Role for transcription Pax5A factor in maintaining commitment to the B cell lineage by selective inhibition of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor expression

Expression of the B-cell receptor component CD79a on immature myeloid cells contributes to their tumor promoting effects

The role of myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) in promoting tumorigenesis is well-established, and significant effort is being made to further characterize surface markers on MDSCs both for better diagnosis and as potential targets for therapy. Here we show that the B cell receptor adaptor molecule CD79a is unexpectedly expressed on immature bone marrow myeloid cells, and is upregulated on MDSCs generated in multiple different mouse models of metastatic but not non-metastatic cancer. CD79a on MDSCs is upregulated and activated in response to soluble factors secreted by tumor cells. Activation of CD79a on mouse MDSCs, by crosslinking with a specific antibody, maintained their immature phenotype (CD11b+Gr1+), enhanced their migration, increased their suppressive effect on T cell proliferation, and increased secretion of pro-tumorigenic cytokines such as IL-6 and CCL22. Furthermore, crosslinking CD79a on myeloid cells activated signaling through Syk, BLNK, ERK and STAT3 phosphorylation. In vivo, CD79+ myeloid cells showed enhanced ability to promote primary tumor growth and metastasis. Finally we demonstrate that CD79a is upregulated on circulating myeloid cells from lung cancer patients, and that CD79a+ myeloid cells infiltrate human breast tumors. We propose that CD79a plays a functional role in the tumor promoting effects of myeloid cells, and may represent a novel target for cancer therapy.

B cell activator PAX5 promotes lymphomagenesis through stimulation of B cell receptor signaling

The presumed involvement of paired box gene 5 (PAX5) in B-lymphomagenesis is based largely on the discovery of Pax5-specific translocations and somatic hypermutations in non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Yet mechanistically, the contribution of Pax5 to neoplastic growth remains undeciphered. Here we used 2 Myc-induced mouse B lymphoma cell lines, Myc5-M5 and Myc5-M12, which spontaneously silence Pax5. Reconstitution of these cells with Pax5-tamoxifen receptor fusion protein (Pax5ER(TAM)) increased neoplastic growth in a hormone-dependent manner. Conversely, expression of dominant-negative Pax5 in murine lymphomas and Pax5 knockdown in human lymphomas negatively affected cell expansion. Expression profiling revealed that Pax5 was required to maintain mRNA levels of several crucial components of B cell receptor (BCR) signaling, including CD79a, a protein with the immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif (ITAM). In contrast, expression of 2 known ITAM antagonists, CD22 and PIR-B, was suppressed. The key role of BCR/ITAM signaling in Pax5-dependent lymphomagenesis was corroborated in Syk, an ITAM-associated tyrosine kinase. Moreover, we observed consistent expression of phosphorylated BLNK, an activated BCR adaptor protein, in human B cell lymphomas. Thus, stimulation of neoplastic growth by Pax5 occurs through BCR and is sensitive to genetic and pharmacological inhibitors of this pathway.

Identification and comparative analysis of Pax5 C-terminal isoforms expressed in human cord blood-derived B cell progenitors

We identified three Pax5 isoforms due to alternative splicing of the C-terminal exons of its gene in cord blood (CB)-derived B cell progenitors cultivated on the murine bone marrow stromal (HESS-5) cells. Apart from wild type (wt), one isoform skips exon 9 without subsequent frameshift (del9), while the other has a frameshift insert between exons 8 and 9, resulting in novel C-terminal sequences (ins8'). Quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction analysis revealed that wt mRNA could be detected in CB CD34(+) cells, but that del9 and ins8' isoforms only appeared after 1 or 3 weeks of co-culture, respectively. Expression of each isoform mRNA was markedly upregulated during B cell differentiation in vitro, and wild type continued to be the most abundant isoform. In a luciferase reporter assay using a synthetic CD19 enhancer, del9 isoform revealed slightly lower activity and ins8' isoform showed much lower activity, compared with Pax5-wt. Furthermore, retroviral expression of each Pax5 isoform in CB CD34(+) cells induced aberrant CD19 expression in a fraction of immature myeloid cells after 1 week of culture, although del9 and ins8' isoforms showed much less potent activity than Pax5-wt. These results suggest that Pax5-wt is quantitatively and qualitatively dominant over other C-terminal isoforms during human B cell differentiation.

Ectopic expression of PAX5 promotes maintenance of biphenotypic myeloid progenitors coexpressing myeloid and B-cell lineage-associated genes

The transcription factor PAX5 is a critical regulator of B-cell commitment and development. Although normally not expressed in myeloid progenitors, PAX5 has recently been shown to be frequently expressed in myeloid malignancies and to suppress expression of myeloid differentiation genes, compatible with an effect on the differentiation or maintenance of myeloid progenitors. However, previous studies in which PAX5 was ectopically expressed in normal myeloid progenitors in vivo and in vitro provided conflicting results as to the effect of PAX5 on myeloid development. Herein, we demonstrate that on ectopic expression of PAX5 in bone marrow multipotent stem/progenitor cells, cells with a biphenotypic B220+GR-1/MAC-1+ phenotype are produced. These remain cytokine-dependent, but unlike control-transduced cells they sustain long-term generation of myeloid progenitors in vitro and remain capable of myeloid differentiation. Notably, PAX5+B220+GR-1/MAC-1+ myeloid progenitors coexpress, at the single-cell level, myeloid genes and otherwise B-cell–specific PAX5 target genes. These findings establish that ectopic expression of PAX5 introduces extensive self-renewal properties in otherwise short-lived myeloid progenitors. Along with the established ectopic expression of PAX5 in acute myeloid leukemia, this motivates a careful investigation of the potential involvement of ectopic PAX5 expression in myeloid and biphenotypic leukemias.

Fate decisions regulating bone marrow and peripheral B lymphocyte development

In adult mammals, bone marrow pluripotent hematopoietic stem cells generate B lymphoid-specified progeny that progress through a series of well-characterized stages before generating B-cell receptor expressing B lymphocytes. These functionally immature B lymphocytes then migrate to the spleen wherein they differentiate through transitional stages into follicular or marginal zone B lymphocytes capable of responding to T-dependent and -independent antigens, respectively. During the terminal stages of B lymphocyte development in the bone marrow, as well as immediately following egress into the peripheral compartments, B lymphocytes are counterselected to eliminate B lymphocytes with potentially dangerous self-reactivity. These developmental and selection events in the bone marrow and periphery are dependent on the integration of intrinsic genetic programs with extrinsic microenvironmental signals that drive progenitors toward increasing B lineage commitment and maturation. This chapter provides a comprehensive overview of the various stages of primary and secondary B lymphocyte development with an emphasis on the selection processes that affect decisions at critical checkpoints. Our intent is to stress the concept that at many steps in the developmental process leading to a mature immunocompetent B lymphocyte, B lineage cells are integrating multiple and different signaling inputs that are translated into specific and appropriate cell fate decisions.

Notch signaling is necessary but not sufficient for differentiation of dendritic cells

The Notch family of receptors plays an important role in regulation of cell differentiation via direct contact between hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs) and bone marrow stroma (BMS). However the precise contribution of Notch in dendritic cell (DC) differentiation is controversial. In 2 different experimental systems using Notch-1-null embryonic stem cells and Notch-1-deficient HPCs we have found that Notch-1 is necessary for DC differentiation. However, activation of Notch-1 and Notch-2 with cell-bound Notch ligand did not result in differentiation of mature DCs or macrophages. Instead, it caused accumulation of immature myeloid cells. Removal of feeder cells resulted in rapid differentiation of DCs and macrophages. Addition of interleukin 4 (IL-4) into the culture dramatically increased accumulation of functionally potent DCs. Lipopolysaccharide was not able to reproduce this effect. Thus, these data indicate that Notch signaling prevents differentiation of mature myeloid cells. Instead, it results in accumulation of precursors readily able to differentiate into mature DCs once the Notch signal is stopped (eg, after cell emigration from bone marrow) and in the presence of other additional differentiation signals provided by IL-4. Thus, Notch is required but not sufficient for DC differentiation.

B-cell commitment: deciding on the players

Considerable progress has been made over the past few years in determining the key molecular players that regulate the commitment and development of early B-lineage cells in mouse bone marrow (transcription factors, cytokines and their receptors). However, confusion remains as to the precise stages, surface phenotypes and lineage restrictions that are observed early in B-cell development. Increasingly powerful flow cytometry analysis of genetically altered animals (knockouts and transgenics) combined with sensitive functional assays may provide an answer, a "scorecard" for the cell stages.

Oscillation between B-lymphoid and myeloid lineages in Myc-induced hematopoietic tumors following spontaneous silencing/reactivation of the EBF/Pax5 pathway

B lymphomagenesis is an uncontrolled expansion of immature precursors that fail to complete their differentiation program. This failure could be at least partly explained by inappropriate expression of several oncogenic transcription factors, such as Pax5 and Myc. Both Pax5 and c-Myc are implicated in the pathogenesis of non-Hodgkin lymphomas. To address their role in lymphomagenesis, we analyzed B-cell lymphomas derived from p53-null bone marrow progenitors infected in vivo by a Myc-encoding retrovirus. All Myc-induced lymphomas invariably maintained expression of Pax5, which is thought to be incompatible with terminal differentiation. However, upon culturing in vitro, several cell lines spontaneously down-regulated Pax5 and its target genes CD19, N-Myc, and MB1. Unexpectedly, other B-cell markers (eg, CD45R) were also down-regulated, and markers of myeloid lineage (CD11b and F4/80 antigen) were acquired instead. Moreover, cells assumed the morphology reminiscent of myeloid cells. A pool of F4/80-positive cells as well as several single-cell clones were obtained and reinjected into syngeneic mice. Remarkably, pooled cells rapidly re-expressed Pax5 and formed tumors of relatively mature lymphoid phenotype, with surface immunoglobulins being abundantly expressed. Approximately half of tumorigenic single-cell clones also abandoned myeloid differentiation and gave rise to B lymphomas. However, when secondary lymphoma cells were returned to in vitro conditions, they once again switched to myeloid differentiation. This process could be curbed via enforced expression of retrovirally encoded Pax5. Our data demonstrate that some Myc target cells are bipotent B-lymphoid/myeloid progenitors with the astonishing capacity to undergo successive rounds of lineage switching.

T-lineage specification and commitment: a gene regulation perspective

T lymphocytes originate from pluripotent precursors and undergo lasting commitment to the T cell developmental fate during their processing in the thymus. Commitment includes both the acquisition of essential T cell characteristics and the foreclosing of other developmental options. Gain of T cell characteristics is probably mediated by separate mechanisms, at least in detail, from loss of alternative developmental potentials. Programmed shifts in survival requirements make changes irreversible. Here we review the current evidence identifying the regulatory components of this commitment pathway, and the first hints of how they work together. Roles for PU.1, GATA-3, and their target genes are highlighted.

Transcriptional regulation of granulocyte and monocyte development

Granulocytes and monocytes develop from a common myeloid progenitor. Early granulopoiesis requires the C/EBPalpha, PU.1, RAR, CBF, and c-Myb transcription factors, and terminal neutrophil differentiation is dependent upon C/EBPepsilon, PU.1, Sp1, CDP, and HoxA10. Monopoiesis can be induced by Maf-B, c-Jun, or Egr-1 and is dependent upon PU.1, Sp1, and ICSBP. Signals eminating from cytokine receptors modulate factor activities but do not determine cell fates. Orchestration of the myeloid developmental program is achieved via cooperative gene regulation, via synergistic and inhibitory protein-protein interactions, via promoter auto-regulation and cross-regulation, via regulation of factor levels, and via induction of cell cycle arrest: For example, c-Myb and C/EBPalpha cooperate to activate the mim-1 and NE promoters, PU.1, C/EBPalpha, and CBF, regulate the NE, MPO, and M-CSF Receptor genes. PU.1:GATA-1 interaction and C/EBP suppression of FOG transcription inhibits erythroid and megakaryocyte gene expression. c-Jun:PU.1, ICSBP:PU.1, and perhaps Maf:Jun complexes induce monocytic genes. PU.1 and C/EBPalpha activate their own promoters, C/EBPalpha rapidly induces PU.1 and C/EBPepsilon RNA expression, and RARalpha activates the C/EBPepsilon promoter. Higher levels of PU.1 are required for monopoiesis than for B-lymphopoiesis, and higher C/EBP levels may favor granulopoiesis over monopoiesis. CBF and c-Myb stimulate proliferation whereas C/EBPalpha induces a G1/S arrest; cell cycle arrest is required for terminal myelopoiesis, perhaps due to expression of p53 or hypo-phosphorylated Rb.