Urinary biomarkers for active Lupus Nephritis that have survived independent validation across cohorts

Most reported biomarkers for lupus nephritis (LN) have not been independently validated across cohorts. Moreover, many of the documented biomarker candidates have been reported to be elevated in LN compared to healthy controls. However, biomarkers that distinguish patients with active LN (ALN) from inactive systemic lupus erythematosus (iSLE) hold significant clinical utility. Hence, our review attempts to identify urine protein biomarkers for LN that have been independently validated across two or more cohorts and exhibit good diagnostic potential for distinguishing ALN from iSLE. PubMed and OVID were screened for studies assessing the diagnostic value of urinary biomarkers in patients with ALN compared to iSLE. Forty peer-reviewed articles were evaluated, encompassing urine biomarker data from 3,411 distinct patients. Of the 32 candidate biomarkers identified, fourteen were repeatedly reported/tested in four or more papers each, namely ALCAM, CCL2 (MCP1), CD163, HAVCR1 (KIM-1), HPGDS, ICAM-1 (CD54), ICAM-2 (CD102), IGFBP-2, LCN2, NCAM-1 (CD56), SELE (E-Selectin), SELL (L-Selectin), TNFSF12 (TWEAK), and VCAM-1, with most exhibiting C-statistics of 0.80 or more across multiple studies when discriminating patients with ALN from iSLE. The 32 reproducibly elevated biomarkers for active LN mapped to nine functional categories. The urinary proteins reported here promise to serve as a liquid biopsy for ALN. Besides representing potential candidates for diagnostic, monitoring, predictive, and prognostic biomarkers in LN, they also provide a window into potential molecular processes within the kidney that may be driving LN. Thus, ongoing advances in proteomics, which offer wider proteome coverage at increased sensitivity, are likely to further reshape our perspective of urinary biomarkers for LN.

Analysis of TNF-like weak inducer of apoptosis for detecting lupus nephritis

Lupus is an autoimmune disease that has various manifestations in various organs. One of the manifestations of lupus is lupus nephritis (LN), which often causes kidney failure and death. Cytokines play an essential role in the pathogenesis of LN and might be helpful for LN biomarkers. This study aimed to evaluate urine TNF-like weak inducer of apoptosis (TWEAK) for detecting LN since this is not an invasive procedure and is more cost-effective. The gold standard procedure for diagnosing LN needs a biopsy of the kidney. However, the procedure is invasive, high cost, and takes time. Thus, a biomarker from urine is needed for early diagnosis of LN. This research conducted was cross-sectional. The total participants were 57, consisting of 29 lupus nephritis and 28 lupus without nephritis. TWEAK levels were determined by ELISA method; urine protein, urine erythrocyte, and leukocyte were examined by a urine autoanalyzer. Statistical analysis using Mann-Whitney, Spearman correlation, Kruskal-Wallis, ROC curve analysis, and a 2 × 2 contingency table. This study showed a significant difference in TWEAK levels between lupus nephritis and lupus without nephritis (p < 0.05), but no significant difference between TWEAK level and renal domain scores of SLEDAI. There were significant correlations between TWEAK level and urine erythrocyte and urine protein, but there was no significant correlation with urine leukocytes. The sensitivity and specificity of TWEAK for determining LN were 72.4% and 72.5%, respectively, with AUC 0.77. TWEAK had a good diagnostic test for detecting lupus nephritis and substantially correlated with urine erythrocyte and urine protein.

Urinary Tumor Necrosis Factor-Like Weak Inducer of Apoptosis as a Biomarker for Diagnosis and Evaluating Activity in Lupus Nephritis: A Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Urinary tumor necrosis factor-like weak inducer of apoptosis (uTWEAK) has been identified as a candidate biomarker for lupus nephritis (LN). However, its diagnostic value remains unclear. This meta-analysis was conducted to comprehensively evaluate the value of uTWEAK for diagnosis and evaluating activity in LN.

METHODS

Medline, Web of Science, Chinese Biomedical Medical, and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure databases were searched to acquire eligible studies published before September 30, 2019. The quality of the studies was evaluated by Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2. Summary receiver operating characteristic curve and area under the curve were applied to summarize the overall diagnostic performances. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated with the fixed-effects model. RevMan 5.3, Stata 12.0, and Meta-disc 1.4 software were used.

RESULTS

A total of 7 studies were included. Of these, 4 studies were available for comparison between SLE with and without LN, and 3 studies were for active and inactive LN. The total area under the curve was 0.8640, and DOR was 14.89 (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.95-27.86). For LN diagnosis, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and DOR were 0.55 (95% CI, 0.47-0.63), 0.92 (95% CI, 0.86-0.96), and 16.54 (95% CI, 7.57-36.15), respectively. For assessing LN activity, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and DOR were 0.91 (95% CI, 0.82-0.96), 0.70 (95% CI, 0.58-0.81), and 18.45 (95% CI, 7.45-45.87), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis indicated that uTWEAK has relatively moderate sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis and evaluating activity in LN, suggesting that uTWEAK can serve as a helpful biomarker for LN.