Small Size Autograft versus Large Size Allograft in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Rectangular-Tunnel Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Quadriceps Tendon-Patellar Bone Autograft Can Reduce Early Donor Site Morbidity While Maintaining Comparable Short-term Clinical Outcomes

Background

Rectangular tunnel and graft have been recently designed to closely resemble the native anatomy in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). This study was performed to compare the short-term clinical outcomes between rectangular and round femoral tunnels in ACLR using quadriceps tendon-patellar bone (QTPB) autografts.

Methods

A total of 78 patients who underwent primary ACLR with QTPB autografts performed by three senior surgeons and had at least 1 year of postoperative follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who underwent rectangular tunnel ACLR (n = 40) were compared to those treated with the conventional round tunnel ACLR (n = 38). Outcomes including knee stability, clinical scores, quadriceps strength, associated complications, postoperative knee range of motion, and cross-sectional area of the graft were assessed.

Results

Significant improvements in knee stability and clinical scores were observed after surgery in both groups (all p < 0.001). The postoperative measurements of knee stability and clinical scores were not significantly different between the two groups. Knee extension strength deficit at 60°/sec was significantly less in the rectangular tunnel group than in the round tunnel group at postoperative 6 months (41.7% vs. 48.9%, p = 0.032). The cross-sectional area of the partial-thickness QTPB graft was approximately 60% of the full-thickness QTPB graft.

Conclusions

In the short-term, rectangular tunnel ACLR was comparable to round tunnel ACLR with QTPB autograft despite the smaller cross-sectional area. Additionally, the rectangular tunnel ACLR allowed partial-thickness grafting technique, which could subsequently reduce early donor site morbidity.

Serial change of femoral and tibial tunnel width after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with allograft

PURPOSE

To investigate progressive tunnel widening and its correlation with postoperative outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using allografts.

METHODS

Sixty-five patients who underwent ACL reconstruction using a tibialis anterior allograft between 2015 and 2017 were enrolled. Femoral and tibial tunnel widths were measured on anteroposterior (AP) and lateral radiographs immediately and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Average femoral and tibial tunnel widths in AP and lateral views were calculated at three different measurement points. Tunnel widening was calculated as the difference in tunnel width immediately and 2 years postoperatively. The correlation between tunnel widening and the postoperative results was analysed.

RESULTS

Tunnel width changes between immediate and 2 years postoperatively were as follows, in AP and lateral views, respectively: femur, 3.0 mm ± 1.5 mm and 2.4 mm ± 1.4 mm; and tibia, 2.8 mm ± 1.4 mm and 2.9 mm ± 1.5 mm. Femoral tunnel widths significantly increased until 1 year, but not from 1 to 2 years postoperatively. Tibial tunnel width significantly increased until 2 years postoperatively. In all tunnels, the increments in tunnel widening decreased over time. Increased knee laxity significantly correlated with greater femoral tunnel widening in AP (r = 0.346, P = 0.006) and lateral views (r = 0.261, P = 0.049).

CONCLUSION

Femoral tunnel widths gradually increased until 1 year postoperatively, and tibial tunnel widths increased until 2 years after ACL reconstruction with allografts. The tunnel widening rate gradually decreased over time. Femoral tunnel widening of 3.7 mm and 3.2 mm on AP and lateral views, respectively, were the cut-off values for postoperative knee laxity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Clinical and MRI Outcomes of Repaired Peripheral Longitudinal Tears of the Posterior Horn of the Medial Meniscus With ACL Reconstruction: Results According to Tear Size

Background

Arthroscopic repair of longitudinal tears in the medial meniscal posterior horn (MMPH) has been reported to result in high rates of meniscal healing when performed alongside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). However, studies that have focused on longitudinal tears and their impact on clinical outcomes after arthroscopic repair are insufficient.

Purpose

To investigate the clinical outcome and healing status after concomitant arthroscopic ACLR and repair of MMPH peripheral longitudinal tears, with respect to the tear length.

Study Design

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

A total of 263 patients who underwent concurrent arthroscopic suture repair of longitudinal tears of the MMPH and ACLR were enrolled. All patients had 2-year postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluations, and 61% of patients underwent a second-look arthroscopy. The exclusion criteria were partial meniscectomies and multiligament injuries. Patients were assessed pre- and postoperatively for clinical scores, amount of anterior translation, grade of pivot shift, and presence of meniscal tear extension. According to the length of longitudinal tears, patients were classified into 2 groups: (1) patients with tears that were located in the posterior compartment and (2) patients with tears that extended to the midbody of the meniscus. Binary stepwise logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the risk factors for unhealed menisci as identified by MRI.

Results

A total of 83 patients were included in this study-52 patients (group 1) had MMPH tears without tear extension and 31 patients (group 2) had MMPH tears with tear extension. There were no differences in outcomes between the groups, including the healing rate after meniscal repair (P > .05). Based on postoperative MRI scans, 67 patients (80.7%) were categorized as completely healed and 16 patients (19.3%) as unhealed. There were no significant differences between the completely healed and unhealed groups in outcomes or the rate of preoperative midbody tear extension. Higher body mass index and lower preoperative Lysholm scores were identified as risk factors for unhealed menisci.

Conclusion

Overall, the rate of complete healing of MMPH tears repaired concomitantly with ACLR was 80.7% (67/83), and midbody tear extension did not affect the healing rate of the repaired meniscus. Results indicate that suture repair for unstable MMPH tears should be considered regardless of tear size.

Comparison of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes According to the Presence or Absence of a Posterior Draw Force during Graft Fixation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Background and Objectives: A reduction forced toward the posterior side during graft fixation may help to lessen anterior tibial translation after ACL reconstruction. The purpose was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of graft fixation when a posterior draw was used and when it was not used during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction surgery. Materials and Methods: Of 110 patients who had undergone primary arthroscopic ACL reconstruction between January 2017 and August 2020, in all, 76 patients had been operated on without a posterior draw (non-draw group), and 34 patients had received surgery with a posterior draw (draw group). The results of the Lachman test and the pivot-shift test, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) indexes, the Lysholm scores, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective scores, and side-to-side difference (STSD) on stress radiography were compared between the two groups. Results: The postoperative WOMAC indexes, Lysholm scores, and IKDC subjective scores were similar across both groups. Postoperative STSD (2.4 ± 2.2 for the non-draw group vs. 2.0 ± 2.2 for the draw group; p = 0.319) and change in STSD (3.5 ± 3.5 for preoperative STSD vs. 4.3 ± 4.4 for postoperative STSD; p = 0.295) were not superior in the draw group. Conclusions: The take-home message is that graft fixation with a posterior draw during ACL reconstruction did not result in significantly better postoperative stability. The postoperative clinical outcomes were similar between both groups.

The orientation of the ALL femoral tunnel to minimize collision with the ACL tunnel depends on the need or not of far-cortex drilling

PURPOSE

To (1) evaluate the optimal drill orientation of the anterolateral ligament (ALL) femoral tunnel to minimize collision with the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) femoral tunnel during anatomical ACL reconstruction according to the need for far-cortex drilling and (2) investigate the geometric factors that affect tunnel collision secondary to drill orientation of the ALL femoral tunnel.

METHODS

A three-dimensional femoral model of patients who underwent anatomical single-bundle ACL reconstruction between 2015 and 2016 was constructed, and the geometric factors were evaluated. Virtual ALL femoral tunnels were created to simulate 45 drilling conditions. For each condition, whether the virtual ALL femoral tunnel and its trajectory violated the femoral cortex and the minimum distance between tunnels was investigated.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine subjects were included. Overall violation rates of the femoral cortex by the ALL tunnels and its trajectories were 11.1% (195 of 1755 conditions) and 40.7% (714 of 1755 conditions), respectively. A drilling angle of axial 0° and coronal - 40° showed the longest minimum distance between tunnels without femoral cortex violation by the ALL tunnel (6.3 ± 4.0 mm; collision rate 2.6% [1 of 39 subjects]). With simultaneous consideration of the ALL tunnel's trajectory representing far-cortex drilling, a drill angle of axial 40° and coronal 10° showed the longest minimum distance between tunnels without femoral cortex violation (0.6 ± 3.9 mm; collision rate 38.5% [15 of 39 subjects]). For surgical techniques requiring far-cortex drilling, regression analyses were performed on geometric factors that could affect tunnel collision, which revealed that the sagittal inclination angle of the ACL and the distance between the ACL femoral tunnel's outlet and ALL's femoral attachment were associated with tunnel collision.

CONCLUSION

The optimal drill orientations of the ALL femoral tunnel to minimize collision with the ACL femoral tunnel were axial 0° and coronal - 40° for surgical techniques not requiring far-cortex drilling and axial 40° and coronal 10° for techniques requiring far-cortex drilling. For techniques requiring far-cortex drilling, additional adjustment for orientation of the ACL femoral tunnel is required to reduce the risk of tunnel collision. Therefore, an individualized surgical strategy should be applied according to the graft fixation method of the ALL femoral tunnel.

No Differences In Clinical Outcomes Between Rectangular and Round Tunnel Techniques For Anterior Crucial Ligament Reconstruction

PURPOSE

To compare the clinical outcomes between conventional round tunnel and rectangular tunnel in anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

METHODS

This was a retrospective comparative cohort study between March 2015 and September 2018. The primary ACL reconstructions using anteromedial portal technique with minimum of 2 years follow-up were enrolled for this study. The exclusion criteria were patients with revision ACL reconstruction, high tibial osteotomy, multiligament injuries, and associated fractures around the knee. Outcome measures included the subjective International Knee Documentation Committee score, Tegner activity score, knee laxity testing, and measurement of the centers of the femoral and tibial tunnels on postoperative computed tomography (CT) images.

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients with ACL reconstruction with rectangular tunnel (group 1) and 108 patients with ACL reconstructions with conventional rounded tunnel (group 2) were included consecutively. There were no significant differences between groups in terms of clinical scores or knee laxity, as well as femoral and tibial tunnel positions on CT. One patient in group 2 had ACL failure because of trauma and was treated with revision surgery. Two patients had incomplete tibial fracture, but they healed spontaneously and showed no residual laxity at final follow-up. The intraobserver and interobserver reliability for the radiological measurements ranged from 0.78 to 0.86.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no differences in radiological and clinical results between rectangular tunnel group and conventional round tunnel group for arthroscopic ACL reconstruction. ACL reconstruction with a rectangular tunnel could be considered as a reliable technique, but care should be taken during tunnel establishment because of risk of fractures and malposition of rectangular tunnel.