Nature and Clonality of the Fluoresceinated Secondary Antibody in Luminex Multiplex Bead Assays Are Critical Factors for Reliable Monitoring of Serum HLA Antibody Levels in Patients for Donor Organ Selection, Desensitization Therapy, and Assessment of the Risk for Graft Loss

Antibodies to cryptic epitopes on HLA class I and class II heavy chains bound to single antigen beads: Clinically relevant?

Cell surface HLA class I consists of trimers, i.e., alpha - heavy chain, beta - 2 - microglobulin, and a peptide, termed closed conformers (CC) on non-activated lymphocytes. HLA class I and class II may also exist, respectively, as alpha-chain only or alpha and beta - chain only on activated cells termed open conformers (OC). We extend previous studies using an OC-specific monoclonal antibody that demonstrate LABScreen HLA class I and II single antigen beads (SABs) contain a mixture of open and closed conformers. LIFECODES SABs have bound CC only. More HLA class I and class II LABScreen SABs were reactive than LIFECODES SABs due to the presence of OC on LABScreen SABs. We hypothesized that antibody against OC on HLA B antigens would not be detected in cell based cross matches (XMs) with typical lymphocyte targets since anti-HLA OC antibodies would not react with native HLA CC on the cell surface. To test this hypothesis, we performed flow cytometry XM (FCXM) assays with sera of sufficient strength that most laboratories would likely predict positive FCXMs. Sera that reacted strongly with LABScreen SABs (>13,000 MFI) but weakly or not at all with LIFECODES SABs (<1000 MFI) gave negative T and B cell FCXMs. In contrast, sera that reacted with LIFECODES SABs (>13,000 MFI) but weakly with LABScreen SABs (<2100 MFI) exhibited positive FCXMs. Detection of antibodies directed against OC in SAB assays, may lead to inappropriate listing of unacceptable antigens, a decision not to XM or pre-or post - transplant desensitization procedures.

Defining the structural basis for human leukocyte antigen reactivity in clinical transplantation

The current state-of-the-art technology employed to assess anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies (Anti-HLA Ab) for donor-recipient matching and patient risk stratification in renal transplantation is the single antigen bead (SAB) assay. However, there are limitations to the SAB assay as it is not quantitative and due to variations in techniques and reagents, there is no standardization across laboratories. In this study, a structurally-defined human monoclonal alloantibody was employed to provide a mechanistic explanation for how fundamental alloantibody biology influences the readout from the SAB assay. Performance of the clinical SAB assay was evaluated by altering Anti-HLA Ab concentration, subclass, and detection reagents. Tests were conducted in parallel by two internationally accredited laboratories using standardized protocols and reagents. We show that alloantibody concentration, subclass, laboratory-specific detection devices, subclass-specific detection reagents all contribute to a significant degree of variation in the readout. We report a significant prozone effect affecting HLA alleles that are bound strongly by the test alloantibody as opposed to those bound weakly and this phenomenon is independent of complement. These data highlight the importance for establishing international standards for SAB assay calibration and have significant implications for our understanding of discordance in previous studies that have analyzed its clinical relevance.

Validation and cross-reactivity pattern assessment of monoclonal antibodies used for the screening of donor-specific IgG antibody subclasses in transplant recipients

The screening for IgG subclass donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) in allograft recipients uses IgG1-4 subclass-specific monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that should be mono-specific. The cross-reactivity discrepancies reported for IgG subclass-specific mAbs warranted a critical cross-reactivity pattern analysis of the IgG subclass-specific mAbs most commonly used to detect DSAs. We tested the reactivity of 2 anti-IgG1-, 3 anti-IgG2-, 1 anti-IgG3-, and 2 anti-IgG4-specific PE-conjugated mAbs against microbeads coated with IgG1-4 proteins separately. Each IgG subclass protein was coated at three densities on the beads (0.5, 1, and 2 μg of protein per 10⁶ beads), and the PE-conjugated mAbs were titrated from 0.04 μg/mL to 5 μg/mL. The IgG subclass reactivity of the sample was acquired on the Luminex multiplex platform. Among the IgG subclass-specific mAbs, only the anti-IgG3 (clone: HP6050) mAb was mono-specific. All other mAbs tested were binding to IgG subclass proteins other than their respective immunogen, thereby being cross-reactive. IgG subclass cross-reactivity patterns were dependent on the concentration of both IgG subclass-specific mAbs and IgG1-4 protein targets coated onto the beads. With the current IgG subclass mAbs available, 3 of the 15 possible combinations of IgG1-4 subclass protein could be identified. While the remaining 12 unique combinations cannot be distinguished clearly, 6 groups that corresponded to two different unique combinations of IgG1-4 subclass protein could be identified. The dilution of serum samples and IgG subclass-specific mAbs, other than the anti-IgG3 (clone: HP6050), must be further optimized before their implementation in IgG subclass DSA screening in allograft recipients.

Significance of the intraindividual variability of HLA IgG antibodies in renal disease patients observed with different beadsets monitored with two different secondary antibodies on a Luminex platform

The accurate measurement of anti-HLA alloantibodies in transplant candidates is required for determining the degree of sensitization and for the listing of unacceptable antigens for organ allocation. Both the configuration of the HLA molecules coated on the beads and the nature of detection antibodies may impede assessment of the presence and strength of anti-HLA IgG- with the Luminex single-antigen-bead assay. Sera antibodies of the end-stage renal disease patients were compared using LIFECODES (LC) and LABScreen (LS) beadsets monitored with polyclonal-Fab (IgHPolyFab) and monoclonal-IgG (FcMonoIgG) second antibodies. Positive results at mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) > 500 (at serum dilution 1/10) were used to calculate panel reactive antibody (cPRA) levels. LS-beadsets are coated with monomeric variants in addition to intact HLA antigens with or without peptides, while LC-beadsets are devoid of monomeric variants and with lesser levels of peptide-free heterodimers. Consequently, IgG antibodies against both classes of HLA were reactive to more antigens with LS than with LC-beadsets. For both classes, MFIs were also frequently higher with LS than with LC. For HLA-I, MFIs were higher with IgHPolyFab than with FcMonoIgG with the exception of sera with MFIs > 5000 where they were comparable. For HLA-II, the reverse occurred, with significantly higher levels with FcMonoIgG regardless of the beadsets. The intraindividual variability observed between beadsets with two detection antibodies elucidates that antigens found as acceptable with one beadset may end up unacceptable with the other beadsets, with the possibility of denying potentially compatible transplants to candidates.