Effects of hydrogen peroxide pretreatment and heat activation of silane on the shear bond strength of fiber-reinforced composite posts to resin cement

Bond strength and failure mode of glass fiber posts with different surface treatments prior to silanization: An in vitro comparative study

Aim

The use of chemical agents in the surface treatment of glass fiber posts can improve their bond strength to the root canal. The aim of this study was to assess the bond strength and failure mode of glass fiber posts that received different surface treatments prior to silanization.

Materials and Methods

In this cross-sectional and in vitro experimental study, 50 human lower premolar roots were randomly divided into five groups and subsequently prepared to receive the cementation of a fiberglass post prior to silanization. They were distributed as group 1 (with 24% hydrogen peroxide), group 2 (with 37% phosphoric acid), group 3 (with 1.23% acidulated phosphate fluoride for 2 minutes), group 4 (with 1.23% acidulated phosphate fluoride for 6 minutes), and group 5 (without pretreatment). After cementation, the roots were sectioned into two discs for each cervical, middle, and apical region. Bond strength was assessed using the push out technique. Adhesive, mixed, and cohesive failure modes were also assessed. For data analysis, ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc tests were used, as well as Pearson's chi-square test. A significance of P < 0.05 was considered in all statistical analyses.

Results

When comparing the bond strength of root regions, significant differences were obtained in groups pretreated with phosphoric acid (P = 0.018) and acidulated phosphate fluoride for 2 and 6 minutes (P = 0.001 and P = 0.000, respectively). Furthermore, significant differences were obtained between posts treated only with silane and those that received phosphoric acid pretreatment (P = 0.006) and acidulated phosphate fluoride for 6 minutes (P = 0.001). Significant association of mixed failure mode was observed with hydrogen peroxide (P = 0.014) and phosphoric acid (P = 0.006) pretreatments. Cohesive failure was significantly associated with acidulated phosphate fluoride pretreatment for 2 minutes (P = 0.032) and with posts that did not receive treatment prior to silanization (P = 0.000).

Conclusion

Posts treated only with silane and pretreated with hydrogen peroxide and acidulated phosphate fluoride for 2 minutes presented significantly higher bond strength with respect to those pretreated with phosphoric acid and acidulated phosphate fluoride for 6 minutes. However, acidulated phosphate fluoride for 2 minutes and silane were associated with a better bonding type.

Effect of Glass Fiber Post Surface Treatment on Bond Strength of a Self-Adhesive Resin Cement: An "In Vitro" Study

Objective

This study evaluated the influence of different mechanical and chemical surface treatments alone and combined with silane on the bond strength (BS) of glass fiber posts (GFPs) using self-adhesive resin cement.

Methods

Eighty-four single-rooted bovine teeth (six groups, n = 14) were submitted to BS analysis after GFP cementation. The treatments applied in the studied groups were no surface treatment (control), silane (S), 24% hydrogen peroxide (PER), 24% hydrogen peroxide and silane (PER + SIL), blasting with 50 μm aluminum oxide particles (BLAST), and blasting with 50 μm aluminum oxide particles and silane (BLAST + SIL).

Results

BS differed significantly among groups (p < 0.001). It was higher in the SIL (10.5 ± 3.5 MPa), BLAST + SIL (11.5 ± 3.2 MPa), and PER + SIL (11.6 ± 4.6 MPa) groups than in the control (6.5 ± 2.9 MPa), BLAST (8.6 ± 4.0 MPa), and PER (7.1 ± 2.8 MPa) groups, with no significant difference among groups receiving silanization. Cement post adhesive failure was more common in the SIL, BLAST, and PER + SIL groups, and cement-dentin adhesive failure was more common in the control, BLAST + SIL, and PER groups.

Conclusion

These results show that silane application alone increases BS.

Impact of different surface treatment methods on bond strength between fiber post and composite core material

PURPOSE

To assess the impact of different surface treatments on the push-out bond strength between fiber post and a composite resin core material.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Seventy-two glass-fiber posts were randomly assigned into six groups according to the method of surface treatment: Control (no treatment), silane, sandblasting, hydrofluoric acid, hydrogen peroxide, and hydrogen peroxide with sandblasting. Two posts from each group were inspected under a scanning electron microscope to assess the surface modifications and 10 posts were employed for the push-out test. Each post was placed vertically in the middle of a cylindrical putty matrix and a dual-cure composite resin material was applied for core build-up. Two discs of each specimen were cut using a low-speed diamond saw (total 120 discs). The push-out test was executed using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (p ≤ 0.05). The mode of failure of each disc was evaluated under SEM.

RESULTS

The sandblasting and hydrofluoric acid groups presented significantly higher bond strength than control and hydrogen peroxide groups. The hydrogen peroxide groups exhibited significantly the lowest bond strength of all groups. There was no significant difference between the control and silane groups. All groups showed predominantly adhesive failure except the hydrogen peroxide with sandblasting, where the cohesive failure of the post was predominant.

CONCLUSIONS

Sandblasting and hydrofluoric acid surface treatments demonstrated superior results to silane and hydrogen peroxide. The combined method of hydrogen peroxide and sandblasting could weaken the fiber post and lead to clinical fractures.

[Evaluation of modified micro-push-out bond strength of glass fiber posts with chemically treated resin cements]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the modified micro-push-out bond strengths of prefabricated glass fiber posts with silaneafter 35% phosphoric acid to resin cements.

METHODS

In the study, 40 glass fiber posts were randomly divided into 2 groups (20 posts in each group) for different surface treatments. Group 1, treated with silaneafter 35% phosphoric acid; group 2, no surface treatment (Control group). Then each group was randomly divided into 2 minor groups (modified group and traditional group), with each group with 10. So the four groups were group 1M (phosphoric acid + silane-modified), group 1T (phosphoric acid + silane-traditional), group 2M (control-modified), and group 2T (control-traditional). A modified micro-push-out bond strength test method was used in modified groups. In traditional groups, the 20 extracted human, single-rooted teeth were endodontically treated. Gutta-percha was removed with #1-2 Peeso Reamers (Mani), and the post space of each specimen was enlarged with a standard drill system from the corresponding fiber post system to create a 9 mm post space with at least 4 mm of filling material in the root apex. Following post cementation according to the manufacturer's instructions, the traditional micro-push-out bond strengths were tested using a universal testing machine(0.5 mm/min). Both failure modes were examined with a stereomicroscope. The data of the four groups were statistically analyzed using the one-way ANOVA test(α= 0.05).

RESULTS

The bond strengths were (18.85±1.42) MPa for group 1M, (19.39±1.35) MPa for group 1T, (11.26±1.57) MPa for group 2M, and (11.27±1.83) MPa for group 2T. The bond strength of Group 1 was significantly higher than that of group 2(P<0.05), no matter which method was used. The fracture mode 100% in group M was the destruction of the post/resin interface, compared with 65.7% in group T.

CONCLUSION

In contrasted to the traditional micro-push-out test, the modified test can evaluate the bond strength of fiber post to resin cement more effectively, and 35% phosphate acid + silane treatment can improve the bonding strength.

Irrigación del conducto radicular y tratamiento de superficie de pernos de fibra, previo a la cementación: revisión de tema

Introducción: el tratamiento endodóntico es muy solicitado para preservar las piezas dentales, así como la utilización de pernos de fibra cuando el remanente coronario no es el adecuado para recibir una prótesis coronaria, permitiendo de esta manera reconstruir el muñón dental para la posterior colocación de la restauración definitiva. Objetivo: identificar tanto el tratamiento de superficie de pernos de fibra como el irrigante radicular idóneos para conseguir una cementación adecuada; así como conocer cuál es el tratamiento de superficie que produce menos desintegración de las fibras del perno de fibra. Materiales y métodos: se incluyeron 47 artículos publicados en inglés, durante los últimos 20 años, teniendo en cuenta que los mismos se obtuvieron hasta octubre del 2018. Conclusiones: previa la cementación de pernos sean estos de fibra o de cuarzo es indispensable realizar tratamiento de superficie para así mejorar la adhesión, estos pueden ser químicos o físicos, los que ofrecen mejor resultado sin alterar de manera significativa la estructura del mismo es el enarenado con partículas de diamante sintéticas de 1-3 µm seguido de silanización y dentro de los químicos H2O2 al 10% por 1 min seguido de silano. Para obtener mejores resultados se debe accionar el silano a una temperatura de 80°C. En cuanto a protocolos de irrigación depende del sistema de cementación que se vaya a emplear EDTA 18% + Hipoclorito de sodio al 5,25% o EDTA 18% + clorhexidina al 2% cuando se va emplear un cemento autoadhesivoy NaOCl al 11% cuando se utilice el acondicionamiento ácido de lavado y secado.