Deficiency of β-Arrestin 2 in Dendritic Cells Contributes to Autoimmune Diseases

Interactions between β-arrestin proteins and the cytoskeletal system, and their relevance to neurodegenerative disorders

β-arrestins, which have multiple cellular functions, were initially described as proteins that desensitize rhodopsin and other G protein-coupled receptors. The cytoskeletal system plays a role in various cellular processes, including intracellular transport, cell division, organization of organelles, and cell cycle. The interactome of β-arrestins includes the major proteins of the three main cytoskeletal systems: tubulins for microtubules, actins for the actin filaments, and vimentin for intermediate filaments. β-arrestins bind to microtubules and regulate their activity by recruiting signaling proteins and interacting with assembly proteins that regulate the actin cytoskeleton and the intermediate filaments. Altered regulation of the cytoskeletal system plays an essential role in the development of Alzheimer's, Parkinson's and other neurodegenerative diseases. Thus, β-arrestins, which interact with the cytoskeleton, were implicated in the pathogenesis progression of these diseases and are potential targets for the treatment of neurodegenerative disorders in the future.

Zbtb46 Controls Dendritic Cell Activation by Reprogramming Epigenetic Regulation of cd80/86 and cd40 Costimulatory Signals in a Zebrafish Model

The establishment of an appropriate costimulatory phenotype is crucial for dendritic cells (DCs) to maintain a homeostatic state with optimal immune surveillance and immunogenic activities. The upregulation of CD80/86 and CD40 is a hallmark costimulatory phenotypic switch of DCs from a steady state to an activated one for T cell activation. However, knowledge of the regulatory mechanisms underlying this process remains limited. In this study, we identified a Zbtb46 homolog from a zebrafish model. Zbtb46 deficiency resulted in upregulated cd80/86 and cd40 expression in kidney marrow-derived DCs (KMDCs) of zebrafish, which was accompanied with a remarkable expansion of CD4⁺/CD8⁺ T cells and accumulation of KMDCs in spleen of naive fish. Zbtb46 ^-/- splenic KMDCs exhibited strong stimulatory activity for CD4⁺ T cell activation. Chromatin immunoprecipitation-quantitative PCR and mass spectrometry assays showed that Zbtb46 was associated with promoters of cd80/86 and cd40 genes by binding to a 5'-TGACGT-3' motif in resting KMDCs, wherein it helped establish a repressive histone epigenetic modification pattern (H3K4me0/H3K9me3/H3K27me3) by organizing Mdb3/organizing nucleosome remodeling and deacetylase and Hdac3/nuclear receptor corepressor 1 corepressor complexes through the recruitment of Hdac1/2 and Hdac3. On stimulation with infection signs, Zbtb46 disassociated from the promoters via E3 ubiquitin ligase Cullin1/Fbxw11-mediated degradation, and this reaction can be triggered by the TLR9 signaling pathway. Thereafter, cd80/86 and cd40 promoters underwent epigenetic reprogramming from the repressed histone modification pattern to an activated pattern (H3K4me3/H3K9ac/H3K27ac), leading to cd80/86 and cd40 expression and DC activation. These findings revealed the essential role of Zbtb46 in maintaining DC homeostasis by suppressing cd80/86 and cd40 expression through epigenetic mechanisms.

Double life: How GRK2 and β-arrestin signaling participate in diseases

G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) kinases (GRKs) and β-arrestins play key roles in GPCR and non-GPCR cellular responses. In fact, GRKs and arrestins are involved in a plethora of pathways vital for physiological maintenance of inter- and intracellular communication. Here we review decades of research literature spanning from the discovery, identification of key structural elements, and findings supporting the diverse roles of these proteins in GPCR-mediated pathways. We then describe how GRK2 and β-arrestins partake in non-GPCR signaling and briefly summarize their involvement in various pathologies. We conclude by presenting gaps in knowledge and our prospective on the promising pharmacological potential in targeting these proteins and/or downstream signaling. Future research is warranted and paramount for untangling these novel and promising roles for GRK2 and arrestins in metabolism and disease progression.

Differential Regulation of GPCRs-Are GRK Expression Levels the Key?

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) comprise the largest family of transmembrane receptors and their signal transduction is tightly regulated by GPCR kinases (GRKs) and β-arrestins. In this review, we discuss novel aspects of the regulatory GRK/β-arrestin system. Therefore, we briefly revise the origin of the "barcode" hypothesis for GPCR/β-arrestin interactions, which states that β-arrestins recognize different receptor phosphorylation states to induce specific functions. We emphasize two important parameters which may influence resulting GPCR phosphorylation patterns: (A) direct GPCR-GRK interactions and (B) tissue-specific expression and availability of GRKs and β-arrestins. In most studies that focus on the molecular mechanisms of GPCR regulation, these expression profiles are underappreciated. Hence we analyzed expression data for GRKs and β-arrestins in 61 tissues annotated in the Human Protein Atlas. We present our analysis in the context of pathophysiological dysregulation of the GPCR/GRK/β-arrestin system. This tissue-specific point of view might be the key to unraveling the individual impact of different GRK isoforms on GPCR regulation.

Concepts of GPCR-controlled navigation in the immune system

G‐protein–coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling is essential for the spatiotemporal control of leukocyte dynamics during immune responses. For efficient navigation through mammalian tissues, most leukocyte types express more than one GPCR on their surface and sense a wide range of chemokines and chemoattractants, leading to basic forms of leukocyte movement (chemokinesis, haptokinesis, chemotaxis, haptotaxis, and chemorepulsion). How leukocytes integrate multiple GPCR signals and make directional decisions in lymphoid and inflamed tissues is still subject of intense research. Many of our concepts on GPCR‐controlled leukocyte navigation in the presence of multiple GPCR signals derive from in vitro chemotaxis studies and lower vertebrates. In this review, we refer to these concepts and critically contemplate their relevance for the directional movement of several leukocyte subsets (neutrophils, T cells, and dendritic cells) in the complexity of mouse tissues. We discuss how leukocyte navigation can be regulated at the level of only a single GPCR (surface expression, competitive antagonism, oligomerization, homologous desensitization, and receptor internalization) or multiple GPCRs (synergy, hierarchical and non‐hierarchical competition, sequential signaling, heterologous desensitization, and agonist scavenging). In particular, we will highlight recent advances in understanding GPCR‐controlled leukocyte navigation by intravital microscopy of immune cells in mice.

Phosphatase PTPN22 Regulates Dendritic Cell Homeostasis and cDC2 Dependent T Cell Responses

Dendritic cells (DCs) are specialized antigen presenting cells that instruct T cell responses through sensing environmental and inflammatory danger signals. Maintaining the homeostasis of the multiple functionally distinct conventional dendritic cells (cDC) subsets that exist in vivo is crucial for regulating immune responses, with changes in numbers sufficient to break immune tolerance. Using Ptpn22^-/- mice we demonstrate that the phosphatase PTPN22 is a highly selective, negative regulator of cDC2 homeostasis, preventing excessive population expansion from as early as 3 weeks of age. Mechanistically, PTPN22 mediates cDC2 homeostasis in a cell intrinsic manner by restricting cDC2 proliferation. A single nucleotide polymorphism, PTPN22^R620W, is one of the strongest genetic risk factors for multiple autoantibody associated human autoimmune diseases. We demonstrate that cDC2 are also expanded in mice carrying the orthologous PTPN22^619W mutation. As a consequence, cDC2 dependent CD4⁺ T cell proliferation and T follicular helper cell responses are increased. Collectively, our data demonstrate that PTPN22 controls cDC2 homeostasis, which in turn ensures appropriate cDC2-dependent T cell responses under antigenic challenge. Our findings provide a link between perturbations in DC development and susceptibility to a broad spectrum of PTPN22^R620W associated human autoimmune diseases.