Critical Update on the Third Edition of the Guidelines for Managing Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in Children

Measuring Energy Requirements of Traumatic Brain Injury Patients in Pediatric Intensive Care With Indirect Calorimetry: A Comparison With Empiric Methods

OBJECTIVES

Energy requirements following moderate or severe pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI) have not been fully elucidated. Indirect calorimetry (IC) is the gold standard for measuring resting energy expenditure (MREE) in PICU. However, technical complexity limits its use. We aimed to determine whether MREE differs from standard of care energy estimation and delivery in a cohort of pediatric patients following moderate to severe TBI during PICU admission.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series study.

SETTING

Single-center, 16-bed general PICU in Canada between May 2011 and January 2019.

PATIENTS

Children (0-18 yr) admitted to a PICU for moderate (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] 9-12) to severe TBI (GCS < 9) and had an IC study performed while mechanically ventilated.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

During the study period, 245 patients were admitted with the diagnosis of trauma with TBI. The study includes a convenience sample of 26 patients with severe ( n = 23) and moderate ( n = 3) TBI who underwent a total of 34 IC measurements. MREE varied considerably from 29% to 144% of predicted energy expenditure. Using Bland-Altman comparative analysis, neither Schofield nor World Health Organization predictive equations were in agreement with MREE. Only one measurement revealed that the patient was appropriately fed (energy provided in nutrition support was within 10% of MREE); 10 (38%) measurements revealed overfeeding and 15 (58%) underfeeding at the time of testing.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study adds to the small body of literature highlighting the limitations of predictive equations to evaluate energy requirements following moderate to severe pediatric TBI. IC, when feasible, should be used as the preferred method to orient PICU teams to feed such vulnerable patients.

Pre-hospital mild therapeutic hypothermia for patients with severe traumatic brain injury

BACKGROUND

We aimed to assess the effects of pre-hospital mild therapeutic hypothermia (MTH) on patients with severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI).

METHODS

Eighty-six patients with sTBI were prospectively enrolled into the pre-hospital MTH group and the late MTH group (initiated in hospital). Patients in the pre-hospital MTH group were maintained at a tympanic temperature of 33°C-35°C before admission and continued to be treated with a therapeutic hypothermia device for 4 days. Patients in the late MTH group were treated with the same MTH parameters. Intracranial pressure (ICP), complications and Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) scores were monitored.

RESULTS

ICP was significantly lower for patients in the pre-hospital MTH group 24, 48, and 72 h after treatment (17.38 ± 4.88 mmHg, 18.40 ± 4.50 mmHg, and 16.40 ± 4.13 mmHg, respectively) than that in the late MTH group (20.63 ± 3.00 mmHg, 21.80 ± 6.00 mmHg, and 18.81 ± 4.50 mmHg) (P < .05). The favorable prognosis (GOS scores 4-5) rate in the pre-hospital MTH group was higher tha n the late MTH group (65.1% vs. 37.2%, respectively; P < .05) without complications .

CONCLUSION

Pre-hospital MTH for patients with STBI can reduce ICP and improve neurological outcomes.

Role of innate inflammation in traumatic brain injury

Traumatic brain injury is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality throughout the world. Its increasing incidence, in addition to its fundamental role in the development of neurodegenerative disease, proves especially concerning. Despite extensive preclinical and clinical studies, researchers have yet to identify a safe and effective neuroprotective strategy. Following brain trauma, secondary injury from molecular, metabolic, and cellular changes causes progressive cerebral tissue damage. Chronic neuroinflammation following traumatic brain injuries is a key player in the development of secondary injury. Targeting this phenomenon for development of effective neuroprotective therapies holds promise. This strategy warrants a concrete understanding of complex neuroinflammatory mechanisms. In this review, we discuss pathophysiological mechanisms such as the innate immune response, glial activation, blood-brain barrier disruption, activation of immune mediators, as well as biological markers of traumatic brain injury. We then review existing and emerging pharmacological therapies that target neuroinflammation to improve functional outcome.

Pediatric traumatic brain injury and abusive head trauma

Childhood traumatic brain injury (TBI) commonly occurs during brain development and can have direct, immediately observable neurologic, cognitive, and behavioral consequences. However, it can also disrupt subsequent brain development, and long-term outcomes are a combination of preinjury development and abilities, consequences of brain injury, as well as delayed impaired development of skills that were immature at the time of injury. There is a growing number of studies on mild TBI/sport-related concussions, describing initial symptoms and their evolution over time and providing guidelines for effective management of symptoms and return to activity/school/sports. Mild TBI usually does not lead to long-term cognitive or academic consequences, despite reports of behavioral/psychologic issues postinjury. Regarding moderate to severe TBI, injury to the brain is more severe, with evidence of a number of detrimental consequences in various domains. Patients can display neurologic impairments (e.g., motor deficits, signs of cerebellar disorder, posttraumatic epilepsy), medical problems (e.g., endocrine pituitary deficits, sleep-wake abnormalities), or sensory deficits (e.g., visual, olfactory deficits). The most commonly reported deficits are in the cognitive-behavioral field, which tend to be significantly disabling in the long-term, impacting the development of autonomy, socialization and academic achievement, participation, quality of life, and later, independence and ability to enter the workforce (e.g., intellectual deficits, slow processing speed, attention, memory, executive functions deficits, impulsivity, intolerance to frustration). A number of factors influence outcomes following pediatric TBI, including preinjury stage of development and abilities, brain injury severity, age at injury (with younger age at injury most often associated with worse outcomes), and a number of family/environment factors (e.g., parental education and occupation, family functioning, parenting style, warmth and responsiveness, access to rehabilitation and care). Interventions should identify and target these specific factors, given their major role in postinjury outcomes. Abusive head trauma (AHT) occurs in very young children (most often <6 months) and is a form of severe TBI, usually associated with delay before appropriate care is sought. Outcomes are systematically worse following AHT than following accidental TBI, even when controlling for age at injury and injury severity. Children with moderate to severe TBI and AHT usually require specific, coordinated, multidisciplinary, and long-term rehabilitation interventions and school adaptations, until transition to adult services. Interventions should be patient- and family-centered, focusing on specific goals, comprising education about TBI, and promoting optimal parenting, communication, and collaborative problem-solving.