Image-Based Treatment Planning of the Post-Lumpectomy Breast Utilizing CT and 3TMRI

The Role of MRI in Breast Cancer and Breast Conservation Therapy

Contrast-enhanced breast MRI has an established role in aiding in the detection, evaluation, and management of breast cancer. This article discusses MRI sequences, the clinical utility of MRI, and how MRI has been evaluated for use in breast radiotherapy treatment planning. We highlight the contribution of MRI in the decision-making regarding selecting appropriate candidates for breast conservation therapy and review the emerging role of MRI-guided breast radiotherapy.

Target volumes comparison between postoperative simulation magnetic resonance imaging and preoperative diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging for prone breast radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery

BACKGROUND

This study investigated the differences in target volumes between preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRIpre) and postoperative MRI (MRIpost) for breast radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) using deformable image registration (DIR).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Seventeen eligible patients who underwent whole-breast irradiation in the prone position after BCS were enrolled. On MRIpre, the gross tumor volume (GTV) was delineated as GTVpre, which was then expanded by 10 mm to represent the preoperative lumpectomy cavity (LC), denoted as LCpre. The LC was expanded to the clinical target volume (CTV) and planning target volume (PTV) on the MRIpre and MRIpost, denoted as CTVpre, CTVpost, PTVpre, and PTVpost, respectively. The MIM software system was used to register the MRIpre and MRIpost using DIR. Differences were evaluated regarding target volume, distance between the centers of mass (dCOM), conformity index (CI), and degree of inclusion (DI). The relationship between CILC /CIPTV and the clinical factors was also assessed.

RESULTS

Significant differences were observed in LC and PTV volumes between MRIpre and MRIpost (p < 0.0001). LCpre was 0.85 cm3 larger than LCpost, while PTVpre was 29.38 cm3 smaller than PTVpost. The dCOM between LCpre and LCpost was 1.371 cm, while that between PTVpre and PTVpost reduced to 1.348 cm. There were statistically significant increases in CI and DI for LCpost-LCpre and PTVpost-PTVpre (CI = 0.221, 0.470; DI = 0.472, 0.635). No obvious linear correlations (p > 0.05) were found between CI and GTV, primary tumor volume-to-breast volume ratio, distance from the primary tumor to the nipple and chest wall, and body mass index.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite using DIR technology, the spatial correspondence of target volumes between MRIpre and MRIpost was suboptimal. Therefore, relying solely on preoperative diagnostic MRI with DIR for postoperative LC delineation is not recommended.

Comparison of dosimetry with magnetic resonance and computed tomography imaging delineation of surgical bed volume in breast cancer irradiation

Background

Postoperative radiotherapy after conservative surgery for patients with breast cancer usually includes focal over-irradiation (boost) to the surgical bed (SB). Irradiation planning using computed tomography (CT) is difficult in many cases because of insufficient intrinsic soft tissue contrast. To ensure appropriate radiation to the tumor, large boost volumes are delineated, resulting in a higher dose to the normal tissue. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides superior soft tissue contrast than CT and can better differentiate between normal tissue and the SB. However, for SB delineation CT images alone remain the pathway followed in patients undergoing breast irradiation. This study aimed to evaluate the potential advantages in boost dosimetry by using MRI and CT as pre-treatment imaging.

Methods

Eighteen boost volumes were drawn on CT and MRI and elastically co-registered using commercial image registration software. The radiotherapy treatment plan was optimized using the CT volumes as the baseline. The dose distributions of the target volumes on CT and MRI were compared using dose-volume histogram cutoff points.

Results

The radiation volumes to the SB varied considerably between CT and MRI (conformity index between 0.24 and 0.67). The differences between the MRI and CT boost doses in terms of the volume receiving 98% of the prescribed dose (V98%) varied between 10% and 30%. Smaller differences in the V98% were observed when the boost volumes were delineated using MRI.

Conclusion

Using MRI to delineate the volume of the SB may increase the accuracy of boost dosimetry.

Computed tomography-guided partial-breast brachytherapy using implanted catheters as fiducial markers versus co-registered magnetic resonance imaging

PURPOSE

Partial-breast irradiation (PBI) needs accurate cavity delineation with computed tomography (CT). In perioperative PBI using multicatheter-interstitial brachytherapy (MIB), catheters implanted during surgery were enabled as fiducial markers. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can also assist delineation with CT.

METHODS

Patients receiving MIB-PBI were analyzed. Cavity visualization scores (CVSs) were categorized with CT. With catheter-based delineation (CBD), the relationship between cavity boundaries and catheters were used to contour the tumor bed. Co-registered MRI delineation (CMD) was also performed. The correlation between cavity volume and the excised tissue weight was compared for the two techniques.

RESULTS

The association between CVS and preoperative characteristics in 159 patients showed mammographic breast density (MBD) remained correlated to CVS on multiple regression analyses; CVS = 5.2-0.61 x MBD (p < 0.0001). In 43 patients, the cavity volumes determined with CBD vs CMD were 12.8 ± 6.4 cm³ vs 16.1 ± 12.4 cm³ (p < 0.0001), and their plots with excised weights showed the best fitting lines were 0.29 vs 0.48 (p < 0.0001), respectively. The correlation coefficients for CBD vs CMD were 0.65 vs 0.55 (p = 0.20) in low (CVS 1-3, n = 27) and 0.72 vs 0.58 (p = 0.36) in high visualized cavities (CVS 4-5, n = 16), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of implanted catheters as fiducial markers was associated with smaller cavities and greater correlations with the excised tissue weights than co-registration with MRI. This might be a useful technique, especially for patients with dense breasts on mammography.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Breast Tumor Bed Delineation: Computed Tomography Comparison and Sequence Variation

Purpose

Our purpose was to investigate the interobserver variability in breast tumor bed delineation using magnetic resonance (MR) compared with computed tomography (CT) at baseline and to quantify the change in tumor bed volume between pretreatment and end-of-treatment MR for patients undergoing whole breast radiation therapy.

Methods and Materials

Forty-eight patients with breast cancer planned for whole breast radiation therapy underwent CT and MR (T1, T1 fat-suppression [T1fs], and T2) simulation in the supine treatment position before radiation therapy and MR (T1, T1fs, and T2) at the end of treatment in the same position. Two observers delineated 50 tumor beds on the CT and all MR sequences and assigned cavity visualization scores to the images. The primary endpoint was interobserver variability, measured using the conformity index (CI).

Results

The mean cavity visualization scores at baseline were 3.14 (CT), 3.26 (T1), 3.41 (T1fs), and 3.58 (T2). The mean CIs were 0.65, 0.65, 0.72, and 0.68, respectively. T1fs significantly improved interobserver variability compared with CT, T1, or T2 (P < .001, P < .001, and P = .011, respectively). The CI for T1fs was significantly higher than T1 and T2 at the end of treatment (mean 0.72, 0.64, and 0.66, respectively; P < .001). The mean tumor bed volume on the T1fs sequence decreased from 18 cm³ at baseline to 13 cm³ at the end of treatment (P < .01).

Conclusions

T1fs reduced interobserver variability on both pre- and end-of-treatment scans and measured a reduction in tumor bed volume during whole breast radiation therapy. This rapid sequence could be easily used for adaptive boost or partial breast irradiation, especially on MR linear accelerators.

A rapid review of influential factors and appraised solutions on organ delineation uncertainties reduction in radiotherapy

Background and purpose.Accurate volume delineation plays an essential role in radiotherapy. Contouring is a potential source of uncertainties in radiotherapy treatment planning that could affect treatment outcomes. Therefore, reducing the degree of contouring uncertainties is crucial. The role of utilized imaging modality in the organ delineation uncertainties has been investigated. This systematic review explores the influential factors on inter-and intra-observer uncertainties of target volume and organs at risk (OARs) delineation focusing on the used imaging modality for these uncertainties reduction and the reported subsequent histopathology and follow-up assessment.Methods and materials.An inclusive search strategy has been conducted to query the available online databases (Scopus, Google Scholar, PubMed, and Medline). 'Organ at risk', 'target', 'delineation', 'uncertainties', 'radiotherapy' and their relevant terms were utilized using every database searching syntax. Final article extraction was performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. Included studies were limited to the ones published in English between 1995 and 2020 and that just deal with computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) modalities.Results.A total of 923 studies were screened and 78 were included of which 31 related to the prostate 20 to the breast, 18 to the head and neck, and 9 to the brain tumor site. 98% of the extracted studies performed volumetric analysis. Only 24% of the publications reported the dose deviations resulted from variation in volume delineation Also, heterogeneity in studied populations and reported geometric and volumetric parameters were identified such that quantitative synthesis was not appropriate.Conclusion.This review highlightes the inter- and intra-observer variations that could lead to contouring uncertainties and impede tumor control in radiotherapy. For improving volume delineation and reducing inter-observer variability, the implementation of well structured training programs, homogeneity in following consensus and guidelines, reliable ground truth selection, and proper imaging modality utilization could be clinically beneficial.

The Impact of Different Simulation Modalities on Target Volume Delineation in Breast-Conserving Radiotherapy

Purpose

In the management of breast-conserving radiotherapy, computed tomography (CT) simulation is now commonly used to identify tumor bed while has difficulties defining precisely. We aimed to evaluate the impact of magnetic resonance (MR) and CT simulation on defining the postoperative tumor bed for breast-conserving radiotherapy in patients without the aid of surgical clips.

Methods

From August 2018 to March 2019, twenty patients with T_1-2N₀M₀ breast cancer at our institution were enrolled. All the patients underwent breast-conserving surgery without implantation of surgical clips and were prepared to receive radiotherapy. CT and MR images were acquired on the same day for each patient. Three radiation oncologists independently assigned cavity visualization score (CVS) and delineated the tumor bed based on first the CT then the MR images. Interobserver variability was assessed by volumes, generalized conformity index (CI_gen) and the distance between the centers of mass (dCOM). Differences in mean values for parameters were tested by paired t-test or one-way analysis of variance, as appropriate.

Results

First, the mean volumes of tumor bed derived from MR were 22%, 27% and 21% smaller than those based on CT images for each observer. In addition, the mean CI_gen was significantly superior, and dCOM was smaller for MR than for CT images (CI_gen: 0.59 vs 0.52, P= 0.008; dCOM: 1.30 cm vs 1.39 cm, P= 0.095). Moreover, the mean CVS was 3.23±1.34 and 2.43±0.92 for MR and CT images, respectively (P= 0.035). Last, a positive association was observed between the CVS and CI_gen for both modalities (P< 0.01).

Conclusion

Compared to CT, MR can improve the visualization of changes in the postoperative tumor bed. In addition, MR can yield a more precise definition of the tumor bed and improve the consistency of tumor bed contouring in patients without surgical clips.

DE-MR simulation imaging for prone radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery: assessing its application in lumpectomy cavity delineation based on deformable image registration

Background

The application of delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance (DE-MR) simulation imaging in lumpectomy cavity (LC) delineation for prone radiotherapy in patients with an invisible seroma or a low seroma clarity score (SCS) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) based on deformable image registration (DIR) was assessed.

Methods

Twenty-six patients who were suitable for radiotherapy in prone positions after BCS were enrolled, and both computed tomography (CT) and DE-MR simulation scans were acquired. The LC delineated based on titanium surgical clips on CT images was denoted as LC_CT. The LC delineated based on the signal of cavity boundaries on fat-suppressed T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and multiphase delayed-enhancement T1-weighted imaging (DE-T1WI), which was performed at 2 min, 5 min and 10 min postinjection, were denoted as LC_T2, LC_2T1, LC_5T1 and LC_10T1, respectively. Afterwards, DIR was performed to compare the volumes and locations of the LCs with MIM software. The generalized conformity index (CIgen) of inter (intra) observer (Inter-CIgen and Intra-CIgen) was also used to explore the inter(intra) observer variation for LC delineation on each image modality.

Results

LC_CT–LC_10T1 provided the best conformal index (CI) and degree of inclusion (DI), increasing by 2.08% and 4.48% compared to LC_CT–LC_T2, 11.36% and 2.94% for LC_CT–LC_2T1, and 8.89% and 7.69% for LC_5T1–LC_CT, respectively. The center of mass (COM) of LC_CT–LC_10T1 decreased by 17.86%, 6.12% and 13.21% compared with that of LC_CT–LC_T2, LC_CT–LC_2T1 and LC_CT–LC_5T1, respectively. The agreement of LC delineation was strongest for 10th min DE-TIWI (coefficient of variation, COV = 2.30%, Inter-CIgen = 87.06%, Intra-CIgen = 92.64%).

Conclusion

For patients with a low SCS (SCS ≤ 2) after BCS, it is feasible to contour the LC based on prone DE-MR simulation images. Furthermore, the LC derived from prone DE-T1WI at 10 min was found to be most similar to that derived from prone CT simulation scans using titanium surgical clips regardless of the volume and location of the LC. Inter (intra) variability was minimal for the delineation of the LC based on 10th min DE-TIWI.

Impact of inter-observer variations in target volume delineation on dose volume indices for accelerated partial breast irradiation with multi-catheter interstitial brachytherapy

PURPOSE

To investigate dosimetric impact of inter-observer variation in clinical target volume(CTV) delineation for patients undergoing interstitial partial breast brachytherapy.

METHODS

Five radiation oncologists delineated CTV in twenty patients who underwent multi-catheter partial breast brachytherapy. Five treatment plans for each patient were graphically optimized for CTV of all observers and evaluated using coverage index(CI), external volume index(EI), overdose volume index(OI) and conformal index(COIN). In addition, volume enclosed by prescription isodose(V₁₀₀), its spatial concordance(CI_common), mean coverage of all CTVs with common volume of prescription dose(V_{100_common}) and mean CTV coverage for all pairs of observer with common prescription volume of respective pairs(V_{100_pair}) were also computed.

RESULTS

The mean ± standard deviation(SD) of CI and COIN ranged from 0.756 ± 0.076 to 0.840 ± 0.070 and 0.591 ± 0.090 to 0.673 ± 0.06 respectively. When a plan made for CTV of individual observer was evaluated on CTV of all observers, the maximum variations(ρ < 0.05) in the mean CI,COIN,OI and EI were 10.6%,11.4%,10.6% and 72.7% respectively. The observed mean ± SD of V₁₀₀, CI_common of V₁₀₀, CTV coverage with V_{100_common} and V_{100_pair} was 160.7 ± 52.1, 0.70 ± 0.09, 73.1 ± 8.1% and 77.9 ± 7.3% respectively.

CONCLUSION

Inter-observer variation in delineation of CTV showed significant dosimetric impact with mean CTV coverage of 73.1% and 77.9% by common and paired prescription dose volume respectively among all observers.

MRI Reduces Variation of Contouring for Boost Clinical Target Volume in Breast Cancer Patients Without Surgical Clips in the Tumour Bed

BACKGROUND

Omitting the placement of clips inside tumour bed during breast cancer surgery poses a challenge for delineation of lumpectomy cavity clinical target volume (CTVLC). We aimed to quantify inter-observer variation and accuracy for CT- and MRI-based segmentation of CTVLC in patients without clips.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

CT- and MRI-simulator images of 12 breast cancer patients, treated by breast conserving surgery and radiotherapy, were included in this study. Five radiation oncologists recorded the cavity visualization score (CVS) and delineated CTVLC on both modalities. Expert-consensus (EC) contours were delineated by a senior radiation oncologist, respecting opinions of all observers. Inter-observer volumetric variation and generalized conformity index (CIgen) were calculated. Deviations from EC contour were quantified by the accuracy index (AI) and inter-delineation distances (IDD).

RESULTS

Mean CVS was 3.88 +/- 0.99 and 3.05 +/- 1.07 for MRI and CT, respectively (p = 0.001). Mean volumes of CTVLC were similar: 154 +/- 26 cm3 on CT and 152 +/- 19 cm3 on MRI. Mean CIgen and AI were superior for MRI when compared with CT (CIgen: 0.74 +/- 0.07 vs. 0.67 +/- 0.12, p = 0.007; AI: 0.81 +/- 0.04 vs. 0.76 +/- 0.07; p = 0.004). CIgen and AI increased with increasing CVS. Mean IDD was 3 mm +/- 1.5 mm and 3.6 mm +/- 2.3 mm for MRI and CT, respectively (p = 0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

When compared with CT, MRI improved visualization of post-lumpectomy changes, reduced interobserver variation and improved the accuracy of CTVLC contouring in patients without clips in the tumour bed. Further studies with bigger sample sizes are needed to confirm our findings.

Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computed Tomography for Breast Target Volume Delineation in Prone and Supine Positions

PURPOSE

To determine whether T2-weighted MRI improves seroma cavity (SC) and whole breast (WB) interobserver conformity for radiation therapy purposes, compared with the gold standard of CT, both in the prone and supine positions.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Eleven observers (2 radiologists and 9 radiation oncologists) delineated SC and WB clinical target volumes (CTVs) on T2-weighted MRI and CT supine and prone scans (4 scans per patient) for 33 patient datasets. Individual observer's volumes were compared using the Dice similarity coefficient, volume overlap index, center of mass shift, and Hausdorff distances. An average cavity visualization score was also determined.

RESULTS

Imaging modality did not affect interobserver variation for WB CTVs. Prone WB CTVs were larger in volume and more conformal than supine CTVs (on both MRI and CT). Seroma cavity volumes were larger on CT than on MRI. Seroma cavity volumes proved to be comparable in interobserver conformity in both modalities (volume overlap index of 0.57 (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.54-0.60) for CT supine and 0.52 (95% CI 0.48-0.56) for MRI supine, 0.56 (95% CI 0.53-0.59) for CT prone and 0.55 (95% CI 0.51-0.59) for MRI prone); however, after registering modalities together the intermodality variation (Dice similarity coefficient of 0.41 (95% CI 0.36-0.46) for supine and 0.38 (0.34-0.42) for prone) was larger than the interobserver variability for SC, despite the location typically remaining constant.

CONCLUSIONS

Magnetic resonance imaging interobserver variation was comparable to CT for the WB CTV and SC delineation, in both prone and supine positions. Although the cavity visualization score and interobserver concordance was not significantly higher for MRI than for CT, the SCs were smaller on MRI, potentially owing to clearer SC definition, especially on T2-weighted MR images.

Recommendations from GEC ESTRO Breast Cancer Working Group (II): Target definition and target delineation for accelerated or boost partial breast irradiation using multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy after breast conserving open cavity surgery

OBJECTIVE

To prepare guidelines for target definition and delineations after open cavity breast conserving surgery in accelerated partial breast irradiations or boost treatments using multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy based on the consensus of the Breast Working Group of GEC-ESTRO.

METHOD

Following a study on interobserver variations of target volume delineation in multicatheter breast brachytherapy after open cavity surgery and a number of discussions in consensus meetings these guidelines were worked out by experts on the field.

PROPOSED RECOMMENDATIONS

(1) Consistent windowing has to be used for proper cavity visualization. (2) The cavity visualization score has to be at least 3 in order to minimize the interobserver variations of target definition. (3) At delineation of surgical cavity only the homogeneous part of the postoperative seroma has to be included in the contours and protrusions or sharp irregularities have to be excluded. When surgical clips are present, they have to be surrounded by the contour with close contact. (4) CTV is created from the outlined surgical cavity with a nonisotropic geometrical extension. In each direction the safety margin is calculated by taking into account the size of the free resection margin. The total size of safety margin is always 20mm which is the sum of the surgical and added safety margins. CTV is limited to chest wall/pectoral muscles and 5mm below the skin surface.

CONCLUSION

Following these guidelines the target volume definition in breast brachytherapy after open cavity surgery is expected to be accomplished in more consistent way with low interobserver variations.