Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer: multidisciplinary case report with review of the literature

CDH1 Gene Mutation Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer Outcomes: Analysis of a Large Cohort, Systematic Review of Endoscopic Surveillance, and Secondary Cancer Risk Postulation

Simple Summary

Some patients carry a mutated copy of the CDH1 gene that can lead to a very rare form of hereditary gastric cancer called signet-ring cell adenocarcinoma (SRCC). SRCCs rarely form visible tumors prior to spreading. Hence, patients are recommended to have prophylactic gastrectomies at a young age. Many patients wish to avoid surgery and thus have regular checks with upper endoscopy with biopsies to rule out cancer. Further, these patients may also be at risk of other cancers beyond the already known breast cancer risks, but this is not known. In this study, we show that despite systematic biopsy protocols, many early cancers might be missed on endoscopy. Therefore, patients should not rely on endoscopy to delay surgery. These patients may also be at increased risk of colorectal SRCC, which has very poor survival outcomes. To confirm this, we need a central database that captures outcomes for this patient population.

Abstract

Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC) is a rare signet-ring cell adenocarcinoma (SRCC) linked to CDH1 (E-cadherin) inactivating germline mutations, and increasingly other gene mutations. Female CDH1 mutation carriers have additional risk of lobular breast cancer. Risk management includes prophylactic total gastrectomy (PTG). The utility of endoscopic surveillance is unclear, as early disease lacks macroscopic lesions. The current systematic biopsy protocols have unknown efficacy, and other secondary cancer risks are postulated. We conducted a retrospective study of consecutive asymptomatic HDGC patients undergoing PTG, detailing endoscopic, pathologic, and outcome results. A systematic review compared endoscopic biopsy foci detection via random sampling versus Cambridge Protocol against PTG findings. A population-level secondary-cancer-risk postulation among sporadic gastric SRCC patients was completed using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Of 97 patients, 67 underwent PTG, with 25% having foci detection on random endoscopic biopsy despite 75% having foci on final pathology. There was no improvement in the endoscopic detection rate by Cambridge Protocol. The postulated hazard ratio among sporadic gastric SRCC patients for a secondary colorectal SRCC was three-fold higher, relative to conventional adenocarcinoma patients. Overall, HDGC patients should not rely on endoscopic surveillance to delay PTG, and may have secondary SRCC risks. A definitive determination of actual risk requires collaborative patient outcome data banking.

New Insights in Histogenetic Pathways of Gastric Cancer

The aim of this paper was to describe 3 possible histogenetic pathways for poorly cohesive (diffuse) carcinomas and 2 for intestinal-type gastric carcinomas (GCs), which might influence the behavior of GC. In the present observational study, 102 patients with early (n = 50) and advanced GCs (n = 52) were evaluated, and the histogenetic background was analyzed. All of the cases were sporadic GCs. For particular aspects, Maspin, E-cadherin, and SLUG immunostains were performed. For our final conclusions, the results were correlated with literature data. In early stages, poorly cohesive carcinomas can display 3 histogenetic pathways, with particular molecular behaviors: "carcinoma with intraepithelial pagetoid onset" (with or without a switch from E-cadherin to SLUG positivity), "carcinoma with early lymphatic invasion" (carcinoma limited to mucosa but with carcinomatosis of the lymph vessels from subjacent layers), and "microglandular-type poorly cohesive carcinoma" (the onset is similar with adenocarcinoma but abrupt dedifferentiation can be seen in the submucosa, with persistence of a dual component in the deep layers). The intestinal type carcinoma can be developed on the background of superficially located dysplasia ("classic adenocarcinoma") or in the submucosal heterotopic mucosa ("adenocarcinoma arising from the mucosal infolding in the submucosa"). Based on personal observations correlated with literature data, 5 histopathogenetic pathways are proposed with specific denominations. Each of them can partially explain the aberrant behavior of early gastric cancer.

Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer: a family diagnosis and treatment

Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC) is a rare cancer representing approximately 2% of all gastric cancers. It is caused by CDHI gene mutations, inherited in an autosomal dominant fashion, that affect the function of E-cadherin. Approximately 38% of HDGC families have a CDHI gene mutation. With an estimated 75% penetrance rate, carriers are at high risk for HDGC. We describe the case of a Caucasian male of German-Russian ancestry, carrying a CDHI gene mutation, who survived for 18 months after being diagnosed with HDGC. The results of genetic testing undergone by his family members are also reported, along with a review of the current literature. Since surveillance methods for HDGC are ineffective and unreliable, total prophylactic gastrectomy is advised for individuals with the gene mutation. Additionally, a diagnosis of HDGC should lead to genetic evaluation of family members followed by preventative measures.

Frequency of CDH1 germline mutations in gastric carcinoma coming from high- and low-risk areas: metanalysis and systematic review of the literature

Background

The frequency of E-cadherin germline mutations in countries with different incidence rates for gastric carcinoma has not been well established. The goal of this study was to assess the worldwide frequency of CDH1 germline mutations in gastric cancers coming from low- and high-risk areas.

Methods

English articles using MEDLINE access (from 1998 to 2011). Search terms included CDH1, E-cadherin, germline mutation, gastric cancer, hereditary, familial and diffuse histotype.

The study included all E-cadherin germline mutations identified in gastric cancer patients; somatic mutations and germline mutations reported in other tumors were excluded.

The method of this study was scheduled in accordance with the "PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses". Countries were classified as low- or middle/high risk-areas for gastric carcinoma incidence. Statistical analysis was performed to correlate the CDH1 mutation frequency with gastric cancer incidence areas.

Results

A total of 122 E-cadherin germline mutations have been identified; the majority (87.5%) occurred in gastric cancers coming from low-risk areas. In high-risk areas, we identified 16 mutations in which missense mutations were predominant. (68.8%). We verified a significant association between the mutation frequency and the gastric cancer risk area (p < 0.001: overall identified mutations in low- vs. middle/high-risk areas).

Conclusions

E-cadherin genetic screenings performed in low-risk areas for gastric cancer identified a higher frequency of CDH1 germline mutations. This data could open new approaches in the gastric cancer prevention test; before proposing a proband candidate for the CDH1 genetic screening, geographic variability, alongside the family history should be considered.