J Wave Syndromes: History and Current Controversies

Why Is There an Increased Risk for Sudden Cardiac Death in Patients With Early Repolarization Syndrome?

The last two decades have changed the viewpoint on early repolarization syndrome (ERS). The prevalence of the early repolarization pattern is variable and ranges between 3-24% depending upon age, gender, and criteria used for J-point upliftment from baseline (0.05mV vs. 1 mV). While this pattern was previously linked with a benign result, multiple recent investigations have found a link between early repolarization and Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD) by causing life-threatening arrhythmias like Ventricular tachycardia/Ventricular fibrillation, a condition known as early repolarization syndrome. The syndrome falls under a broader bracket of J wave syndromes, which can be caused by early repolarization or depolarization abnormalities. The characteristics of early repolarization that are considered high risk for Sudden Cardiac Death include the amplitude of J-point upliftment from baseline ( > 0.2 mV), Inferior-lateral location of Early Repolarization pattern, and horizontal and downsloping ST-segment. Patients with symptomatic early repolarisation patterns on ECG are more likely to have repeated cardiac episodes. Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) implantation and isoproterenol are the recommended treatments in symptomatic patients. On the other hand, asymptomatic patients with early repolarization patterns are prevalent and have a better outcome. Risk categorization is still obscure in asymptomatic early repolarization patterns. This traditional review outlines the known knowledge of pathophysiology behind the increased risk of sudden cardiac death, risk stratification of patients with ERS, and the treatment guidelines for patients with ERS. Further prospective studies are recommended to elucidate the exact mechanism for ventricular arrhythmogenesis in ERS patients and to risk stratifying asymptomatic patients with ERS.

Delta QRS distinguishes Ito -mediated J waves from pseudo J waves produced by conduction delay on body surface electrocardiographic

BACKGROUND

On surface electrocardiographic (ECGs), it is difficult to differentiate I_to -mediated J waves, a repolarization phenomenon seen in J wave syndromes (JWS) from terminal QRS deflections that mimic J waves (pseudo J waves) in intraventricular conduction delay (IVCD), an abnormality in depolarization. We hypothesize that the difference between the "maximum QRS duration" inclusive of J point or terminal QRS deflections and the minimum QRS duration identified across a 12-lead ECG is significantly larger in I_to -mediated J waves, and can serve as a marker to make this distinction.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on adults with ECGs consisting of one of the four following manifestations: J waves associated with hypothermia and early repolarization, and pseudo J waves associated with right bundle branch block (RBBB) and non-specific intraventricular conduction delay (NS-IVCD). All ECGs were assessed individually and the maximum and minimum discrete QRS deflections on 12-lead tracings, defined as "QRS_max " and QRS_min , were identified. The difference between "QRS_max " and QRS_min , designated as ∆QRS, was calculated and compared across the studied populations.

RESULTS

A total of 60 patients consisting of 15 patients in each arm were included in the study. ΔQRS was significantly larger in the hypothermia and early repolarization groups, compared to RBBB and NS-IVCD (p < .0001), with the following mean ∆QRS: hypothermia 54.3 ± 13.7 ms, early repolarization pattern 47.3 ± 15.3 ms, RBBB 19.3 ± 6.5 ms, and NS-IVCD 16.0 ± 6.6 ms.

CONCLUSION

∆QRS may serve as a reliable ECG parameter for distinguishing I_to -mediated J waves from pseudo J waves produced by delayed intraventricular conduction.

Depolarization versus repolarization abnormality underlying inferolateral J-wave syndromes: New concepts in sudden cardiac death with apparently normal hearts

Early repolarization indicates a distinct electrocardiographic phenotype affecting the junction between the QRS complex and the ST segment in inferolateral leads (inferolateral J-wave syndromes). It has been considered a benign electrocardiographic variant for decades, but recent clinical studies have demonstrated its arrhythmogenicity in a small subset, supported by experimental studies showing transmural dispersion of repolarization. Here we review the current knowledge and the issues of risk stratification that limit clinical management. In addition, we report on new mapping data of patients refractory to pharmacologic treatment using high-density electrogram mapping at the time of inscription of J wave. These data demonstrate that distinct substrates, delayed depolarization, and abnormal early repolarization underlie inferolateral J-wave syndromes, with significant implications. Finally, based on these data, we propose a new simplified mechanistic classification of sudden cardiac deaths without apparent structural heart disease.

Tpeak-Tend, Tpeak-Tend/QT ratio and Tpeak-Tend dispersion for risk stratification in Brugada Syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Brugada syndrome is an ion channelopathy that predisposes affected subjects to ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT/VF), potentially leading to sudden cardiac death (SCD). Tpeak-Tend intervals, (Tpeak-Tend)/QT ratio and Tpeak-Tend dispersion have been proposed for risk stratification, but their predictive values in Brugada syndrome have been challenged recently.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to examine their values in predicting arrhythmic and mortality outcomes in Brugada Syndrome. PubMed and Embase databases were searched until 1 May 2018, identifying 29 and 57 studies.

RESULTS

Nine studies involving 1740 subjects (mean age 45 years old, 80% male, mean follow-up duration was 68 ± 27 months) were included. The mean Tpeak-Tend interval was 98.9 ms (95% CI: 90.5-107.2 ms) for patients with adverse events (ventricular arrhythmias or SCD) compared to 87.7 ms (95% CI: 80.5-94.9 ms) for those without such events, with a mean difference of 11.9 ms (95% CI: 3.6-20.2 ms, P = 0.005; I 2 = 86%). Higher (Tpeak-Tend)/QT ratios (mean difference = 0.019, 95% CI: 0.003-0.036, P = 0.024; I 2 = 74%) and Tpeak-Tend dispersion (mean difference = 7.8 ms, 95% CI: 2.1-13.4 ms, P = 0.007; I 2 = 80%) were observed for the event-positive group.

CONCLUSION

Tpeak-Tend interval, (Tpeak-Tend)/QT ratio and Tpeak-Tend dispersion were higher in high-risk than low-risk Brugada subjects, and thus offer incremental value for risk stratification.

Meta-analysis of Tpeak-Tend and Tpeak-Tend/QT ratio for risk stratification in congenital long QT syndrome

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Congenital long QT syndrome (LQTS) predisposes affected individuals to ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VF/VF), potentially resulting in sudden cardiac death. The T_peak-T_end interval and the T_peak-T_end/QT ratio, electrocardiographic markers of dispersion of ventricular repolarization, were proposed for risk stratification but their predictive values in LQTS have been controversial. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to examine the value of T_peak-T_end intervals and T_peak-T_end/QT ratios in predicting arrhythmic and mortality outcomes in congenital LQTS.

METHOD

PubMed and Embase databases were searched until 9th May 2017, identifying 199 studies.

RESULTS

Five studies on long QT syndrome were included in the final meta-analysis. T_peak-T_end intervals were longer (mean difference [MD]: 13ms, standard error [SE]: 4ms, P=0.002; I²=34%) in congenital LQTS patients with adverse events [syncope, ventricular arrhythmias or sudden cardiac death] compared to LQTS patients without such events. By contrast, T_peak-T_end/QT ratios were not significantly different between the two groups (MD: 0.02, SE: 0.02, P=0.26; I²=0%).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis showed that T_peak-T_end interval is significant higher in individuals who are at elevated risk of adverse events in congenital LQTS, offering incremental value for risk stratification.

A female patient with hypokalaemia-induced J wave syndrome: An unusual case report

RATIONALE

Prominent J waves can be seen in life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias such as Brugada syndrome, early repolarization syndrome, and ventricular fibrillation. We herein present an unusual case report of hypokalemia-induced J wave syndrome and ST (a part of ECG) segment elevation.

PATIENTS CONCERNS

A 52-year-old woman with chief complaints of chest pain for 2 hours and diarrhea showed a marked hypokalemia (2.8 mmol/L) and slightly elevated creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB) (57.5 U/L). The electrocardiographic (ECG) recording was normal upon admission and computed tomography (CT) aorta angiography excluded an aorta dissection. ECG done 17 hours after admission showed ST segment elevation and elevated J wave in leads II, III and aVF, and fusion of T and U wave in all leads.

DIAGNOSIS

We first thought that the diagnosis of this patient was acute myocardial syndrome.

INTERVENTION

Potassium chloride and oflocaxin treatment was given to the patient.

OUTCOMES

Laboratory test showed the level of serum potassium ion increased to 3.4 mmol/L and CK-MB did not have any significant change. The infusion of potassium chloride-induced disappearance of the elevated J wave, although QT (a part of ECG) intervals were still longer than that upon admission.

LESSONS

This case tells us that hypokalaemia might induce J wave and elevated ST segments which should be distinguished from acute myocardial syndrome.

J Waves for Predicting Cardiac Events in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to investigate whether the presence of J waves was associated with cardiac events in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM).

BACKGROUND

It has been uncertain whether the presence of J waves predicts life-threatening cardiac events in patients with HCM.

METHODS

This study evaluated consecutive 338 patients with HCM (207 men; age 61 ± 17 years of age). A J-wave was defined as J-point elevation >0.1 mV in at least 2 contiguous inferior and/or lateral leads. Cardiac events were defined as sudden cardiac death, ventricular fibrillation or sustained ventricular tachycardia, or appropriate implantable cardiac defibrillator therapy. The study also investigated whether adding the J-wave in a conventional risk model improved a prediction of cardiac events.

RESULTS

J waves were seen in 46 (13.6%) patients at registration. Cardiac events occurred in 31 patients (9.2%) during median follow-up of 4.9 years (interquartile range: 2.6 to 7.1 years). In a Cox proportional hazards model, the presence of J waves was significantly associated with cardiac events (adjusted hazard ratio: 4.01; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.78 to 9.05; p = 0.001). Compared with the conventional risk model, the model using J waves in addition to conventional risks better predicted cardiac events (net reclassification improvement, 0.55; 95% CI: 0.20 to 0.90; p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of J waves was significantly associated with cardiac events in HCM. Adding J waves to conventional cardiac risk factors improved prediction of cardiac events. Further confirmatory studies are needed before considering J-point elevation as a marker of risk for use in making management decisions regarding risk in patients with HCM.