A hybrid procedure for atrial fibrillation using total thoracoscopic ablation and post-procedural electrophysiological confirmation of ablation lines

Updates in hybrid AF ablation: a hybrid approach to surgical epicardial ablation and cather endocardial ablation in persistent atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common and increasing cardiac arrhythmia. AF increases thromboembolic events and hospitalizations and deteriorates quality of life. The mechanism of AF is not completely understood. James Cox proposed a concept of Maze procedure in 1987 which was based on a surgical ablation lesion for electrical conduction pathway. Although surgical ablation offers a higher success rate, it should be performed with minimally invasive techniques because of its high invasiveness. Haissaguerre et al. identified potential sources of AF in the pulmonary veins as triggers and developed the percutaneous catheter ablation as the treatment strategy for paroxysmal AF refractory to pharmaceutical therapy. The atrial remodeling occurs electrically and structurally in persistent or longstanding persistent AF, and the catheter ablation and surgical ablation have variable success rates. Persistent or longstanding persistent AF presents a major challenge. Despite continuous improvements, catheter-based procedures have shown relatively far from satisfactory outcomes and may need to be repeated to achieve sinus rhythm. A hybrid approach consisting of the sequential combination of a surgical minimally invasive epicardial ablation and a transvenous catheter endocardial ablation would be an alternative option that supplements the limitations of endo- and epicardial strategies. Close cooperation between cardiac surgeons and electrophysiologists for optimal selection of patients and management for arrhythmia recurrence seems suggestible for persistent or longstanding persistent AF.

Usefulness of Postprocedural Electrophysiological Confirmation Upon Totally Thoracoscopic Ablation in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Little information is available concerning the usefulness of electrophysiological confirmation followed by totally thoracoscopic ablation. This study aimed to examine whether postprocedural electrophysiological confirmation is always necessary after totally thoracoscopic ablation (TTA) in patients with isolated persistent atrial fibrillation. Forty-five patients with isolated persistent atrial fibrillation were randomized into 2 groups those who received routine electrophysiological confirmation and additional catheter ablation after totally thoracoscopic ablation (the hybrid group [n = 22]) and those who did not (the TTA group [n = 23]). Electrophysiological study was performed 4 or 5 days after surgery. No early or late mortality occurred. In the hybrid group, 5 patients (23%, 5/22) required additional ablation due to residual potential in the left atrium. At a year postoperatively, normal sinus rhythm was observed in 89% of patients (40/45) and similar in both groups (Odds ratio 0.80, 95% confidence interval 0.32 to 1.99). During follow-up, sinus rhythm was maintained in 16 patients (70%) in the TTA group without additional catheter ablation, which was similar (p = 0.920) to the results in the hybrid group (n = 15, 68.2%). Event-free survival rate at 12 months did not differ between groups (TTA group vs hybrid group, 78% vs 77%; p = 0.633). In simple Cox regression analysis, preoperative left atrium volume index was associated with atrial arrhythmia (p = 0.030, hazards ratio 1.087, 95% confidence interval 1.01-1.18). In conclusion, thoracoscopic ablation provided good 1-year durability in patients with isolated persistent AF irrespective of postprocedural electrophysiological confirmation. Seventy-percent of the TTA group did not need additional catheter ablation.