Critical Thinking Tools for Quality Improvement Projects

Academic Electronic Health Record in Mental Health Clinical: A Quality Review

Developing competency in the use of EHRs is essential for entry-level professional nurses. Although nursing education has been encouraged to integrate this technology into nursing curriculum, many students still graduate feeling unprepared in this area. As a result, nursing graduates lack the skills necessary to effectively use EHRs, which may have negative consequences for safe patient care. Use of academic EMRs provides students the opportunity to integrate informatics education, develop critical thinking, and incorporate problem-solving skills in the clinical area. An academic EMR was introduced to students in the second semester of a baccalaureate degree nursing program. Students completed documentation on one patient from the mental health clinical rotation. A retrospective chart review was conducted, using a rubric to determine charting efficacy. Data analysis indicated that students struggled with documentation of the mental health assessment, care plan development, and nursing notes. Student documentation was strongest in vital signs and basic information. Students need practice documenting on the critical aspects of nursing care. Utilization of an academic EMR for clinical charting provides an opportunity for students to practice documentation and develop necessary skills for clinical practice.

Improving Malaria Case Management and Referral Relationships at the Primary Care Level in Ghana: Evaluation of a Quality Assurance Internship

In Ghana, Community-based Health Planning and Services (CHPS) compounds managed by trained nurses and midwives called community health officers (CHOs) play a major role in malaria service delivery. With heavy administrative burdens and minimal training in providing patient care, particularly for febrile illnesses, including malaria, CHOs struggle to comply with the World Health Organization's test, treat, and track initiative guidelines and appropriate referral practices. A clinical training and mentorship program was implemented for CHOs to prevent and manage uncomplicated malaria and offer appropriate pre-referral treatment and referrals to district hospitals. Medical officers, pharmacists, midwives, health information officers, and medical laboratory scientists at 52 district referral hospitals were trained as mentors; CHOs from 520 poorly performing CHPS compounds underwent a 5-day internship at their assigned district referral hospital to improve knowledge and clinical skills for malaria case management. Three months later, mentors conducted post-training mentoring visits to assess knowledge and skill retention and provide ongoing on-the-job guidance. Significant percentage-point increases were observed immediately post-internship for history taking (+12.0, 95% confidence interval [CI]=8.3, 15.1; P<.001); fever assessment (+24.9, 95% CI=20.9, 29.3; P<.001); severe malaria assessment and referral (+32.0, 95% CI=28.2, 35.8; P<.001); and knowledge assessment (+15.8, 95% CI=10.0, 21.3; P<.001). Three months later, a third assessment revealed these gains were largely maintained. Analysis of national health management information system data showed statistically significant improvements in testing, treatment, and referral indicators at intervention CHPS compounds after the intervention that were not observed in comparison CHPS compounds. This training and mentorship approach offers a replicable model to build primary care provider competencies in malaria prevention and management and demonstrates how developing relationships between primary care and first-level referral facilities benefits both providers and clients. More methodologically rigorous studies are needed to measure the impact of this approach.

Research, Evidence-Based Practice, and Quality Improvement Simplified

Is the research process different than evidence-based practice and quality improvement, or is it the same? Scattered evidence and misperceptions regarding research, evidence-based practice, and quality improvement make the answer unclear among nurses. This article clarifies and simplifies the three processes for frontline clinical nurses and nurse leaders. The three processes are described and discussed to give the reader standards for differentiating one from the other. The similarities and differences are highlighted, and examples are provided for contextualization of the methods. [J Contin Educ Nurs. 2023;54(1):40-48.].

Effects of a simulation-based nursing process educational program: A mixed-methods study

AIMS

To examine the effects of a simulation-based nursing process educational program on nursing students' confidence in communication and foundational understanding of the nursing process.

BACKGROUND

The nursing process is a core component of patient-centered nursing care that is underpinned by effective communication. However, learning how to engage patients and carry out the distinct steps of the nursing process can be challenging if students are not able to apply knowledge to practice. Simulation-based learning programs can provide an immersive opportunity for students to enhance their understanding of the nursing process as well as improve their communication skills.

DESIGN

A mixed methods randomized controlled trial METHODS: Two Fundamentals of Nursing classes were recruited from a university in northern Taiwan. The experimental group (n = 58) engaged with the simulation-based nursing process educational program, which consisted of an online interactive animation and a standardized patient simulation. The control group (n = 49) was assigned a case-study. Confidence in Communication surveys, assignment and examination scores, satisfaction questionnaires and post-simulation reflection logs were used for data collection. Data were analyzed using SPSS 22.0 and qualitative content analysis.

RESULTS

Both groups showed statistically significant improvement in Confidence in Communication (p < .001). The experimental group performed better on the assignment than the control group (p < .001). No significant difference was seen between either groups' examination performances. The animation's high usage rate (mean 5.91 interactions per-user) and the results of the satisfaction questionnaires indicate the program's positive reception from the experimental group. The following themes emerged: effective communication skills, problem solving, confidence, feeling prepared and novel learning experience.

CONCLUSION

The results demonstrate that the simulation-based nursing process educational program increased students' self-confidence in communication and non-verbal communication skills as well as foundational understanding of how to carry out the nursing process. The use of interactive simulation-based learning experiences is recommended to improve nursing students' understanding of how to apply abstract concepts into practice.