Changes in maximum lip-closing force after extraction and nonextraction orthodontic treatments

Extraction vs nonextraction orthodontic treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To compare four first premolar extraction and nonextraction treatment effects on intra-arch width, profile, treatment duration, occlusal outcomes, smile aesthetics and stability.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An electronic search of the literature to June 2, 2023 was conducted using health science databases, with additional search of gray literature, unpublished material, and hand searching, for studies reporting nonsurgical patients with fixed appliances regarding sixteen sub-outcomes. Data extraction used customized forms, quality assessed with ROBINS-I (Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies-of Interventions) and Cochrane RoB 2 (risk-of-bias) tool. GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) assessed certainty of evidence.

RESULTS

Thirty (29 retrospective studies, 1 randomized controlled trial) studies were included. Random-effect meta-analysis (95% CI) demonstrated maxillary (MD: -2.03 mm; [-2.97, -1.09]; P < .0001) and mandibular inter-first molar width decrease (MD: -2.00 mm; [-2.71, -1.30]; P < .00001) with four first premolar extraction; mandibular intercanine width increase (MD: 0.68 mm; [0.36, 0.99]; P < .0001) and shorter treatment duration (MD: 0.36 years; [0.10, 0.62]; P = .007) in the nonextraction group. Narrative synthesis included three and five studies for upper and lower lip-E plane, respectively. For American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System and maxillary/mandibular anterior alignment (Little's irregularity index), each included two studies with inconclusive evidence. There were no eligible studies for UK Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) score. Class I subgroup/sensitivity analyses favored the same results. Prediction interval indicated no significant difference for all outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Four first premolar extraction results in maxillary and mandibular inter-first molar width decrease and retraction of upper/lower lips. Nonextraction treatment results in mandibular intercanine width increase and shorter treatment duration. There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding maxillary intercanine width, US PAR score, and posttreatment smile esthetics. Further high-quality focused research is recommended.

Influence of age and diet consistency on the oral muscle pressure of orthodontically treated and untreated subjects with normal occlusion and comparison of their 3D facial shape

OBJECTIVES

(1) To investigate the effect of age and diet consistency on maximum lips, tongue and cheek pressure of orthodontically treated and untreated subjects with normal, Class I dental occlusion, (2) to find out whether there is a muscle imbalance between anterior tongue and lip pressure in the same subjects at different ages and (3) to compare the 3D facial shape of treated and untreated individuals.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Subjects with normal occlusion were prospectively grouped into orthodontically treated/untreated and in children/adolescents/adults. Iowa Oral Performance Instrument was used to record the maximum muscle pressure. Two-way ANOVA and Tukey post hoc test analysed age-specific differences in muscle pressure. Two-way ANCOVA analysed the effect of diet consistency on muscle pressure. Lips and tongue imbalance was analysed using z-scores and 3D faces using a generalized Procrustes analysis.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-five orthodontically untreated and 114 treated participants were included. Muscle pressure was found to increase with age in both groups, except for the tongue in treated subjects. No differences in the balance between lips and tongue muscle pressure were found, but a higher cheek pressure in untreated adults (p<0.05) was observed. 3D facial shapes showed subtle differences. Untreated subjects with soft diet consistency showed lower lip pressure (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Oral muscle pressure of orthodontically treated patients without relapse does not differ from that of untreated patients with Class-I occlusion.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study provides normative lip, tongue and cheek muscle pressure in subjects with normal occlusion, which can be used for diagnosis, treatment planning and stability.

Palatal shape covariation in extraction versus nonextraction borderline patients: A geometric morphometric study

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to evaluate changes in palatal shape after orthodontic treatment from a borderline sample of extraction and nonextraction patients with a Class I relationship.

METHODS

A borderline sample regarding premolar extractions was obtained through discriminant analysis and comprised 30 nonextraction and 23 extraction patients. The digital dental casts of these patients were digitized with 3 curves and 239 landmarks placed on the hard palate. Procrustes superimposition and principal component analysis were implemented to assess group shape variability patterns.

RESULTS

The success of the discriminant analysis in identifying a borderline sample regarding the extraction modality was validated using geometric morphometrics. Concerning palatal shape, no sexual dimorphism was found (P = 0.78). The first 6 principal components that were statistically significant accounted for 79.2% of the total shape variance. Palatal changes were 61% more pronounced in the extraction group, which exhibited a decrease in palatal length (P = 0.02; 10,000 permutations). In contrast, the nonextraction group showed an increase in the palatal width (P <0.001; 10,000 permutations). Intergroup comparisons indicated that the nonextraction group exhibited longer palates, whereas the extraction group exhibited higher palates (P = 0.02; 10,000 permutations).

CONCLUSIONS

Considerable changes in palatal shape were seen for the nonextraction and extraction treatment group, with the latter exhibiting more pronounced changes, mainly in terms of palatal length. Further investigations are needed to clarify the clinical significance of the palatal shape changes in borderline patients after extraction and nonextraction treatment.