Rotational tolerances of a titanium abutment in the as-received condition and after screw tightening in a conical implant connection

Comparative Analysis of Internal Tapered Implant-Abutment Connections: Evaluating the Morse Effect

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the Morse effect of different internal tapered implant-abutment connections (ITCs) using a pullout test. Implants with different ITCs were selected: Short (Bicon, USA), G1; Novo Colosso (Medens, Brazil), G2; Epkut (SIN, Brazil), G3; Strong SW (SIN, Brazil), G4; Flash (Conexão, Brazil), G5 and Bone Level (Straumann, Switzerland), G6. The respective computer-aided design (CAD) files were loaded into the analysis software to measure each ITC's taper angle and implant-abutment contact area. Six implants from each group were embedded in acrylic resin blocks, and the respective universal abutments were fixed using a mallet (G1) or by applying 20 Ncm of torque (G2 to G6). After 10 minutes, each abutment's retention screw was removed, and the force necessary for abutment rupture was recorded using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. The groups were compared using a one-way analysis of variance and Tukey's test. Spearman's correlation was used to check the correlation of the taper angle and contacting area with the pullout strength. G1, a no-screw abutment with a 3° taper, and G2, a 10° tapered abutment tightened by 20 Ncm, presented the highest pullout strength (P < .05). The increased taper angle of G4, compared to G3, reduced the Morse effect despite their similar implant-abutment contacting areas (P < .05). The G5 and G6 abutments loosened after screw removal and did not exhibit pullout resistance. The closer the tapered angle (r = -.958) and the higher the implant-abutment contact area (r = .880), the higher the pullout strength (P < .001). Within the limits of this study, the Morse effect is different among tapered implant-abutment connections. The closer the tapered angle and the higher the interface area, the higher the Morse effect between the abutment and the implant.

Bacterial Detection, Deformation, and Torque Loss on Dental Implants with Different Tapered Connections Compared with External Hexagon Connection after Thermomechanical Cycling

The relationship between bacterial infiltration and internal conical Implant-Abutment Interfaces (IAIs) with different conicities still requires investigations that can offer valuable information in the clinical understanding of peri-implant health. The present study aimed to verify the bacterial infiltration of two internal conical connections with an angulation of 11.5° and 16° with the external hexagonal connection as a comparative after thermomechanical cycling using saliva as a contaminant. Test (n = 10) and control (n = 3) groups were set up. Evaluations were made on torque loss, Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), and Micro Computerized Tomography (MicroCT) after performing 2 × 10⁶ mechanical cycles (120 N) and 600 thermal cycles (5°-55° C) with 2 mm lateral displacement. The contents of the IAI were collected for microbiological analysis. There was a difference (p < 0.05) in torque loss of the groups tested; groups from the 16° IAI obtained a lower percentage of torque loss. All groups presented contamination and the analysis of the results shows that the microbiological profile of the IAI differs qualitatively from the profile found in the saliva used for contamination. The mechanical loading affects the microbiological profile found in the IAIs (p < 0.05). In conclusion, the IAI environment may favor a microbiological profile different from that of saliva and the thermocycling condition may alter the microbial profile found in the IAI.

Clinical Outcomes of Dental Implants with Two Different Internal Connection Configurations—A RCT

Background: The aim of the present study was to highlight clinical and radiographical differences among implants sharing the same macro-geometry but with two different prosthodontic connections. Methods: Patients requiring at least 2 implants in the posterior area of the jaw were randomly divided into two groups (Conical (CS) and Internal Hexagonal (IH) connection). At implant surgery (T0), insertion torque, implant stability quotient (ISQ values recorded by resonance frequency analysis, RFA), and soft tissue thickness (STH) were assessed. A 1-abutment/1-time protocol was applied, and the prosthesis was realized following a fully digital workflow. At the 36-month follow-up periapical x-rays were taken. In order to statistically analyse differences among the two groups and the different variables, paired T-test was used. Linear regression analysis was conducted to analyze how marginal bone loss (MBL) was affected by other independent variables. A neural network created to predict the success (good or not good) of the implant itself was implemented. Results: 30 out of 33 patients (14 males, 16 females, mean age: 68.94 ± 13.01 years) (32 CS and 32 IH) were analyzed. No implants failed. Marginal bone loss at the 3-year time-point was 0.33 ± 0.34 mm and 0.43 ± 0.37 mm respectively for CS and IH with a significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.004). The presence of keratinized gingiva (p = 0.034) significantly influenced MBL. Conclusions: Both the implant connections investigated presented optimal clinical outcomes with minimal marginal bone loss; however, CS implants and implants with the presence of a greater width of keratinized tissue presented significantly lower MBL.

Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes of Titanium and Zirconia Implant Abutments: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews

Background: Dental implants are widely used and in order to answer to esthetic demands, zirconia has been introduced as an abutment material as an alternative to titanium. Several studies have been published on this topic, but the results have been often inconsistent. The objective of the present study is to systematically analyze the existing literature comparing clinical outcomes of titanium and zirconia implant abutments. The study was designed as a systematic review of systematic reviews. Methods: This systematic review is in accordance with the Transparent Reporting of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses. A MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and SCOPUS literature search was performed up to and including June 2021. Data were extracted independently by two reviewers and tAMSTAR2 was used to assess the quality of the systematic reviews. Results: The electronic search identified 1146 papers, and 175 duplicates were removed. After manual screening, 954 studies were excluded and the final analysis was conducted on 11 papers. Both mechanical and esthetic outcomes and biological complications were analyzed. Conclusions: It can be concluded that titanium abutments have a better mechanical resistance than zirconia ones. Plaque accumulation is reported to be slightly higher on titanium but without any significant inflammatory process. The esthetic outcomes seem to be more related to the thickness (>3 mm) of the soft tissues than to the abutment material.