The decline effect in cardiovascular medicine: is the effect of cardiovascular medicine and stent on cardiovascular events decline over the years?

Preoperative Low-dose and High-dose Pregabalin and Cardiovascular Response to Endotracheal Intubation: A Prospective, Randomized, Single-blind, Controlled Study in China

PURPOSE

A prospective, randomized, single-blind, controlled clinical study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of preoperative pregabalin on cardiovascular response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation.

METHODS

Patients aged 18-60 years with an American Society of Anesthesiologists scale score of I or II were recruited and randomly allocated to receive placebo (control), low-dose (150-mg) pregabalin, or high-dose (300-mg) pregabalin. The medications were orally administered 1 hour before general anesthesia. Heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, and mean arterial blood pressure were measured and recorded prior to the administration of placebo or pregabalin; before endotracheal intubation; and at 0, 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10 minutes after intubation. The sedation score was evaluated 1 hour after the administration of placebo or pregabalin.

FINDINGS

A total of 90 patients were enrolled (n = 30 per group). Pregabalin (150 or 300 mg) was associated with reduced blood pressure fluctuations after intubation, but with no significant differences between the 2 dose groups. Pregabalin was associated with an inhibitory effect on heart rate fluctuations and reduced hemodynamic complications after intubation, in a dose-dependent manner, but no effect on the required perioperative opioid dosage was found. Both doses were effective in reducing preoperative anxiety, but visual analog scale pain scores at 1 hour after surgery were reduced only in limb and spine as well as abdominal surgeries. A pregabalin-related adverse reaction was dizziness, which was observed at 1 hour after surgery in both groups.

IMPLICATIONS

In this study, high-dose (300-mg) pregabalin effectively attenuated cardiovascular response after endotracheal intubation. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03456947.

Contradicting/negative results in clinical research: Why (do we get these)? Why not (get these published)? Where (to publish)?

Obtaining negative or contradicting results, whereas conducting a study has always been overlooked as inadequacies on the part of the researcher. Many-a-times, negative results are arrived at even after conducting the study with great care and effort. This cannot be considered, a flaw, always. Contradicting results may be arrived at because of various reasons and should be considered and published in order to arrive at a definitive result. Various journals are available which publish these contradicting results exclusively. It is the duty of the researcher to know in detail the cause and effect of these, considering the pros and cons. This article gives a bird's eye view of when, where and how to manage negative or contradicting results of a study.