Unplanned Removal of Medical Devices in Critical Care Units in North West England Between 2011 and 2016

Situations and Risk Factors of Unplanned Extubation of Nasogastric Tubes in Inpatients: A Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study is to understand whether the risk factors of the unplanned extubation (UE) of nasogastric (NG) tubes vary among different inpatient situations.

METHODS

Inpatients who experienced UE between 2009 and 2022 at a medical center were selected, and electronic medical records were used to collect patient background data and their conditions during UE. A total of 302 patients were included in our analysis.

RESULTS

Conscious patients were at greater risk of UE when coughing, scratching their nose, blowing their nose, or sneezing than those who were confused (odds ratio [OR] = 0.07, P < 0.001) and those who were drowsy or comatose (OR = 0.15, P = 0.026). During activity, repositioning, bathing, or changing incontinence pads, the risk of UE was higher in patients whose hands were not restrained at the time of UE than in those whose hands were restrained (OR = 0.05, P = 0.004), higher in those with companions than in those without companions (OR = 7.78, P = 0.002), and higher in those with longer NG tube placement time (OR = 1.05, P = 0.008). Accidental extubation (OR = 2.62, P = 0.007) occurred more frequently during activity, repositioning, bathing, or changing incontinence pads.

CONCLUSIONS

There is an increased risk of UE in conscious patients during activity, repositioning, bathing, or changing incontinence pads. Patients inserted with an NG tube for a longer period of time were at greater risk of accidental extubation during activity, repositioning, bathing, or changing incontinence pads irrespective of whether a companion could aid them if their hands were or were not restrained.

Impact of the restraint decision tree for physical restraint use in South Korean neurointensive care units

BACKGROUND

Nurses in neurointensive care units (NCUs) commonly use physical restraint (PR) to prevent adverse events like unplanned removal of devices (URDs) or falls. However, PR use should be based on evidenced decisions as it has drawbacks. Unfortunately, there is a lack of research-based PR protocol to support decision-making for nurses, especially for neurocritical patients.

AIM

This study developed a restraint decision tree for neurocritical patients (RDT-N) to assist nurses in making PR decisions. We assessed its effectiveness in reducing PR use and adverse events.

STUDY DESIGN

This study employed a baseline and post-intervention test design at a NCU with 19 beds and 45 nurses in a tertiary hospital in a metropolitan city in South Korea. Two-hundred and thirty-seven adult patients were admitted during the study period. During the intervention, nurses were trained on the RDT-N. PR use and adverse events between the baseline and post-intervention periods were compared.

RESULTS

Post-intervention, total number of restrained patients decreased (20.7%-16.3%; χ2 = 7.68, p = .006), and the average number of PR applied per restrained patient decreased (2.42-1.71; t = 5.74, p < .001). The most frequently used PR type changed from extremity cuff to mitten (χ2 = 397.62, p < .001). No falls occurred during the study periods. On the other hand, URDs at baseline were 18.67 cases per 1000 patient days in the high-risk group and 5.78 cases per 1000 patient days in the moderate-risk group; however, no URD cases were reported post-intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

The RDT-N effectively reduced PR use and adverse events. Its application can enhance patient-centred care based on individual condition and potential risks in NCUs.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Nurses can use the RDT-N to assess the need for PR in caring for neurocritical patients, reducing PR use and adverse events.

Peripheral intravenous catheter failure, nurse staffing levels and care complexity individual factors: A retrospective multicentre cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Short peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) failure is a common complication that is generally underdiagnosed. Some studies have evaluated the factors associated with these complications, but the impact of care complexity individual factors and nurse staffing levels on PIVC failure is still to be assessed. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence and risk factors of PIVC failure in the public hospital system of the Southern Barcelona Metropolitan Area.

METHODS

A retrospective multicentre observational cohort study of hospitalised adult patients was conducted in two public hospitals in Barcelona from 1st January 2016 to 31st December 2017. All adult patients admitted to the hospitalisation ward were included until the day of discharge. Patients were classified according to presence or absence of PIVC failure. The main outcomes were nurse staffing coverage (ATIC patient classification system) and 27-care complexity individual factors. Data were obtained from electronic health records in 2022.

RESULTS

Of the 44,661 patients with a PIVC, catheter failure was recorded in 2,624 (5.9%) patients (2,577 [5.8%] phlebitis and 55 [0.1%] extravasation). PIVC failure was more frequent in female patients (42%), admitted to medical wards, unscheduled admissions, longer catheter dwell time (median 7.3 vs 2.2 days) and those with lower levels of nurse staffing coverage (mean 60.2 vs 71.5). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the female gender, medical ward admission, catheter dwell time, haemodynamic instability, uncontrolled pain, communication disorders, a high risk of haemorrhage, mental impairments, and a lack of caregiver support were independent factors associated with PIVC failure. Moreover, higher nurse staffing were a protective factor against PIVC failure (AUC, 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.72-0.74).

CONCLUSION

About 6% of patients presented PIVC failure during hospitalisation. Several complexity factors were associated with PIVC failure and lower nurse staffing levels were identified in patients with PIVC failure. Institutions should consider that prior identification of care complexity individual factors and nurse staffing coverage could be associated with a reduced risk of PIVC failure.

Types of peripherally inserted central catheters and the risk of unplanned removals in patients: A prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Peripherally inserted central catheters are widely used in clinical practice. Despite the many advantages of peripherally inserted central catheters, unplanned removals can occur owing to irreversible complications and may have adverse consequences for patients. However, the relationship between peripherally inserted central catheter type and the incidence of unplanned removal is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association between the type of peripherally inserted central catheter and unplanned catheter removal.

DESIGN

A multicenter prospective cohort study.

SETTINGS

Sixty hospitals located in 30 cities across seven provinces in China.

PARTICIPANTS

Three thousand two hundred and twenty-two patients aged 18 years or older with one peripherally inserted central catheter inserted for treatment were enrolled, and 3166 (98.3 %) patients with follow-up data were included in the final analysis.

METHODS

The included participants had peripherally inserted central catheters that either had a proximal valve (n = 2436) or were open-ended (n = 730). A competing risk Cox regression model was used, and both univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted. A sub-distribution hazard model was applied to test the validity of the results.

RESULTS

Of the 2436 peripherally inserted central catheters with a proximal valve and 730 that were open-ended, 272 (11.2 %) and 46 (6.3 %) were removed unplanned, respectively. The whole incidence of unplanned removal was 10.04 %; multivariate Cox regression was conducted and it was determined that unplanned removal was statistically significantly associated with the proximal valve peripherally inserted central catheter type (hazard ratio: 1.86, 95 % confidence interval: 1.28 to 2.70, p = 0.001). In patients without cancer, the risk of unplanned removal of peripherally inserted central catheters with a proximal valve was 8.14 times higher than that of open-ended peripherally inserted central catheters (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, peripherally inserted central catheters with a proximal valve had a higher risk of unplanned removals, especially in patients without cancer. The peripherally inserted central catheter type should be considered in advance, and clinical staff should take appropriate measures to prevent unplanned removals after insertion.

Validation of a Risk Assessment Tool for Unplanned Endotracheal Extubation: An Observational Study

The purpose of this study was to validate and determine the sensitivity and specificity of the risk assessment tool for unplanned endotracheal extubation. Unplanned endotracheal extubation is a common adverse event. The rate of unplanned endotracheal extubation is an indicator to measure patient safety and medical quality. This study was conducted in five intensive care units in a tertiary-A hospital. A total of 227 samples encounters were obtained from 147 unique patients. The content validity was 0.91, and the item content validity ranged from 0.80 to 1.00. Cronbach's α was .58, the interrater reliability was .93. The area under the curve was 0.89 (95% CI [0.84, 0.94], p < 0.01), the sensitivity was 87.80%, and the specificity was 74.20%. This tool presented good reliability and validity and can be used to assess the risk of unplanned endotracheal extubation in patients with artificial airways.

Accidental removal of dialysis central venous catheter inserted for blood purification therapy: a single-center study

BACKGROUND

Dialysis central venous catheters (DCs) are used for various blood purification therapies. Accidental removal of a DC is a potentially life-threatening event. However, the risk factors associated with accidental removal have rarely been discussed in the literature.

METHODS

We performed a 5 year retrospective, single-center, cohort study of patients who were admitted to the ward other than intensive care units and were inserted DCs. We compared patient characteristics between patients who used DCs with and without a history of accidental removal.

RESULTS

There were 17 cases of accidental removal (3.5%) out of 489 DC insertions during the observation period. There was no significant difference between patients with and without accidental removal in terms of age, sex, reason for DC insertion, catheter type, or insertion site. The presence of dementia was 35 and 11% (p = 0.006), and that of delirium was 88 and 13% (p < 0.0001) in those with and without accidental removal, respectively. The median days from insertion to accidental removal were 5 (range 0-21) days, and removal occurred mainly at night (71%). One patient with accidental removal developed hemorrhagic shock, but there no deaths occurred due to accidental removal.

CONCLUSIONS

The present findings suggest that to prevent accidental removal, sufficient attention should be paid to delirium that occurs after admission as well to pre-existing dementia at the time of admission. As accidental removal occurs most commonly early after insertion and at night, special attention should be paid during these periods.

Migration of Feeding Tubes Assessed by Using an Electromagnetic Device: A Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Bedside methods to verify placement of a feeding tube are not accurate for detecting placement within the gastrointestinal tract, increasing risk of pulmonary aspiration. Current guidelines recommend verifying placement every 4 hours, yet the rationale for this recommendation is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To assess spontaneous migration of small-bore feeding tubes in critically ill adults.

METHODS

A prospective, repeated-measures cohort study was performed in 2 intensive care units. An electromagnetic placement device was used to assess distal feeding tube location every 24 hours for 7 days. Tube migration between zones-esophageal, gastric, and postpyloric- was considered clinically significant.

RESULTS

Feeding tubes were analyzed in 20 patients. Interrater agreement was substantial for round 2 of a blinded analysis of insertion tracings (g = 0.78); 100% agreement was achieved after unblinding. Among 62 outcomes (migration assessments), 4 feeding tubes migrated 8 times (3 forward and 5 retrograde). All migrations occurred in the postpyloric zone and none were clinically significant. Within 24 hours of insertion, 50% of feeding tubes had migrated forward. Repeated-measures analysis showed a greater likelihood of migration in patients with an endotracheal tube (relative risk, 3.46 [95% CI, 1.14-10.53]; P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

No tubes migrated retrograde into the stomach or esophagus, challenging the practice of verifying placement every 4 hours. Verification every 24 hours may be adequate if migration is not suspected. Also, lack of visible anatomical structures on insertion tracings from an electromagnetic placement device make subtle changes in postpyloric placement difficult to identify accurately.