Domain-Specific and Stage-Intrinsic Changes in Tcrb Conformation during Thymocyte Development

The Cyclin D3 Protein Enforces Monogenic TCRβ Expression by Mediating TCRβ Protein-Signaled Feedback Inhibition of Vβ Recombination

In jawed vertebrates, adaptive immunity depends on the process of V(D)J recombination creating vast numbers of T and B lymphocytes that each expresses unique Ag receptors of uniform specificity. The asynchronous initiation of V-to-(D)J rearrangement between alleles and the resulting protein from one allele signaling feedback inhibition of V recombination on the other allele ensures homogeneous receptor specificity of individual cells. Upon productive Vβ-to-DβJβ rearrangements in noncycling double-negative thymocytes, TCRβ protein signals induction of the cyclin D3 protein to accelerate cell cycle entry, thereby driving proliferative expansion of developing αβ T cells. Through undetermined mechanisms, the inactivation of cyclin D3 in mice causes an increased frequency of αβ T cells that express TCRβ proteins from both alleles, producing lymphocytes of heterogeneous specificities. To determine how cyclin D3 enforces monogenic TCRβ expression, we used our mouse lines with enhanced rearrangement of specific Vβ segments due to replacement of their poor-quality recombination signal sequence (RSS) DNA elements with a better RSS. We show that cyclin D3 inactivation in these mice elevates the frequencies of αβ T cells that display proteins from RSS-augmented Vβ segments on both alleles. By assaying mature αβ T cells, we find that cyclin D3 deficiency increases the levels of Vβ rearrangements that occur within developing thymocytes. Our data demonstrate that a component of the cell cycle machinery mediates TCRβ protein-signaled feedback inhibition in thymocytes to achieve monogenic TCRβ expression and resulting uniform specificity of individual αβ T cells.

Direct regulation of TCR rearrangement and expression by E proteins during early T cell development

γδ T cells are widely distributed throughout mucosal and epithelial cell-rich tissues and are an important early source of IL-17 in response to several pathogens. Like αβ T cells, γδ T cells undergo a stepwise process of development in the thymus that requires recombination of genome-encoded segments to assemble mature T cell receptor (TCR) genes. This process is tightly controlled on multiple levels to enable TCR segment assembly while preventing the genomic instability inherent in the double-stranded DNA breaks that occur during this process. Each TCR locus has unique aspects in its structure and requirements, with different types of regulation before and after the αβ/γδ T cell fate choice. It has been known that Runx and Myb are critical transcriptional regulators of TCRγ and TCRδ expression, but the roles of E proteins in TCRγ and TCRδ regulation have been less well explored. Multiple lines of evidence show that E proteins are involved in TCR expression at many different levels, including the regulation of Rag recombinase gene expression and protein stability, induction of germline V segment expression, chromatin remodeling, and restriction of the fetal and adult γδTCR repertoires. Importantly, E proteins interact directly with the cis-regulatory elements of the TCRγ and TCRδ loci, controlling the predisposition of a cell to become an αβ T cell or a γδ T cell, even before the lineage-dictating TCR signaling events. This article is categorized under: Immune System Diseases > Stem Cells and Development Immune System Diseases > Genetics/Genomics/Epigenetics.

Transcriptional Regulation of Early T-Lymphocyte Development in Thymus

T-lymphocytes play crucial roles for maintaining immune homeostasis by fighting against various pathogenic microorganisms and establishing self-antigen tolerance. They will go through several stages and checkpoints in the thymus from progenitors to mature T cells, from CD4^-CD8^- double negative (DN) cells to CD4⁺CD8⁺ double positive (DP) cells, finally become CD4⁺ or CD8⁺ single positive (SP) cells. The mature SP cells then emigrate out of the thymus and further differentiate into distinct subsets under different environment signals to perform specific functions. Each step is regulated by various transcriptional regulators downstream of T cell receptors (TCRs) that have been extensively studied both in vivo and vitro via multiple mouse models and advanced techniques, such as single cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) and Chromatin Immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq). This review will summarize the transcriptional regulators participating in the early stage of T cell development reported in the past decade, trying to figure out cascade networks in each process and provide possible research directions in the future.

The Toolbox for Untangling Chromosome Architecture in Immune Cells

The code of life is not only encrypted in the sequence of DNA but also in the way it is organized into chromosomes. Chromosome architecture is gradually being recognized as an important player in regulating cell activities (e.g., controlling spatiotemporal gene expression). In the past decade, the toolbox for elucidating genome structure has been expanding, providing an opportunity to explore this under charted territory. In this review, we will introduce the recent advancements in approaches for mapping spatial organization of the genome, emphasizing applications of these techniques to immune cells, and trying to bridge chromosome structure with immune cell activities.

RSSs set the odds for exclusion

In this issue of JEM, Wu et al. (https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20200412) provide new insights into allelic exclusion. They demonstrate that V_β-to-D_βJ_β rearrangement occurs stochastically on two competing Tcrb alleles, with suboptimal V_β recombination signal sequences limiting synchronous rearrangements and essential for allelic exclusion.

Regulation of T-cell Receptor Gene Expression by Three-Dimensional Locus Conformation and Enhancer Function

The adaptive immune response in vertebrates depends on the expression of antigen-specific receptors in lymphocytes. T-cell receptor (TCR) gene expression is exquisitely regulated during thymocyte development to drive the generation of αβ and γδ T lymphocytes. The TCRα, TCRβ, TCRγ, and TCRδ genes exist in two different configurations, unrearranged and rearranged. A correctly rearranged configuration is required for expression of a functional TCR chain. TCRs can take the form of one of three possible heterodimers, pre-TCR, TCRαβ, or TCRγδ which drive thymocyte maturation into αβ or γδ T lymphocytes. To pass from an unrearranged to a rearranged configuration, global and local three dimensional (3D) chromatin changes must occur during thymocyte development to regulate gene segment accessibility for V(D)J recombination. During this process, enhancers play a critical role by modifying the chromatin conformation and triggering noncoding germline transcription that promotes the recruitment of the recombination machinery. The different signaling that thymocytes receive during their development controls enhancer activity. Here, we summarize the dynamics of long-distance interactions established through chromatin regulatory elements that drive transcription and V(D)J recombination and how different signaling pathways are orchestrated to regulate the activity of enhancers to precisely control TCR gene expression during T-cell maturation.

DNA double-strand breaks induce H2Ax phosphorylation domains in a contact-dependent manner

Efficient repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) requires a coordinated DNA Damage Response (DDR), which includes phosphorylation of histone H2Ax, forming γH2Ax. This histone modification spreads beyond the DSB into neighboring chromatin, generating a DDR platform that protects against end disassociation and degradation, minimizing chromosomal rearrangements. However, mechanisms that determine the breadth and intensity of γH2Ax domains remain unclear. Here, we show that chromosomal contacts of a DSB site are the primary determinants for γH2Ax landscapes. DSBs that disrupt a topological border permit extension of γH2Ax domains into both adjacent compartments. In contrast, DSBs near a border produce highly asymmetric DDR platforms, with γH2Ax nearly absent from one broken end. Collectively, our findings lend insights into a basic DNA repair mechanism and how the precise location of a DSB may influence genome integrity.

Formation of γH2Ax serves as a checkpoint for double-strand break (DSB) repair pathways. Here the authors reveal via integrated chromatin analysis that γH2Ax domains are established by chromosomal contacts with the DSB site.

cis-Regulatory Circuits Regulating NEK6 Kinase Overexpression in Transformed B Cells Are Super-Enhancer Independent

Alterations in distal regulatory elements that control gene expression underlie many diseases, including cancer. Epigenomic analyses of normal and diseased cells have produced correlative predictions for connections between dysregulated enhancers and target genes involved in pathogenesis. However, with few exceptions, these predicted cis-regulatory circuits remain untested. Here, we dissect cis-regulatory circuits that lead to overexpression of NEK6, a mitosis-associated kinase, in human B cell lymphoma. We find that only a minor subset of predicted enhancers is required for NEK6 expression. Indeed, an annotated super-enhancer is dispensable for NEK6 overexpression and for maintaining the architecture of a B cell-specific regulatory hub. A CTCF cluster serves as a chromatin and architectural boundary to block communication of the NEK6 regulatory hub with neighboring genes. Our findings emphasize that validation of predicted cis-regulatory circuits and super-enhancers is needed to prioritize transcriptional control elements as therapeutic targets.

Activation of Mouse Tcrb: Uncoupling RUNX1 Function from Its Cooperative Binding with ETS1

T lineage commitment requires the coordination of key transcription factors (TFs) in multipotent progenitors that transition them away from other lineages and cement T cell identity. Two important TFs for the multipotent progenitors to T lineage transition are RUNX1 and ETS1, which bind cooperatively to composite sites throughout the genome, especially in regulatory elements for genes involved in T lymphopoiesis. Activation of the TCR β (Tcrb) locus in committed thymocytes is a critical process for continued development of these cells, and is mediated by an enhancer, Eβ, which harbors two RUNX-ETS composite sites. An outstanding issue in understanding T cell gene expression programs is whether RUNX1 and ETS1 have independent functions in enhancer activation that can be dissected from cooperative binding. We now show that RUNX1 is sufficient to activate the endogenous mouse Eβ element and its neighboring 25 kb region by independently tethering this TF without coincidental ETS1 binding. Moreover, RUNX1 is sufficient for long-range promoter-Eβ looping, nucleosome clearance, and robust transcription throughout the Tcrb recombination center, spanning both DβJβ clusters. We also find that a RUNX1 domain, termed the negative regulatory domain for DNA binding, can compensate for the loss of ETS1 binding at adjacent sites. Thus, we have defined independent roles for RUNX1 in the activation of a T cell developmental enhancer, as well as its ability to mediate specific changes in chromatin landscapes that accompany long-range induction of recombination center promoters.

Long-Range Control of V(D)J Recombination & Allelic Exclusion: Modeling Views

Allelic exclusion of immunoglobulin (Ig) and T-cell receptor (TCR) genes ensures the development of B and T lymphocytes operating under the mode of clonal selection. This phenomenon associates asynchronous V(D)J recombination events at Ig or TCR alleles and inhibitory feedback control. Despite years of intense research, however, the mechanisms that sustain asymmetric choice in random Ig/TCR dual allele usage and the production of Ig/TCR monoallelic expressing B and T lymphocytes remain unclear and open for debate. In this chapter, we first recapitulate the biological evidence that almost from the start appeared to link V(D)J recombination and allelic exclusion. We review the theoretical models previously proposed to explain this connection. Finally, we introduce our own mathematical modeling views based on how the developmental dynamics of individual lymphoid cells combine to sustain allelic exclusion.

Regulation of Tcrb Gene Assembly by Genetic, Epigenetic, and Topological Mechanisms

The adaptive immune system endows mammals with an ability to recognize nearly any foreign invader through antigen receptors that are expressed on the surface of all lymphocytes. This defense network is generated by V(D)J recombination, a set of sequentially controlled DNA cleavage and repair events that assemble antigen receptor genes from physically separated variable (V), joining (J), and sometimes diversity (D) gene segments. The recombination process itself must be stringently regulated to minimize oncogenic translocations involving chromosomes that harbor immunoglobulin and T cell receptor loci. Indeed, V(D)J recombination is controlled at several levels, including tissue-, developmental stage-, allele-, and gene segment-specificity. These levels of control are imposed by a collection of architectural and regulatory elements that are distributed throughout each antigen receptor locus. Together, the genetic elements regulate developmental changes in chromatin, transcription, and locus topology that promote or disfavor long-range recombination. This chapter focuses on the cross talk between these mechanisms at the T cell receptor beta (Tcrb) locus, and how they sculpt a diverse TCRβ repertoire while maintaining monospecificity of this antigen receptor on each mature T lymphocyte. We also discuss how insights obtained from studies of Tcrb are more generally relevant to our understanding of gene regulation strategies employed by mammals.