Early and Midterm Results Following Interventional Coarctoplasty: Evaluation of Variables that Can Affect the Results

Late open conversion after endovascular treatment for the coarctation of aorta in adult due to restenosis with thrombus

A 22-year-old man was referred to our hospital for rib notching found on a radiograph and hypertension. Computed tomography revealed coarctation of the descending aortic isthmus. Because he refused open surgery, endovascular treatment was performed. The 2-year follow-up computed tomography scan showed infolding of the stent graft and thrombus formation. He had presented with intermittent claudication; therefore, graft interposition was performed. Endovascular surgery plays an important role in the treatment of coarctation of the aorta. However, insufficient dilatation can lead to restenosis accompanied by thrombus formation, and excess ballooning can cause aortic wall injury. Careful performance of the procedure and close postoperative follow-up are essential.

Balloon-Expandable Cheatham-Platinum Stents Versus Self-Expandable Nitinol Stents in Coarctation of Aorta: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to compare the safety and efficacy of the balloon-expandable stent (BES) and the self-expandable stent (SES) in the endovascular treatment of coarctation of aorta.

BACKGROUND

Coarctoplasty with stents has conferred promising results. Although several nonrandomized studies have approved the safety and efficacy of the BES and the SES, no high-quality evidence exists for this comparison.

METHODS

In the present open-label, parallel-group, blinded endpoint randomized pilot clinical trial, adult patients with de novo native aortic coarctation were randomized into Cheatham-platinum BES and uncovered nitinol SES groups. The primary outcome of the study was a composite of procedural and vascular complications. The secondary outcomes of the study consisted of the incidence of aortic recoarctation, thoracic aortic aneurysm/pseudoaneurysm formation, and residual hypertension at a 12-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Among 105 patients who were screened between January 2017 and December 2019, 92 eligible patients (32 women [34.8%]) with a median age of 30 years (IQR: 20-36 years) were randomized equally into the BES and SES groups. The composite of procedural and vascular complications occurred in 10.9% of the BES group and 2.2% of the SES group (odds ratio: 0.18; 95% CI: 0.02-1.62; P = 0.20). Aortic recoarctation occurred in 5 patients (5.4%), 3 patients (6.5%) in the BES group and 2 patients (4.3%) in the SES group (odds ratio: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.10-4.09; P = 0.64). Only 1 patient (1.1%) was complicated by aortic pseudoaneurysm. Hypertension control was achieved in 50% of the study population, with an equal distribution in the 2 study groups at the 12-month follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the BES and the SES were safe and effective in the treatment of native coarctation.

Endovascular stent implantation for aortic coarctation: parameters affecting clinical outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate safety and efficacy of endovascular stenting for aortic coarctation (AC) and to explore the effect of clinical parameters and stent characteristics on outcomes.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Clinical data of all patients with AC who had attempted transcatheter stenting between 2004 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Eligible patients had native or recurrent AC with systemic arterial hypertension and resting arm-leg pressure gradient > 20 mmHg. Exclusions included distance between takeoff of cervical arteries and stenotic aortic lesion < 10 mm, contraindication to antithrombotic therapy, bodyweight < 25 kg, and secondary hypertension.

RESULTS

A total of 20 patients (75.0% with native lesions) were included with a mean age of 18.4 years and a mean bodyweight of 59.2 kg. Procedure was successful in 90.0% of cases with an immediate drop in the invasive pressure gradient across lesions. On a median follow-up of 12 months (range, 8 to 144.9 months), coarctation reoccurred in five patients, but four of them required intervention after a median of 104.4 months with successful outcomes. Cheatham Platinum stents were significantly associated with lower rates of recoarctations and reinterventions. At the latest follow-up, three out of six patients with persistent hypertension had no recoarctation. Analysis showed that the need for antihypertensive therapy was not influenced by clinical parameters, aortic arch geometry, or stent characteristics.

CONCLUSION

Treating AC with stent implantation is a safe and successful procedure. Using Cheatham Platinum stents appears to be associated with better outcomes. The persistence of arterial hypertension despite successful stenting remains a complex and challenging phenomenon.

Paradigm Shift in the Management of Isolated Interrupted Aortic Arch in Adulthood

An interrupted aortic arch (IAA) is a rare type of congenital heart disease, and few patients survived into the adulthood. Surgical reconstruction is still the recommended approach, despite its complexity and considerable complication. In addition, patients with IAA usually suffer from several other important congenital heart anomalies, which increase the complexity of surgical management of IAA. Although endovascular therapy has replaced surgery in the treatment of the majority of non-IAA, its applicability in IAA is still matter of debate. In the present review, we have discussed about various therapeutic solutions of IAA, and present a stepwise approach for its endovascular management.