Cardiorenal syndrome in acute heart failure syndromes

Clinical efficacy of tolvaptan in acute decompensated heart failure patients with severe aortic stenosis and atrial fibrillation: a sub-analysis from the LOHAS registry

BACKGROUND

Severe aortic valve stenosis (AS) and atrial fibrillation (AF) are risk factors of hemodynamic instability in heart failure (HF) management due to low cardiac output, respectively. Therefore, the treatment of HF due to severe AS complicated with AF is anticipated to be difficult. Tolvaptan, a vasopressin V2 receptor inhibitor, is effective in controlling acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) with hemodynamic stability. However, its clinical efficacy against ADHF caused by AS with AF remains to be determined.

METHODS

Clinical information (from September 2014 to December 2017) of 59 patients diagnosed with ADHF due to severe AS (20 patients with AF; 39 patients with sinus rhythm [SR]) was obtained from the LOHAS registry. The registry collected data from seven hospitals and assessed the short-term effects of tolvaptan in patients hospitalized for ADHF with severe AS. We attempted to identify clinical differences from baseline up to 4 days, comparing patients with AF (AF group) versus those with SR (SR group).

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the groups in age (83.7 ± 4.5 vs. 85.8 ± 6.9 years, respectively; p = 0.11) and aortic valve area (0.60 [0.46-0.73] vs. 0.56 [0.37-0.70] cm2, respectively; p = 0.50). However, left atrial volume was larger (104 [85-126] vs. 87 [64-103] mL, respectively; p < 0.01), whereas stroke volume was lower (51.6 ± 14.8 vs. 59.0 ± 18.7 mL, respectively; p = 0.08) in the AF group versus the SR group. Body weight decreased daily from baseline up to day 4 in both groups (from 55.4 to 53.2 kg [p < 0.01] and from 53.5 to 51.0 kg [p < 0.01], respectively) without change in heart rate. Notably, the systolic blood pressure decreased slightly in the AF group after 2 days of treatment with tolvaptan.

CONCLUSIONS

Short-term treatment with tolvaptan improved HF in patients hospitalized for severe AS, regardless of the presence of AF or SR. After achieving sufficient diuresis, a slight decrease in blood pressure was observed in the AF group, suggesting an appropriate timeframe for safe and effective use of tolvaptan.

Renoprotective effect of tolvaptan in patients with new-onset acute heart failure

AIMS

Although tolvaptan has been reported to prevent worsening renal function (WRF) in patients with advanced acute heart failure (AHF), evidence regarding the effect of tolvaptan on renal function in patients with new-onset AHF is not available. This study aimed to investigate the renoprotective effect of tolvaptan in patients hospitalized with new-onset AHF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 122 consecutive patients hospitalized with new-onset AHF between May 2015 and December 2018 were retrospectively evaluated. WRF was defined as an absolute increase in serum creatinine ≥0.3 mg/dL (≥26.4 μmol/L) within 48 h or a 1.5-fold increase in serum creatinine after hospitalization. The furosemide group (n = 75) and the tolvaptan add-on group (n = 47) were compared. The tolvaptan group consists of patients who received tolvaptan as an individual physicians' decision. The incidence of WRF was significantly lower in the tolvaptan add-on group (8.5%) than in the furosemide group (24.0%, P = 0.03). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that tolvaptan treatment was an independent variable related to the prevention of WRF [odds ratio (OR), 0.20; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.05-0.85]. Furthermore, subgroup analysis revealed a more favourable effect of tolvaptan in patients with serum creatinine ≥1.1 mg/dL on admission (OR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.06-0.98) and an ejection fraction <50% (OR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.04-0.90).

CONCLUSIONS

A lower incidence of WRF was observed in patients with new-onset AHF who were treated with the tolvaptan add-on therapy, specifically those with left ventricular systolic dysfunction and renal impairment on admission.

Differential effects of inotropes and inodilators on renal function in acute cardiac care

Pathological interplay between the heart and kidneys is widely encountered in heart failure (HF) and is linked to worse prognosis and quality of life. Inotropes, along with diuretics and vasodilators, are a core medical response to HF but decompensated patients who need inotropic support often present with an acute worsening of renal function. The impact of inotropes on renal function is thus potentially an important influence on the choice of therapy. There is currently relatively little objective data available to guide the selection of inotrope therapy but recent direct observations on the effects of levosimendan and milrinone on glomerular filtration favour levosimendan. Other lines of evidence indicate that in acute decompensated HF levosimendan has an immediate renoprotective effect by increasing renal blood flow through preferential vasodilation of the renal afferent arterioles and increases in glomerular filtration rate: potential for renal medullary ischaemia is avoided by an offsetting increase in renal oxygen delivery. These indications of a putative reno-protective action of levosimendan support the view that this calcium-sensitizing inodilator may be preferable to dobutamine or other adrenergic inotropes in some settings by virtue of its renal effects. Additional large studies will be required, however, to clarify the renal effects of levosimendan in this and other relevant clinical situations, such as cardiac surgery.

Association of anemia and renal dysfunction with in-hospital mortality among patients hospitalized for acute heart failure syndromes with preserved or reduced ejection fraction

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of anemia and renal dysfunction with in-hospital outcomes in acute heart failure syndromes patients with preserved or reduced ejection fraction.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Of the 4842 patients enrolled in the Acute Decompensated Heart Failure Syndromes (ATTEND) registry, 4693 patients were evaluated to investigate the association among anemia, renal dysfunction, a preserved or reduced ejection fraction and in-hospital mortality. They were divided into four groups based on hemoglobin and estimated glomerular filtration rate at admission. The in-hospital mortality rate was 5.9% and 6.9% of the preserved and reduced ejection fraction groups, respectively. After adjustment for multiple comorbidities, there was no association of either anemia or renal dysfunction alone with in-hospital mortality in preserved ejection fraction patients, but the combination of anemia and renal dysfunction was associated with a somewhat higher risk of in-hospital mortality than that without either condition (odds ratio (OR), 2.75; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.72-10.41; p=0.137). In reduced ejection fraction patients, adjusted analysis showed that a significantly higher risk of in-hospital mortality was associated with anemia alone (OR, 2.56; 95% CI, 1.10 -5.94; p=0.029) and with anemia plus renal dysfunction (OR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.09-5.03; p=0.029) relative to the risk without either condition.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings demonstrate that anemia combined with renal dysfunction is not a risk factor for in-hospital mortality in patients with a preserved ejection fraction, whereas anemia is an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality risk in reduced ejection fraction patients regardless of renal dysfunction.

Randomized pilot trial comparing tolvaptan with furosemide on renal and neurohumoral effects in acute heart failure

AIMS

Loop diuretics are first-line medications for congestive heart failure (CHF); however, they are associated with serious adverse effects, including decreased renal function, and sympathetic nervous and renin-angiotensin system activation. We tested whether tolvaptan, a vasopressin V2-receptor antagonist, could reduce unfavourable furosemide-induced effects during CHF treatment.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Sixty patients emergently hospitalized owing to CHF-induced dyspnea were randomly assigned to receive either 40 mg intravenous furosemide daily or 7.5 mg oral tolvaptan for 5 days after admission. Both groups also received intravenous carperitide and canrenoate potassium. As results, baseline patient characteristics were similar between the furosemide (n = 30) and the tolvaptan (n = 30) groups, with no significant difference in 5 day urine volume or fluid balance. Brain natriuretic peptide and body weight improvements were similar between groups. However, serum creatinine (Cr) level did not increase, and the incidence of worsening renal function was significantly lower in the tolvaptan group. Consequently, the Cr increase to gain 1000 mL urine was 2.5-fold lower in the tolvaptan group. Furthermore, the blood urea nitrogen (BUN)/Cr ratio significantly decreased in the tolvaptan group, suggesting that renal perfusion was preserved, and urea reuptake and passive water reabsorption were suppressed following tolvaptan treatment. Although catecholamine improvements after treatment were not significantly different, plasma renin activity was enhanced in the furosemide group.

CONCLUSIONS

As compared with furosemide, tolvaptan in patients with acute heart failure is associated with comparable decongestion, better preservation of renal function and less activation of renin-angiotensin system. (UMIN 000014134).

Advances in pathogenesis and current therapeutic strategies for cardiorenal syndrome

Cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) is characterized as a syndrome involving both the cardiovascular system and kidneys. Due to its complexity and high mortality, it has becoming a significant burden and a universal clinical challenge to society worldwide. The mechanisms underlying CRS are potentially multifactorial, including hemodynamic alterations, neurohormonal activation, inflammation, oxidative stress, iron disorders, anemia, and mineral metabolic derangements. Despite the understanding and awareness of CRS gaining attention, appropriate approaches to manage CRS remain deficient. Loop diuretic and thiazides, inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system, vitamin D receptor activation and dopamine and natriuretic peptides could potentially be helpful to improve the prognosis of CRS. Ultrafiltration might be an alternative therapeutic strategy for the loss of liquid. However, adenosine receptor antagonists do not appear to be superior to furosemide in CRS treatment. novel therapeutic approaches should be explored.

Nonuremic indication for peritoneal dialysis for refractory heart failure in cardiorenal syndrome type II: review and perspective

Cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) type II is a serious condition in which chronic cardiac abnormalities cause worsening kidney function, leading to permanent chronic kidney damage. Management of CRS type II coupled with diuretic-resistant congestive heart failure (CHF) has been an issue of dispute. However, since the early 1990s, reports indicating the clinical usefulness of peritoneal dialysis (PD) as maintenance therapy for intractable CHF in this population have been accumulating. The present manuscript reviews the mechanisms by which kidney dysfunction develops within CHF, and then examines recent experiences of PD as chronic supportive therapy for intractable CRS type II, reviews the contributing mechanisms, and discusses the rationale for using PD as a new therapeutic approach in the nonuremic setting of CHF.

Inotropes for the management of acute heart failure patients with renal dysfunction. Still an option?

INTRODUCTION

Renal dysfunction is highly prevalent in patients with acute heart failure (AHF). These patients are more vulnerable in worsening of kidney function and have also higher mortality rates.

AREAS COVERED

Recent developments in the understanding of bidirectional interaction between heart and kidney are reviewed in the context of the potential impact of inotropes on renal function. Key clinical trials reporting the use of inotropes in AHF patients with renal dysfunction are discussed in this review.

EXPERT OPINION

Inotropes may be indicated on a short-term basis and under close monitoring in AHF with renal dysfunction mostly in cases of low output heart failure that can provoke renal hypoperfusion. Dopamine administration with low dose of i.v. furosemide has been recently compared with high dose of i.v. furosemide alone, demonstrating lower rates of worsening renal function and electrolyte disturbances. Moreover, small clinical trials have shown that the novel inodilator levosimendan seems to be superior to dobutamine or placebo in improving renal function in patients with acutely decompensated heart failure. The impact of novel inotropes on kidney function is still unclear. Randomized clinical trials are required in order to identify the role of inotropes in the management and/or prevention of acute cardiorenal syndrome.

Renal function in advanced heart failure

Despite recent advances with neurohormonal antagonists and devices, the prognosis of patients with advanced heart failure (HF) remains grave. Renal dysfunction is a common comorbid condition in HF and is associated with adverse outcomes. Current evidence indicates that intrinsic renal disease and inflammation in HF makes the kidney susceptible to hemodynamic compromise and congestion and contributes to a great extent to the development of renal dysfunction. Relief of congestion requires combination treatment with diuretics, neurohormonal antagonists, and occasionally vasodilators as well as inotropes. However, high doses of diuretics may accelerate the development of renal dysfunction by increasing neurohumoral activity and inducing renal structural and functional changes. Ultrafiltration should be reserved for patients with true diuretic resistance. Finally, early identification of the "patient at risk" remains a challenging issue and is limited by the currently used conventional parameters of renal function. However, novel biomarkers of acute kidney ischemia and/or injury are emerging and promise to become a diagnostic option for this patient population.