Second Generation Antipsychotics in the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder: An Update

Adjunctive cariprazine for major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Converging evidence has suggested that treatment augmentation with a second-generation atypical antipsychotic (SGA) may improve treatment outcomes in major depressive disorder (MDD) patients after an incomplete response to a first-line antidepressant. Cariprazine is a recently approved SGA for MDD augmentation. Herein, we evaluate both continuous (ie, change in depressive symptom severity scores over time) and categorical (ie, remission and response rates) outcomes. Following a full-text review, four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in our meta-analysis, while five studies were included for a qualitative review. Risk ratios (RRs) were calculated for all included randomized controlled studies to determine the relative response and remission rates of cariprazine compared to placebo augmentation. The RR for all-cause dropout was also determined as a proxy for overall acceptability. Two studies found a statistically significant treatment response using cariprazine augmentation. One study observed depressive symptom remission for cariprazine compared to placebo. Our random-effects model revealed moderate antidepressant effects of cariprazine, with a standardized mean difference (SMD) in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scores of -1.79 (95% CI): -2.89, -0.69). Our pooled response RR and remission RR were calculated as 1.21 (95% CI: 1.05, 1.39, P=0.008) and 0.99 (95% CI: 0.84, 1.17, P=0.91), respectively. The RR for response was statistically significant (P<0.05). However, the RR for remission was not statistically significant. The findings from our meta-analysis include a variable magnitude of effects. Evidence suggests cariprazine may be an effective treatment for MDD; however, further results are needed to clarify this relation.

The Potential Role of Aripiprazole Augmentation for Major Depressive Disorder with Anxious Distress in Naturalistic Treatment Setting

Objective

: This study tried to observe clinical benefit of aripiprazole augmentation (ARPA) treatment for major depressive disorder with anxious distress (MDDA) in routine practice.

Methods

: Retrospective chart review (n = 41) was conducted for clinical benefit of ARPA in patients with MDDA in routine practice. The primary endpoint was the mean change of Hamilton Anxiety Rating scale (HAMA) total scores from baseline to the endpoint. Additional secondary endpoints were also retrieved.

Results

: The changes of primary endpoint HAMA (t = 5.731, -4.6, p = 0.001), and secondary endpoints including Hamilton Depression Rating scale (HAMD, t = 4.284, -3.4, p ＜ 0.001), Clinical Global Impression-Clinical Benefit (CGI-CB, -0.9, t = 1.821, p = 0.026), and Clinical Global Impression Score-Severity (CGI-S, t = 3.556, -0.4, p ＜ 0.001) scores were also significantly improved during the study. No significant adverse events were observed.

Conclusion

: This study has shown additional benefit of ARPA treatment for MDDA patients in routine practice. However, adequately-powered and well-controlled studies are necessary for generalization of the present findings.

Facial emotion processing in patients with borderline personality disorder as compared with healthy controls: an fMRI and ECG study

BACKGROUND

Maladaptive behaviors and interpersonal difficulties in patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) seem connected to biased facial emotion processing. This bias is often accompanied by heightened amygdala activity in patients with BPD as compared to healthy controls. However, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies exploring differences between patients and healthy controls in facial emotion processing have produced divergent results. The current study explored fMRI and heart rate variability (HRV) correlates of negative facial emotion processing in patients with BPD and healthy controls.

METHODS

The study included 30 patients with BPD (29 females; age: M = 24.22, SD = 5.22) and 30 healthy controls (29 females; M = 24.66, SD = 5.28). All participants underwent the "faces" task, an emotional face perception task, in an fMRI session simultaneously with ECG. In this task, participants are presented with emotional expressions of disgust, sadness, and fear (as a negative condition) and with the same pictures in a scrambled version (as a neutral condition).

RESULTS

We found no differences in brain activity between patients with BPD and healthy controls when processing negative facial expressions as compared to neutral condition. We observed activation in large-scale brain areas in both groups when presented with negative facial expressions as compared to neutral condition. Patients with BPD displayed lower HRV than healthy controls in both conditions. However, there were no significant associations between HRV and amygdala activity and BPD symptoms.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study indicate no abnormal brain activity during emotional facial processing in patients with BPD. This result contrasts with previous studies and more studies are needed to clarify the relationship between facial emotion processing and brain activity in patients with BPD. Possible reasons for the absence of brain activity differences are discussed in the study. Consistent with previous findings, patients showed lower HRV than healthy controls. However, HRV was not associated with amygdala activity and BPD symptoms.

Differences in pharmacologic and demographic factors in male and female patients with vascular dementia, Alzheimer's disease, and mixed vascular dementia

Background

Increasing evidence suggests that demographic and pharmacologic factors may play a significant role in the epidemiology of dementia. Sex differences in prevalence also depend on dementia subtypes, such as Alzheimer's dementia (AD), vascular dementia (VaD), and mixed vascular-Alzheimer's dementia (MVAD). Therefore, studies are needed to investigate sex-specific differences, and identify potential therapeutic targets for both sexes.

Methods

Data was collected from the Prisma Health-Upstate Alzheimer's registry from 2016 to 2021 for 6,039 VaD patients, 9,290 AD patients, and 412 MVAD patients. A logistic regression was used to determine demographic and pharmacological factors associated with gender differences in patients with VaD, AD, and MVAD.

Results

In patients with VaD, African Americans (OR = 1.454, 95% CI, 1.257-1.682, p < 0.001) with increasing age (OR = 1.023, 95% CI, 1.017-1.029, p < 0.001), treated with aripiprazole (OR = 4.395, 95% CI, 2.880-6.707, p < 0.001), were associated with females, whereas patients treated with galantamine (OR = 0.228, 95% CI, 0.116-0.449, p < 0.001), memantine (OR = 0.662, 95% CI, 0.590-0.744, p < 0.001), with a history of tobacco (OR = 0.312, 95% CI, 0.278-0.349, p < 0.001), and ETOH (OR = 0.520, 95% CI, 0.452-0.598, p < 0.001) were associated with males. Among AD patients, African Americans (OR = 1.747, 95% CI, 1.486-2.053, p < 0.001), and Hispanics (OR = 3.668, 95% CI, 1.198-11.231, P = 0.023) treated with buspirone (OR = 1.541, 95% CI, 1.265-1.878, p < 0.001), and citalopram (OR = 1.790, 95% CI, 1.527-2.099, p < 0.001), were associated with females, whereas patients treated with memantine (OR = 0.882, 95% CI, 0.799-0.974, p = 0.013), and with a history of tobacco (OR = 0.247, 95% CI, 0.224-0.273, p < 0.001), and ETOH (OR = 0.627, 95% CI, 0.547-0.718, p < 0.001) were associated with male AD patients. In patients with MVAD, rivastigmine (OR = 3.293, 95% CI, 1.131-9.585, p = 0.029), memantine (OR = 2.816, 95% CI, 1.534-5.168, p < 0.001), and risperidone (OR = 10.515, 95% CI, 3.409-32.437, p < 0.001), were associated with females while patients with an increased length of stay (OR = 0.910, 95% CI, 0.828-1.000, p = 0.049), with a history of tobacco (OR = 0.148, 95% CI, 0.086-0.254, p < 0.001) and ETOH use (OR = 0.229, 95% CI, 0.110-0.477, p < 0.001) were more likely to be associated with males.

Conclusions

Our study revealed gender differences and similarities in the demographic and pharmacological factors of VaD, AD, and MVAD. Prospective studies are needed to determine the role of demographic and pharmacological factors in reducing sex-based disparities among VaD, AD, and MVAD patients.

Exhaustive in silico design and screening of novel antipsychotic compounds with improved pharmacodynamics and blood-brain barrier permeation properties

Antipsychotic drugs or neuroleptics are widely used in the treatment of psychosis as a manifestation of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. However, their effectiveness largely depends on the blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeation (pharmacokinetics) and drug-receptor pharmacodynamics. Therefore, in this study, we developed and implemented the in silico pipeline to design novel compounds (n = 260) as leads using the standard drug scaffolds with improved PK/PD properties from the standard scaffolds. As a result, the best candidates (n = 3) were evaluated in molecular docking to interact with serotonin and dopamine receptors. Finally, haloperidol (HAL) derivative (1-(4-fluorophenyl)-4-(4-hydroxy-4-{4-[(2-phenyl-1,3-thiazol-4-yl)methyl]phenyl}piperidin-1-yl)butan-1-one) was identified as a "magic shotgun" lead compound with better affinity to the 5-HT2A, 5-HT1D, D2, D3, and 5-HT1B receptors than the control molecule. Additionally, this hit substance was predicted to possess similar BBB permeation properties and much lower toxicological profiles in comparison to HAL. Overall, the proposed rational drug design platform for novel antipsychotic drugs based on the BBB permeation and receptor binding might be an invaluable asset for a medicinal chemist or translational pharmacologist.Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma.

Recent advances in dopamine D2 receptor ligands in the treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders

Dopamine is a biologically active amine synthesized in the central and peripheral nervous system. This biogenic monoamine acts by activating five types of dopamine receptors (D_1-5 Rs), which belong to the G protein-coupled receptor family. Antagonists and partial agonists of D₂ Rs are used to treat schizophrenia, Parkinson's disease, depression, and anxiety. The typical pharmacophore with high D₂ R affinity comprises four main areas, namely aromatic moiety, cyclic amine, central linker and aromatic/heteroaromatic lipophilic fragment. From the literature reviewed herein, we can conclude that 4-(2,3-dichlorophenyl), 4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-, 4-(benzo[b]thiophen-4-yl)-1-substituted piperazine, and 4-(6-fluorobenzo[d]isoxazol-3-yl)piperidine moieties are critical for high D₂ R affinity. Four to six atoms chains are optimal for D₂ R affinity with 4-butoxyl as the most pronounced one. The bicyclic aromatic/heteroaromatic systems are most frequently occurring as lipophilic appendages to retain high D₂ R affinity. In this review, we provide a thorough overview of the therapeutic potential of D₂ R modulators in the treatment of the aforementioned disorders. In addition, this review summarizes current knowledge about these diseases, with a focus on the dopaminergic pathway underlying these pathologies. Major attention is paid to the structure, function, and pharmacology of novel D₂ R ligands, which have been developed in the last decade (2010-2021), and belong to the 1,4-disubstituted aromatic cyclic amine group. Due to the abundance of data, allosteric D₂ R ligands and D₂ R modulators from patents are not discussed in this review.

Evidence on sociodemographic and clinical correlates of antidepressant combination or augmentation with second-generation antipsychotics in major depressive disorder

About two thirds of the patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) do not sufficiently respond to monotherapy with antidepressants (ADs) which makes them reliant on further treatment approaches. Hereby, combination of different ADs and augmentation with second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) are widely used and recommended psychopharmacotherapeutic strategies. The present secondary analyses are based on an international, naturalistic, cross-sectional multicenter study conducted by the European Group for the Study of Resistant Depression. Comparing socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of 436 adult MDD patients receiving either SGAs (N = 191, 43.8%) or ADs (N = 245, 56.2%), that were additionally administered to their first-line AD psychopharmacotherapy, we aimed to identify possible trajectories of decision-making for clinicians regarding which treatment option to prefer in individual patients. Our most robust findings represent an association of SGA augmentation with the presence of psychotic symptoms, longer mean duration of lifetime psychiatric hospitalizations, employment of further augmentation strategies with mood-stabilizers and benzodiazepines, and a trend towards higher mean daily dosages of their first-line ADs and current suicidal risk. Treatment outcome was not significantly different between patients receiving either SGA augmentation or AD combination. Being aware of limitations inherent to the cross-sectional study design and the lack of randomization, more severe and rather chronic conditions in MDD seemed to encourage clinicians to choose SGA augmentation over AD combination. The fact that mood-stabilizers and/or benzodiazepines were more frequently co-administered with SGAs may represent a requirement of an overall refined psychopharmacotherapy including additional fast-acting agents with potent AD, tranquilizing and anti-suicidal effects in MDD patients experiencing challenging clinical manifestations. New glutamatergic substances seem to be promising in this regard.

Osteocalcin levels decrease during the treatment of an acute depressive episode

OBJECTIVES

Osteocalcin is a protein secreted by osteoblasts with a versatile endocrine role. Several domains in which it plays a role-stress response, monoamine synthesis, and cognitive functioning-are implicated also in the pathophysiology of major depressive disorder. In search of possible objective biomarkers of depression, the aim of the study was to assess the relationship between osteocalcin and depressive symptoms during the treatment of depressive episode.

METHODS

The study included female inpatients with at least moderate depressive episode. In these patients, depression severity was measured using the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), and osteocalcin levels were assessed before the stabilization of antidepressive treatment and after 6 weeks. Relationships between osteocalcin levels and symptoms were analyzed with mixed-effect and linear models, taking into account age, menopausal status, and body mass index.

RESULTS

In 11 out of 13 enrolled inpatients, osteocalcin levels decreased during the first 6 weeks of treatment; this decrease was significant according to the mixed-effects model (t = -2.345, p = 0.019). According to the linear model, this decrease was significantly associated with reduction in depressive symptom severity (t = 2.673, p = 0.028). Osteocalcin was not associated with initial depressive symptom severity, and initial osteocalcin levels did not predict response to treatment. Limitations of the study include low sample size and inclusion of both pre- and postmenopausal women of various ages.

CONCLUSIONS

This preliminary study suggests that osteocalcin may be a candidate biomarker of antidepressive treatment response and that this topic warrants further investigation.

The Choice of Either Quetiapine or Aripiprazole as Augmentation Treatment in a European Naturalistic Sample of Patients With Major Depressive Disorder

BACKGROUND

Augmentation with second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) represents an evidence-based psychopharmacotherapeutic strategy recommended in case of insufficient response to the first-line antidepressant (AD) treatment in major depressive disorder (MDD). Comparative evidence regarding efficacy and prescription preferences of the individual SGAs is scarce.

METHODS

In the scope of this European, multi-site, naturalistic cross-sectional investigation with retrospective assessment of treatment outcome, we compared sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of 187 MDD patients receiving either quetiapine (n = 150) or aripiprazole (n = 37) as augmentation of their first-line AD psychopharmacotherapy.

RESULTS

Comorbid posttraumatic stress disorder and diabetes were significantly associated with aripiprazole augmentation in our primary and post-hoc binary logistic regression analyses. Furthermore, we identified an association between aripiprazole co-administration and the presence of additional psychotic features, higher rates of AD combination treatment, and a longer duration of psychiatric hospitalizations during the lifetime, which, however, lost significance after correcting for multiple comparisons. Regarding treatment outcome, we found a trend of higher response rates and greater reductions in severity of depressive symptoms in MDD patients dispensed quetiapine.

CONCLUSIONS

Factors associated with a more chronic and severe profile of MDD seem to encourage clinicians to choose aripiprazole over quetiapine, that was, however, administered in the majority of our MDD patients, which might reflect the current approval situation allowing to prescribe exclusively quetiapine as on-label augmentation in MDD in Europe. Given the retrospective assessment of treatment response, the markedly smaller proportion of patients receiving aripiprazole augmentation generally showing an unfavorable disease profile, and the partially heterogeneous statistical robustness of our findings, further studies are required to elaborate on our observation and to generate unambiguous recommendations regarding the choice of first-line SGA augmentation in MDD.

Synthesis and In Vitro Evaluation of Novel Dopamine Receptor D2 3,4-dihydroquinolin-2(1H)-one Derivatives Related to Aripiprazole

In this pilot study, a series of new 3,4-dihydroquinolin-2(1H)-one derivatives as potential dopamine receptor D₂ (D₂R) modulators were synthesized and evaluated in vitro. The preliminary structure-activity relationship disclosed that compound 5e exhibited the highest D₂R affinity among the newly synthesized compounds. In addition, 5e showed a very low cytotoxic profile and a high probability to cross the blood-brain barrier, which is important considering the observed affinity. However, molecular modelling simulation revealed completely different binding mode of 5e compared to USC-D301, which might be the culprit of the reduced affinity of 5e toward D₂R in comparison with USC-D301.

Characteristics of patients with major depressive disorder switching SSRI/SNRI therapy compared with those augmenting with an atypical antipsychotic in a real-world setting

BACKGROUND

Following a partial response of first-line antidepressant therapy for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD), there is a choice to augment treatment with another agent or switch to a different antidepressant.

OBJECTIVE

To report the prevalence and compare the characteristics of patients switching from their initial selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor or serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SSRI/SNRI) to a new SSRI/SNRI versus those augmenting SSRI/SNRI therapy with a second-generation antipsychotic (SGA).

METHODS

MDD patients receiving first-line SSRI/SNRI treatment were identified from a large US-based claims database during 2000-2019. Patients augmenting therapy with an SGA were compared with those who switched to a new SSRI/SNRI. The date of the treatment change was the index date. Previously diagnosed comorbid conditions, medication use and demographics were captured. Treatment patterns following the index date were also captured. Standardized differences (StdDiff) were used to quantify dissimilarities between the two groups.

RESULTS

There were 4572 SGA add-on and 24,409 switching patients identified. SGA augmentation patients had more severe disease (diagnosed severe recurrent major depression: 24.7% vs. 9.5%, StdDiff = 0.41) and more diagnosed psychiatric conditions, including: suicidal thoughts (10.7% vs. 3.2%, StdDiff = 0.29), post-traumatic stress disorder (6.1% vs. 2.6%, StdDiff = 0.17) and alcohol abuse (5.4% vs. 2.7%, StdDiff = 0.14). SGA augmentation patients had higher rates of prior use of anxiolytics (37.4% vs. 28.2%, StdDiff = 0.20) and anticonvulsants (26.0% vs. 13.1%, StdDiff = 0.33).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients adding an SGA to their SSRI/SNRI therapy appeared to have more severe depression and comorbid psychiatric profile than those switching their SSRI/SNRI. These differences are important to consider and adequately control for in any future comparative outcome research between these two groups.

Ketogenic diet for depression: A potential dietary regimen to maintain euthymia?

Approximately 30% of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) present resistance to current pharmacological therapies. There is the possibility that an appropriate nutritional regimen can maintain euthymia. Poor dietary pattern and lack of nutritional knowledge are common among today's population; nutrient-rich foods are being replaced by highly processed foods that lead to a higher risk of developing chronic diseases such as metabolic syndrome, hypercholesterolemia, and diabetes. There is growing evidence of the beneficial role of vitamins and dietary supplements for improving symptoms in a range of affective disorders by regulating the gut microbiome, gut-brain axis, and neurotransmitter levels. Reduced GABA neurotransmission is regularly observed in MDD. Moreover, positive allosteric GABA modulators (i.e benzodiazepines) are widely prescribed to alleviate depression symptoms, but their use needs to be limited, as it can lead to addiction. An alternative option may be the adherence to a ketogenic diet, which consists of low-carbohydrate, moderate-protein, and high-fat intake. It is mainly known for its beneficial role in weight-loss, refractory epilepsy treatment, and balancing glucose levels. A ketogenic diet can also increase GABA levels to aid the mechanism of action of monoaminergic drugs. Thus, it could potentially be used in the treatment for affective disorders due to its potential role in GABA/glutamate balance. While more research is needed before this regimen can be regularly recommended to patients, here we discuss evidence that may encourage physicians to prescribe ketogenic diet as an adjuvant for patients receiving psychotherapy and pharmacology.

Practical recommendations for the management of treatment-resistant depression with esketamine nasal spray therapy: Basic science, evidence-based knowledge and expert guidance

OBJECTIVES

Despite the available therapies for treatment-resistant depression (TRD), there are a limited number that are evidence-based and effective in this hard-to-treat population. Esketamine nasal spray, an intranasal N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) glutamate receptor antagonist, is a novel, fast-acting option in this patient population. This manuscript provides expert guidance on the practicalities of using esketamine nasal spray.

METHODS

A group of six European experts in major depressive disorder (MDD) and TRD, with clinical experience of treating patients with esketamine nasal spray, first generated practical recommendations, before editing and voting on these to develop consensus statements during an online meeting.

RESULTS

The final consensus statements encompass not only pre-treatment considerations for patients with TRD, but also specific guidelines for clinicians to consider during and post-administration of esketamine nasal spray.

CONCLUSIONS

Esketamine nasal spray is a novel, fast-acting agent that provides an additional treatment option for patients with TRD who have previously failed several therapies. The guidance here is based on the authors' experience and the available literature; however, further real-world use of esketamine nasal spray will add to existing knowledge. The recommendations offer practical guidance to clinicians who are unfamiliar with esketamine nasal spray.

Metabolic screening in primary care for patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder and taking antipsychotic medication

INTRODUCTION Life expectancy in patients with schizophrenia is 15-20 years less than the general population. A dominant cause of morbidity and mortality in these patients is cardiovascular disease. Adverse consequences of modifiable cardiovascular risk factors can be reduced by regular monitoring of metabolic outcomes and intervention if required. AIM To evaluate the metabolic screening in primary care for patients with schizoaffective disorders managed in primary care. To show the usefulness of combining simple practice audits in evaluating such areas of clinical practice. METHODS An audit was undertaken in eight general practices in the Waikato and Bay of Plenty regions of New Zealand. Specifically, the monitoring of patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder whose antipsychotic medication was prescribed by primary care doctors was audited. Patient monitoring was compared to the guideline recommendation of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP) and the Best Practice Advisory Centre (BPAC). RESULTS In total, 117 patients were included in the audit and none were fully monitored, as recommended by the RANZCP guidelines. Although two-thirds of patients had been evaluated for glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c), lipids, blood pressure, complete blood count and weight, <10% of patients had had prolactin, waist circumference or electrocardiogram measurements recorded. The proportion of patients having a HbA1c measured was also significantly higher in younger patients and patients who were non-Māori or enrolled with an urban practice (all P<0.05). When using the simplified BPAC guidelines, half of all patients were correctly monitored. DISCUSSION These findings show there is room for improvement in the monitoring of patients receiving antipsychotic medication in primary care. This may indicate the need for clear guidance and general practitioner education around the monitoring requirements of these patients. Alternatively, a more simplified monitoring protocol may need to be developed. This audit has also shown that there is value in several practices completing the same audit and providing a larger cohort of patients for pooled data analysis.

An International Comparison of the Information in the Regulatory-Approved Drug Labeling and Prescribing Guidelines for Pediatric Depression

Objectives: To determine the differences in information between prescribing guidelines and drug labeling, as well as to compare the approval of psychotropic medicines for major depression in pediatric patients ("pediatric depression") across countries. Methods: The recommendations of The Maudsley Prescribing Guidelines in Psychiatry (MPGP) for the treatment of pediatric depression (<18 years) were compared against the regulatory-approved drug-labeling documents from the United Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand, Canada, and the United States. The use of medicines outside of their regulatory approval is defined as off-label use, so differences between the drug labeling and MPGP were characterized according to unapproved age, indication, dosage, or route of administration. Information in the drug labeling was also compared across countries. Results: MPGP provides recommendations for 6 medicines for the treatment of pediatric depression, for which, 30 drug labeling were retrieved. Three of 30 drug labeling were consistent with MPGP recommendations (fluoxetine in the United Kingdom, fluoxetine and escitalopram in the United States). Differences in information between MPGP and the drug labeling were identified in 26 of 30 drug labeling analyzed, most often due to age (24/26) followed by indication (2/26). No differences pertaining to dosage or route of administration information were identified. The number of approved psychotropic medicines varied across the studied countries and we found cross-country discrepancies in information in the drug labeling. Conclusion: Significant differences in information exists between MPGP and the drug labeling for psychotropic medicines for pediatric depression, due to unapproved ages or indications. Additionally, approval information in the drug labeling are not consistent across countries. Further research into reasons for variability and impact on practice may be warranted.

Antidepressant Augmentation: A Review of the Literature and a Review of the Pharmacoeconomic Considerations

PURPOSE

Antidepressant augmentation strategies for treatment-resistant depression (TRD) are discussed here with an analysis of patient out-of-pocket costs for various medications. The choice of agent ranges from newer atypical antipsychotics (aripiprazole, brexpiprazole, quetiapine) to older agents including buspirone, liothyronine (T3), and lithium. We sought to better understand the differences among these agents to aid in clinical decision making.

METHODS

We conducted a focused review of the support for each of the aforementioned agents in antidepressant augmentation. We then compared the approximate out-of-pocket cost for each medication during a typical augmentation trial using the typical prescription costs on ClinCalc.com derived from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. We calculated the cost to achieve response for one patient with TRD based on the number needed to treat (NNT).

FINDINGS

We observed significant variance in cost to achieve response based on the NNT derived from our review of each of the medications. For example, the overall out-of-pocket cost for one patient to achieve response with aripiprazole (the costliest generic agent) could cover lithium prescriptions for 4 to 5 patients with TRD to achieve response. Although brexpiprazole was estimated separately because of its brand name cost, we estimated that 324 patients receiving lithium could achieve response for same cost of single patient receiving brexpiprazole.

IMPLICATIONS

These findings suggest that among augmentation agents, there are differences in cost that may be highly important in clinical decision making. Other issues of medication monitoring may incur additional costs, and brand name medications offer significantly greater complexity and potential out-of-pocket costs to patients. The use of lithium as a first-line agent for TRD should be considered based on low cost, lowest NNT, and data in support of its efficacy.

Pharmacological Treatment of Schizophrenia: Japanese Expert Consensus

Introduction Conventional treatment guidelines of schizophrenia do not necessarily provide solutions on clinically important issues.

Methods A total of 141 certified psychiatrists of the Japanese Society of Clinical Neuropsychopharmacology evaluated treatment options regarding 19 clinically relevant situations in the treatment of schizophrenia with a 9-point scale (1=“disagree” and 9=“agree”).

Results First-line antipsychotics varied depending on predominant symptoms: risperidone (mean±standard deviation score, 7.9±1.4), olanzapine (7.5±1.6), and aripiprazole (6.9±1.9) were more likely selected for positive symptoms; aripiprazole (7.6±1.6) for negative symptoms; aripiprazole (7.3±1.9), olanzapine (7.2±1.9), and quetiapine (6.9±1.9) for depression and anxiety; and olanzapine (7.9±1.5) and risperidone (7.5±1.5) for excitement and aggression. While only aripiprazole was categorized as a first-line treatment for relapse prevention (7.6±1.0) in patients without noticeable symptoms, aripiprazole (8.0±1.6) and brexpiprazole (6.9±2.3) were categorized as such for social integration. First-line treatments in patients who are vulnerable to extrapyramidal symptoms include quetiapine (7.5±2.0) and aripiprazole (6.9±2.1).

Discussion These clinical recommendations represent the expert consensus on the use of a particular antipsychotic medication for a particular situation, filling a current gap in the literature.

Use of antipsychotics and the risk of acute respiratory failure among adults: A disease risk score-matched nested case-control study

AIMS

Evidence on acute respiratory failure (ARF) from antipsychotics is scant, and only 1 population-based study examined this drug safety issue in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients. Antipsychotics have been frequently prescribed off-label in adults, but whether antipsychotic use carries an increased ARF risk among adult patients is uncertain.

METHODS

We adopted a nested case-control study analysing 716 493 adults aged ≥20 years, identified from the Taiwan nationwide healthcare claims records between January 2000 and December 2013. Among the study cohort, 7084 adults with ARF and 12,785 disease risk scored-matched randomly selected controls were analysed. Multivariable logistic regression models were employed to estimate odds ratios of ARF with antipsychotic usages.

RESULTS

Current, recent, and recent past use of antipsychotics was associated with a 2.33-fold (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.06-2.64), 1.79-fold (95% CI = 1.43-2.25) and 1.41-fold (95% CI = 1.20-1.66) increased risk of ARF, respectively, compared with nonuse, while antipsychotics discontinued >90 days carried no risk. A dose-dependent association was observed with current therapy of antipsychotics (test for trend, P < .001), in which antipsychotic use at >1 defined daily dose yielded the highest risk of 6.53-fold (95% CI = 3.33-12.79). The findings were robust to using carbamazepine as an active comparator.

CONCLUSION

Antipsychotic use was associated with an increased risk of ARF in adult patients. The risk was dose-dependent and markedly higher with current use of antipsychotic agents at doses of 1 defined daily dose and above, <10% of this cohort. Physicians should be vigilant about any respiratory symptoms in patients currently receiving antipsychotics at such dose.

Treatment Combinations for Alzheimer's Disease: Current and Future Pharmacotherapy Options

Although Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the world’s leading cause of dementia and the population of patients with AD continues to grow, no new therapies have been approved in more than a decade. Many clinical trials of single-agent therapies have failed to affect disease progression or symptoms compared with placebo. The complex pathophysiology of AD may necessitate combination treatments rather than monotherapy. The goal of this narrative literature review is to describe types of combination therapy, review the current clinical evidence for combination therapy regimens (both symptomatic and disease-modifying) in the treatment of AD, describe innovative clinical trial study designs that may be effective in testing combination therapy, and discuss the regulatory and drug development landscape for combination therapy. Successful combination therapies in other complex disorders, such as human immunodeficiency virus, may provide useful examples of a potential path forward for AD treatment.

Antidepressant efficacy and side effect burden: an updated guide for clinicians

Antidepressant treatment has been evolving and changing since the 1950s following the discovery of the classic antidepressant treatments including tricyclic antidepressants and monoamine oxidase inhibitors. The heterogeneity of the disorder became apparent in the beginning when individuals remained symptomatic despite medication compliance. This spurred further research in order to understand the neurobiology underlying the disorder. Subsequently, newer medications were designed to target specific neurotransmitters and areas of the brain involved in symptom development and maintenance. Our original review article looked at both classic and modern antidepressant medications used in the treatment of major depressive disorder. This manuscript is an update to the original review and serves to provide clinicians with information about novel antidepressant medications, augmentation strategies with atypical antipsychotics, over-the-counter medications, as well as nonpharmaceutical treatments that should be considered when treating each individual patient who remains symptomatic despite treatment efforts.

Leptin and psychiatric illnesses: does leptin play a role in antipsychotic-induced weight gain?

Antipsychotic-induced weight gain is the most prevalent somatic adverse event occurring in patients treated by antipsychotics, especially atypical antipsychotics. It is of particular interest because of its repercussion on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality especially now that the use of second-generation antipsychotics has been extended to other mental health illnesses such as bipolar disorders and major depressive disorder. The mechanism underlying antipsychotics-induced weight gain is still poorly understood despite a significant amount of work on the topic. Recently, there has been an on-going debate of tremendous research interest on the relationship between antipsychotic-induced weight gain and body weight regulatory hormones such as leptin. Given that, researchers have brought to light the question of leptin's role in antipsychotic-induced weight gain. Here we summarize and discuss the existing evidence on the link between leptin and weight gain related to antipsychotic drugs, especially atypical antipsychotics.

Treatment patterns and sequences of pharmacotherapy for patients diagnosed with depression in the United States: 2014 through 2019

BACKGROUND

Understanding how patients are treated in the real-world is vital to identifying potential gaps in care. We describe the current pharmacologic treatment patterns for the treatment of depression.

METHODS

Patients with depression were identified from four large national claims databases during 1/1/2014-1/31/2019. Patients had ≥2 diagnoses for depression or an inpatient hospitalization with a diagnosis of depression. Patients were required to have enrollment in the database ≥1 year prior to and 3 years following their first depression diagnosis. Treatment patterns were captured at the class level and included selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants, other antidepressants, anxiolytics, hypnotics/sedatives, and antipsychotics. Treatment patterns were captured during all available follow-up.

RESULTS

We identified 269,668 patients diagnosed with depression. The proportion not receiving any pharmacological treatment during follow-up ranged from 29 to 52%. Of the treated, approximately half received ≥2 different classes of therapy, a quarter received ≥3 classes and more than 10% received 4 or more. SSRIs were the most common first-line treatment; however, many patients received an anxiolytic, hypnotic/sedative, or antipsychotic prior to any antidepressive treatment. Treatment with a combination of classes ranged from approximately 20% of first-line therapies to 40% of fourth-line.

CONCLUSIONS

Many patients diagnosed with depression go untreated and many others receive a non-antidepressant medication class as their first treatment. More than half of patients received more than one type of treatment class during the study follow up, suggesting that the first treatment received may not be optimal for most patients.

Analysis of Time-Course, Dose-Effect, and Influencing Factors of Antidepressants in the Treatment of Acute Adult Patients With Major Depression

OBJECTIVE

Model-based meta-analysis was used to describe the time-course and dose-effect relationships of antidepressants and also simultaneously investigate the impact of various factors on drug efficacy.

METHODS

This study is a reanalysis of a published network meta-analysis. Only placebo-controlled trials were included in this study. The change rate in depression rating scale scores from baseline was used as an efficacy indicator because a continuous variable is more likely to reflect subtle differences in efficacy between drugs.

RESULTS

A total 230 studies containing 64 346 patients were included in the analysis. The results showed that the number of study sites (single or multi-center) and the type of setting (inpatient or noninpatient) are important factors affecting the efficacy of antidepressants. After deducting the placebo effect, the maximum pure drug efficacy value of inpatients was 18.4% higher than that of noninpatients, and maximum pure drug efficacy value of single-center trials was 10.2% higher than that of multi-central trials. Amitriptyline showed the highest drug efficacy. The remaining 18 antidepressants were comparable or had little difference. Within the approved dose range, no significant dose-response relationship was observed. However, the time-course relationship is obvious for all antidepressants. In terms of safety, with the exception of amitriptyline, the dropout rate due to adverse events of other drugs was not more than 10% higher than that of the placebo group.

CONCLUSION

The number of study sites and the type of setting are significant impact factors for the efficacy of antidepressants. Except for amitriptyline, the other 18 antidepressants have little difference in efficacy and safety.

The Potential Utility of Aripiprazole Augmentation for Major Depressive Disorder with Mixed Features Specifier: A Retrospective Study

Objective

The present study aimed to observe potential benefit of aripiprazole augmentation in the treatment of major depressive disorder with mixed specifier (MDDM) in naturalistic treatment setting.

Methods

Data were collected from MDDM patients using a retrospective chart review for 8 weeks (week –8 and week 0) in routine practice. All patients were on current antidepressants upon starting of aripiprazole. Patients were treated without restriction of doses of aripiprazole. The primary endpoint was the mean change of Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total scores along with various secondary endpoint measures.

Results

In total 38 patients were analyzed. The changes of MADRS, Clinical Global Impression (CGI)-severity, Young Mania Rating Scale, Sheehan Disability Scale, and CGI-clinical benefit total scores from baseline to the endpoint were −7.1, −0.8, −4.9, −4.1, and −3.6, respectively (all p < 0.0001). At the endpoint, the responder and remitter rates by MADRS score criteria were approximately 32% and 21%, respectively.

Conclusion

The present findings have clearly shown the effectiveness and tolerability of aripiprazole augmentation for MDDM patients in routine practice. The present study warrants subsequent, adequately-powered, well-controlled studies for generalizability near future.

Medication Adherence, Health Care Utilization, and Costs in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder Initiating Adjunctive Atypical Antipsychotic Treatment

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare medication adherence, health care utilization, and cost among patients receiving adjunctive treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD) with brexpiprazole, quetiapine, or lurasidone.

METHODS

Using Truven Health MarketScan® Commercial, Medicaid, and Medicare Supplemental Databases, we identified adults with MDD initiating adjunctive treatment with brexpiprazole, quetiapine, or lurasidone (index atypical antipsychotic [AAP]). We compared medication adherence and persistence measured by proportion of days covered (PDC) and treatment duration of index AAP, all-cause and psychiatric hospital care (hospitalization or emergency department visit), and medical costs during 6-month follow-up. Models performed included logistic regression for hospital care, linear regression for PDC and cost, and Cox proportional hazards regression for time to discontinuation, adjusting for demographic, clinical, and utilization differences during the 6 months before index AAP.

FINDINGS

The total sample included 778 brexpiprazole, 626 lurasidone, and 3458 quetiapine therapy initiators. Adjusting for baseline differences, the risk of discontinuation of index AAP was statistically significantly higher for quetiapine than for brexpiprazole (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.13; 95% CI, 1.02-1.25; P = 0.023) and did not differ between lurasidone and brexipiprazole (HR = 1.14; 95% CI, 1.00-1.29; P = 0.054). The adjusted rate of all-cause hospitalization or emergency department visit in the postindex period was lowest for brexpiprazole at 27.4% (95% CI, 24.0%-31.0%), compared with 31.1% (95% CI, 27.3%-35.2%) for lurasidone and 35.3% (95% CI, 33.5%-37.1%) for quetiapine (P< 0.001 for all comparisons). Quetiapine users had increased all-cause costs compared with brexpiprazole users (estimate = $2309; 95% CI, $31-$4587; P = 0.047); all-cause medical costs did not differ between lurasidone and brexpiprazole (estimate = $913; 95% CI, $-2033 -$3859; P = 0.543). Adjusted psychiatric hospital care, psychiatric costs, and PDC did not differ significantly among the groups.

IMPLICATIONS

In patients with MDD and a variety of insurance types, brexpiprazole use was associated with statistically significantly lower risks of discontinuation, risk of hospital care (hospitalization and ED visits), and all-cause medical costs compared with adjunctive quetiapine. Differences between brexpiprazole and lurasidone were not statistically significant. These findings suggest that drug choice is associated with subsequent health care utilization and costs.

Changes in healthcare resource use and costs associated with early versus delayed initiation of atypical antipsychotic adjunctive treatment in major depressive disorder

AIMS

The study compared all-cause and major depressive disorder (MDD)-related healthcare resource use (HRU) and costs in patients with MDD treated with atypical antipsychotic (AAP) adjunctive therapy early or later in treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Adults with MDD and antidepressant treatment (ADT) who newly initiated adjunctive aripiprazole, brexpiprazole, lurasidone, or quetiapine between October 1, 2014 and September 30, 2015 were identified in the IQVIA Real-World Data Adjudicated Claims database; the index date was the date of the first AAP claim. Patients were stratified into three cohorts: AAP initiated in the first year (Y1); in the second year (Y2); and more than 2 years (Y3) of first ADT use. Within each cohort, HRU and costs were compared between the 12 months before and after the index date. Pre-post changes in HRU and costs were then compared between cohorts.

RESULTS

Five hundred and six (36.7%) patients were categorized as Y1; 252 (18.3%) as Y2; and 622 (45.1%) as Y3. AAP use was associated with significantly decreased rates of all-cause and MDD-related hospitalization and emergency department visits, and increased rates of pharmacy fills and physician office visits; and the magnitude of changes was largest in cohort Y1. Cohort Y1 had the largest reductions in mean (±SD) all-cause medical costs per patient (-$10,496 ± $85,022, p = .015) compared to Y2 (-$2,474 ± $85,022, p = .572) and Y3 (-$472 ± $31,334, p = .823), mainly due to the reduction in hospitalization. After adjusting for differences in baseline characteristics, the largest reductions in hospitalization and medical costs were observed in cohort Y1. Similar increases in all-cause pharmacy costs were seen in all cohorts. A similar trend in costs was observed in MDD-related healthcare services.

LIMITATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS

AAP treatment was associated with reductions in all-cause and MDD-related medical costs, primarily in decreased hospitalization. The reductions were largest among patients who initiated treatment in the first year.

A rapid LC-MS/MS method for simultaneous determination of quetiapine and duloxetine in rat plasma and its application to pharmacokinetic interaction study

Combinations of new antidepressants like duloxetine and second-generation antipsychotics like quetiapine are used in clinical treatment of major depressive disorder, as well as in forensic toxicology scenarios. The drug–drug interaction (DDI) between quetiapine and duloxetine is worthy of attention to avoid unnecessary adverse effects. However, no pharmacokinetic DDI studies of quetiapine and duloxetine have been reported. In the present study, a rapid and sensitive liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method was developed for simultaneous determination of quetiapine and duloxetine in rat plasma. A one-step protein precipitation with acetonitrile was applied for sample preparation. The analytes were eluted on an Eclipse XDB-C₁₈ column using the mixture of acetonitrile and 2 mM ammonium formate containing 0.1% formic acid at a gradient elution within 6.0 min. Quantification was performed in multiple-reaction-monitoring mode with the ion transitions m/z 384.4 → 253.2 for quetiapine, m/z 298.1→154.1 for duloxetine and m/z 376.2→165.2 for IS (haloperidol), respectively. Good linearity was obtained in the range of 0.50–100 ng/mL for quetiapine (r² = 0.9972) and 1.00–200 ng/mL for duloxetine (r² = 0.9982) using 50 μL of rat plasma, respectively. The method was fully validated with accuracy, precision, matrix effects, recovery and stability. The validated data have met the acceptance criteria in FDA guideline. The method was applied to a pharmacokinetic interaction study and the results indicated that quetiapine had significant effect on the enhanced plasma exposure of duloxetine in rats under combination use. This study could be readily applied in therapeutic drug monitoring of major depressive disorder patients receiving such drug combinations.

Selanylimidazopyridine Prevents Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Depressive-Like Behavior in Mice by Targeting Neurotrophins and Inflammatory/Oxidative Mediators

Inasmuch, as the major depressive disorder (MDD) has been characterized as a heterogeneous disease as the inflammatory processes, neurotrophic factors' dysfunction and oxidative/nitrosative stress are believed to play a vital role in its establishment. Organoselenium compounds stand out due to their antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, neuroprotective, and antidepressant effects. In this sense, the present study investigated the effect of 3-((4-methoxyphenyl)selanyl)-2-phenylimidazo[1,2-a]pyridine (MPI; 20 and 50 mg/kg, intragastrically) pretreatment [30 min prior lipopolysaccharide (LPS) challenge (0.83 mg/kg)] on acute LPS induced depressive-like behavior, neuroinflammation, and oxidative stress. MPI was able to prevent the increased immobility time induced by LPS on the forced swimming test (FST), the increase in pro-inflammatory cytokines' expression in the hippocampus (HC) of mice after LPS challenge via NFkB downregulation, and the increase of the reactive oxygen species generation and lipid peroxidation in the prefrontal cortex and HC of mice. It was observed that at the doses tested, MPI protected against reducing levels of BDNF in the cortex and HC of mice challenged with LPS. These observations suggest that the antidepressant-like effect of MPI depends on its capacity to modulate the inflammatory, antioxidant, and neurotrophic systems.

Pharmacological treatment of unipolar depressive disorders: summary of WFSBP guidelines

OBJECTIVE

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a severe mood disorder affecting individuals of all ages and is characterised by single or recurrent major depressive episodes. Key elements of acute and maintenance treatment of MDD include pharmacotherapy, and psychological approaches such as psychoeducation and adherence monitoring.

METHODS

This summary of the 'Practice guidelines for the biological treatment of unipolar depressive disorders' comprises acute, continuation and maintenance treatment developed by an international Task Force of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP), and focuses on pharmacological treatment options.

RESULTS

A variety of different antidepressants are available for the effective acute and prophylactic treatment of depressed patients. Randomised placebo-controlled efficacy studies indicate that all major classes of antidepressants are effective in acute treatment but also in preventing recurrence of depression showing about a two-fold higher relapse rate with placebo treatment. Evidence suggests that the 'newer' antidepressants have superior long-term effectiveness due to better tolerability and safety profile compared to traditional antidepressants, e.g., the tricyclic antidepressants (TCA).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite progress in the availability of different treatment options there is still a substantial proportion of patients who do not achieve full remission. Several add-on pharmacological treatment options are among the best-evidenced strategies for refractory depressed patients.

Amisulpride Switching in Schizophrenic Patients Who Showed Suboptimal Effect and/or Tolerability to Current Antipsychotics in a Naturalistic Setting: An Explorative Study

Objective

Despite numerous atypical antipsychotics (AAP) available, many patients with schizophrenia still experience lack of efficacy and persistent side-effects. Switching from one AAP to another with a different side-effect profile has become a common clinical strategy. We aimed to investigate effect of switching to amisulpride in patients who showed suboptimal effect and/or tolerability to current antipsychotics treatment.

Methods

This was a 6-week, prospective, multicenter, open-label, flexible-dose study in patients with schizophrenia. Switching to amisulpride was achieved using cross-titration within 7 days (day 1: 300 mg on day 1 then flexibly dosed 400–800 mg/day). The primary end-point measure was proportion of patients achieving improvement in clinical benefit at week 6 based on Clinical Global Impressions-Clinical Benefit (CGI-CB). Secondary endpoints included change in scores in CGI-CB, CGI-Severity (CGI-S), Subjective Satisfaction Scores (SSS), Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), and Simpson and Angus Rating Scale.

Results

Among 37 patients switched to amisulpride, 76% completed study and 56.8% had clinical benefit measure by CGI-CB. CGI-CB and CGI-S scores showed significant improvement at week 6 compared to baseline (mean changes of CGI-CB and CGI-S scores: −1.7+1.0, p<0.0001 and −0.6±0.0, p=0.001, respectively). SSS scores also improved significantly (mean change: 2.1±2.6, p<0.0001). Mean weight of patients significantly lowered compared to baseline (mean change: −1.2±2.0, p<0.0001).

Conclusion

Patients with schizophrenia who showed suboptimal efficacy or tolerability with their current antipsychotics and thereby switched to amisulpride resulted in clinical benefit in terms of both improved efficacy and tolerability. The small sample size limits generalizability of the study results.