusions: The 6-month score proved to be a useful tool in guiding further strategy for patients with a low risk, while a longer follow-up to 12 months may avoid unnecessary early reinterventions.

Treatment success and its predictors as well as the complications of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in a high-volume centre

Purpose

Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) is a standard procedure for maintaining sinus rhythm. The aim of this study was to evaluate treatment success and its predictors and to provide quality control data on complications and redo operations in a centre with an initially a low but currently high annual volume.

Methods

Data on patients (n = 1,253) treated with catheter ablation for AF in Tays Heart Hospital between January 2010 and May 2018 was evaluated (n = 1178 ablation-naïve patients and n = 1514 AF ablations). Comprehensive data on patient characteristics, treatment results, redo operations and complications were collected. Treatment success (maintenance of sinus rhythm at 1 year) was evaluated among patients residing within the hospital district (45% of the entire study population).

Results

Treatment success was observed in approximately 62.9% of the ablation-naïve patients. Preoperative predictors of treatment success were paroxysmal AF type, previous use of antiarrhythmic drugs, left atrium diameter and age. The experience at the centre did not associate with the 1-year outcome. A relapse during the first 3-month blanking period was associated with a nine-fold risk of failure at 1 year (unadjusted OR 9.1, 95% CI 5.5–15.1, p < 0.001). The major complication rate was 4.5% (68/1514) with no deaths. Ten percent of the patients needed a redo procedure within the first year.

Conclusions

Patient-related factors are the most significant predictors of treatment success. A relapse during a 3-month blanking period is associated with a very high risk of failure at 1 year.

Atrial Fibrillation Ablation with Multipolar Phased-Radiofrequency Catheter: The Learning Curve Effect for Procedural Parameters, but not for the Long-Term Outcome

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is a routine treatment in atrial fibrillation (AF). Single-shot techniques were introduced to simplify the procedure. We analyzed time-dependent changes in procedural parameters, acute success, complication rates, and long-term outcomes during our initial experience with multipolar phased-radiofrequency (RF) ablation. Methods and Results: The first 126 consecutive patients (98 male; age: 58.8 ± 8.7 years) who underwent PVI with phased-RF ablation at our center were included in the study. Procedural parameters, complication rate, acute success and 12-month efficacy were compared in the first, second and third group of 42 consecutive patients. In all patients, 516/526 PVs were effectively isolated (98.1%), with no differences between the tierces (p = 0.67). Procedure (169.8 vs. 132.9 vs. 105.8 min, p < 0.0001), fluoroscopy (32.9 vs. 24.3 vs. 14.1 min, p < 0.0001) and left atrial dwell (83.0 vs. 61.9 vs. 51.4 min, p < 0.0001) times were significantly reduced with experience in tierces 1-3, respectively. In the 12-month follow-up, 60.3% of patients were arrhythmia-free with no differences between the tierces (p = 0.88). In multivariate analysis, the relapse in the blanking period (p < 0.0001), time from AF diagnosis (p = 0.004) and left atrial diameter (p = 0.012) were the only independent predictors of AF recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

The learning curve effect was demonstrated in procedural parameters, but not in the complication rate nor the long-term success of PVI with phased-RF technique. The relapse in the blanking period was the strongest predictor of treatment failure in long-time observation.