Risk of Atrial Fibrillation and Adverse Outcomes in Patients With Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices

Long-term adherence to a wearable for continuous behavioural activity measuring in the SafeHeart implantable cardioverter defibrillator population

Aims

Wearable health technologies are increasingly popular. Yet, wearable monitoring only works when devices are worn as intended, and adherence reporting lacks standardization. In this study, we aimed to explore the long-term adherence to a wrist-worn activity tracker in the prospective SafeHeart study and identify patient characteristics associated with adherence.

Methods and results

This study enrolled 303 participants, instructed to wear a wrist-worn accelerometer day and night for 6 months. Long-term adherence was defined as valid days (≥22 h of wear time) divided by expected days, and daily adherence as mean hours of wear time per 24 h period. Optimal, moderate, and low long-term and daily adherence groups were defined as long-term adherence above or below 95 and 75% and daily adherence above or below 90 and 75%. Regression models were used to identify patient characteristics associated with long-term adherence. In total, 296 participants [median age 64 years; interquartile range (IQR) 57-72; 19% female] were found eligible, yielding 44 003 days for analysis. The median long-term adherence was 88.2% (IQR 74.6-96.5%). A total of 83 (28%), 127 (42.9%), and 86 (29.1%) participants had optimal, moderate, and low long-term adherence, and 163 (55.1%), 87 (29.4%), and 46 (15.5%) had optimal, moderate, and low daily adherence, respectively. Age and smoking habits differed significantly between adherence levels, and increasing changeover intervals improved the degree of long-term adherence.

Conclusion

Long-term adherence to a wearable activity tracker was 88.2% over a 6-month period. Older age and longer changeover interval were positively associated with long-term adherence. This serves as a benchmark for future studies that rely on wearable devices.

Trial registration number

The National Trial Registration number: NL9218 (https://onderzoekmetmensen.nl/).

Neuromodulation for Atrial Fibrillation Control

Trigger and functional substrate are related to the tone of autonomic nervous system, and the role of the autonomic nerve is more significant in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) compared to non-paroxysmal AF. We have several options for neuromodulation to help to manage patients with AF. Neuromodulation targets can be divided into efferent and afferent pathways. On the efferent side, block would be an intuitive approach. However, permanent block is hard to achieve due to completeness of the procedure and reinnervation issues. Temporary block such as botulinum toxin injection into ganglionated plexi would be a possible option for post-cardiac surgery AF. Low-level subthreshold stimulation could also prevent AF, but the invasiveness of the procedure is the barrier for the general use. On the afferent side, block is also an option. Various renal denervation approaches are currently under investigation. Auditory vagus nerve stimulation is one of the representative low-level afferent stimulation methods. This technique is noninvasive and easy to apply, so it has the potential to be widely utilized if its efficacy is confirmed.