The effect of repeated bonding on the shear bond strength of different resin cements to enamel and dentin

Evaluation of the re-bond strength of debonded metal and ceramic brackets following Er: YAG laser treatment

BACKGROUND

Failure of orthodontic bracket bonds is a common occurrence during orthodontic treatment. This study investigated the impact of Er: YAG laser-based removal of adhesive from the bases of metal and ceramic brackets for re-bonding.

METHODS

A total of 168 extracted premolars were collected from patients. 84 metal brackets were used to be bonded on the buccal surface of the premolars in Groups 1, 2, 3 and 4, while 84 ceramic brackets were applied in Groups I, II, III and IV. Group 1/I represented the initial bonding group, with Group 2/II being the re-bonding group with new brackets, while Groups 3/III and 4/ IV received recycled brackets treated by Er: YAG laser or flaming respectively. Both the first and second de-bonding were performed in all samples using a universal testing machine to determine the shear bond strength (SBS). The adhesive remnant index (ARI) was evaluated using a stereo-microscope. The new and the treated bracket bases were evaluated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Differences in initial bonding and re-bonding ability were analyzed through one-way ANOVAs, and differences in ARI were assessed with the Kruskal-Wallis test.

RESULTS

Greater amounts of adhesive residue were observed on ceramic brackets treated by laser. The SBS values for recycled metal brackets in Group 3 (26.13 MPa) were comparable to Group 1 (23.62 MPa) whereas they differed significantly from Group 4 (12.54 MPa). No significant differences in these values were observed when comparing the 4 groups with ceramic brackets. ARI score in Group 4 (2-3 points) differed significantly from the three other groups (P < 0.05). For Group I, II, III and IV, similar ARI scores were observed (P > 0.05). SEM analysis didn't show apparent damage of bracket bases consisting of either metal or ceramic material treated by Er: YAG laser.

CONCLUSIONS

Er: YAG laser treatment was superior to flame treatment as a means of removing adhesive without damaging the brackets. SBS values and ARI scores following Er: YAG laser treatment were similar to those for new brackets, offering further support for Er: YAG laser treatment as a viable means of recycling debonded brackets.

Effect of Er:YAG, Co2 lasers, papain, and bromelain enzymes dentin treatment on shear bond strength of composite resin

OBJECTIVE

Effective bond strength of composite resin restoration leads to its durability, so evaluation of dentin surface treatment with enzymes and laser for higher bond strength is an important factor.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty human molar teeth were cut at a depth of 2 mm of occlusal part and divided into six groups (n = 10). G1: etched with 37% phosphoric, G2 and G3: 10% papain or bromelain enzymes were used on the dentinal surface, G4: 10% papain and bromelain enzyme mixture were used for. Then, the specimens were washed with distilled water. In G5 and G6: Er:YAG or Co2 lasers were used on the dentin surface. An adhesive system was applied and then nanohybrid composite was placed in teflon mold and light cured. Samples were subjected to a shear bond strength (SBS) test by universal testing machines. Statistical analysis was performed, using one-way analysis of variance and Tukey HSD tests (p < .05).

RESULTS

The mean SBS in G1 was significantly higher in comparison with the other groups (p < .0001). On the other hand, a comparison of mean SBS between groups 2, 3, 4, and 5 shows no significant differences (p = .221). The mean SBS in group 6 (Co2 laser) was significantly lower in comparison with the other groups (p < .0001).

CONCLUSION

Results showed that SBS of composite resin to dentin was not significantly affected, using either bromelain or papain 10% enzymes or erbium laser. Co2 laser had a negative effect on dentin and decreased the SBS. Phosphoric acid has the best result.

Shear bond strength of ceramic laminate veneers to finishing surfaces with different percentages of preserved enamel under a digital guided method

Background

The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of the percentages of preserved enamel on ceramic laminate veneers’ (CLVs) shear bond strength (SBS).

Methods

Seventy extracted human maxillary central incisors were scanned and reconstructed into three-dimensional models. The extracted teeth were then embedded and randomly divided into seven groups (n = 10 per group). Based on digital analyses of the three-dimensional models, guided tooth preparation and bonding procedures were performed individually to form seven different percentages (100%, 80%, 60% 50%, 40%, 20% and 0%) of remaining enamel thickness on the bonding surface. Finally, the SBS test was performed, and the data were statistically analysed by one-way ANOVA with LSD post hoc test (α = 0.05).

Results

The complete enamel surface exhibited the highest SBS (19.93 ± 4.55 MPa), followed by 80% enamel (19.03 ± 3.66 MPa), 60% enamel (18.44 ± 3.65 MPa), 50% enamel (18.18 ± 3.41 MPa), 40% enamel (17.83 ± 3.01 MPa) and 20% enamel (11.32 ± 3.42 MPa) group. The lowest SBS (9.63 ± 3.46 MPa) was detected in 0% enamel group. No significant difference was observed among the 40–100% enamel groups, while the 20% or 0% enamel group demonstrated a significantly lower mean SBS than the 40% enamel group (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

The SBS value of CLVs bonded to 100% enamel on the finishing surfaces (nearly 20 MPa) was twice that which bonded to 0% enamel (nearly 10 MPa). Bonding to 100% enamel is the most reliable treatment. When dentin exposure is inevitable, enamel should be preserved as much as possible to maintain good bonding. In addition, 40% of preserved enamel on the bonding surface was the minimal acceptable value to fulfil the requirements of good bonding strength.

Efficacy of Polyacrylic Acid as a Conditioning Agent on the Bond Strength of Self-adhesive Resin Cements to Dental Enamel

PURPOSE

This in vitro study evaluated the effectiveness of polyacrylic acid as an acid etchant similar to phosphoric acid and its effect on the microtensile bond strength of self-adhesive resin cement to enamel.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ninety Te-Econom Plus resin blocks (11 x 4 mm) were cemented onto bovine enamel and distributed into 10 groups according to the surface treatments (no surface treatment; etching with 37% phosphoric acid; etching with 20% polyacrylic acid; etching with 37% phosphoric acid + dental adhesive, and etching with 20% polyacrylic acid + dental adhesive) and the self-adhesive resin cements used (RelyX U200 and MaxCem Elite) (n = 9). After bonding, the specimens were sectioned into sticks, subjected to thermocycling (5760 cycles, 5°C and 55°C) and microtensile bond strength testing (n = 6). Images of representative specimens were obtained using a scanning electron microscope. Enamel penetration evaluation of different surface treatments was analysed by confocal laser scanning microscopy (n = 3). Data on bond strength were subjected to 2-way ANOVA and Tukey's least significant difference test (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

Both 37% phosphoric acid and 20% polyacrylic acid yielded the same microtensile bond strength between self-adhesive resin cement and enamel, independent of the application of dental adhesives (p > 0.05). MaxCem Elite showed higher bond strength values than RelyX U200 just for the 20% polyacrylic acid group (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Acid pre-conditioning of dental enamel may influence the bond strength of self-adhesive resin cement to enamel, and 20% polyacrylic acid showed efficacy similar to that of 37% phosphoric acid.

Evaluation of rebonding strengths of leucite and lithium disilicate veneers debonded with an Er:YAG laser

Resin cements create a high bond between the tooth and ceramic surfaces, thus making it impossible to remove the restoration in one piece. The aims of this study were to evaluate (i) the efficiency of an Er:YAG laser for debonding, and (ii) the changes in the rebonding strength values of all-ceramic veneers, which were removed after laser application. A tooth reduction of 120 extracted human maxillary central incisors was made to provide two different bonding surfaces (60 enamel and 60 dentin). Sixty leucite and 60 lithium disilicate discs (1-mm thickness, 5-mm diameter) were cemented to prepared surfaces with a dual-cure resin cement. Each group was divided into two subgroups (n = 15): control and laser-irradiated. Er:YAG laser (2940 nm) was applied for 9 s at 3 W power (10 Hz, 300 mJ) with 100 μs pulse duration. Shear bond strength (SBS) test was made with a universal testing machine. After the tested laser-irradiated specimens had been rebonded, the SBS test was performed again and rebonding strengths were measured. The statistical evaluations were performed by using repeated measures one-way ANOVA and post hoc Bonferroni tests (p < 0.05). Significant differences were found between the control and laser-irradiated groups (p < 0.001). While the required SBS values for control groups were between 30.04 and 24.66 MPa, the values for laser-irradiated groups were between 6.60 and 4.09 MPa. There was no significant difference between the control and rebonded groups. Er:YAG laser-irradiation is an effective method for removing all-ceramic restorations without affecting the rebonding strength.

Effect of Intraoral Mechanical Cleaning Techniques on Bond Strength of Cast Crowns to Metal Cores

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of cleaning of metal cores from provisional cement, using an intraoral airborne-particle abrasion method, on the bond strength of permanent resin cement with cast crowns to cores.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty stainless steel models of a standard complete crown tooth preparation were fabricated. Thirty Type III gold crowns were fabricated. Each cast crown corresponded to one stainless steel crown preparation model. All crowns were cemented with noneugenol zinc oxide cement and stored for 7 days at 37°C. All crowns were debonded, and the cement was cleaned with airborne-particle abrasion using 50 µm aluminum oxide at 4.1 bar (0.41 MPa) followed by ultrasonic cleaning. Based on the mechanical cleaning technique of the remaining provisional cement on surfaces of cast cores, specimens were equally divided into 3 groups: hand cleaning (HC) with a dental excavator, hand cleaning followed by polishing using a brush and pumice (BP), and hand cleaning followed by intraoral airborne-particle abrasion (APA). All crowns were then cemented to their corresponding cores using universal resin cement. All crowns were stored for 7 days at 37°C. An Instron universal testing machine was used to record the bond strength of crowns.

RESULTS

Airborne-particle abrasion method for intraoral mechanical cleaning revealed a statistically significantly higher bond strength compared to the other two methods.

CONCLUSIONS

When comparing the three methods of provisional cement cleaning from metal cores, airborne-particle abrasion resulted in the highest bond strength for cast crowns.