1
|
Koech MJ, Mwangi J, Kithaka B, Kimaru S, Kusu N, Munyi L, Chahonyo S, Makokha F. Effects of stigma on quality of life of cancer survivors: Preliminary evidence from a survivorship programme in Kenya. Heliyon 2024; 10:e30165. [PMID: 38720711 PMCID: PMC11076907 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2023] [Revised: 03/22/2024] [Accepted: 04/21/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Globally, cancer is a major public health problem. There is a paucity of information regarding stigma and how it affects the cancer survivors' quality of life (QoL) in Kenya. In a recent report by Globocan, 42,116 new cases and 27,072 fatalities related to cancer were documented in Kenya in 2020. Cancer survivors are more likely to suffer physical and psychological disorders as a result of their poor QoL. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs regarding the stigma associated with the disease as well as how it affects their QoL among a cohort of cancer survivors supported by the KILELE Health Association. Methods This research used a cross-sectional design with both quantitative and qualitative methods. The study enrolled 45 cancer survivors from a cohort participating in the KILELE Health Association (KHA) survivors' program. The quantitative data were coded and analyzed using the 26th version of the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS). Utilizing content analysis, qualitative data was thematically evaluated. In accordance with the study's goals and key measures, the generated transcripts were organized into themes and sub-themes. Results Participants' mean age was 44.55 ± 9.89 years. Forty-two of the participants completed the survey and were thus included in the analysis. Cancer survivors reported experiencing low levels of stigma across the following dimensions: awkwardness (2.51 ± 0.75), severity (3.22 ± 1.29), financial discrimination (2.77 ± 1.17), personal responsibility (1.9 ± 1.38), avoidance (1.38 ± 0.68), and policy level stigmatization (5.09 ± 1.70). Awareness raising (97.62%), using communication channels (95.24%), advocacy, and lobbying (92.86%) were the most commonly stated strategies to change people's attitudes in terms of interventions to reduce stigma and improve QoL. Conclusion Respondents in this study showed low levels of stigma, which may be due to the support they receive from the KILELE Health Association. Strategic steps in advocacy, publicity, and education are required to end stigmatization to promote awareness and pique people's interest in cancer survivorship. Further research with a larger sample size of cancer survivors from various settings is warranted.
Collapse
|
2
|
Fan R, Wang L, Bu X, Wang W, Zhu J. Unmet supportive care needs of breast cancer survivors: a systematic scoping review. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:587. [PMID: 37365504 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11087-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer is the most common type of cancer in women worldwide. Though improved treatments and prolonged overall survival, breast cancer survivors (BCSs) persistently suffer from various unmet supportive care needs (USCNs) throughout the disease. This scoping review aims to synthesize current literature regarding USCNs among BCSs. METHODS This study followed a scoping review framework. Articles were retrieved from Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Medline from inception through June 2023, as well as reference lists of relevant literature. Peer-reviewed journal articles were included if USCNs among BCSs were reported. Inclusion/exclusion criteria were adopted to screen articles' titles and abstracts as well as to entirely assess any potentially pertinent records by two independent researchers. Methodological quality was independently appraised following Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tools. Content analytic approach and meta-analysis were performed for qualitative and quantitative studies respectively. Results were reported according to the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews. RESULTS A total of 10,574 records were retrieved and 77 studies were included finally. The overall risk of bias was low to moderate. The self-made questionnaire was the most used instrument, followed by The Short-form Supportive Care Needs Survey questionnaire (SCNS-SF34). A total of 16 domains of USCNs were finally identified. Social support (74%), daily activity (54%), sexual/intimacy (52%), fear of cancer recurrence/ spreading (50%), and information support (45%) were the top unmet supportive care needs. Information needs and psychological/emotional needs appeared most frequently. The USCNs was found to be significantly associated with demographic factors, disease factors, and psychological factors. CONCLUSION BCSs are experiencing a large number of USCNs in fearing of cancer recurrence, daily activity, sexual/intimacy, psychology and information, with proportions ranging from 45% to 74%. Substantial heterogeneity in study populations and assessment tools was observed. There is a need for further research to identify a standard evaluation tool targeted to USCNs on BCSs. Effective interventions based on guidelines should be formulated and conducted to decrease USCNs among BCSs in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rongrong Fan
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, No.37, Guoxue Lane, Wuhou District, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Lili Wang
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, No.37, Guoxue Lane, Wuhou District, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Xiaofan Bu
- The School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong
| | - Wenxiu Wang
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, No.37, Guoxue Lane, Wuhou District, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Jing Zhu
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, No.37, Guoxue Lane, Wuhou District, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Khajoei R, Ilkhani M, Azadeh P, Zohari Anboohi S, Heshmati Nabavi F. Breast cancer survivors-supportive care needs: systematic review. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2023; 13:143-153. [PMID: 36972985 DOI: 10.1136/spcare-2022-003931] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/08/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To achieve optimal survival care outcomes, all healthcare services must be tailored to patients' specific needs, preferences and concerns throughout the survival period. This study aimed to identify supportive care needs from the point of view of breast cancer survivors. METHODS Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for reporting systematic reviews, a comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus was performed. The inclusion criteria were studies published from inception to the end of January 2022, covering all stages of breast cancer. The exclusion criteria were mixed-type studies relating to cancer, such as case reports, commentaries, editorials and systematic reviews, as well as studies that assessed patients' needs during cancer treatment. Two quality assessment tools were used for the qualitative and quantitative studies. RESULTS Of the 13 095 records retrieved, 40 studies, including 20 qualitative and 20 quantitative studies, were retained for this review. Survivors' supportive care needs were classified into 10 dimensions and 40 subdimensions. The most frequently mentioned supportive care needs of survivors were psychological/emotional needs (N=32), health system/informational needs (N=30), physical and daily activities (N=19), and interpersonal/intimacy needs (N=19). CONCLUSIONS This systematic review highlights several essential needs for breast cancer survivors. Supportive programmes should be designed in order to take into consideration all aspects of these needs, particularly psychological, emotional and informational needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rahimeh Khajoei
- Student Research Committee, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (the Islamic Republic of)
| | - Mahnaz Ilkhani
- Department of Medical Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (the Islamic Republic of)
| | - Payam Azadeh
- Radiation Oncology Department, Imam Hossein Hospital, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (the Islamic Republic of)
| | - Sima Zohari Anboohi
- Department of Medical Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (the Islamic Republic of)
| | - Fatemah Heshmati Nabavi
- Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran (the Islamic Republic of)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
León-Salas B, Álvarez-Pérez Y, Ramos-García V, Del Mar Trujillo-Martín M, de Pascual Y Medina AM, Esteva M, Brito-García N, González-Hernández N, Bohn-Sarmiento U, Biurrun-Martínez MC, Serrano-Aguilar P. Information needs and research priorities in long-term survivorship of breast cancer: Patients and health professionals' perspectives. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2022; 31:e13730. [PMID: 36226900 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2022] [Revised: 09/19/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this work is to identify unmet information needs of long-term-survivors of breast cancer (BC) and future research needs from the perspectives of patients and health care professionals. METHODS Two online Delphi surveys were conducted. Participants in Survey 1 were patients. Participants in Survey 2 were health care professionals from both primary and secondary care involved in BC care. Both surveys included three successive rounds. The first round aimed to identify research and information needs; the second round aimed to rank the relative importance of those needs; the third round aimed to find consensus. RESULTS The most important information needs were self-management recommendations of common health problems after treatment and complications of breast reconstruction after 5 years. The most important research priorities were related to interventions and tools to increase information provision by professionals about certain tests, diet, and coordinated action between primary and specialised care during follow-up, and indications and safety issues of pregnancy in survivors. CONCLUSIONS Two fundamental ideas were identified: (1) Patients request information about self-management common health problems after treatment and breast reconstruction complications. (2) Health care professionals emphasise the need for a standardised approach based on protocols, recommendations, and coordinated actions in the provision of information. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Given the increasing number of BC survivors, it is essential to identify information and research needs to improve their care and health outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beatriz León-Salas
- Canary Islands Health Research Institute Foundation (FIISC), Tenerife, Spain.,Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Madrid, Spain.,Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), Madrid, Spain
| | - Yolanda Álvarez-Pérez
- Canary Islands Health Research Institute Foundation (FIISC), Tenerife, Spain.,Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), Madrid, Spain
| | - Vanesa Ramos-García
- Canary Islands Health Research Institute Foundation (FIISC), Tenerife, Spain.,Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), Madrid, Spain.,University of La Laguna (ULL), Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
| | - Mª Del Mar Trujillo-Martín
- Canary Islands Health Research Institute Foundation (FIISC), Tenerife, Spain.,Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Madrid, Spain.,Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Magdalena Esteva
- Research Unit, Majorca Primary Care Department, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.,Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands (IdISBa), Palma de Mallorca, Spain.,Red de Investigación de Actividades Preventivas y Promoción de la Salud (RedIAPP), Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Nerea González-Hernández
- Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Madrid, Spain.,Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), Madrid, Spain.,Kronikgune Institute for Health Services Research, Bizkaia, Basque Country, Spain.,Research Unit, Hospital Galdakao-Usansolo, Galdakao, Bizkaia, Spain
| | - Uriel Bohn-Sarmiento
- Medical Oncology Service, University Hospital of Gran Canaria "Dr. Negrin", Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
| | | | - Pedro Serrano-Aguilar
- Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Madrid, Spain.,Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), Madrid, Spain.,Evaluation Unit (SESCS), Canary Islands Health Service (SCS), Tenerife, Spain
| |
Collapse
|