Baek SH, Hong H, Yang IH. Growth Patterns of the Maxillomandibular Complex in Preadolescent Patients With Pierre-Robin Sequence Using Cluster Analysis and Longitudinal Follow-Up Cephalometric Data.
J Craniofac Surg 2024:00001665-990000000-01612. [PMID:
38771200 DOI:
10.1097/scs.0000000000010187]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2023] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To investigate the growth patterns of the maxillomandibular complex in preadolescent patients with Pierre-Robin sequence (PRS).
METHODS
The samples consisted of 20 preadolescent PRS patients who had cleft palate and did not undergo growth-modification therapy or surgical intervention [6 boys and 14 girls; mean age of lateral cephalograms taken, 8.8 y (T1) and 13.7 y (T2)]. According to k-means cluster analysis, four clusters were defined over 3 major groups at T1: (1) Both very retrusive maxilla and mandible group: Cluster-4 [n=4, very large gonial angle, very low facial height ratio (FHR)] and Cluster-1 (n=5, small gonial angle, normal FHR); (2) Retrusive maxilla and very retrusive mandible group (Cluster-3, n=7, normal gonial angle, very low FHR); and (3) Both normal maxilla and mandible group (Cluster-2, n=4, very large gonial angle, low FHR). Seven angular and ratio variables [sella-nasion-A point (SNA), sella-nasion-B point (SNB), A point-nasion-B point (ANB), saddle angle, gonial angle, mandibular-body-length/anterior-cranial-base-length (MBL/ACBL), and FHR] at T1 and T2 and growth change from T1 to T2 were investigated.
RESULTS
At T1, SNA, SNB, saddle angle, gonial angle (all P<0.05), and FHR (P<0.01) showed significant difference among 4 clusters. At T2, SNA, SNB and gonial angle (all P<0.05) still showed significant difference among 4 clusters. During T1 to T2, there was no significant change in variables at each cluster except an increase in MBL/ACBL in Cluster-1 and FHR in Cluster-3 (all P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
Preadolescent PRS patients exhibited diverse skeletal phenotypes at T1, which did not change significantly from their original skeletal patterns by growth during T1 to T2.
Collapse