Nasogastric tube placement and verification in children: review of the current literature

Enhancing nasogastric tube insertion skill performance by using updated checklist among nursing students

Background

Nasogastric tube (NGT) insertion is one of the most commonly performed procedures for critically ill patients through the nostril or mouth into the stomach, which is indicated for multiple reasons.

Objective

This study is, therefore, aimed to enhance the NGT insertion skill performance of third-year nursing students using the updated checklist, 2021.

Method

A facility-based pre-post intervention study was conducted among third-year nursing students of the School of Nursing, Jimma University. An updated checklist and intervention package were used among 26 randomly selected nursing students. The collected data was entered into EpiData version 3.1, EpiData Association, Denmark and exported to SPSS version 23, IBM Corp, Armonk, NewYork for analysis. Descriptive statistics were made for each item and Paired T-test analysis was conducted to summarize the findings.

Result

The highest NGT skill insertion performance score from 40% before the intervention was 35; however, after the intervention, the score increased to 40.3. Their mean score in NGT skill performance was increased by 11 after the intervention of implementing the intervention package using the updated checklist from 26.5 ±5 0.3 the pre-intervention to 37.8 ±5 1.7 post-intervention. The finding indicated that the improvement was statistically significant at p < 0.001.

Conclusion

Implementing an intervention package and employing an updated NGT insertion checklist improved the performance of third-year nursing students' NGT insertion skills by an average of 11 points compared to their pre-test scores. A large-scale control randomized trial study was recommended to control for the effects of confounding factors on the implementation of intervention packages.

Checking nasogastric tube safety in children cared for in the community: a re-examination of the evidence base

Nasogastric tube feeding is generally considered safe provided a nasogastric aspirate with a pH ≤5.5, which indicates that the end of tube is correctly located in the stomach, can be obtained. When this is not possible, hospital attendance or admission is usually required so that an X-ray can be undertaken to check the tube's position. This practice is based on an interpretation of the evidence that places undue importance on nasogastric aspirate pH testing before every use of a tube that is already in place, with potential negative consequences for children cared for in the community and their families. Following a re-examination of the evidence base, a revised approach is proposed in this article: when a child has a tube in place, provided its position has been confirmed as correct on initial placement using aspirate pH testing, nurses can use checks other than aspirate pH testing, alongside their clinical judgement, to determine whether it is safe and appropriate to use the tube. This proposed revised approach would reduce delayed or missed administration of fluids, feeds and medicines and enable more children to remain at home.

Comparison of 3 Methods for Measuring Gastric Tube Length in Newborns: A Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Incorrectly positioned gastric tubes occur in approximately 60% of infants hospitalized in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), increasing the risk of potentially serious complications.

PURPOSE

To compare 3 methods of determining gastric tube insertion length in infants in the NICU.

METHODS

In this randomized triple-blind clinical trial, 179 infants admitted to the NICU were randomized to have their gastric tube insertion length determined by 1 of 3 methods: (1) the nose, earlobe, mid-umbilicus (NEMU) method, (2) a weight-based method, or (3) an age-related height-based (ARHB) method. Positioning of the gastric tube was verified by radiograph. R software was used for analyses. To compare categorical variables, Fisher's exact test, χ2 tests, and simulated χ2 tests were used.

RESULTS

Overall, infants had a mean gestational age of 35 weeks, 115 (58.8%) were male, and the mean birth weight was 2481.5 g. Upon radiological assessment, 145 gastric tubes (81.3%) were correctly positioned in the gastric body or greater curvature of the stomach with the weight-based method having the highest percentage of correctly positioned gastric tubes (n = 53; 36.6%), followed by the ARHB method (n = 47; 32.4%) and the NEMU method (n = 45; 31.0%). No significant differences were identified between groups (P = .128).

IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE AND RESEARCH

Despite the NEMU method being the most commonly used method in clinical practice, the weight-based and ARHB methods to determine gastric tube insertion length may be more accurate.

Ultrasound to Verify Gastric Tube Position in Infants and Children: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Placement of gastric tubes is commonly performed in infants and children but malpositioning is common and is associated with significant complications.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this systematic review is to identify the evidence on the use of ultrasound to verify correct gastric tube placement in infants and children and gaps in the research.

METHODS

This review was performed using CINAHL, PUBMED, EMBASE and Web of Science databases. Studies were included if they used an empirical study design, were published in English, included infants or children, and evaluated the use of ultrasound to verify correct gastric tube placement compared to radiograph. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were evaluated.

RESULTS

Four articles were included in the review. Sensitivity estimates were 0.88 to 1.00 and a positive predictive value of 0.99 was reported in one study. Specificity was not reported in any of the included studies. Ultrasound may be an important method to correctly identify gastric tube placement in infants and children with less radiation exposure and cost.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Ultrasound could be a used to verify gastric tube positioning in infants and children for both initial placement and continued verification leading to reduced radiation exposure and cost.

IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH

Research should focus on evaluating ultrasound specificity and the clinical feasibility of using ultrasound as a standard practice, including cost and time required to complete the exam, as well as the ability of ultrasound to verify gastric tube placement in infants weighing less than 1500 grams.

Factors Impacting Long-Term Gastrostomy Tube Dependence in Infants with Congenital Heart Disease

BACKGROUND

Infants with congenital heart disease (CHD) often experience oral feeding intolerance requiring gastrostomy (GT). Complications related to GT use are common. The study aim was to identify factors associated with continued GT use at one-year.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed at a tertiary children's hospital using the Society of Thoracic Surgeons database and patients' electronic medical record. Infants <1-year with CHD who underwent cardiac and GT surgery between January 2014-October 2019 were identified. Patient demographics, preoperative feeding, clinical variables, and GT use at one-year was evaluated. A separate cohort discharged with a nasogastric tube (NGT) was identified for longitudinal comparisons.

RESULTS

Of 137 infants who received a GT, 115 (84%) continued using their GT at one-year. Factors associated with continued GT use included lower median percent of goal oral feeding before GT placement (0% IQR 0-6.5 versus 3.7% IQR 0-31), prolonged hospitalization after GT placement (36% versus 14%, P-value = 0.048), and failure to take oral feeds at discharge (69% versus 27%, P-value <0.001). There was no difference in demographics or clinical comorbidities between groups. Clinic/emergency room visits for GT complications were common (72%). Eight infants discharged with a NGT did not require GT placement.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with CHD tolerating minimal oral nutrition before GT placement, prolonged hospitalization after GT, and difficulty with oral feeds at discharge were more likely to use their GT at 1-year. Outpatient NGT feeding is feasible for select infants with CHD. Efforts to optimize care for this complex, device-dependent population are warranted to minimize risks and facilitate family engagement for long-term care.

Actual and Potential Impact of a Home Nasogastric Tube Feeding Program for Infants Whose Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Discharge Is Affected by Delayed Oral Feedings

OBJECTIVE

To compare healthcare use and parent health-related quality of life (HRQL) in 3 groups of infants whose neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) discharge was delayed by oral feedings.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a prospective, single-center cohort of infants in the NICU from September 2018 to March 2020. After enrollment, weekly chart review determined eligibility for home nasogastric (NG) feeds based on predetermined criteria. Actual discharge feeding decisions were at clinical discretion. At 3 months' postdischarge, we compared acute healthcare use and parental HRQL, measured by the PedsQL Family Impact Module, among infants who were NG eligible but discharged with all oral feeds, discharged with NG feeds, and discharged with gastrostomy (G) tubes. We calculated NICU days saved by home NG discharges.

RESULTS

Among 180 infants, 80 were orally fed, 35 used NG, and 65 used G tubes. Compared with infants who had NG-tube feedings, infants who had G-tube feedings had more gastrointestinal or tube-related readmissions and emergency encounters (unadjusted OR 3.97, 95% CI 1.3-12.7, P = .02), and orally-fed infants showed no difference in use (unadjusted OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.1-1.7, P = .225). Multivariable adjustment did not change these comparisons. Parent HRQL at 3 months did not differ between groups. Infants discharged home with NG tubes saved 1574 NICU days.

CONCLUSIONS

NICU discharge with NG feeds is associated with reduced NICU stay without increased postdischarge healthcare use or decreased parent HRQL, whereas G-tube feeding was associated with increased postdischarge healthcare use.

Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Two Methods of Measuring Insertion Length of Nasogastric Tubes in Newborns

INTRODUCTION

The selection of a method for measuring the insertion length of nasogastric tubes in newborns is an important factor in establishing the safe use of this device.

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to verify whether there is a difference in the proportion of correctly placed nasogastric tubes when using the nose, earlobe, mid-umbilicus (NEMU) method and the weight-based equation for measuring the insertion length.

METHODS

This study is a randomized, controlled, blinded study comparing 2 methods of nasogastric insertion at a neonatal unit, with intensive and intermediate care, on 162 randomized individuals. Radiological assessment and pH test were conducted to verify tube placement. Data were collected on sex, birth weight, gestational age, and days of life. A log-binomial model was used to verify whether there were placement differences between investigated methods.

RESULTS

Of the patients, 56.1% were male, who had a mean birth weight of 1886.8 g and gestational age of 32.9 weeks and were 10.8 days old. Radiological images demonstrated that tubes were properly placed in the gastric body in 67.5% of patients using the NEMU method and in 91.5% using the weight-based equation: the weight-based equation was superior to the NEMU method, with a prevalence ratio of 1.36 (95% CI, 1.15-1.44). There was no difference between the 2 methods, according to pH test (P-value: .7179).

CONCLUSION

Based on radiographic confirmation, the weight-based equation for measuring the insertion length of the nasogastric tube in newborns resulted in significantly more nasogastric tubes being placed in the correct intragastric location.

Aspiration After Congenital Heart Surgery

Dysphagia and vocal cord dysfunction are frequent complications after congenital heart surgery. Both are risk factors for aspiration, which can lead to pneumonia, progressive lung disease, and respiratory arrest. A protocol was implemented to promote early detection of aspiration in a high-risk cohort of patients. Retrospective data were collected on all patients under 120 days old who underwent the Norwood procedure, aortic arch repair, Blalock-Taussig shunt placement, or cervical cannulation for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation from 10/2012 to 05/2016 at a single institution. Patients underwent an assessment of symptoms, fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES), and modified barium swallow (MBS) study in the postoperative period prior to initiating oral feeds. Patients with and without aspiration were compared. Of the 96 patients included in the study, one-third (33%) of patients had evidence of vocal cord dysfunction by FEES and just over half (51%) had evidence of aspiration by FEES or MBS. Most (73%) of the patients with aspiration were asymptomatic and a majority (53%) of patients with aspiration had normal vocal cord function. Aspiration is common after congenital heart surgery, and an assessment of vocal cord or swallow function in isolation may lead to underdiagnosis. A comprehensive protocol including MBS and FEES is necessary for the early detection of vocal cord dysfunction and aspiration and may prevent adverse outcomes in high-risk postoperative patients.

The Use of Ultrasonography for Verifying Gastric Tube Placement in Newborns

BACKGROUND

The use of gastric tubes in newborns admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit is fairly high, and there is a risk of serious complications related to this procedure.

PURPOSE

Considering the need to find a method that does not involve the patient's exposure to radiation, this study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography for verifying gastric tube placement in newborns.

METHODS

This was a prospective, double-blind, observational study performed in a neonatal intensive care unit, in which 159 infants had gastric intubation using ultrasound examination and radiological imaging, to verify positioning. Results were analyzed in terms of diagnostic accuracy.

RESULTS

The tubes were correctly positioned in 157 cases (98.7%), according to radiological images, and in 156 cases (98.1%), according to ultrasound. The sensitivity analysis was 0.98 and the positive predictive value was 0.99. It was not possible to perform a specificity analysis, as there were not enough negative cases in the sample.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The use of ultrasonography to identify correct positioning of gastric tubes in infants and newborns shows good sensitivity.

IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH

It was not possible to evaluate the ultrasonography specificity; further studies with greater samples are probably necessary, so that this objective can be achieved.Video Abstract available at https://journals.lww.com/advancesinneonatalcare/Pages/videogallery.aspx?videoId=29&autoPlay=true.

Use of pH reagent strips to verify gastric tube placement in newborns

Objective:

to confirm the accuracy of the pH test in identifying the placement of the gastric tube in newborns.

Method:

double-blind, diagnostic test study conducted with 162 newborns admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit and an intermediate care unit. The subjects were submitted to enteral intubation, followed by pH test with reagent strip, which was analyzed by a nurse, and radiological examination, analyzed by radiologist. Blinding was kept among professionals regarding test results. Diagnostic accuracy analysis of the pH test in relation to the radiological exam was performed.

Results:

the sample consisted of 56.17% boys, with average birth weight of 1,886.79g (SD 743,41), 32.92 (SD 2.99) weeks of gestational age and the mean pH was 3.36 (SD 1.27). Considering the cutoff point of pH≤5.5, the sensitivity was 96.25%, specificity 50%, positive predictive value 99.35% and negative predictive value 14.29%.

Conclusion:

The pH test performed with reagent strips is sensitive to identify the correct placement of the gastric tube, so it can be used as an adjuvant technique in the evaluation of the gastric tube placement. In interpreting the results, pH ≤5.5 points to correct placement and values > 5.5 require radiological confirmation.

Feeding tubes in children

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

A practical guide to different feeding tubes available for nutritional support in children, focused on indications, placement methods and complications.

RECENT FINDINGS

Enteral nutritional support refers to the delivery of nutrition into the gastrointestinal tract distal to the oesophagus. Different feeding tubes are available for exclusive or supplemental nutritional support in children who are unable to independently sustain their own growth, nutritional and hydration status. Gastric feeding is the first choice; however, jejunal feeding provides a good alternative route in the presence of contraindications or intolerance. Feeding tubes can be short or long term: nasogastric and nasojejunal tubes provide short-term nutrition support, gastrostomy and jejunostomy tubes, long-term enteral feeding. The latter are established surgically through the formation of a stoma, an artificial connection between gastric or jejunal lumen and the abdominal wall, performed either endoscopically (percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, percutaneous endoscopic gastrojejunostomy) or surgically (gastrostomy, direct jejunostomy). Awareness of different available options, technical considerations and potential risks will inform the decision-making process for an individual patient to ensure the correct balance between adequate enteral nutritional and unnecessary morbidity.

SUMMARY

Successful administration of nutrition support requires knowledge of the correct indication, route and specific functional details of the appropriate feeding tube.

Comparison of Neonatal Nursing Practices for Determining Feeding Tube Insertion Length and Verifying Gastric Placement With Current Best Evidence

BACKGROUND

Oral-nasogastric feeding tubes (FTs) are often malpositioned, placing infants at risk for complications. Confusion exists regarding the accuracy of methods to determine FT insertion length and verify gastric FT placement, and it is unknown whether evidence-based methods are used by neonatal nurses.

PURPOSE

To compare individual and unit-based neonatal nursing practices regarding methods used to determine FT insertion length and verify gastric FT placement.

METHODS

Neonatal nurses were surveyed about individual and unit-based practices regarding methods used to determine FT insertion length and verify gastric FT placement in infants in the neonatal intensive care unit.

RESULTS

Sixty neonatal nurses completed the survey, with 63% utilizing the nose-ear-midway to the umbilicus method, which was included in 50% of protocols and is associated with up to a 90% accuracy rate. Although it has an unacceptably high inaccuracy rate, the nose-to-ear-to-xiphoid method was used by 32% of nurses and recommended in 30% of protocols. To verify gastric FT placement, 98% of nurses used auscultation of a whoosh sound and 83% used aspiration of gastric contents. Neither verification method is supported by evidence or recommended for use.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

A lack of consistency exists between nursing practice and evidence-based methods.

IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH

Research is needed to determine more accurate and reliable ways to determine FT insertion depth and verify gastric FT placement in neonates.

Safety and Efficacy of Bedside Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Placement in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study is to describe the safety and efficacy of bedside percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement in a level 3 neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed on 106 infants with a birthweight ≤6 kg receiving bedside PEG placement at Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital between 2007 and 2013. Preprocedure, postprocedure, and demographic data were collected. The main safety outcome was postprocedure complication rate and the main efficacy outcome was time to initiate feeds and time on respiratory support.

RESULTS

The mean birth weight and mean gestational age of our population at the time of procedure were 2.2 kg and 33 weeks, respectively. There were 9 total complications (8.5%) with major complications being only 2 (1.8%). There were no instances of blood stream infections. The mean length of time to initiate feeds was 1.2 days (standard deviation [SD] = 1.2). Ninety-three percent of patients were extubated within 24 hours.

CONCLUSIONS

Bedside PEG placement is safe with minimal complications. It is associated with little need for ventilator support and allows for early re-initiation of feeds and early success at reaching goal feedings.

Posicionamento de sonda enteral em neonatos segundo técnica modificada de mensuração

Resumo Objetivo: Avaliar a efetividade da mensuração de sonda enteral pela técnica modificada, nariz - orelha - apêndice xifoide, com desconto dos orifícios distais da sonda, para posicionamento na câmara gástrica de neonatos. Métodos: Estudo prospectivo, desenvolvido em unidade neonatal de um hospital de ensino do município de São Paulo, a partir da análise radiográfica de 60 radiografias de 28 neonatos em uso de sonda enteral mensurada pela técnica modificada, submetidos à radiografia toracoabdominal. Resultados: O índice de posicionamento correto, de acordo com a análise por posições, foi de 68,3% e 71,7%, segundo os avaliadores 1 e 2, respectivamente, enquanto na análise por vértebras, 95% das sondas estavam adequadamente locadas na câmara gástrica. Ocorreu associação estatisticamente significante entre estatura e localização da sonda enteral, segundo o avaliador 2. Conclusão: A técnica de mensuração avaliada apresenta risco para posicionamento inadequado da sonda enteral utilizada em neonatos, devendo ser desencorajada sua aplicação na prática clínica.

Use of Nasogastric Feeding Tubes for Children at Home: A Template for Caregiver Education

There is a lack of knowledge on the part of caregivers who need to place nasogastric (NG) tubes in children for enteral nutrition therapy. This article provides the rationale, best practices, and a template for caregiver education. Canadian and Australian programs have excellent patient education materials. They have shared these step-by-step procedures for healthcare professionals to provide to caregivers to whom they are teaching placement and care of NG tubes.

Procedures for measuring and verifying gastric tube placement in newborns: an integrative review

Objective:

to investigate evidence in the literature on procedures for measuring gastric tube insertion in newborns and verifying its placement, using alternative procedures to radiological examination.

Method:

an integrative review of the literature carried out in the Cochrane, LILACS, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE and Scopus databases using the descriptors “Intubation, gastrointestinal” and “newborns” in original articles.

Results:

seventeen publications were included and categorized as “measuring method” or “technique for verifying placement”. Regarding measuring methods, the measurements of two morphological distances and the application of two formulas, one based on weight and another based on height, were found. Regarding the techniques for assessing placement, the following were found: electromagnetic tracing, diaphragm electrical activity, CO₂ detection, indigo carmine solution, epigastrium auscultation, gastric secretion aspiration, color inspection, and evaluation of pH, enzymes and bilirubin.

Conclusion:

the measuring method using nose to earlobe to a point midway between the xiphoid process and the umbilicus measurement presents the best evidence. Equations based on weight and height need to be experimentally tested. The return of secretion into the tube aspiration, color assessment and secretion pH are reliable indicators to identify gastric tube placement, and are the currently indicated techniques.

Intraoperative Gastric Tube Intubation: A Summary of Case Studies and Review of the Literature

Study Objective

Establish complications and risk factors that are associated with blind tube insertion, evaluate the validity of correct placement verification methods, establish the rationales supporting its employment by anesthesia providers, and describe various deployment facilitators described in current literature.

Measurements

An exhaustive literature review of the databases Medline, CINAHL, Cochrane Collaboration, Scopus, and Google Scholar was performed applying the search terms “gastric tube”, “complications”, “decompression”, “blind insertion”, “perioperative”, “intraoperative” in various order sequences. A five-year limit was applied to limit the number and timeliness of articles selected.

Main Results

Patients are exposed to potentially serious morbidity and mortality from blindly inserted gastric tubes. Risk factors associated with malposition include blind insertion, the presence of endotracheal tubes, altered sensorium, and previous tube misplacements. Pulmonary aspiration risk prevention remains the only indication for anesthesia-related intraoperative use. There are no singularly effective tools that predict or verify the proper placement of blindly inserted gastric tubes. Current placement facilitation techniques are perpetuated through anecdotal experience and technique variability warrants further study.

Conclusion

In the absence of aspiration risk factors or the need for surgical decompression in ASA classification I & II patients, a moratorium should be instituted on the elective use of gastric tubes.

Outcomes of Infants With Home Tube Feeding: Comparing Nasogastric vs Gastrostomy Tubes

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to determine the tube-related complications and feeding outcomes of infants discharged home from the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) with nasogastric (NG) tube feeding or gastrostomy (G-tube) feeding.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a chart review of 335 infants discharged from our NICU with home NG tube or G-tube feeding between January 2009 and December 2013. The primary outcome was the incidence of feeding tube-related complications requiring emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalizations, or deaths. Secondary outcome was feeding status at 6 months postdischarge. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

There were 322 infants discharged with home enteral tube feeding (NG tube, n = 84; G-tube, n = 238), with available outpatient data for the 6-month postdischarge period. A total of 115 ED visits, 28 hospitalizations, and 2 deaths were due to a tube-related complication. The incidence of tube-related complications requiring an ED visit was significantly higher in the G-tube group compared with the NG tube group (33.6% vs 9.5%, P < .001). Two patients died due to a G-tube-related complication. By 6 months postdischarge, full oral feeding was achieved in 71.4% of infants in the NG tube group compared with 19.3% in the G-tube group ( P < .001). Type of feeding tube and percentage of oral feeding at discharge were significantly associated with continued tube feeding at 6 months postdischarge.

CONCLUSION

Home NG tube feeding is associated with fewer ED visits for tube-related complications compared with home G-tube feeding. Some infants could benefit from a trial home NG tube feeding.

Following the evidence: enteral tube placement and verification in neonates and young children

Enteral tube placement in hospitalized neonates and young children is a common occurrence. Accurate placement and verification are imperative for patient safety. However, despite many years of research that provides evidence for a select few methods and clearly discredits the safety of others, significant variation in clinical practice is still common. Universal adoption and implementation of evidence-based practices for enteral tube placement and verification are necessary to ensure consistency and safety of all patients. This integrative review synthesizes current and seminal literature regarding the most accurate enteral tube placement and verification methods and proposes clinical practice recommendations.

Use of Temporary Enteral Access Devices in Hospitalized Neonatal and Pediatric Patients in the United States

BACKGROUND

Temporary enteral access devices (EADs), such as nasogastric (NG), orogastric (OG), and postpyloric (PP), are used in pediatric and neonatal patients to administer nutrition, fluids, and medications. While the use of these temporary EADs is common in pediatric care, it is not known how often these devices are used, what inpatient locations have the highest usage, what size tube is used for a given weight or age of patient, and how placement is verified per hospital policy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a multicenter 1-day prevalence study. Participating hospitals counted the number of NG, OG, and PP tubes present in their pediatric and neonatal inpatient population. Additional data collected included age, weight and location of the patient, type of hospital, census for that day, and the method(s) used to verify initial tube placement.

RESULTS

Of the 63 participating hospitals, there was an overall prevalence of 1991 temporary EADs in a total pediatric and neonatal inpatient census of 8333 children (24% prevalence). There were 1316 NG (66%), 414 were OG (21%), and 261 PP (17%) EADs. The neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) had the highest prevalence (61%), followed by a medical/surgical unit (21%) and pediatric intensive care unit (18%). Verification of EAD placement was reported to be aspiration from the tube (n = 21), auscultation (n = 18), measurement (n = 8), pH (n = 10), and X-ray (n = 6).

CONCLUSION

The use of temporary EADs is common in pediatric care. There is wide variation in how placement of these tubes is verified.