Inter- and intra-observer reliability of MRI for lumbar lateral disc herniation

Novel MRI signs of ruptured disc in the cervical spine with intraoperative comparisons

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of two novel MRI signs for extruded disc (ED) and uncontained ED (ruptured disc, RD) in the cervical spine using intraoperative findings as reference.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients who underwent cervical spine MRI and surgery for disc pathology with intraoperative confirmation of RD from September 1, 2016, to January 31, 2021. Two radiologists determined whether the disc was extruded or ruptured with and without the aid of two novel MRI signs suggesting RD (sign 1: blurred margin of the disc; sign 2: mushroom-shaped disc). The diagnostic performance was analyzed using surgical findings as reference. Intra- and interobserver agreements were measured for each MRI sign.

RESULTS

A total of 91 patients totaling 131 discs were enrolled (mean age: 56.02 ± 12.93; range: 26-88; 62 men and 29 women), of whom 62 were surgically confirmed with RD. When the diagnosis was based exclusively on existing ED definitions, ED was diagnosed with 62.9-79.0% sensitivity and 80.2% accuracy, whereas RD was diagnosed with 35.5-45.2% sensitivity and 67.9-71.0% accuracy. However, when the two novel MRI signs were used as an aid in the diagnosis, ED was diagnosed with 95.2-96.8% sensitivity and 84.0-88.5% accuracy, while RD was diagnosed with 95.2-96.8% sensitivity and 84.0-89.3% accuracy. Intra- and interobserver agreement was substantial (k = 00.77-0.86, 0.69-0.79, respectively, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The detection of two novel MRI signs on preoperative MRI can lead to a more accurate RD diagnosis.

KEY POINTS

• The diagnostic sensitivity of MRI for cervical ruptured disc is very low (about 35-45 %) using the standardized definition of lumbar disc nomenclature. • Two novel MRI signs can lead to a more accurate diagnosis of the surgically confirmed ruptured disc in the cervical spine. • These two novel MRI signs showed substantial intra-and interobserver reliabilities.

Magnetic resonance imaging interpretation in patients with sciatica who are potential candidates for lumbar disc surgery

Background

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is considered the mainstay imaging investigation in patients suspected of lumbar disc herniations. Both imaging and clinical findings determine the final decision of surgery. The objective of this study was to assess MRI observer variation in patients with sciatica who are potential candidates for lumbar disc surgery.

Methods

Patients for this study were potential candidates (n = 395) for lumbar disc surgery who underwent MRI to assess eligibility for a randomized trial. Two neuroradiologists and one neurosurgeon independently evaluated all MRIs. A four point scale was used for both probability of disc herniation and root compression, ranging from definitely present to definitely absent. Multiple characteristics of the degenerated disc herniation were scored. For inter-agreement analysis absolute agreements and kappa coefficients were used. Kappa coefficients were categorized as poor (<0.00), slight (0.00–0.20), fair (0.21–0.40), moderate (0.41–0.60), substantial (0.61–0.80) and excellent (0.81–1.00) agreement.

Results

Excellent agreement was found on the affected disc level (kappa range 0.81–0.86) and the nerve root that most likely caused the sciatic symptoms (kappa range 0.86–0.89). Interobserver agreement was moderate to substantial for the probability of disc herniation (kappa range 0.57–0.77) and the probability of nerve root compression (kappa range 0.42–0.69). Absolute pairwise agreement among the readers ranged from 90–94% regarding the question whether the probability of disc herniation on MRI was above or below 50%. Generally, moderate agreement was observed regarding the characteristics of the symptomatic disc level and of the herniated disc.

Conclusion

The observer variation of MRI interpretation in potential candidates for lumbar disc surgery is satisfactory regarding characteristics most important in decision for surgery. However, there is considerable variation between observers in specific characteristics of the symptomatic disc level and herniated disc.

L5-S1 extraforaminal intraneural disc herniation mimicking a malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

An extraforaminal disc herniation may present as a retroperitoneal mass and is thus a differential diagnosis for a malignant lesion.

PURPOSE

To highlight the difficulty in the accurate preoperative differentiation between an extraforaminal disc herniation and a malignant retroperitoneal mass despite the use of advanced anatomical and metabolic imaging.

STUDY DESIGN

Case report.

METHODS

The authors present a case of a 55-year-old man, with a family history of neurofibromatosis, who presented to us 2 months after the insidious occurrence of severe, unrelenting, right-sided, L5 dermatomal pain. He subsequently developed rapidly progressive motor weakness in the same myotome, which caused a foot drop. On examination, his straight-leg raise test was normal. Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated a peripherally enhancing, complex, cystic mass continuous with the L5 nerve, displacing its fascicles medially, as it descended over the right sacral ala. A positron emission tomography scan demonstrated increased radiotracer uptake. The clinicoradiologic presentation was that of a malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor.

RESULTS

At surgery, an intraneural disc herniation was seen.

CONCLUSIONS

Several pitfalls exist in establishing the uncommon diagnosis of an extraforaminal disc herniation. This entity occurs ventrally and must remain a consideration when elaborating the differential diagnosis of a retroperitoneal mass in close proximity to the vertebral column.